RFID: A Generation is all they need

Run_to_da_hills

thecommander wrote: »

Your right, its a sad sad day in society when parents will do their best to make sure their kids aren't abducted from public places. Shame on them.

If parents had proper control over their kids one wouldn't need such devices. Next thing they will become popular in crèches and primary schools.

humanji

Are you serious? Have you ever had to look after a child? Take your eyes off them for a split second and they're gone. Add to this some freak who wants to kidnap them and a child can be taken fairly easily.

The only thought I'd have on it is how secure is the device? I mean, is it easy enough to take off, which could negate the whole point of it.

Rob_l

humanji wrote: »

Are you serious? Have you ever had to look after a child? Take your eyes off them for a split second and they're gone. Add to this some freak who wants to kidnap them and a child can be taken fairly easily.

The only thought I'd have on it is how secure is the device? I mean, is it easy enough to take off, which could negate the whole point of it.

Yeah if its a device that can only be removed by the parent rather than one embedded in the child i see no problem, I dont think any parent who has young children would argue against this technology especially when shopping with their little run-aways.

Run_to_da_hills

humanji wrote: »

The only thought I'd have on it is how secure is the device? I mean, is it easy enough to take off, which could negate the whole point of it.

There are numerous RFID signal blocking materials available that any professional abductor could use if they wanted to kidnap a child.

Mahatma coat

So now the Pedos are tryin to tempt kids into their Faraday Cage instead of their their Vans

humanji

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

There are numerous RFID signal blocking materials available that any professional abductor could use if they wanted to kidnap a child.

But it's one more deterrent. A suitably determined kidnapper will go to any length to get their target. A kidnapper who wasn't as confident may be warned off.

Run_to_da_hills

Humans 'will be implanted with microchips'

All Australians could be implanted with microchips for tracking and identification within the next two or three generations, a prominent academic says.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/technology/735519/humans-will-be-implanted-with-microchips

iPlop

+1

Rockefeller said so

www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA

thecommander

Septic Leper wrote: »

+1

Rockefeller said so

www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA

This one man holds everything for CTers. You use him as proof of so many things, just because he said it. I've said it before, and I'll say it again;

Just because someone says something, doesn't mean its going to happen.

I'm surprised at CTers on this forum, if a president or leader said there was no NWO, or aliens or whatever, you'd all jump in and tell us that you couldn't believe what they said, yet you take everything that this man says as a warning.

iPlop

thecommander wrote: »

This one man holds everything for CTers. You use him as proof of so many things, just because he said it. I've said it before, and I'll say it again;

Just because someone says something, doesn't mean its going to happen.

I'm surprised at CTers on this forum, if a president or leader said there was no NWO, or aliens or whatever, you'd all jump in and tell us that you couldn't believe what they said, yet you take everything that this man says as a warning.

His family runs the planet with the rotshchild dynasty ,they think of us as "serfs" to them and we are worthless scum to be disposed of by any means they wish ,and the have publicly endorsed a mass cull of humans on this planet of 90% ,they would prefer 200>300 million far more controllable.Did you watch the vid ?

thecommander

Septic Leper wrote: »

Did you watch the vid ?

Yeah. It CTers porn. Very little proof of what he's saying. Same stuff that is xeroxed onto the forum.

Kernel

thecommander wrote: »

This one man holds everything for CTers. You use him as proof of so many things, just because he said it. I've said it before, and I'll say it again;

The reason 'we' (NWO believers, I guess) use him as proof is because we have carried out our own research into the topic, and much of it points back to Rockefeller and his bloodline. He has pushed the globalist NWO for many years, and has funded aspects of it. Open your eyes, this man created the trilateral commission and the council on foreign relations for Christ's sake.

Have a read of these and see what you think:
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Council_Foreign_Relations.htm

http://www.svpvril.com/nwo.html

I take it you've seen the Aaron Russo doc already? Seriously, your question tells me that you do not know enough about the man, so I suggest you start researching.

thecommander wrote: »

I'm surprised at CTers on this forum, if a president or leader said there was no NWO, or aliens or whatever, you'd all jump in and tell us that you couldn't believe what they said, yet you take everything that this man says as a warning.

It's better to use your own mind and research for yourself rather than waiting for the official word to tell you the truth. Because you may be waiting a long time.

Run_to_da_hills

OLYMPIA, Wash. US Lawmakers are considering a controversial bill that would outfit sex offenders with a surgically-implanted device that tracks their movement.

