Eastenders [News, Spoilers and Discussion]

Kaching

Shirley treats her like **** at times too

A V A

and why would he kill her??? i know his doesnt really have time for heather but that doesnt give him a motive to kill her , its like me killing someone for not getting me a bounty bar. . .ridiculous if you ask me

Kaching

A V A wrote: »

and why would he kill her??? i know his doesnt really have time for heather but that doesnt give him a motive to kill her , its like me killing someone for not getting me a bounty bar. . .ridiculous if you ask me

madness ..right?

JP Liz V1

A V A wrote: »

and why would he kill her??? i know his doesnt really have time for heather but that doesnt give him a motive to kill her , its like me killing someone for not getting me a bounty bar. . .ridiculous if you ask me

Phil dont kill her

Ben does and Phil destroys evidence to protect Ben

Kaching

After Everything he did :O ?

A V A

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Phil dont kill her

Ben does and Phil destroys evidence to protect Ben

sorry should made myself clearer:p i meant if shirly was to accuse him like

eternal

I don't think there is anything wrong with the way Ben looks, he is fine. Don't know what people are on about.

Silvio.Dante

Jane was one heartless cow tonight...

Kaching

eternal wrote: »

I don't think there is anything wrong with the way Ben looks, he is fine. Don't know what people are on about.

he looks like Mr. Potato head

twirlagig

Lucy looks a lot like Mandy actually!
Whatever happened to

Lauren and Greg having an affair?

I missed a lot of Eastenders this year, so maybe it did happen

Silvio.Dante

Am I the only one who thought Jane's departure was a tad melodramatic..?

JP Liz V1

Silvio.Dante wrote: »

Am I the only one who thought Jane's departure was a tad melodramatic..?

I dont get why Jane returned just to have a brief romance with Massod :rolleyes:

Silvio.Dante

I quite liked Jane as a character but she never had the gravitas of an East End legend, yet the amount of emotion and tears spilled was way OTT for me...:)

Kaching

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

I dont get why Jane returned just to have a brief romance with Massod :rolleyes:

Oh come on now ! Compared to Ian Beale I'd be more than willing to come back for a fling with Masood

FreudianSlippers

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Silvio.Dante wrote: »

Am I the only one who thought Jane's departure was a tad melodramatic..?

I dont get why Jane returned just to have a brief romance with Massod :rolleyes:

Is she actually gone for good? I seem to remember that she went on maternity leave and still had a good amount of time on her contract?

Temaz

Kat leaves for 3 months to care for Charlie who has a stroke.

ToniTuddle

Temaz wrote: »

Kat leaves for 3 months to care for Charlie who has a stroke.

That's probably what they had to come up with when her and the man broke up on the wedding day and she needed some time off?
Or was that why she seemed to be off on two sun holidays with alfie!

JP Liz V1

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

Is she actually gone for good? I seem to remember that she went on maternity leave and still had a good amount of time on her contract?

I think she is, she wanted to spend as much time as possible with her child and if felt for good

sue z

RE: Jane, I dont know about any1 else, but there's no way I'd leave my best friend if she was battling cancer.. not to mention my adopted son..?

Kaching

sue z wrote: »

RE: Jane, I dont know about any1 else, but there's no way I'd leave my best friend if she was battling cancer.. not to mention my adopted son..?

but she had to exit somehow

sue z

Kaching wrote: »

but she had to exit somehow

probably better if she didnt bother coming back in the 1st place!

Kaching

sue z wrote: »

probably better if she didnt bother coming back in the 1st place!

too true:)

pencilsharp

Kaching wrote: »

Isnt Phil in Prison ? how could he murder Heather from prison?

Ben kills Heather not Phil

Kaching

pencilsharp wrote: »

Ben kills Heather not Phil

I know but I thought somewhere it said someone was accusing Phil of murdering Heather :pac:

Alessandra

How funny was Kimba tonight?

Kaching

Derek Branning . Kindly f*ck off !

JP Liz V1

Alessandra wrote: »

How funny was Kimba tonight?

Andrew has some moves

Lisha

WTF is Amira's angle leading on the Moon boy?? I just dont get her motive, I cant believe she really into him

Busi_Girl08

Trying to make Syed jealous. Well he's back with Christian now so it seems to be working a treat. :pac:

Kaching

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Andrew has some moves

Heather is one lucky chick;)

Silvio.Dante

I'm sick of Whitney now. She wants it all...

casio4

Silvio.Dante wrote: »

I'm sick of Whitney now. She wants it all...

I never liked her

Silvio.Dante

Awww poor Hev...

Kaching

casio4 wrote: »

I never liked her

far tooo chavvy

qwertytlk

Can anyone shed ssome light on why derek would be sending the moons out to rob train line cables or something?? What, is there some unknown profit in them, like copper wire??? I just didnt get that one. Personally i like derek, hes a bit different. Apparently he bases the derek charachter on his dad who was actually a real east end villan, who helped the kray twins with some murder and was in prison for years....hmmm interesting.

u_c_thesecond

am i the only one that finds andrews mood swings very odd, no one else i know seems to see them but me. The minute anyone does something he doesnt like he gets all moody

And what was with proposing to heather? She keps asking him to say it again because she couldnt believe it and he pretty much snarls "Yer gonna marry me or wut?"

ignorant out!!!

Blatter

http://www.digitalspy.ie/soaps/s2/eastenders/news/a363385/eastenders-letitia-dean-to-reprise-role-as-sharon-watts.html

EastEnders bosses have announced that Sharon Watts will be returning to Walford later this year.

Letitia Dean has signed up to reprise her role as the fan favourite, who will be back on screen in the summer.

