Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Post pics of your watches ***Please NO QUOTING PHOTOS***

1111112114116117195

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,847 ✭✭✭micks_address


    Alpinist on two tone strapcode bracelet

    2cehfh5.jpg

    amcc1s.jpg

    Feels like different watch


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Invicta arrived a few days early and I'm feeling a bit 'meh' about it. There's nothing wrong with it as such but it just doesn't excite me and has kind of reaffirmed that it's probably best to stick to respected/established watch brands. Maybe it'll grow on me, we'll see.
    Invicta are well established .... as in: it's well established that they're junk :pac:

    I jest, i'm sure they're not all junk and there are happy owners. Not my cup of tea though.

    Is this the one that was coming from Amazon US? Or did you reorder from UK with the refund?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,018 ✭✭✭✭Kintarō Hattori


    Invicta are well established .... as in: it's well established that they're junk :pac:

    I jest, i'm sure they're not all junk and there are happy owners. Not my cup of tea though.

    Is this the one that was coming from Amazon US? Or did you reorder from UK with the refund?

    I knew they had a mixed reputation and I'd certainly never order one of their 'mad' designs but felt a traditional looking watch couldn't be too bad especially when it has a Seiko movement. Plus, lots of reviews of it were positive. I don't know what I expected to be honest so maybe it's just a passing thing.
    I got in contact with Amazon a day or two after they had been in contact and said as the watch was lost I'd like a refund. A few hours later they sent a mail saying they had dispatched another watch. Not what I had asked for but I got the watch in the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,320 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano


    I think any homage watch is going to have it's fair share of critics. I think if you want a divers watch and want low budget but something a bit different, can't go wrong with a vostok.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,018 ✭✭✭✭Kintarō Hattori


    Cienciano wrote: »
    I think any homage watch is going to have it's fair share of critics. I think if you want a divers watch and want low budget but something a bit different, can't go wrong with a vostok.

    I hear you. I went with the Invicta as I wanted that submariner look but didn't want to spend a huge amount as I had been 'out' of the hobby for some time. Plus it was really a spur of the moment purchase. I have a Seiko SKX009 so just wanted something a little different.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭funkyouup


    In relation to that shop not wanting to sell the Patek without additional purchases. Is that because they do not make a huge profit of it, or just because they might aswell seen as if you can afford the watch another 20 grand on other items probably wont affect your bank balance in any noticeable way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,338 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    funkyouup wrote: »
    In relation to that shop not wanting to sell the Patek without additional purchases. Is that because they do not make a huge profit of it, or just because they might aswell seen as if you can afford the watch another 20 grand on other items probably wont affect your bank balance in any noticeable way.

    they make more money on their own jewellery i guess so if they can entice you to spend on that then all the better


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    funkyouup wrote: »
    In relation to that shop not wanting to sell the Patek without additional purchases. Is that because they do not make a huge profit of it, or just because they might aswell seen as if you can afford the watch another 20 grand on other items probably wont affect your bank balance in any noticeable way.
    Demand exceeds supply. Normally that would drive prices up. ADs are not allowed to sell above RRP so they do the next best thing which is to force you to buy some extra stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,226 ✭✭✭893bet


    Love it, that along with a white gold 5296 are my dream Pateks. How long were you waiting? I see some discussion that Patek have closed the book on sports models for the moment.

    Yup. Forget a “sports” Patek from an AD unless you are a massive spender. Can’t remember what Keanes said when I thought I was in with a chance (as they tried to get me buy some omega LE’s) but it was something like “the last aquanaut went to some one who has bought 5 other Patek here over the last few years”. So that’s what you are up against. Same for Steel Daytona.

    I got my second hand on TZ off probably the only member of the site that I would have been willing to BT such a sum of € with no comeback before them posting the watch to me!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,011 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    I'm debating selling my Citizen JP-3050 as tbh, whilst I do love the watch.
    I bought for diving and I'm not getting the opportunity to do that anymore.
    I know quartz goes against the grain of what many in this sub prefer, but its a dive computer as well as a time piece so I hope that earns me some leeway :)

    If I was to sell, have any of the good folk here any idea what I should expect to get?
    With box but no manual?

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/B5zUwCYbdSXY2D3N7


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭2shea


    banie01 wrote: »
    I'm debating selling my Citizen JP-3050 as tbh, whilst I do love the watch.
    I bought for diving and I'm not getting the opportunity to do that anymore.
    I know quartz goes against the grain of what many in this sub prefer, but its a dive computer as well as a time piece so I hope that earns me some leeway :)

    If I was to sell, have any of the good folk here any idea what I should expect to get?
    With box but no manual?

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/B5zUwCYbdSXY2D3N7

    That's a nice piece.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,018 ✭✭✭✭Kintarō Hattori


    470341.jpg

    One of my favourite watches in my collection, I just wish it was a little bigger. It's 39mm as it is which is fine but I do tend to favour a slightly larger watch. I'm not sure whether this is the SNN079 or the SNN079P2... does anyone know what the actual difference is?