The devices would replace the ankle bracelets that are currently used to track offenders. The bracelets have been criticized as a lacking device as offenders have successfully removed them in the past before disappearing off of the radar.

http://www.komonews.com/news/37623484.html#idc-container

Esel

That's bad? How? Will ANPR be able to detect this this device?

Run_to_da_hills

esel wrote: »

That's bad? How? Will ANPR be able to detect this this device?

No, ANPR is optic.

The Eazypass readers on the Westlink toll plaza might :eek:

thecommander

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

No, ANPR is optic.

The Eazypass readers on the Westlink toll plaza might :eek:

Ever used an easy pass tag? If it's anywhere but your front window it won't work. Can't be read from within the car.

Run_to_da_hills

thecommander wrote: »

Ever used an easy pass tag? If it's anywhere but your front window it won't work. Can't be read from within the car.

Only taking the pi*s. Apart from being on entirely different RFID frequencies one is passive while the other is active.

I am sure verichip corp are currently working night and day to develop the next generation implant that could be read from the distance of an overhead gantry or indeed a satellite. :eek:

Run_to_da_hills

GPS tracking devices are to be fitted to dementia patients in the first trial of its kind in Britain.

A total of 20 patients from the Thames Valley and Somerset areas are taking part in a pilot basis which enables their movements to be monitored on a map via a secure website.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1162827/GPS-tracking-tags-attached-dementia-sufferers-NHS-trust.html

Microchips then Next !.
"VeriChip Corporation Partners with Alzheimer’s Community Care to Conduct Study of VeriMed Patient Identification System. Two hundred patients to receive VeriMed implantable microchip and enroll in VeriMed system"

http://www.verichipcorp.com/news/1172151146

King Mob

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

GPS tracking devices are to be fitted to dementia patients in the first trial of its kind in Britain.

A total of 20 patients from the Thames Valley and Somerset areas are taking part in a pilot basis which enables their movements to be monitored on a map via a secure website.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1162827/GPS-tracking-tags-attached-dementia-sufferers-NHS-trust.html

Microchips then Next !.
"VeriChip Corporation Partners with Alzheimer’s Community Care to Conduct Study of VeriMed Patient Identification System. Two hundred patients to receive VeriMed implantable microchip and enroll in VeriMed system"

http://www.verichipcorp.com/news/1172151146

Helping old people you are at risk of becoming lost and disorientated. Those Fiends!

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Helping old people you are at risk of becoming lost and disorientated. Those Fiends!

The elderly should be properly cared for and not left out of sight if they suffer from Alzheimer's or dementia, they are a hazard to both themselves and road traffic. I know well of this because my own mother suffers from this.

King Mob

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

The elderly should be properly cared for and not left out of sight if they suffer from Alzheimer's or dementia, they are a hazard to both themselves and road traffic. I know well of this because my own mother suffers from this.

Yes and that's what they're doing.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Yes and that's what they're doing.

They are doing this because they don't want to pay for proper public nursing home facilities as it would be cheaper to E_tag them and let them roam about the streets in public. :rolleyes:

King Mob

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

They are doing this because they don't want to pay for proper public nursing home facilities as it would be cheaper to E_tag them and let them roam about the streets in public. :rolleyes:

Have you anything to suggest that this is what they are planning?
I mean otherwise it just seems like more scaremongering on your part.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Have you anything to suggest that this is what they are planning?
I mean otherwise it just seems like more scaremongering on your part.

I am not scaremongering because it is NOW a reality and is happening already as I have demonstrated in several links.

The elderly will be one of the first in society to receive electronic tagging whether it is the removable bracelet or RFID verichip Implant.

K-9

It's definitely happening:
http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20011219S0016

Heineken Helen

I don't understand how so many people can simply say 'this will never happen' when it's happening in several places at the mo. Links have been posted and ignored... government officials would drool at the thought of having everyone chipped. It's already at the stage where, if the chipping WERE available for all kids, any parent who refuses it would be a bad parent. So now we're gonna have our kids chipped to take the 'choice' factor out of it? It's all very sad and of course people are already saying 'but what's wrong with that?':rolleyes:

humanji

There's a huge difference between something being available and the enslavement of humanity. It's logistically impossible to force everyone to get chipped. It's impossible to even trick everybody into getting chipped. Stop being so paranoid. The world isn't out to get you, because the world doesn't give a shìt about you.

Heineken Helen

humanji wrote: »

There's a huge difference between something being available and the enslavement of humanity. It's logistically impossible to force everyone to get chipped. It's impossible to even trick everybody into getting chipped. Stop being so paranoid. The world isn't out to get you, because the world doesn't give a shìt about you.

but that's wrong... it's possible within OUR generation to enforce quite a few people to be chipped... and of course the next generation will all be chipped from birth . I read on other boards increasingly more frequently about people (mainly in the states) starting new jobs and having to either give drug tests or give their finger prints for simple jobs like serving coffee and people replying 'well if you haven't done anything wrong blah blah blah' and 'of course your employer has rights to this information' and it's becoming increasingly normal.

It's not paranoia... it's observation!:cool:

meglome

Heineken Helen wrote: »

I don't understand how so many people can simply say 'this will never happen' when it's happening in several places at the mo. Links have been posted and ignored... government officials would drool at the thought of having everyone chipped. It's already at the stage where, if the chipping WERE available for all kids, any parent who refuses it would be a bad parent. So now we're gonna have our kids chipped to take the 'choice' factor out of it? It's all very sad and of course people are already saying 'but what's wrong with that?':rolleyes:

I'd imagine I could find links that say the twin towers we destroyed by giant invisible unicorns. Would I be surprised that people ignore them?

Heineken Helen wrote: »

but that's wrong... it's possible within OUR generation to enforce quite a few people to be chipped... and of course the next generation will all be chipped from birth . I read on other boards increasingly more frequently about people (mainly in the states) starting new jobs and having to either give drug tests or give their finger prints for simple jobs like serving coffee and people replying 'well if you haven't done anything wrong blah blah blah' and 'of course your employer has rights to this information' and it's becoming increasingly normal.

It's not paranoia... it's observation!:cool:

Exactly how are you going to force people to get chipped and then remain in power at the next election? Ah but wait then they'll just have a military coup right? There's no way most people would allow a chip to be put into them unless it was for some life saving reason. But wait they fake a life saving reason?

There would be several good reasons for a number of jobs that you'd want your employees to be drug free and to have their fingerprints on file. Nothing sinister about that. Anyone who allows themselves to be fingerprinted for a job serving coffee is crazy. And now I don't suppose that you can prove they were even asked?

Heineken Helen

meglome wrote: »

I'd imagine I could find links that say the twin towers we destroyed by giant invisible unicorns. Would I be surprised that people ignore them?



Exactly how are you going to force people to get chipped and then remain in power at the next election? Ah but wait then they'll just have a military coup right? There's no way most people would allow a chip to be put into them unless it was for some life saving reason. But wait they fake a life saving reason?

There would be several good reasons for a number of jobs that you'd want your employees to be drug free and to have their fingerprints on file. Nothing sinister about that. Anyone who allows themselves to be fingerprinted for a job serving coffee is crazy. And now I don't suppose that you can prove they were even asked?

No:rolleyes:just people asking for advice on a message board... should I tell them I want written confirmation of it before I believe them?:D Problem is, if you want the job... and in this day and age they're pretty hard to come by.

And if you're talking about forcing people to get chipped... read my posts again... I've said it will likely be the next generation (or even the one after that) by the time everyone's chipped (cos babies will be chipped at birth). It WILL happen. Today you can't get a job if you don't have a bank account :rolleyes:you can't go on holiday if you don't have a credit card. Ok well you can JUST about do either of them but it's very very difficult and you'll pay a lot more. THAT was all conspiracy theory talk a couple of decades ago... now it's common life.

the links provided were from acceptable sites like the BBC and the daily mail etc. There was no talk of unicorns :rolleyes: but good way to simply pretend the facts aren't there

And yes, they will find a life saving reason... after the Madelaine McCann case, there was lots of talk of microchipping kids... and this WILL come up again and poor Maddie's face will be plastered all over it:mad:

humanji

See, you're just making wild assumptions. Having a technology doesn't automatically mean it will be used for nefarious means. The links provided show nothign about people being mass forced in order to enslave them. Maddy has been gone for quite a while now. Kids are disappearing all the time. I've yet to see a mad rush for parents to get their kids chipped. Hell, people can already get bracelets for their kids that have rfid chips in them and they're not being bought either.

And here's another question. Who's going to do it? The government? Won't they be out of office by the time we're all slaves? You say yourself that it won't happen for a generation or two. So if the governments are so evil and self serving, then why the hell would they give a thought to those who may or may not follow them? These people who have no human decency, exploit anyone to get ahead and will do away with anyone who stands in their way are still kind enough to make life easier for people who they most likely don't even know? How does that work? Why would they be willing to bankrupt their country and face possible coup just for someone else?