Sharon has not appeared on Albert Square since January 2006, when she bowed out following the death of her husband Dennis Rickman. As she made her exit, she was pregnant with Dennis's child.

Speaking of her return, Dean commented: "I am really looking forward to being part of the EastEnders team again, as it has always been very close to my heart. I cannot wait to work with my old colleagues and see what is in store for Sharon."

EastEnders' executive producer Bryan Kirkwood added: "I'm thrilled that Letitia is coming back home to Albert Square where she belongs. Sharon is a real favourite amongst EastEnders' fans and I for one can't wait until she arrives back in the summer."

Sharon - the adopted daughter of Den and Angie Watts - was one of EastEnders' original characters when the programme launched in 1985.

Over the years, fans have seen her at the centre of an explosive love triangle with Mitchell brothers Phil and Grant, take the helm of the Queen Vic as landlady and endure the tragedy of Dennis's death.

Storyline details for Sharon's return to Walford are currently being kept under wraps.

JP Liz V1

^ Why would she return though no family or friends left perhaps only Ian but were they really that close :rolleyes:

JP Liz V1

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

^ Why would she return though no family or friends left perhaps only Ian but were they really that close :rolleyes:

well there ian and bianca and mandy alfie she knew all them b4 she must want a cash top up

dont caree after losing peggy and R.I.P PAT nice ot have here back

hope they tie her down to a 2 years contract and let her in the pub again

plus wnt her child be like be 11 or 12 years old now ? she was pregant when she left with dennis baby b4 he died

JP Liz V1

Deleted User wrote: »

well there ian and bianca and mandy alfie she knew all them b4 she must want a cash top up

dont caree after losing peggy and R.I.P PAT nice ot have here back

hope they tie her down to a 2 years contract and let her in the pub again

plus wnt her child be like be 11 or 12 years old now ? she was pregant when she left with dennis baby b4 he died

Oh yes forgot about baby Dennis or Denise (what had she again )

I hated Sharon with Phil, didnt mind her with Grant or Dennis

EE should try and get Nigel Harman back as Dennis's twin brother

d1975

Deleted User wrote: »

plus wnt her child be like be 11 or 12 years old now ? she was pregant when she left with dennis baby b4 he died

if she was pregnant when she left in 2006 wouldn't child be 6?

d1975

d1975 wrote: »

if she was pregnant when she left in 2006 wouldn't child be 6?

:eek: it was 2006 wow i thought it was in 2000 she left oh yea we dont had do we ? i tihkn she has a boy and called him dennis

Kaching

NEVER liked that story , incestuous relationships are non condone-able

JP Liz V1

What happened with Michael and Derek?

It is a shame that

Ben kills Heather, they have a nice sweet friendship and I cant understand why he will

casio4

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

What happened with Michael and Derek?

It is a shame that

Ben kills Heather, they have a nice sweet friendship and I cant understand why he will

I didn't understand that either, why did Michael go to see Derek and ask him to leave his brothers alone? as if Derek would have said ok then:rolleyes: when Michael was at the door and he hadn't shown his face fully to Derek he looked like there was a tear in his eye and his nose looked wet like he had been crying. I don't get it Derek got the money owed off Janine so why beat Michael up, did he know he grassed on him?

Chinafoot

casio4 wrote: »

I didn't understand that either, why did Michael go to see Derek and ask him to leave his brothers alone? as if Derek would have said ok then:rolleyes: when Michael was at the door and he hadn't shown his face fully to Derek he looked like there was a tear in his eye and his nose looked wet like he had been crying. I don't get it Derek got the money owed off Janine so why beat Michael up, did he know he grassed on him?

I could be waaay off but I don't think

Derek just beat the crap out of Michael. The tear when he first appeared, the crying when he was on the floor, the way Derek said "old school" I think there was sex involved. Michael offered himself to protect his brothers not knowing that the debt had been repayed. Derek used to bully Michael as a child, I reckon he abused him too.

Again, I could be miles off but it seemed like there was more to it than a hiding.

Kaching

believe it or not i thought the exact same thing

Lisha

Oh I hope ye wrong, I'd find that way to upsetting to watch and unfold.
But it does make (twisted) sense.

I think Michael is a great actor, if a damaged character, with a teeny tiny waist when his coats is buttoned up

Posy

sue z wrote: »

RE: Jane, I dont know about any1 else, but there's no way I'd leave my best friend if she was battling cancer.. not to mention my adopted son..?

It's always going to be a bit unrealistic to write people out of a soap if they have a husband/kids/close friends. I too, would never be able to walk away from a sick friend but I suppose they didn't have a choice. I hope they write Tania a nice new friend.

Deleted User wrote: »

hope they tie her down to a 2 years contract and let her in the pub again

I hope so. It really grinds my gears when they highly publicise bringing back a former character and the person only stays for a few episodes. That's more 'guest appearance' than 'returning to the show' really. :rolleyes:

neveah

I felt physically ill and so sad after the last two scenes between Michael and Derek last night. There were very dark undertones and the whole thing was extremely sinister. Straight away I thought Derek had raped Michael. In fact Eastenders did every well to put those two scenes together and portray such a shocking event without actually showing it. If it was just a beating I don't know why they wouldn't have shown Derek take a swing at Michael. In fact they didn't show anything at all only Michael crying with a bloody nose and Derek panting heavily and fixing his pants and his hair and didn't he say something like 'as much as I enjoyed that...' It was very chilling IMO. I personally don't think it was just a beating. Those two scenes were carefully planned and executed by the Eastenders production and if a lot of people got the impression that Derek raped Michael then I think that's exactly what they were trying to portray.

If Derek is and was sexually abusing Michael for a long time then it would explain why Michael is so scared of Derek considering he is such a hard man himself.

It will be interesting to see where they go with this storyline.