    It's a simple enough watch but I like the dark brown dial (it looks black I know), the splashes of orange and the date window on the left hand side.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    One of my favourite watches in my collection, I just wish it was a little bigger. It's 39mm as it is which is fine but I do tend to favour a slightly larger watch. I'm not sure whether this is the SNN079 or the SNN079P2... does anyone know what the actual difference is?
    SNN079 is the basic model designation without telling you what strap. P1 comes with a steel bracelet, P2 comes with the canvas strap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,018 ✭✭✭✭Kintarō Hattori


    SNN079 is the basic model designation without telling you what strap. P1 comes with a steel bracelet, P2 comes with the canvas strap.

    Ah thank you, a quick Google search didn't explain it. I feel it looks better with the canvas strap than the steel one.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,842 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    This week I are mostly wearing...

    470360.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 923 ✭✭✭Captainsatnav


    This week I are mostly wearing...

    Lovely - similar to the Tudor Heritage Ranger I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 747 ✭✭✭HDMI


    That Hamilton would be on the list of those I regret selling. Super comfortable and pretty much any strap goes with it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,816 ✭✭✭accensi0n


    Pretty rare.

    IMAG0382.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭Ionised


    A couple of late Christmas presents to myself...

    Seiko Presage Starlight SRPC01

    IMG-20190116-105213.jpg

    Updated my SKX007 with custom bezel and insert plus Strapcode bracelet

    IMG-20190116-112013.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭funkyouup


    470744.jpg


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,174 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Now that's a brand you don't see often enough. Nice. :) Very 70's.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 162 ✭✭porker36


    and then along comes two :)

    470756.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,032 ✭✭✭furiousox


    I have an Omega Speedy which I like to keep for evening and weekend wear.

    I'm thinking of adding a Tissot for day to day use but don't know a lot about Tissot as a brand tbh, is it well regarded?

    I like the look of both of these two, may go for one or both?

    The PRC always stood out to me in a jewellers window.
    The XL has a look of IWC about it?

    What's the verdict? All advice welcome :)


    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tissot-T17158652-PRC200-Chronograph-Quartz/dp/B000L3CHC0


    https://www.tissotwatches.com/en-gb/shop/t1166171605700.html

    CPL 593H



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 456 ✭✭oxocube


    The SKX011J1 just back from its natural habitat :D

    470763.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,257 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    furiousox wrote: »
    I'm thinking of adding a Tissot for day to day use but don't know a lot about Tissot as a brand tbh, is it well regarded?

    I like the look of both of these two, may go for one or both?

    I had a prc200 years ago, they’re great for the price. I found it wore a little small, but I was into bigger watches than I am now.

    Tissot are a good brand - part of the swatch family (so Hamilton, Omega etc). I think they’d generally be regarded as an entry level, mainstream Swiss watch brand.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,174 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    To join the party, a very dirty phone pic of my early 30's Zenith. :o

    470766.jpg

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭2shea


    Wibbs does the crown shoot out like a James bond watch ?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,174 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    *Takes aim at 2Shea* :D It's a pilots watch and at the time many aircraft had open cockpits and bugger all had heated cockpits so pilots wore gloves and the big crown made it easier for them to wind and adjust things wearing gloves. It was an absolutely massive watch for the period. 42mm across minus crown when most men's watches were under 30mm, for reasons of legibility for pilots(and a bigger balance wheel was more accurate). It had one piece lugs to attach a longer strap when needed as they were often worn outside on the jacket or gloves, sometimes on the leg. Here's a modern reenactment as it were*.

    watch-pilot.jpg

    They also had compasses for the wrist. Again worn on the outside of flight suits/gloves. Here's one of those, a matching pair. The Zenith would originally have had a riveted on leather strap too.

    470768.jpg

    The Zenith was mad radioactive in the past, the compass is slightly radioactive. So that's pretty James Bond I suppose. :D



    *EDIT, that's a terrible reconstruction pic at the top. :s He's wearing the watch on the right wrist which he wouldn't even if he was left handed as the throttles are on the left and his right hand would be on the joystick, the left wrist being more visible and stable. Plus even if he was left handed and a contortionist with the skillz of an Indian Fakir he couldn't wind nor adjust the time without taking the watch off.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,167 [Deleted User]


    What do you mean was mad radioactive?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,322 ✭✭✭emo72


    What do you mean was mad radioactive?

    the lume that was used is radioactive i guess. applied liberally and wasnt the safe stuff like they have nowadays. but i could be wrong, wibbs knows best about this stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭scotchy


    What do you mean was mad radioactive?


    223.jpg


    .

    💙 💛 💙 💛 💙 💛



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,387 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Wibbs wrote: »
    To join the party, a very dirty phone pic of my early 30's Zenith. :o

    Jaysus, there's enough radium lume on that to call in a hazardous waste removal team :D

    Ever run it passed a Geiger counter?

    Absolutely gorgeous watch, love the massive crown.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,174 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Good point and question MG.

