Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
No way out 2009 thread - ***SPOILERS***
Comments
-
pingu_girl wrote: »Nope your Wrong, you'd wanna re-check your records there lad
Source: http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/profiles/t/triple-h.php
Take your head out of your ass next time.0 -
-
-
-
-
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »SR, I'd explain to you what's wrong but I'd need you to have an open mind so that's a non-starter.
I need an open mind? That's laughable considering you've done nothing but criticize WWE in recent weeks, first they're not using midcard scrub Christian properly, despite the fact that he's only a week back!! Then it's bitch at HHH on a monthly basis (yet it's ok for Taker to bury Edge a few months earlier!).
On top of that you still think that Heyman being on the WWE payroll since about 97 is "McMahon based revisionism" despite the fact that they had done several talent exchanges during the attitude era, which most people with a brain knew about.
But sure, i'm the closed minded one... riiiight.
0 -
-
-
I dont want to turn this into a huge internet row, for Orestes sanity if he is still awake, but many who dislike Hunters politics were pissed of with what Taker done at Summerslam as well, some people hate both!!!
No problem with me, once it's kept civil and relevent to the thread it's all fair game. This is a discussion site after all
And if you think this is MNG and SR having a row, you ain't seen nothing yet 0 -
I dont want to turn this into a huge internet row, for Orestes sanity if he is still awake, but many who dislike Hunters politics were pissed of with what Taker done at Summerslam as well, some people hate both!!!
This aint a row, m'man, anyone thats been here in the last couple of years would be familiar with mine and MNG's debates.
I'm bored of HHH's winning streak, but at the same time, i don't go and piss and moan for a week after every PPV either.0 -
Advertisement
-
ShawnRaven wrote: »I need an open mind? That's laughable considering you've done nothing but criticize WWE in recent weeks, first they're not using midcard scrub Christian properly, despite the fact that he's only a week back!! Then it's bitch at HHH on a monthly basis (yet it's ok for Taker to bury Edge a few months earlier!).
On top of that you still think that Heyman being on the WWE payroll since about 97 is "McMahon based revisionism" despite the fact that they had done several talent exchanges during the attitude era, which most people with a brain knew about.
Have you been fishing because that's an admirable amount of red herrings you've thrown in there! Kudos!ShawnRaven wrote:But sure, i'm the closed minded one... riiiight.
You seem to be the only one not shocked by what happened so doesn't that tell you something?
The facts say everything. The guy has been positioned strongly for every Wrestlemania and notches up titles on a regular basis. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to know what's going on.0 -
-
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »Have you been fishing because that's an admirable amount of red herrings you've thrown in there! Kudos!
Wow, it's 2007 all over again. Nice to see you got some new lines.You seem to be the only one not shocked by what happened so doesn't that tell you something?
It doesn't! As i've already said, i'm bored with his winning streak, i just don't feel the need to bitch about it at the end of every PPV, especially when MEGACena wins, he's done a year of jobbing, big deal, we'll get 3 years of him winning now. Wonder whos gonna win the RAW elimination chamber.The facts say everything. The guy has been positioned strongly for every Wrestlemania and notches up titles on a regular basis. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to know what's going on.
Takers winning streak? But no, he's not a politician, no sir. I don't hear you bitching about that.
*cues snoozefest lines about red herrings and changing the subject*0 -
-
-
ShawnRaven wrote: »Wow, it's 2007 all over again. Nice to see you got some new lines.
It doesn't! As i've already said, i'm bored with his winning streak, i just don't feel the need to bitch about it at the end of every PPV, especially when MEGACena wins, he's done a year of jobbing, big deal, we'll get 3 years of him winning now. Wonder whos gonna win the RAW elimination chamber.
Takers winning streak? But no, he's not a politician, no sir. I don't hear you bitching about that.
*cues snoozefest lines about red herrings and changing the subject*
Wow everything but the issue itself has been brought up by you. It must be 2007 again!
Nice to see the Taker references are still there though. But the guy we're talking about has just pinned Taker clean and notched up another title reign. For the record I have spoken out about how I disliked the stale nature of Taker's character and how he could do with being out of the title scene. As I've said before WWE needs new blood not politicians looking out for their egos.0 -
-
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »Wow everything but the issue itself has been brought up by you. It must be 2007 again!
I mentioned the issue, and my stance on it. I didn't feel the need to repeat it again, and as i said, simple comparisons, just for clarity's sake. No harm to pale in contrast now, is there?Nice to see the Taker references are still there though. But the guy we're talking about has just pinned Taker clean and notched up another title reign. For the record I have spoken out about how I disliked the stale nature of Taker's character and how he could do with being out of the title scene. As I've said before WWE needs new blood not politicians looking out for their egos.
This I do agree with, which is why i came back and brought it up, you were never gonna be happy. You jumped all over HHH for pinning Taker, however, if Taker had won, you'd have been pissed off because Jeff didn't win. That was a loaded final two for you, and you know it.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
ShawnRaven wrote: »I mentioned the issue, and my stance on it. I didn't feel the need to repeat it again, and as i said, simple comparisons, just for clarity's sake. No harm to pale in contrast now, is there?
LOL yeah simple pointless comparisons. No harm at all.ShawnRaven wrote:This I do agree with, which is why i came back and brought it up, you were never gonna be happy. You jumped all over HHH for pinning Taker, however, if Taker had won, you'd have been pissed off because Jeff didn't win. That was a loaded final two for you, and you know it.
But I stated in the thread my unhappiness over Jeff's elimination. That's no secret. But not even I could have expected that finish which was politics at its finest!
With regards to Orton I think politics ensured he had to struggle to get a win over a non-active wrestler which is a total joke.
Anyway I've to be up for 7 so that's me done for the evening. I'll look forward to learning what the plans are for SuperHunter. How many titles will he notch up in '09? Place your bets now folks!0 -
-
ShawnRaven wrote: »OH MY GOD, THAT POLITICIAN!! Orton NEVER puts anyone over!!! Another win for Orton! The new blood like Shane McWhatever never had a chance!!
I gotta admit, I laughed 0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: »LOL yeah simple pointless comparisons. No harm at all.
How was it pointless?But I stated in the thread my unhappiness over Jeff's elimination. That's no secret. But not even I could have expected that finish which was politics at its finest!
What do you care? My point is, for all the amount you're sick of it, even last year you threatened never to watch again as a result of HHH, yet months later here you are still. If you don't like it, don't watch it! But enough of the moaning about it man. It serves little or no purpose, and it's getting predictable, with all due respect.With regards to Orton I think politics ensured he had to struggle to get a win over a non-active wrestler which is a total joke.
Tell me that's sarcasm!Anyway I've to be up for 7 so that's me done for the evening. I'll look forward to learning what the plans are for SuperHunter. How many titles will he notch up in '09? Place your bets now folks!
And there we go again, bitch bitch bitch. 0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
Sssh orestes, MNG might think i'm trying to knock up more thanks than HHH's title wins!
Oh, your sig is a little out of date.
Back to NWOOTD - Rebecca Michaels must go to the same tanning salons as Matt Hardy and Jack Swagger, the Tango Tanning Tables! ©RebelRockChick (partially)0 -
-
ShawnRaven wrote: »Oh, your sig is a little out of date.
I have no idea what you mean
<_<
>_>
I'm enjoying this match a lt more than I thought I would, nice one.
And here comes the HBK comeback!0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement