Some C&C please

sun child

Two images taken on a recent trip to Prague. Any C&C would be appreciated.

Danbo!

Hi, welcome to boards,
You may get a better reply to this if you embed the images in your post. Take the address of the the image (right click, and click 'copy image location') and then click this button when you are writing your post, and paste the location into the box that appears

It should look like this (without the *)

[*IMG]https://us.v-cdn.net/6034073/uploads/attachments/156994/73986.jpg[/IMG]

[*IMG]https://us.v-cdn.net/6034073/uploads/attachments/156994/73987.jpg[/IMG]

sun child

Thanks:)

I guess then leaving a space between the addresses would leave a space between images.

Tawfee

i like the foreground detail in the first. The second doesn't do much for me though, might have been better in colour?

Danbo!

sun child wrote: »

Thanks:)

I guess then leaving a space between the addresses would leave a space between images.

Just skip a line between the two addresses, nice pics (sorry I'm not the best for asking for C&C)

sun child

Unedited image. Not sure I like it like this.

melekalikimaka

love the first image, lovely work

AnimalRights

Decent shots and yes your reworked version of #2 is def far better than the original.

oshead

I'm not too sure about these. The perspective on both could have been done a little differently and produced vastly superior shots. The BW conversions are fine.

artyeva

i prefer #2 - and it's much better with the sepia tones

paulkellypix

artyeva wrote: »

i prefer #2 - and it's much better with the sepia tones

me too - also prefer the uncropped version - the path leads you into the shot.

No 1 does nothing for me - sorry!

Paul

sun child

Thanks for the C&C. Looking forward to posting more images.

AnCatDubh

#1 I really like but it looks lobsided to mine eyes - the structures on both sides appear to move towards convergance from top to bottom (without actually converging). Optical illusion / form of aberation or bad building practices(!) - i'm not sure.

I think you've caught a little motion blur in there on the dude walking away. Now if you are looking for technical perfection this point is a flaw but don't let that put you off. The softness that it yields can be quite asthetically pleasing in particular circumstances.

In #2 i'm not sure if there is enough of the context of the image - we visually assume there is a top to a building and it can be difficult if croping that out to maintain something which our brains doesn't naturally query. Having said that it isn't bad. I think your bigger enemy is the sky which peers throught the upper center of the image and looks 'blown out'. In the sepia tone it appears very white.

Both quite reasonable images - #1 I would prefer / Prefer sepia than colour in #2.

Borderfox

Hope you dont mind Sun Child but I adjusted the second shot as it has imo more potential than the first. Great city for photography

Colour


Antique Plate