Random Photo Part IX DO NOT QUOTE PHOTOS & < 800px PLEASE!

Imposter

Some photos from some spring skiing the last 2 weekends:

Above the mist:



Nice view!



Reflections



Beer goggles

Calina

Calina wrote: »

This is a brief note from your friendly moderator.

The title of this post reminds you not to quote photographs within the thread.

Anyone who does it from here on out will get a 4 day ban from photography if I am the one who winds up editing the post. The rules are in the OP and they are in the title. Please don't even consider claiming you didn't know.

KylieWyley banned for 4 days.

Note to users: there are rules in this thread. Please do not ignore them. It is not fair on those with dial up or slow midband connections.

Ostrom

From Dublin Today;

Grand Canal Dock & Fatima Mansions

projectmayhem

An odd pillow fight situation in Dam square which turned out to be a rally to raise awareness for cancer...

Panhour

Kintarō Hattori

Not a great photo but worth displaying for what must surely be one of the most unusual plaques on display in Dublin:




http://www.flickr.com/photos/liamandagnieszka/3413100886/

humberklog

Film. IS0200

humberklog

efla wrote: »

From Dublin Today;

Grand Canal Dock & Fatima Mansions

Efla that is one of the most beautiful photos (the 2nd one) I've ever seen on-line. Stupendus, clever and simply gorgeous. (Pain in the belly pose?).

kgiller

A few random shots.

1

2

3

4

5

FuzzyWuzzyWazza

I need to get out more with my camera :pac:

Here's 1 I took after looking tru this thread. Extreemly bored at home



and one i took a while ago

colblimp

Out and about today...

Borderfox

Leixlip today

Brian

HDR?

kjt

Baza210 wrote: »

HDR?

Topazzzzzéd

Brian

Can't say the style appeals to me. HDR and its ilk are the new black & white.

mobileblog

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3584/3424590679_7d89f43ac1_b.jpg

one2one

Morrisseeee

Caught this fellow up close the other day....



/see large on pixie

ttcomet

Cosmo K

KylieWyley wrote: »

Ardfry castle!
My uncle owns the black and white farm house directly across from it, so all that land marked "Private Property: Do not enter" is his.... ergo, you were trespassing on his land! hehe, he won't mind though, every1 want tries to get a closer look @ this great castle. don't blame 'em! nice captures!

It was sooooo dark, I must have overlooked the "Private Property" sign;)

But I will ask for his permission the next time, coz I want to take some more pictures of that place.

I didn't use any filters at all, and its not a HDR, in fact, I'm so lazy, I didn't process the pics at all. All pics are outofcam-. Focus is bit soft I know, but thats because, I only had the not so great, 18-200 zoom with me that night, not my wide angle Tokina.

Ooooops, just sawKylieWyley is banned........Soooooorry

Ostrom

Thanks humberklog, I really appreciate the comment

dakar

Sunrise

humberklog

8 sec. exp. on Film ISO200.

djd80

Morrisseeee

^^ To Dakar: Fancy Signatures, meh !!!!!!!!!!!! (I see you've changed your (vip) attitude)

Purple dawn:

Burnt

humberklog; I really like the "look" for you film images, what are you shooting?

trooney

Damn the detractors

Creamy Goodness

L-M

Shiny

Stonehenge

humberklog

Burnt wrote: »

humberklog; I really like the "look" for you film images, what are you shooting?

Thanks Burnt. Not sure of the question though.
Camera is a Canon A-1.
Film was ISO200.
The photograph is of a body under a cover. It's from a collection I'm gathering. The project was to take 3 weeks in total but I'm going to run with it until the collection is a 100%. So however that long takes. That's one of 150 snaps from 12 locations. I popped that up on here as it was the least one I'm sure of in the collection and at the moment I haven't a home for it. But I liked it on it's individual merits. I'll be back to take it again but will use different setting next time.

dudara

We spent a lovely few hours on the Ile Sainte-Marguerite outside Cannes recently. Took a photo of this seagull but I later realised that he is in the background of at least 20 of my photos taken from different viewpoints. He just sat there for hours.

Fajitas!

Baza210 wrote: »

Can't say the style appeals to me. HDR and its ilk are the new black & white.

You mean the new colour, surely?

Morrisseeee

An attempt at 'leading lines'

La La

brooklyn bridge, innit?

Burnt

Sorry for the confusion humberklog; on second reading I was more than a bit vague, I ment what type of film are you using; Kodak Ultra, Fuji Superia etc...

humberklog

Burnt wrote: »

Sorry for the confusion humberklog; on second reading I was more than a bit vague, I ment what type of film are you using; Kodak Ultra, Fuji Superia etc...

Fuji 200. Cheapest possible.

Ricky91t

Shiny

Penis Man



AKA: Cerne Abbas Giant

Brian

Fajitas! wrote: »

You mean the new colour, surely?

No, I mean the "my photo's in black and white so that makes it arty and immediately better" fad.

humberklog wrote: »

Fuji 200. Cheapest possible.

Cheap as freeeee!

eas

.





.

gloobag

PaulieC

Baza210 wrote: »

No, I mean the "my photo's in black and white so that makes it arty and immediately better" fad.

oh dear, did you really say that? I suppose each to his own, but that's just plain wrong

Brian

cambo_gueno wrote: »

oh dear, did you really say that? I suppose each to his own, but that's just plain wrong

Go on.. are you saying that black & white shooting does inherently improve a photograph?

mehfesto2

Self portrait on Dublin Bus, after a disappointing night out.

stick-dan

humberklog

Another from a set I like and took in Scooter Island.
Film is200

Simplicius

Classic Mercedes, Dublin Ireland
1950's Agfa Isolette III with Solinar Lens, Metered with old Selenium Sekonic. 2 stops allowed for old yellow filter.
Fuji Neopan 400. Dev In Rodinal Special, 1:30 dilution, @20C . Time = 8 mins @ 10'' Agitation /minute.

Tzetze

jebuz