Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Welfare & Volunteerism

Options
  • 04-02-2009 11:43am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 432 ✭✭


    Would it be ludicrous to suggest that those able-bodied recieving welfare payments should be doing a volunteer job for a few hours a week?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 162 ✭✭GeeNorm


    Not sure if it would go down to well with charities themselves. Charity is a big business and lots of people earn good wages from it.
    Although maybe more volunteers would mean more admin jobs in the charities??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 432 ✭✭Mingey


    Well they are always looking for unpaid workforce. It's just a way for people to contribute something back for their payments.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 187 ✭✭conlonbmw


    Mingey wrote: »
    Would it be ludicrous to suggest that those able-bodied recieving welfare payments should be doing a volunteer job for a few hours a week?

    Agree, there should be a minimum of 15 hours pw, and longer for long term dole scroungers who have been signing on because they cannot be arsed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    Mingey wrote: »
    Would it be ludicrous to suggest that those able-bodied recieving welfare payments should be doing a volunteer job for a few hours a week?
    I was thinking of this in the shower earlier today (yes I am that sad), and I had the sudden image of Anto' leaning forward to have a chat with a old wan cringing in her seat....


  • Registered Users Posts: 78,428 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Mingey wrote: »
    Would it be ludicrous to suggest that those able-bodied recieving welfare payments should be doing a volunteer job for a few hours a week?
    Who says they aren't?

    Who says they are suitable?

    Shouldn't they be out looking for "real" work?

    Shouldn't we be employing people to do these jobs in the first place?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,731 ✭✭✭pete


    not sure what the rules are now, but it used to be the case that if you weren't available for work you weren't eligible for the scratcher / unemployment assistance / jobseekers allowance / employmentally challenged supplement or whatever it's called these days.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    GeeNorm wrote: »
    Not sure if it would go down to well with charities themselves. Charity is a big business and lots of people earn good wages from it.
    Define "lots".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 432 ✭✭Mingey


    Victor wrote: »
    Who says they aren't?

    They can prove where they volunteer from.
    Who says they are suitable?

    Garda check if they were to be working with vulnerable, this takes about 6-8 weeks, plenty of time for the long term unemployed.
    Shouldn't they be out looking for "real" work?

    Yes they should, a few hours a week isn't going to hinder their search, and will look good on a CV.. Especially if it has taken them over 6 months to 'find' work.
    Shouldn't we be employing people to do these jobs in the first place?


    Volunteer/community work? There's always space for a few extra hands. Even if it is just picking up rubbish or painting over tags in their areas.


Advertisement