Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Graduate enrty to medicine and fee's abroad

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,523 ✭✭✭Traumadoc


    You may not believe it an acceptable excuse but she was found innocent. Im sure if the hospital was charged with corporate manslaughter it might have been a different result.

    The system is the problem. If it was a nurse providing the medication there would protocols to follow. There should be the same for all providers.

    If the system makes you work 100 hours and then allows you to make a life or death decision/mistake something is wrong.

    See what the victims wife said:

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_/ai_n14488673


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭DrIndy


    eth0_ wrote: »
    I really don't think that is an acceptable excuse.
    Yes she was tired but obviously not so overcome with sleep that she didn't realise she needed to trace each IV line back to source...and then turned round to pick up a syringe and forgot which tube she was holding? I wonder if you asked her colleagues, would they point out any other incidents of incompetence.

    Also - isn't that a massive single point of failure? Shouldn't the lines be colour coded or labelled?
    You are correct - its not an acceptable excuse when you consider the life or death decisions simple mistakes people make.

    If you work in an office and accidently use a blue pen instead of a black pen for a form - then the form is not photocopied properly and cannot be used. No biggie - do it again with a black pen. Simple mistake? yes.

    With us, a simple mistake happens - which tube do i use? Someone dies, a chief wage earner is gone as well as a father or mother to children. The ramifications are much bigger, but the error is as simple.

    So its not acceptable ever - but it still happens. Should people who use the wrong colour pen to fill in a form be brought up on manslaughter charges?

    I'm not minimising the error that happened or trying to excuse or brush off the result - but it does happen and the system has failed when it does, not one single individual. You need checks and balances to minimise significant error - not blaming an individual.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 608 ✭✭✭Anthony16


    Fionnanc wrote: »
    The LC is not an intelligence test. A good work ethic can get gr8 results with an average intelligence in the LC.

    I agree.got 580 in the leaving and only consider myself to be of average intelligence:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭wheresthebeef


    I feel terribly sorry for those few doctors named in the links above, those incidents will follow them all their lives. It's things like that which terrify me into being so unbelievably careful, to the point of annoying others ;-)
    What I will say though, is that in all those situations, any of those junior docs could have sought an independant check from a nurse or another doctor in order to reduce the error. In terms of the doctor who got the two tubes confused, as soon as she identified that the tubes were tangled and similar, she could have stuck a piece of tape onto one of them or marked it somehow. And as someone already said about the KCl, the vial is marked, it has a white label with a red banner. It says Potassium Chloride on the bottle. I find it hard to believe that he picked it up and only looked at the back of the bottle, never checked the drug name, or the expiry date. It is standard practice amongst all nurses to read aloud the name, strength, route and expiry date of a solution, and check it with the prescription, and then allow another nurse do to the same, before its given. These poor guys and girls were under a lot of pressure, no-one would deny that, but they could have done some very simple things that would have only taken them an extra 10 seconds each time to cover their asses. We need more lectures on risk management me thinks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,778 ✭✭✭tallaght01


    I feel terribly sorry for those few doctors named in the links above, those incidents will follow them all their lives. It's things like that which terrify me into being so unbelievably careful, to the point of annoying others ;-)
    What I will say though, is that in all those situations, any of those junior docs could have sought an independant check from a nurse or another doctor in order to reduce the error. In terms of the doctor who got the two tubes confused, as soon as she identified that the tubes were tangled and similar, she could have stuck a piece of tape onto one of them or marked it somehow. And as someone already said about the KCl, the vial is marked, it has a white label with a red banner. It says Potassium Chloride on the bottle. I find it hard to believe that he picked it up and only looked at the back of the bottle, never checked the drug name, or the expiry date. It is standard practice amongst all nurses to read aloud the name, strength, route and expiry date of a solution, and check it with the prescription, and then allow another nurse do to the same, before its given. These poor guys and girls were under a lot of pressure, no-one would deny that, but they could have done some very simple things that would have only taken them an extra 10 seconds each time to cover their asses. We need more lectures on risk management me thinks.