    Well the basic gist was back in the 90's someone I knew was in college(can't recall the degree(, but she was doing some investigations into sources of radiation in the home and general environment. Radon and that sorta thing. She looked at things like smoke detectors, antique glass, older electronics and the like and watches came up. Knowing I had a few old watches including this family "heirloom" she asked me for any that had luminous dials. Coolaboola. A few days later I get a phonecall with her telling me that that particular dial was very "hot". I can't remember the numbers, but I do remember terms like; "low level nuclear waste", "dangerous" and so on. The dial was pretty ropey then. Radium lume is very hygroscopic, it sucks up moisture in the air to beat the band, so had partially rotted the dial. The radiation had impacted the dial too. Here's another example of a similar watch where the radiation burned into the acrylic crystal.

    1418a239e1dc74516a414e0258ea6bca.jpg

    So just a tad concerned by this I had the dial redone to the original design and had the movement throughly cleaned as the radium can turn to dust over time and permeate everything inside the case. It's clean now.

    On radioactive dials on older watches, I would generally not be too worried about stuff from say the 50's on, even the 40's on as the mixes got more refined with much less radium. Tritium I'd worry about even less. The type of radiation it gives off is stopped by the case and crystal and even if it gets out, it'll be stopped by your skin(unless you breathe some in)The main concern with such watches would be to a watchmaker who opens the case.

    Of older than 1940 stuff, I would be most concerned with World War One "Trench watches". They really lobbed the stuff on and didn't realise the dangers. They can be extremely hot and my advice there would be to get the dial, hands and movement cleaned. They usually had enamel dials which don't get burnt in and are have much more longevity than painted metal dials.

    Joke is as a kid I used to sleep with that watch on the beside table, even sometimes under my pillow, because the ticking sent me off to sleep. :eek:

    Me. Earlier.
    Mutant2.gif
    More wrists for watches I say. :D

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,174 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    emo72 wrote: »
    i could be wrong, wibbs knows best about this stuff.
    Hahahahahhaahha.... oh wait... :eek: Oh god no, you're so wrong*. :D
    o1s1n wrote: »
    Absolutely gorgeous watch, love the massive crown.
    Thanks O. It's defo my "my world is on fire which one do I take" watch.






    *My studied field is Bullshite and I do have a Phd in that. Available for lectures and peer review boards.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,713 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    Something else about radiation I read on a forum somewhere; be careful about buying an old watchmaker's desk, where do you reckon all the old lume falls out when they take a watch apart?

    I wonder do old watchmakers have higher than average cancer rates?

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭Ionised


    blue5000 wrote:
    I wonder do old watchmakers have higher than average cancer rates?


    Old watchmakers don't die... They just shine brighter


  • Posts: 1,167 [Deleted User]


    First Seiko, first automatic. It starts...

    470839.jpg


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    First Seiko, first automatic. It starts...
    Congrats, lovely watch.

    As it is your first automatic, in case you are not aware: don't adjust the date when the time is between 9pm and 3am.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭fat bloke


    Congrats, lovely watch.

    As it is your first automatic, in case you are not aware: don't adjust the date when the time is between 9pm and 3am.

    Because it will cause a paradox in the space-time continuum?


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭2shea


    fat bloke wrote: »
    Why's that?

    Because it will cause a paradox in the space-time continuum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    fat bloke wrote: »
    Because it will cause a paradox in the space-time continuum?

    ah I seen what you done there :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,008 ✭✭✭mad m


    First auto, slippery slope. God help you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 993 ✭✭✭Time


    Picked up this during the week. I was in an AD trying on a few different watches and tried this on and surprisingly loved it, whereas I hated the yacht master I was planning on getting

    470850.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭fulladapipes


    That is one beauteous watch. Great purchase.
    Time wrote: »
    Picked up this during the week. I was in an AD trying on a few different watches and tried this on and surprisingly loved it, whereas I hated the yacht master I was planning on getting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,901 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    20190119_224752.jpg

    I am no watch collector, but I do like a plain and simple watch. I bought this 20 years ago, and its my only watch.

    Its in desperate need to a clean/service but works great..

    SB

    470851.jpg


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,174 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    :eek: As a Longines man, you have my vote. Mid/Late 40's? Classic dial, not a redial either. Niiiice. And you have a box for it too?

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,901 ✭✭✭SlowBlowin


    Wibbs wrote: »
    :eek: As a Longines man, you have my vote. Mid/Late 40's? Classic dial, not a redial either. Niiiice. And you have a box for it too?

    I seem to remember it was a World War 2 era pilot's dress watch, so you are spot on with the date. It seemed virtually unused with a pristine box.. the strap went about 10 years ago so I just replaced it myself with a strap from the local Woolworths. I really want to get it serviced and cleaned.

    Will the box or watch have some indicator of actual date you can point me too ?

    I cant think of ever parting with it as its just what I want, but I only really wear it on special occasions now as I don't want to damage it (not sure if it has much value but it would be hard to replace no doubt).

    SB


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,174 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    To find another would be hard enough and would cost a fair few quid to do so. Particularly with it being so original.

    Date wise there will be a serial number, usually on the inside of the case back and movement. That'll give you the year. The box may be later. I say that because the tag on the bottom left says Longines Wittnauer. Though they had a few connections before, Longines bought the Wittnauer company in 1950, so the tag anyway is likely post that.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement