Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

bye bye GM?

Options
  • 12-12-2008 8:54am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭


    Instead of having an endless discussions about fog lights or M50, howabout discussion about USA car manufacturers that are goind downhill really fast.

    This decision means propably that at least GM and maybe Chrysler and Ford Usa will go bankruptcy really soon.

    Last year GM alone had a net income about
    -$38.7 Billion so basically GM is running out of money.

    So what you think will happen to car manufacturers, only GM alone has brands: Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GM Daewoo, GMC, Holden, Hummer, Opel, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Vauxhall, and Wuling

    It is going to be interesting to see what happens,but so far it does not look too good to GM. Actually GM lost last year 4,5 million dollars per one hour.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 26,149 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    Ummm the US government decided to bail out the US car industry only yesterday. No fears there really.


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,939 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Berty wrote: »
    Ummm the US government decided to bail out the US car industry only yesterday. No fears there really.

    Read the linked article.

    Senate rejected it cause the UAW wouldn't consider pay cuts til 2011, which was the show stopper for republicans, who didn't back the vote for the bill (along with some democrats) so it was rejected.

    I wonder if McCain had won the election, would the republicans have rejected it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,064 ✭✭✭minxie


    http://news.sky.com/skynews/
    looks like bad news for them now...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭Notch000


    Sky news reported GM motors are losing $52,000 per minute. At that rate no amount of money can save them. If the cars aint shifting there going down. Same as everyone else.


  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭JayeL


    As much as I think GM and Ford deserve to fall for their utter complacency to innovate in the massive North American market, they've shown a willingness to try harder just about anywhere else in the world i.e. where they have real competition.

    Congress can go back to them and say "we'll give you the cash but you have start introducing fuel-efficient cars - immediately". Put pressure to start selling their European ranges in full in the USA. Right now, GM are turning Saturn into Opel USA and Ford are planning to sell the new Fiesta there but this needs to accelerate. This idea of reducing average gas mileage over the range is not the answer - they simply shouldn't be allowed to sell a vehicle that, for example, does less than 30mpg in the real world. It's perfectly possible to do so, there's just no incentive for it. Well that's one: design a gas guzzler and it won't leave the drawing board.

    I have some sympathy for Chrysler - as awful as the Dodge Caliber is, it's an example of their outward-looking, unashamedly-American ethos and with a bit more work, they might just build something the world could be interested in.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 51,248 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Given the amount of jobs that the American car industry has and the potential repocusions to the fragile American economy, the US Government will not allow these "big" three to go under. The bailout will eventually go through but with different terms & conditions plus they will convey a message to other institutions that the tax payer will not continue to pick up the tab for their failings. Expect a major overhall of the American car industry after this bail out.

    It's a pitty our Government didn't do something like with the banks here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭towel401


    Its good to see these muppets go down after the whole electric car thing a few years ago.

    besides most of these brands don't make a single nice car. who would really be disappointed if buick or daewoo were no longer around?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,484 ✭✭✭✭Stephen


    The UAW shot themselves in the foot again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,238 ✭✭✭Rowley Birkin QC


    towel401 wrote: »

    besides most of these brands don't make a single nice car.

    Vauxhall/Holden Monaro
    Vauxhall VX220

    That's about it really. The new Insignia is pretty nice too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 385 ✭✭JayeL


    towel401 wrote: »
    who would really be disappointed if buick or daewoo were no longer around?

    Chinese companies would be lining up to get their hands on Buick, it's GM's volume brand in China as it's got major brand recognition, much more than Chevy.

    GM should hold on to Chevrolet and Saturn but chuck Saab, Cadillac and Hummer; prestige cars not needed in this climate. Turn Pontiac into the home of hot hatches and pocket pockets along with the odd sports car, a brand for the Fast & Furious brigade, students and under 35's generally. Chevy should be the anchor of the GM group, selling re-badged Daewoos and some Holdens (don't sell either brand, obv, they'll come in handy), all built in the USA and be very family-orientated, with two crossover vehicles unique to the brand. Saturn could sell Opels and niche microcars, targetted at young singles and families who want something a bit different, kinda like a GM answer to Toyota's Scion brand in the US.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,511 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    towel401 wrote: »
    daewoo were no longer around?

    Now now, the cars may not be great but the ships aren't half bad:D


    As much as i would like to see them go for their uselessness and incompitance, there are simply to many businesses and jobs relying on them for the US economy to survive their demise. iirc thare are 6 million jobs linked directly or indirectly...

    Just imagine what will happen to Detroit too if they collapsed, the city would simply fail as unemployment skyrocketed and tax revenues were cut massivly. It would end up like somewhere in Africa


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,238 ✭✭✭Rowley Birkin QC


    Isn't that what the great American dream of Capitalism is all about?

    You sink or swim on your own merit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭towel401


    Now now, the cars may not be great but the ships aren't half bad:D


    As much as i would like to see them go for their uselessness and incompitance, there are simply to many businesses and jobs relying on them for the US economy to survive their demise. iirc thare are 6 million jobs linked directly or indirectly...

    Just imagine what will happen to Detroit too if they collapsed, the city would simply fail as unemployment skyrocketed and tax revenues were cut massivly. It would end up like somewhere in Africa

    yea apparently the daewoo ships are of much higher quality than the samsung ones but GM never bought the ship building part of daewoo did they?


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,511 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    towel401 wrote: »
    yea apparently the daewoo ships are of much higher quality than the samsung ones but GM never bought the ship building part of daewoo did they?

    No, hence the smiley


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭E92


    bigkev49 wrote: »
    Vauxhall/Holden Monaro
    Vauxhall VX220

    That's about it really. The new Insignia is pretty nice too.


    I wouldn't shed a tear about seeing most of the GM brands going.

    I'd shed even less of a one when Chrysler go(which they will).

    The trouble is if GM goes then there will be no more Saabs and no more Opels.

    I'd hate to see Opel go now that they've started producing some really lovely cars in recent times. Just look at the Insignia.

    I'd be sorry to see Saab go, yes they haven't produced anything even remotely interesting recently, but still the world wouldn't be right without Saab.

    Fortunately the Sweedish Government are seriously thinking of giving them and Volvo a big bail out and there's talk about the 2 brands going back under Sweedish ownership. That would be the best news I'd have heard in a long time, for Saab in particular. I want to see quirky Saabs back on the roads, after GM doing their best to ruin Saab.

    Otherwise the world will be full of more soulless, dull and boring Toyotas, and that would be the real tradgedy out of all this.

    If Ford go then the only mass produce car maker genuinely committed to making cars involving and exciting to drive will be gone. The last tenuous links that this country has with the car would be gone too.

    That is why Fords are brilliant, they manage to do everything like comfort, space, quality etc as well as their rivals BUT they throw in a car that is great fun to drive as well. And even though they make dynamically superior cars they don't even charge you more for this privilege. While other makes are putting in crappy electric power steering set ups and doing their best to get rid of driving pleasure, Ford are still at it making cars that put as smile on your face.

    Mazda deserves an honourable mention for this too. Some VW group cars are good to drive as well, but some are definitely not.

    The real problem is that GM's and Ford'a European operations make great cars but back in the US GM and Ford sell their customers the utmost in absolute sh!te. No wonder the Americans think that Japmobiles are so far ahead of their American counterparts, the Japs sell the Yanks the same stuff we get and here Japanese cars tend to get poor reviews and the cars that have US parents like Ford and Opel are often top of the class(especially Mitsubishi, Nissan and Toyota).

    What petrolhead here wants to see more white good washing machine type vehicles on our roads?


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,466 ✭✭✭✭Alun




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,272 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Will this open up a massive market to European manufacturers? VW, Peugot, Renault, Fiat etc?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭itarumaa


    JayeL wrote: »
    GM should hold on to Chevrolet and Saturn but chuck Saab, Cadillac and Hummer; prestige cars not needed in this climate.

    I would not be happy to see Cadillac and Saab to go, both have a great history and both brands gives something extra.

    Daewoo otherhand...hmm:) I even drive Daewoo and that is the reason I wound not be sad if Daewoo/Chevrolet would vanish. Also Hummer, I don´t see anything good about their cars, specially H2 feels like a joke, H1 was quite cool tough.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭itarumaa


    Just imagine what will happen to Detroit too if they collapsed, the city would simply fail as unemployment skyrocketed and tax revenues were cut massivly. It would end up like somewhere in Africa

    If you study a little bit Detroit history, then you realize that this is the case already, Detroid have not been the car capital since 70´, and now they are not doing too good.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,511 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    itarumaa wrote: »
    If you study a little bit Detroit history, then you realize that this is the case already, Detroid have not been the car capital since 70´, and now they are not doing too good.

    The 3 largest employers in Detroit as of 2007 are:

    Ford Motor Company 55,342
    General Motors 41,861
    Chrysler LLC 32,597

    Source: Crain's Detroit Business (2007


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,484 ✭✭✭✭Stephen


    JayeL wrote: »
    Chinese companies would be lining up to get their hands on Buick, it's GM's volume brand in China as it's got major brand recognition, much more than Chevy.

    Indeed, the amount of Daewoos driving about with buick badges on them over there is mad. VW are still the daddy in China though :)

    a3a1fd36ff11db888747ad87d1a9e0bb.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭zilog_jones


    I really can't see Ford going under any time soon, considering their success outside the US (and even their current line-up in the US isn't *too* bad). Not too sure about GM and Chrysler though.