    Or they could not make people work 24 hour shifts. Or not make docs have to give IV meds, which is a waste of their skills. It's very easy to criticise in hindsight. But me and my colleagues wrote a begging letter to the nursing hierarchy to reinstate one of our nurses when she did a similar thing and she got suspended. She was fantastic, but cocked up. It happens.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,141 ✭✭✭imported_guy


    Tind777 wrote: »
    Hey
    Anyone have info on people getting say a 4yr medical degree in eastern europe eg prauge, poland, hungary or even the UK etc. and also what fee's do they have to pay. I know that fees for budapest are €7500 per year but think it takes 6 yrs:(
    lets go back on topic a bit

    you have loads of options

    alot of americans come to eastern europe or carrabien to do the 4 year med degrees (they have them in czech republic, poland, romania and some other countries), most eastern EU contries will require you to learn the language for their clinical years, the fees are alot cheaper in poland than here (i remember the undergrad one being 3500 euro for non-eu, so the graduate one hopefully will be similar) EU univeresties, try Gdansk, Jagiellonian, Lodz, Lublin, Pomeranian, Poznan, Silesia, Warsaw in poland, University of Constanta in romania,
    Charles University, Palacky University in czech republic

    option 2 is carrabien, there are a few good universties like SABA, xavier, all-saints, AUC, ross, spartan, SGU,

    okay in carrabien they require you to have a science/premed degree and MCAT (most of them) for the 4 year course, if you dont have these then they let you into a 5 or 6 year programme, and most of their fees are from 15000-25000 US dollars, per year

    i would advise you to go to carrabien rather than EU, because you only study at the university for 2 years, and then you do your clinicals in america, dont have to learn any new languages, the weather will be amazing, good atmosphere, you can relax and study, and you have a high chance of getting a residancy match, and you will be well prepared for USMLEs etc most of these colleges have like 95% first attempt passes at step 1

    i'll post links when i get home


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭drzhivago


    Traumadoc wrote: »
    Its a good point, I remember the Galway incident. It happens every so often, generally when more senior staff get junior staff to perform relatively mundane tasks. Like calling the intern up at 3 am to give IV antibiotics and not explaining to the intern which line is which.
    There was an intern on a manslaughter charge in the north a few years ago, from such an incident, I think it was thrown out.

    EDIT:here it is

    The young Malaysian doctor accused of the manslaughter of a patient
    at Belfast's Royal Victoria Hospital was acquitted by a jury which
    took just 45 minutes to reach its verdict. In February 1994 Samuel
    Beers (36) died when penicillin was injected into a tube leading to
    his brain rather than a tube connected to his wrist. The jury
    accepted Dr Yin Yin Teoh's explanation that, because the two tubes
    were identical, she had to disentangle them and follow them to their
    source to establish which was which. She believes that she must have
    got the two mixed up again as she reached for a syringe.

    Interesting study I remember both of the cases, and there have been others

    Spoke to a pilot friend at the time about human error, in his line of work he said the industry works to engineer out the human error with multiple checks etc, he says its important because they are dealing with peoples lives but not in as direct a way as the doctors involved in these cases

    One simple point he made to me at the time stood out and it remains true today, if a hospital was run to the same safety standards as airline industry there would be a warning on the IV Line going to the brain, a protective device would have to be removed before something could be inserted and the bung on the and would be of a special design that would not accept the routine syringe so someone would have to specifically look for the special syringe reinforcing they are injecting somewhere special

    Same would apply to potassium which would be locked in a cupboard which would need two keys to open and be signed out at point of dispensing,again a safety measure to engineer out the failure from fatigue of misreading the labels

    As a junior doc floating wards at night many years ago I remember coming across a cupboard on a ward where potassium, water for injections and saline for injections were in 3 small pots, overfilled where vials were spilling into the neighbouring pot. Stuff like that should just not be possible


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement