If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Absolutely Ridiculous .

Options

22-02-2009 6:13pm

#1

Cheeky_gal

Closed Accounts Posts: 2,166 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2007

Posts: 2086

There's a diff between calling someone a d*ck and telling them that they're being a d*ck.

Yet I get an infraction?

How's that fair?

:cool:

Post edited by Shield on December 2021

0

Comments

Options
#2 22-02-2009 6:29pm
Zaph

Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 47,307 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2003

Posts: 45052

If you could provide a link it would make it easier for people to give you proper feedback

0
Options
#3 22-02-2009 6:47pm
Duiske

Registered Users Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭

Join Date: November 2005

Posts: 2977

Your going to get the usual replies here first, ie, "did you pm Terry" and "its only an infraction, get over it".

For what its worth, I agree your comments in that thread. The whole thing is a train wreck. It should be moved to the Cuckoo's nest and re-named the "Make a more insensitive post than the last poster" thread.

Its the Jane Goody thread in AH, by the way, from about post 400.

0
Options
#4 22-02-2009 6:47pm
RoundyMooney

Closed Accounts Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2005

Posts: 10325

OMG! That's so gay.

0
Options
#5 22-02-2009 7:03pm
Overheal

Registered Users Posts: 83,224 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2006

Posts: 76718

youre being gay mooney!

I dunno that soundss a little harsh when i read it back. Im sorry mooney

0
Options
#6 22-02-2009 7:09pm
Acacia

Registered Users Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2008

Posts: 2803

Cheeky_gal wrote: »

There's a diff between calling someone a d*ck and telling them that they're being a d*ck.

No there's not. Come off it.

I find it hilarious that the people being chastised as insensitive and shameful for voicing their opinions (however harsh) on Jade Goody, are the ones being called names by the same people claiming that we should all be super-special nice to Jade just because she's sick.

0
Advertisement
Options
#7 22-02-2009 7:59pm
Dudess

Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2005

Posts: 35866

Yeah, it's like the "bah humbug" thread at Christmas by someone who doesn't like Christmas followed by lots of "You hate Christmas? Miserable kunt!" comments.

0
Options
#8 22-02-2009 8:25pm
Terry

Registered Users Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2004

Posts: 24892

Cheeky_Gal wrote:

Acacia wrote: »

How does that work exactly? What if his genuine opinion is that he's glad that Jade has cancer rather than another person? Just because you find it un-palatable , it doesn't mean he's being a 'd*ck' about it.

Why would you bother logging onto a public forum just to rant about someone been more deserving to die than the next? It's gutless and pathetic. So yes he is being a d*ck about it :mad:

This is why the infraction was given.

Did she PM me?
Yes, 5 minutes before starting this thread. I wasn't on-line at the time of the PM.

Will I be requsting the infraction be reversed?
No.

0
Options
#9 22-02-2009 8:50pm
Slidey

Closed Accounts Posts: 12,811 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2008

Posts: 12435

Terry wrote: »

Will I be requsting the infraction be reversed?
No.

Hardcore... :P

0
Options
#10 22-02-2009 10:24pm
Prawo Jazdy

Closed Accounts Posts: 42 ✭

Join Date: February 2009

Posts: 38

Cheeky_gal wrote: »

There's a diff between calling someone a d*ck and telling them that they're being a d*ck.

Yet I get an infraction?

How's that fair?

:cool:

Probably Gordon Cheeky_Gal.

0
Options
#11 22-02-2009 10:34pm
Cheeky_gal

Closed Accounts Posts: 2,166 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2007

Posts: 2086

Terry wrote: »

This is why the infraction was given.

Did she PM me?
Yes, 5 minutes before starting this thread. I wasn't on-line at the time of the PM.

Will I be requsting the infraction be reversed?
No.

No need to be a d*ck about it Terry.

Oh no she didn't...

:mad:

0
Advertisement
Options
#12 22-02-2009 10:39pm
Prawo Jazdy

Closed Accounts Posts: 42 ✭

Join Date: February 2009

Posts: 38

Cheeky_gal wrote: »

No need to be a d*ck about it Terry.

Oh no she didn't...

:mad:

{{{{{hugs}}}}}

0
Options
#13 22-02-2009 10:53pm
sceptre

Registered Users Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 17984

Cheeky_gal wrote: »

There's a diff between calling someone a d*ck and telling them that they're being a d*ck.

Yet I get an infraction?

How's that fair?

:cool:

I'd give an infraction for both or either, regardless of the hair-splitting semantics.

0
Options
#14 22-02-2009 11:03pm
Prawo Jazdy

Closed Accounts Posts: 42 ✭

Join Date: February 2009

Posts: 38

sceptre wrote: »

I'd give an infraction for both or either, regardless of the hair-splitting semantics.

Smod conspiracy. :eek:

I make this stuff in my head

0
Options
#15 22-02-2009 11:12pm
Latchy

Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2007

Posts: 21068

Acacia wrote: »

No there's not. Come off it.

I find it hilarious that the people being chastised as insensitive and shameful for voicing their opinions (however harsh) on Jade Goody, are the ones being called names by the same people claiming that we should all be super-special nice to Jade just because she's sick.

Once anybody gets into the name calling regardless their strong views ,you lose the argument .I made the mistake once here on the forum and it wasn't that I regretted saying what I siad , it was saying it on a public forum were I suspected I might be pulled about it .Although nothing as crass involving the death of somebody .

0
Options
#16 23-02-2009 12:04am
MIN2511

Registered Users Posts: 5,398 ✭✭✭

Join Date: November 2007

Posts: 5193

Duiske wrote: »

Your going to get the usual replies here first, ie, "did you pm Terry" and "its only an infraction, get over it".

For what its worth, I agree your comments in that thread. The whole thing is a train wreck. It should be moved to the Cuckoo's nest and re-named the "Make a more insensitive post than the last poster" thread.

Its the Jane Goody thread in AH, by the way, from about post 400.

It's Jade not Jane

0
Options
#17 23-02-2009 1:04am
randylonghorn

Registered Users Posts: 29,509 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: December 2006

Posts: 28178

Duiske wrote: »

The whole thing is a train wreck. It should be moved to the Cuckoo's nest and re-named the "Make a more insensitive post than the last poster" thread.

:facepalm:

NOT what tCN is for!!

In fact, very much the opposite to the spirit of the place ...

0
Options
#18 23-02-2009 4:19am
Duiske

Registered Users Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭

Join Date: November 2005

Posts: 2977

randylonghorn wrote: »

:facepalm:

NOT what tCN is for!!

In fact, very much the opposite to the spirit of the place ...

Yeah, Your quite right. Wrong choice.

0
Options
#19 23-02-2009 4:24am
Overheal

Registered Users Posts: 83,224 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2006

Posts: 76718

randylonghorn wrote: »

:facepalm:

NOT what tCN is for!!

In fact, very much the opposite to the spirit of the place ...

I agree...in my pants.

0
Options
#20 23-02-2009 7:17am
Agent Smith

Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 21,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2003

Posts: 20751

PENIS

0
Options
#21 23-02-2009 10:41am
Handsome Bob

Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2008

Posts: 22477

The thread is a joke at this stage as it has been reduced to one or two posters knowingly stirring up **** and trying to provoke other posters. Lock the thing FFS.

0
Advertisement
Options
#22 23-02-2009 11:04am
Slidey

Closed Accounts Posts: 12,811 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2008

Posts: 12435

LOUD NOISES!

0
Options
#23 23-02-2009 11:56am
Rb

Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2004

Posts: 13949

And once again, Cheeky_Gal proves herself to be the ideal candidate for forced sterilisation.

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055300519
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055320641
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055326714

0
Options
#24 23-02-2009 12:16pm
_blank_

Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: February 2004

Posts: 39232

Rb, that's not actually very nice. Not very nice at all.

Hi cheeky_gal, I'm sorry I'm only getting to this now.

You broke some rules, but really, an infraction is nothing to get all het up about, it's like a teacher threatening you with lines, but not actually giving you any lines.

0
Options
#25 23-02-2009 12:19pm
Insect Overlord

Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,900 Mod ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2006

Posts: 28670

Rb wrote: »

And once again, Cheeky_Gal proves herself to be the ideal candidate for forced sterilisation.

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055300519
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055320641
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055326714

LOLLerscates :pac:

0
Options
#26 23-02-2009 12:22pm
Slidey

Closed Accounts Posts: 12,811 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2008

Posts: 12435

Rb wrote: »

And once again, Cheeky_Gal proves herself to be the ideal candidate for forced sterilisation.

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055300519
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055320641
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055326714

Somehow I reckon that if all your infractions and warnings were put on planet and all hers put on another, it would be pretty obvious which one would have the bigger gravitational pull.

She is only a kid, cop yourself on.

0
Options
#27 23-02-2009 12:40pm
tbh

Closed Accounts Posts: 15,914 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2003

Posts: 14900

Rb wrote: »

And once again, Cheeky_Gal proves herself to be the ideal candidate for forced sterilisation.

http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055300519
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055320641
http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055326714

can we just take it as read that tons of people will freak the bins over this remark, and rb will at some stage apologise and retract it, possibly once he hears how cheeky has either been sterilised or that being sterile runs in her family*.

No need for the righteous indignation and specifically, no need to mention the thunderdome. G'Night everybody!

*I know, I know.

0
Options
#28 23-02-2009 12:56pm
Rb

Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2004

Posts: 13949

Des wrote: »

Rb, that's not actually very nice. Not very nice at all.

Hi cheeky_gal, I'm sorry I'm only getting to this now.

You broke some rules, but really, an infraction is nothing to get all het up about, it's like a teacher threatening you with lines, but not actually giving you any lines.

Lol, excellent.

tbh wrote: »

can we just take it as read that tons of people will freak the bins over this remark, and rb will at some stage apologise and retract it, possibly once he hears how cheeky has either been sterilised or that being sterile runs in her family*.

If there was any truth behind this, I believe society could breath a sigh of relief

0
Options
#29 23-02-2009 12:57pm
Rb

Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2004

Posts: 13949

slideways wrote: »

She is only a kid, cop yourself on.

Completely irrelevant. There's a ton of other "kids" on this site who carry themselves well and in a pretty mature manner, she does not.

Edit: Also, don't bother coming back with some shit like "There's a ton of adults who carry themselves well and in a mature manner, you do not".

0
Options
#30 23-02-2009 1:06pm
tbh

Closed Accounts Posts: 15,914 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2003

Posts: 14900

Rb wrote: »

Completely irrelevant. There's a ton of other "kids" on this site who carry themselves well and in a pretty mature manner, she does not.

/waves at piste in a manner which is both patronising and complimentary in the same gesture.

0
Advertisement
Options
#31 23-02-2009 1:08pm
stovelid

Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2006

Posts: 27017

Rb wrote: »

And once again, Cheeky_Gal proves herself to be the ideal candidate for forced sterilisation.

0

This discussion has been closed.