    If GM did die, it would be interesting to see what happens to Opel/Vauxhall, GM Daewoo and Holden. For the record, GM have divested from Isuzu and Suzuki in recent years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    Now now, the cars may not be great but the ships aren't half bad:D


    As much as i would like to see them go for their uselessness and incompitance, there are simply to many businesses and jobs relying on them for the US economy to survive their demise. iirc thare are 6 million jobs linked directly or indirectly...
    A good lot of that is Japanese manufacturers.
    Deedsie wrote: »
    Will this open up a massive market to European manufacturers? VW, Peugot, Renault, Fiat etc?

    VW already has a considerable North American market and Fiat have started expanding in the last 4-5 years too.
    The 3 largest employers in Detroit as of 2007 are:

    Ford Motor Company 55,342
    General Motors 41,861
    Chrysler LLC 32,597

    Source: Crain's Detroit Business (2007
    The US has a population of 300m, the UK about 70m

    If the UK govt can let 30,000 jobs disappear without a bailout for Woolworths, and then the peripherals that supply over 800 stores, it equates to about the same as the "Big 3" and their delaer networks falling in the US. There is a massive opportunity for management buyouts of the European operations, with the German Federal Government and state parliaments of Hessen, Thüringen, Nordrhein-Westfallen and Rheinland Pfalz ready to provide funding to underwrite Opel's loans. Opel ain't going nowhere, but the Germans may seek to detach it from GM in order to ensure the underwriting isn't transferred within the company.

    Sat in an Insignia the other day BTW, wasn't overwhelmed, and of all things, the door lock buttons were extremely off putting, they would have been better off burying them in the door with no access, they look really cheap. (I know, you'd think I've little to be worrying about.....feckin management accounting exam:mad::mad::mad:)

    Saab and Volvo could do well if taken back under Swedish control and efforts were made to bring them back to their roots, with all Volvos being tanks on rubber and Saab being ground running aircraft.

    There is ample opportunity for European companies in Ford and GM to capitalise on the misfortune of Motown and start exporting the likes of the Mondeo, Insignia, Euro Focus, Galaxy, Zafira etc to the States. If the companies are focusing all R&D on 1 D segment car for a global market instead of the same car modified 1,000 ways for different markets, quality can only improve. Toyota may discontinue the Avensis in response and we can all have cheaper Camrys:D:D

    I'm motoring biased, but with the amount of engineers we educate in this country and the amount of unskilled labour out of work, I never understood why we don't have our own motor industry.

    One good thing that may come of this is that we'll all have Opels as opposed to Europe having Opel, UK having Vauxhall, South East and Australasia having Holden and US having Saturn.

    Good riddance to bad rubbish and here's to survival of the fittest.

    **Off topic**

    The spelling, grammar and punctuation of some normally fine posters among others is absolutely dire in this thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 511 ✭✭✭TommyT


    Should any government really have to bail out an unsustainable business?
    Quck hint for the car makers, build cars that people actually want to buy, not crap that only Avis, Hertz and Co will buy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    On a side note, 2 lecturers I had last year have been watching and commentating on the downfall of GM to classes for the past 3/4 years.

    It's all in the financial statements.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Cionád


    ninty9er wrote: »
    The US has a population of 300m, the UK about 70m

    If the UK govt can let 30,000 jobs disappear without a bailout for Woolworths, and then the peripherals that supply over 800 stores, it equates to about the same as the "Big 3" and their delaer networks falling in the US.


    Yea but Woolworths employed a few hundred people in each town, whereas the downfall of the Big 3 would have severe consequences at city and state level - for Detroit & Michigan. The population of Detroit is lower than the pop. of Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,502 ✭✭✭Zube


    I love this:

    bigthree.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    Cionád wrote: »
    Yea but Woolworths employed a few hundred people in each town, whereas the downfall of the Big 3 would have severe consequences at city and state level - for Detroit & Michigan. The population of Detroit is lower than the pop. of Ireland.

    Think North of England an mining towns ion the 80s so.

    The people of those towns will never forgive Thatcher, but it doesn't mean she was wrong.


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,458 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Stephen wrote: »
    The UAW shot themselves in the foot again.

    And maybe for the last time. Did I read somewhere that a typical blue collar worker in the car industry in Detroit earns the guts of $100k? Completely unsustainable...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,502 ✭✭✭Zube


    unkel wrote: »
    And maybe for the last time. Did I read somewhere that a typical blue collar worker in the car industry in Detroit earns the guts of $100k? Completely unsustainable...

    Here's a handy chart showing where the costs go:

    Blog_Auto_Labor_Costs.gif


Advertisement