Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ricky Hatton v Manny Pacquiao

1356712

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 418 ✭✭akindoc


    Jayob10 wrote: »
    If you have watched alot of Pacquiao in action previously and lets forget the ODLH fight, Pacquiao is not hard to find. Floyd Mayweather is very hard to find and difficult to hit. Manny does not fight on the back foot. His only hope is that Hatton charges in at the wrong time and gets caught heavy but thats provided his power troubles Ricky significantly.

    To claim Manny is hard to find is grossly incorrect. His main weapon is his speed and offence off the front foot which Hatton can just as easily exploit and he will exploit it.
    Manny Pacquiao is a world class fighter, one of the very best. However as I stressed before he is an elite level fighter up to super featherweight.

    Pound for pound nothing will change with a Hatton win. Manny deserves such a title for having the balls to step up to the higher weight. And yes I do believe Ricky is a world class light welter taking into account his era. But for me its an easier fight then most would think for Hatton. As you say the first 30 seconds will tell alot, and I wouldnt be surprised to see Ricky eat some jabs in the first few rounds. I expect Manny will be shocked at Rickys own speed and mark my words as soon as Manny feels the weight of the punch of an elite light welter like Hatton (who isnt a massive puncher granted) it will be something he won't be able to handle. Cumulative punches over time will also slow Manny down, down the stretch. And dont forget Manny's defence is suspect in its own right.

    Basically Manny has speed and accuracy on his side. Ricky will have aggression, enough speed of his own and more power than Manny can Handle.

    As for the Collazo fight, you cannot make comparison as that was Ricky out of his comfort zone at Welterweight. And Collazo is a big welterweight who has fought at light middle before. He wouldn't bully him like he will Manny. As for the Lazcano fight I think you will agree the current training set up is alot more professional than before.

    I'm supremely confident and i'd be flabbergasted if Manny pulled it off. Hatton will win and he'll do it in style.

    Good post.


    While I agree that Pacman isn't particularly hard to find, Hatton is much much easier to find. Hatton is going to be too easy for Manny to touch in my opinion. He WILL get hit hard on his way in. His strategy is obviously going to be to impose himself on what he believes will be a weaker and smaller guy but I just see Pacman as a FAR superior fighter in almost every aspect. Footspeed, handspeed, combination punching, stamina, ring generalship, lateral movement, and even power in my opinion (we will agree to disagree there). Consider that Pacman will NOT be able to miss Hatton with hard straight left hands and there will only be so many that Hatton can take.

    You are obviously predicting a Hatton stoppage then? Early or late?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭Jayob10


    Well I have no problem getting technical if you want to go down that route I have been schooled in the sweet science myself. :pac:
    My rep for predictions exists outside of these boards so the fact that I have a new account can be said to be an indicator that I know nothing.

    I also really question your rating of Urango who is an extremely ordinary fighter albeit a little heavy handed. I suggest you take a look at his fight v. Rabah and you'll see another one he should lost and was saved by a crazy decision by the judges.

    I agree that cuts may play a part you are right there, and but I have alot of conviction in my opinion that Ricky will be too much of a handful for Manny for reasons ive outlined in other posts. Enjoy the fight


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 418 ✭✭akindoc


    eagle eye wrote: »
    I never said you dished Manny, it was a general comment about the posts in this thread. There is a lot of people underrating Hatton from what I've read.
    Secondly I didn't say that the win over Juan Urango was his greatest win, for me that would be the win over Tsyzu. I said that the win over Urango is what made me believe that he was truly a great light welterweight and for a number of reasons, one because he fought a guy that others were avoiding and who was unbeaten and two he demolished him. He still has only the one defeat and again it will be interesting to see his next fight too against Berto.
    And lol at you questioning anyones opinions, who are you, you just showed up on a new account with no rep. so less of that please.

    I've said my piece there unless you want to get technical but I don't really want to get into that. Suffice to say I rate Hatton very highly unlike a lot of others but I am concerned that his tendancy to cut up will be his downfall in this fight.

    Eagle Eye, I would refrain from dismissing people because they have not posted much in the forum. From what I can see, this guy has 100 times the knowledge you have mate.

    Your comments are shocking. Urango was possibly Hattons most disgusting performance of hit and hold sh*te and any good referee would have been docking points for what Hatton was up to in that fight. He grappled his way to a very unconvincing win where he was very hurt by a body shot at one stage and you are having a wet dream about it on the forums. Are you feeling OK mate??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭Jayob10


    akindoc wrote: »
    Good post.


    While I agree that Pacman isn't particularly hard to find, Hatton is much much easier to find. Hatton is going to be too easy for Manny to touch in my opinion. He WILL get hit hard on his way in. His strategy is obviously going to be to impose himself on what he believes will be a weaker and smaller guy but I just see Pacman as a FAR superior fighter in almost every aspect. Footspeed, handspeed, combination punching, stamina, ring generalship, lateral movement, and even power in my opinion (we will agree to disagree there). Consider that Pacman will NOT be able to miss Hatton with hard straight left hands and there will only be so many that Hatton can take.

    You are obviously predicting a Hatton stoppage then? Early or late?

    It may take a while for Ricky to find his range. But I really believe he could stop Manny at any time with a body shot or head shot. I just don't think Manny will handle getting caught flush at this weight. You may counter that by saying Manny won't get caught flush but I think he will.

    Manny needs to accumulate alot of punches to win on points (the only way he can win in my opinion is if he boxes on the back foot and picks Hatton off), but Manny isn't that type of fighter. He has to come forward. Hatton is naturally stronger and will be quicker than Manny expects.

    You are correct that Manny has better footwork and handspeed etc.... But I think he and Freddie Roach grossly underestimated Hatton and they are in for a huge shock. He has alot more in his locker than they think.

    It'll be a stoppage. I wouldnt be hugely surprised if it was early (3 rounds or less). But ill say between 6-9 rounds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,460 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Jayob10 wrote: »
    Well I have no problem getting technical if you want to go down that route I have been schooled in the sweet science myself. :pac:
    My rep for predictions exists outside of these boards so the fact that I have a new account can be said to be an indicator that I know nothing.

    I also really question your rating of Urango who is an extremely ordinary fighter albeit a little heavy handed. I suggest you take a look at his fight v. Rabah and you'll see another one he should lost and was saved by a crazy decision by the judges.

    I agree that cuts may play a part you are right there, and but I have alot of conviction in my opinion that Ricky will be too much of a handful for Manny for reasons ive outlined in other posts. Enjoy the fight
    Fair enough I maybe rate Urango a little higher than you and some others. I'm not saying either that you don't know your stuff, its just that there are a lot of posters on here who have been posting and discussing boxing for a long time, a lot longer than I've been around. We all enjoy the discussions but when a new guy arrives in and instantly claims that he is great at predicting big fights its just kinda gets to people a bit. If you end up right in this instance then fair enough you have got off to a good start but if you are wrong, well then you're reputation is shot. If you come on and give an opinion on the fight without claiming any previous record then we don't pass judgement on you very quickly.

    Anyways welcome to the forum and hopefully you will stick around and become a regular here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭Jayob10


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Fair enough I maybe rate Urango a little higher than you and some others. I'm not saying either that you don't know your stuff, its just that there are a lot of posters on here who have been posting and discussing boxing for a long time, a lot longer than I've been around. We all enjoy the discussions but when a new guy arrives in and instantly claims that he is great at predicting big fights its just kinda gets to people a bit. If you end up right in this instance then fair enough you have got off to a good start but if you are wrong, well then you're reputation is shot. If you come on and give an opinion on the fight without claiming any previous record then we don't pass judgement on you very quickly.

    Anyways welcome to the forum and hopefully you will stick around and become a regular here.

    Theres a little bit of PBF mayweather in me in the boasting about predictions I admit that! Hey thats why boxing has been so great the last couple of years at the lesser weights anyway. Its hard to call. I picked Margarito to break Cottos heart despite being told I was talking sh*te and the glory went to my head! :D

    Anyway here's hoping its a great fight but I really fancy Hatton in a big way for this one. And yes I have put my money where my mouth is !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,004 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    Jayob10 wrote: »
    You have some valid points. People who don't know the sport or who have never competed don't understand the effects of moving up in weight can have on a fighter. One cannot look past the fact that Manny was a flyweight, no matter how long ago it was. He was knocked out at flyweight actually so does this mean he brings a flyweight chin to a LWW bout?

    We were all Flyweights once(unless some of us have managed to never weigh as much as 112lbs :p), Pacquiao's time as a Flyweight is pretty much irrelevant.
    When he was knocked out at those weights(once by a body shot, once by a head shot) he was badly drained at the weight and his body was in that adolescent stage where it grows very quickly(he was probably even a few inches smaller back then aswell). Pacquiao even failed to make weight for his second loss at 'Flyweight'.

    How drained Pacquiao was is shown by his move to Super-Bantamweight straight away afterwards, at a time(to the very month) when pacquiao had just turned 21. Now in general a fighter won't be able to maintain fighting at the weight they were when they were 21 in their mid/late 20's, unless they could have actually made an even lower weight in the first place.

    Pacquiao wasn't struggling that much to make Super-Bantamweight at the time he moved up, but he would have probably had to move up in a few years anyway. But considering how he had(and still has) such a low % body fat he wasn't undersized at Featherweight at all, and was reasonably big at the weight.

    He didn't spend too long at Featherweight, moving to Super-Featherweight for bigger fights. Now this is where Pacquiao started to really put on muscle, because he had the lbs to play with(as he could have stayed at Featherweight in the state he was in for the majority of the rest of his career I'd say). He bulked up quite a lot, and after 3 years of fighting at the weight, due to his now considerable mass at the weight he was forced to move up to Lightweight.

    Dispite what his measurements are, he's not 'naturally' nearly as big as Ricky.
    If not for him adding so much muscle he'd probably still be a Featherweight or at worse at Super-Featherweight. Against Oscar Larios(a former Super-Bantamweight himself) he looked the smaller man.

    Manny's always had a good chin, however he was floored and almost stopped by Nedal Hussein, but bar that episode has never been badly badly staggered. Marquez and Morales did stun him a little, and Diaz actually hurt him to the body with the only really good shot he landed all night(in the 8th), but his chin and body are extremely good for a fighter of his natural size.
    Whether they'll cope with a Light-Welterweight I'm not so sure.

    Where his body can cope with some wrestling and clinching, with a man about a stone naturally bigger than him, I'm not so sure and whether he can cope with the body attack of a man who's a lethal body puncher at 140 lbs I'm not so sure.

    Hatton's footspeed is key in the fight, Pacquiao's is better than Ricky's but it won't be enough to always avoid being backed up to the ropes(where Manny usually does well to spin off) or in the corner.

    Hatton might have trouble landing his usual 1/1-2 punch that he when in the middle of the ring, Hatton rarely throws Combo's of more than two punches unless he has a man backed up or in a clinch. But what Hatton does do is bring his whole body forward while throwing those punches in mid ring, and either intentionally or inadvertently he ends up right on top of his opponent and they are often forced into a clinch, where Hatton can use his strength, and work off his punches, especially to the body.

    Pacquiao will be forced into clinches, Bayliss will give the fighters some time in those clinches to work out, but won't let them fight all day like that. However having the bigger man on top of him in those clinches will sap Pacquiao's energy, he's not used to that at all and from the sparring we've seen(although that is the sparring Roach has allowed us to see), it's been all clean cut stuff, with no clinching or holding.

    Perhaps Roach thinks Pacquiao will be able to stay away from Hatton with his footspeed and footwork all night, that would be naive of him. While for considerable periods he may be able to stay away, he will be either forced into clinches or forced onto the ropes, or into the corners for quite a bit of the fights too.

    I expect Pacquiao to start well and take the early rounds, but I think as great a physical specimen as he is, this will become physically too much for him, and I see him being broken somewhere around the 8th/9th.

    Of course Maybe Pacquiao will be able to stay away all night, and landing buzzing combinations that hurt Hatton and eventually take him out, I doubt it but if that's the case I'll admit I was wrong afterwards.

    Even Mayweather with all his footspeed and footwork was forced to fight Hatton's fight for long periods, just turns out that he could do that even better than Hatton when required. Pacquiao on the otherhand is not going to get the better of Hatton if he's pegged back to the ropes.

    I think the reason Roach is acting so out of character and being so bold is he is trying to make Hatton angry, make him overly aggressive and downright reckless. I'm not sure the mind games will really play a part though.

    For those that are interested here's the Pacquiao v Hussein round where Pacquiao gets badly hurt


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 418 ✭✭akindoc


    Jayob10 wrote: »
    It may take a while for Ricky to find his range. But I really believe he could stop Manny at any time with a body shot or head shot. I just don't think Manny will handle getting caught flush at this weight. You may counter that by saying Manny won't get caught flush but I think he will.

    Manny needs to accumulate alot of punches to win on points (the only way he can win in my opinion is if he boxes on the back foot and picks Hatton off), but Manny isn't that type of fighter. He has to come forward. Hatton is naturally stronger and will be quicker than Manny expects.

    You are correct that Manny has better footwork and handspeed etc.... But I think he and Freddie Roach grossly underestimated Hatton and they are in for a huge shock. He has alot more in his locker than they think.

    It'll be a stoppage. I wouldnt be hugely surprised if it was early (3 rounds or less). But ill say between 6-9 rounds.

    I actually do think Hatton will definitely have SOME moments in the fight and it might degenerate into an all out war but I think Pacman will be a step ahead at all times. I watched an interview from Roach on youtube just there and he was more realistic about the fight and basically dismissed his 3 round prediction and said the fight will go many rounds although he thinks pacman will stop hatton in the end. Also, Roach was saying that pacmans style will be sort of a counter punching style and that hattons agression will get him in trouble.

    I thought that was interesting.

    We will see Pacman picking Hatton off like you said but hes going to have to get hattons respect first before he can do that. Also, hatton is not going to stop coming forward so Pacman will adopt a sort of backfoot strategy and counter hattons attacks and start some of his own sporafidically. It will be real in and out stuff from pacman, hitting hatton and always moving away. But when he attacks he has to come forward but I still think he can manage to do that and then move away.

    Pacman showed a lot of patience and skill in how he dealth with Oscar remember.

    The thing that worries me here is Hattons footspeed because he is no slouch and he might be able to pin manny down and force him to exchange punches. I have to stress the word MIGHT because Manny is so superior in skill that he could find a way to make Hatton look really foolish in there, even in an exchange.

    Anyway, it is a fascinating fight alright and provokes some good debate which is what this forum is all about. I repect your take on the fight and I think we can both agree that this fight will not go the distance!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,460 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    akindoc wrote: »
    Eagle Eye, I would refrain from dismissing people because they have not posted much in the forum. From what I can see, this guy has 100 times the knowledge you have mate.

    Your comments are shocking. Urango was possibly Hattons most disgusting performance of hit and hold sh*te and any good referee would have been docking points for what Hatton was up to in that fight. He grappled his way to a very unconvincing win where he was very hurt by a body shot at one stage and you are having a wet dream about it on the forums. Are you feeling OK mate??
    Its amazing the way people remember the last three rounds when Hatton did a lot of spoiling but in fairness he destroyed Urango.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 418 ✭✭akindoc


    Big Ears wrote: »
    We were all Flyweights once(unless some of us have managed to never weigh as much as 112lbs :p), Pacquiao's time as a Flyweight is pretty much irrelevant.
    When he was knocked out at those weights(once by a body shot, once by a head shot) he was badly drained at the weight and his body was in that adolescent stage where it grows very quickly(he was probably even a few inches smaller back then aswell). Pacquiao even failed to make weight for his second loss at 'Flyweight'.

    How drained Pacquiao was is shown by his move to Super-Bantamweight straight away afterwards, at a time(to the very month) when pacquiao had just turned 21. Now in general a fighter won't be able to maintain fighting at the weight they were when they were 21 in their mid/late 20's, unless they could have actually made an even lower weight in the first place.

    Pacquiao wasn't struggling that much to make Super-Bantamweight at the time he moved up, but he would have probably had to move up in a few years anyway. But considering how he had(and still has) such a low % body fat he wasn't undersized at Featherweight at all, and was reasonably big at the weight.

    He didn't spend too long at Featherweight, moving to Super-Featherweight for bigger fights. Now this is where Pacquiao started to really put on muscle, because he had the lbs to play with(as he could have stayed at Featherweight in the state he was in for the majority of the rest of his career I'd say). He bulked up quite a lot, and after 3 years of fighting at the weight, due to his now considerable mass at the weight he was forced to move up to Lightweight.

    Dispite what his measurements are, he's not 'naturally' nearly as big as Ricky.
    If not for him adding so much muscle he'd probably still be a Featherweight or at worse at Super-Featherweight. Against Oscar Larios(a former Super-Bantamweight himself) he looked the smaller man.

    Manny's always had a good chin, however he was floored and almost stopped by Nedal Hussein, but bar that episode has never been badly badly staggered. Marquez and Morales did stun him a little, and Diaz actually hurt him to the body with the only really good shot he landed all night(in the 8th), but his chin and body are extremely good for a fighter of his natural size.
    Whether they'll cope with a Light-Welterweight I'm not so sure.

    Where his body can cope with some wrestling and clinching, with a man about a stone naturally bigger than him, I'm not so sure and whether he can cope with the body attack of a man who's a lethal body puncher at 140 lbs I'm not so sure.

    Hatton's footspeed is key in the fight, Pacquiao's is better than Ricky's but it won't be enough to always avoid being backed up to the ropes(where Manny usually does well to spin off) or in the corner.

    Hatton might have trouble landing his usual 1/1-2 punch that he when in the middle of the ring, Hatton rarely throws Combo's of more than two punches unless he has a man backed up or in a clinch. But what Hatton does do is bring his whole body forward while throwing those punches in mid ring, and either intentionally or inadvertently he ends up right on top of his opponent and they are often forced into a clinch, where Hatton can use his strength, and work off his punches, especially to the body.

    Pacquiao will be forced into clinches, Bayliss will give the fighters some time in those clinches to work out, but won't let them fight all day like that. However having the bigger man on top of him in those clinches will sap Pacquiao's energy, he's not used to that at all and from the sparring we've seen(although that is the sparring Roach has allowed us to see), it's been all clean cut stuff, with no clinching or holding.

    Perhaps Roach thinks Pacquiao will be able to stay away from Hatton with his footspeed and footwork all night, that would be naive of him. While for considerable periods he may be able to stay away, he will be either forced into clinches or forced onto the ropes, or into the corners for quite a bit of the fights too.

    I expect Pacquiao to start well and take the early rounds, but I think as great a physical specimen as he is, this will become physically too much for him, and I see him being broken somewhere around the 8th/9th.

    Of course Maybe Pacquiao will be able to stay away all night, and landing buzzing combinations that hurt Hatton and eventually take him out, I doubt it but if that's the case I'll admit I was wrong afterwards.

    Even Mayweather with all his footspeed and footwork was forced to fight Hatton's fight for long periods, just turns out that he could do that even better than Hatton when required. Pacquiao on the otherhand is not going to get the better of Hatton if he's pegged back to the ropes.

    I think the reason Roach is acting so out of character and being so bold is he is trying to make Hatton angry, make him overly aggressive and downright reckless. I'm not sure the mind games will really play a part though.

    For those that are interested here's the Pacquiao v Hussein round where Pacquiao gets badly hurt


    1. Agreed about Pacmans weight struggles and how that affected his performances.

    2. Agreed about Hattons footspeed... very very important in this fight.

    3. STRONGLY disagree about Pacman being drawn into clinches. Show me ONE instance of Pacman in a clinch in a fight. It doesn't happen. He fights hard on the inside and gets away from clinches. You will not see him in the usual hatton hit and hold area in this fight AT ALL and believe me, freddie roach has made sure Pacman knows that clinching and holding is NOT acceptable in this fight. It's not in pacmans nature anyway.

    4. PBF clinches and worked on the inside with Hatton because he was FAR superior. He could have stayed on the outside and beaten Hatton like that but he was having a lot of success on the inside so he basically destroyed hatton at his own game. It had nothing to do with hatton "forcing" him to fight that way.


    lol, it's nearly 5am and this forum is buzzing!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,004 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    Jayob10 wrote: »
    Theres a little bit of PBF mayweather in me in the boasting about predictions I admit that! Hey thats why boxing has been so great the last couple of years at the lesser weights anyway. Its hard to call. I picked Margarito to break Cottos heart despite being told I was talking sh*te and the glory went to my head! :D

    Anyway here's hoping its a great fight but I really fancy Hatton in a big way for this one. And yes I have put my money where my mouth is !

    Why not join our prediction league(well, if Cowzerp is okay with it), and backup your reputation with substance ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭Jayob10


    Big Ears wrote: »
    We were all Flyweights once(unless some of us have managed to never weigh as much as 112lbs :p), Pacquiao's time as a Flyweight is pretty much irrelevant.
    When he was knocked out at those weights(once by a body shot, once by a head shot) he was badly drained at the weight and his body was in that adolescent stage where it grows very quickly(he was probably even a few inches smaller back then aswell). Pacquiao even failed to make weight for his second loss at 'Flyweight'.

    How drained Pacquiao was is shown by his move to Super-Bantamweight straight away afterwards, at a time(to the very month) when pacquiao had just turned 21. Now in general a fighter won't be able to maintain fighting at the weight they were when they were 21 in their mid/late 20's, unless they could have actually made an even lower weight in the first place.

    Pacquiao wasn't struggling that much to make Super-Bantamweight at the time he moved up, but he would have probably had to move up in a few years anyway. But considering how he had(and still has) such a low % body fat he wasn't undersized at Featherweight at all, and was reasonably big at the weight.

    He didn't spend too long at Featherweight, moving to Super-Featherweight for bigger fights. Now this is where Pacquiao started to really put on muscle, because he had the lbs to play with(as he could have stayed at Featherweight in the state he was in for the majority of the rest of his career I'd say). He bulked up quite a lot, and after 3 years of fighting at the weight, due to his now considerable mass at the weight he was forced to move up to Lightweight.

    Dispite what his measurements are, he's not 'naturally' nearly as big as Ricky.
    If not for him adding so much muscle he'd probably still be a Featherweight or at worse at Super-Featherweight. Against Oscar Larios(a former Super-Bantamweight himself) he looked the smaller man.

    Manny's always had a good chin, however he was floored and almost stopped by Nedal Hussein, but bar that episode has never been badly badly staggered. Marquez and Morales did stun him a little, and Diaz actually hurt him to the body with the only really good shot he landed all night(in the 8th), but his chin and body are extremely good for a fighter of his natural size.
    Whether they'll cope with a Light-Welterweight I'm not so sure.

    Where his body can cope with some wrestling and clinching, with a man about a stone naturally bigger than him, I'm not so sure and whether he can cope with the body attack of a man who's a lethal body puncher at 140 lbs I'm not so sure.

    Hatton's footspeed is key in the fight, Pacquiao's is better than Ricky's but it won't be enough to always avoid being backed up to the ropes(where Manny usually does well to spin off) or in the corner.

    Hatton might have trouble landing his usual 1/1-2 punch that he when in the middle of the ring, Hatton rarely throws Combo's of more than two punches unless he has a man backed up or in a clinch. But what Hatton does do is bring his whole body forward while throwing those punches in mid ring, and either intentionally or inadvertently he ends up right on top of his opponent and they are often forced into a clinch, where Hatton can use his strength, and work off his punches, especially to the body.

    Pacquiao will be forced into clinches, Bayliss will give the fighters some time in those clinches to work out, but won't let them fight all day like that. However having the bigger man on top of him in those clinches will sap Pacquiao's energy, he's not used to that at all and from the sparring we've seen(although that is the sparring Roach has allowed us to see), it's been all clean cut stuff, with no clinching or holding.

    Perhaps Roach thinks Pacquiao will be able to stay away from Hatton with his footspeed and footwork all night, that would be naive of him. While for considerable periods he may be able to stay away, he will be either forced into clinches or forced onto the ropes, or into the corners for quite a bit of the fights too.

    I expect Pacquiao to start well and take the early rounds, but I think as great a physical specimen as he is, this will become physically too much for him, and I see him being broken somewhere around the 8th/9th.

    Of course Maybe Pacquiao will be able to stay away all night, and landing buzzing combinations that hurt Hatton and eventually take him out, I doubt it but if that's the case I'll admit I was wrong afterwards.

    Even Mayweather with all his footspeed and footwork was forced to fight Hatton's fight for long periods, just turns out that he could do that even better than Hatton when required. Pacquiao on the otherhand is not going to get the better of Hatton if he's pegged back to the ropes.

    I think the reason Roach is acting so out of character and being so bold is he is trying to make Hatton angry, make him overly aggressive and downright reckless. I'm not sure the mind games will really play a part though.

    For those that are interested here's the Pacquiao v Hussein round where Pacquiao gets badly hurt

    You are 100% spot on with your comments and your technical knowledge is superb excellent post. And i'm not just saying that because we are somewhat in agreement about Hatton breaking Manny down somewhere down the stretch.
    The point about Mayweather is spot on. Hatton didnt believe Floyd would cope with Ricky on the inside and in some ways it broke Rickys heart to know Floyd could adapt and do this better than what Ricky does best.

    Don't be surprised to see Ricky throw more combinations than usual and his defence will be alot sharper in the rounds 1-5 anyway. I think it will be pretty strange for the first round or 2 with Ricky anxious not to be too agressive as he feels Manny out a little. We may not see too much action, Manny may even be the agressor. But when the fight reaches it equilibrium I feel that Hatton will be too overbearing and his body shots will be particularly vicious. I think Roach and Co feel ricky won't have the opportunity to fire such shots off but I reckon Manny will have to feel take some hard shots at some stage. I think the old dog may have learned a few tricks aswell but genuinely I don't think the new regime will be a major factor apart from more lateral movement by Hatton early on aswell as slightly better conditioning. I think its gunna be old school Hatton that surfaces in the heat of it and that'll be too hard for Manny to handle when he can't get Ricky off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭Jayob10


    akindoc wrote: »
    I actually do think Hatton will definitely have SOME moments in the fight and it might degenerate into an all out war but I think Pacman will be a step ahead at all times. I watched an interview from Roach on youtube just there and he was more realistic about the fight and basically dismissed his 3 round prediction and said the fight will go many rounds although he thinks pacman will stop hatton in the end. Also, Roach was saying that pacmans style will be sort of a counter punching style and that hattons agression will get him in trouble.

    I thought that was interesting.

    We will see Pacman picking Hatton off like you said but hes going to have to get hattons respect first before he can do that. Also, hatton is not going to stop coming forward so Pacman will adopt a sort of backfoot strategy and counter hattons attacks and start some of his own sporafidically. It will be real in and out stuff from pacman, hitting hatton and always moving away. But when he attacks he has to come forward but I still think he can manage to do that and then move away.

    Pacman showed a lot of patience and skill in how he dealth with Oscar remember.

    The thing that worries me here is Hattons footspeed because he is no slouch and he might be able to pin manny down and force him to exchange punches. I have to stress the word MIGHT because Manny is so superior in skill that he could find a way to make Hatton look really foolish in there, even in an exchange.

    Anyway, it is a fascinating fight alright and provokes some good debate which is what this forum is all about. I repect your take on the fight and I think we can both agree that this fight will not go the distance!!

    Yeah most definately I think we agree it won't go the distance. And all intelligent debate is good in my book.

    I do think that PacMan v ODLH was the equivalent of Manny moving in and away from the Heavy bags though! Oscar was asking to be hit. Hatton will hit him back though and as you say Hatton is no slouch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭Jayob10


    Big Ears wrote: »
    Why not join our prediction league(well, if Cowzerp is okay with it), and backup your reputation with substance ;)

    Yeah sure thing how can I join?

    You guys are dying to see me fall now aren't ye??? :)

    Id love to join the prediction league


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,004 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    akindoc wrote: »
    1. Agreed about Pacmans weight struggles and how that affected his performances.

    2. Agreed about Hattons footspeed... very very important in this fight.

    3. STRONGLY disagree about Pacman being drawn into clinches. Show me ONE instance of Pacman in a clinch in a fight. It doesn't happen. He fights hard on the inside and gets away from clinches. You will not see him in the usual hatton hit and hold area in this fight AT ALL and believe me, freddie roach has made sure Pacman knows that clinching and holding is NOT acceptable in this fight. It's not in pacmans nature anyway.

    4. PBF clinches and worked on the inside with Hatton because he was FAR superior. He could have stayed on the outside and beaten Hatton like that but he was having a lot of success on the inside so he basically destroyed hatton at his own game. It had nothing to do with hatton "forcing" him to fight that way.


    lol, it's nearly 5am and this forum is buzzing!

    3. Pacquiao hasn't been fighting manny fighters than clinch often. Morales, Barrera and Marquez have comprised half of his fights for the last 8/9 years and none of the 3 like to clinch unless badly stunned.

    You can see Manny clinching quite a bit in the video with Hussein, however that's for obvious reasons.....:D

    I could be wrong but I seem to remember the Solis fight having quite a bit of holding in it. I'd certainly agree that Roach would have said to Pacquiao don't let him clinch you no matter what, however because of that they quite possibly haven't worked out what to if Hatton does get him into clinches, which would be a huge mistake on Roach's part.

    4. I'm not so sure Mayweather could have gotten to fight on the outside that easily, Jesus Chavez forced Mayweather into a similar fight previously.
    Although Chavez did a better job than Hatton and actually made Mayweather take quite a lot of punishment(although the majority to the body), he wasn't able to get on the outside in that fight(or else he didn't try, which would of been stupid with how much he got hit and how close some rounds were), and imo it was the same in the Hatton fight.









    I just remebered Larios actually shook Manny a bit in their fight too
    Jayob10 wrote: »
    Yeah sure thing how can I join?

    You guys are dying to see me fall now aren't ye??? :)

    Id love to join the prediction league

    pm Cowzerp and ask if he'll let you join the boxing comp poll league.

    I will point out some drawbacks first, this did start in January so it would be difficult for you to win even if you were very good at predicting. Although the scoring system has changed in the last few weeks(which may be permanent or temporary) and it allows for you to catch up quickly enough if you're predicting fights very accurately. Well actually if you were good at picking the exact round the old system would allow you to catch up much quicker, but the new system works in having a bunch of rounds to pick from rather than a specific one(that's if you're picking a knockout of course), and if you can keep getting that right, you'll zoom up the table.

    The other 'drawback'.....well it's only a drawback if you see it as one, is the competition is being done for charity this time.
    So everyone entering has to give €10 and if you win your charity of choice gets the lot. The charity can be a non-profit boxing club aswell.

    f1dan 255
    Bigears 255
    ODD JOB 240
    MBC 235
    Megadodge 200
    Cowzerp 195
    Nacho Libre 195
    Rockman 190
    Duagre 180
    Sligobhoy67 145
    Dr Mason 130
    blackgold>> 60

    There's the current table, and at the moment it is working as such:
    20 points for winner
    10 for correct group of rounds of the 3, (1-4, 5-8, 9-12)
    10 for guessing a stoppage
    10 for points
    60 for draw

    So basically you're looking at 30/40 points for every fairly accurate prediction you make.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    What's goin' on fellas, the night shift seem to be posting more than the day shift.
    I want a shift swap:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I may have posted something similar earlier, but for anyone interested in the under card, here it is from eastsideboxing:


    In the co-feature fight, WBC super featherweight titlist Humberto Soto will face Benoit Gaudet for Soto’s belt. Soto is an excellent 130 lb. fighter, rated #1 in the division by Ring magazine, who nonetheless lacks the charisma and fan following of a star fighter. Against the right opponent, Soto could elevate his stock exponentially with a career-defining win on the big stage. Unfortunately, Gaudet is not the right opponent.

    Gaudet is virtually anonymous to all but his family and friends, at least in the United States. Of Gaudet’s 21 fights, only two were fought outside of Canada, where he built his record against nondescript competition. In his last fight he defeated Genaro Trazancos by eight round decision; Trazancos is best known as the first fighter to last more than one round with Edwin Valero. Prior to facing Gaudet, Trazancos had lost six of his previous seven fights.

    Nothing on Gaudet’s resume suggests a fighter who has earned a title shot, especially not on the highest-profile boxing card of the year to date. And with only seven knockouts to his credit in 21 fights and just two in his last 10 fights, the potential drama a big puncher, even one of limited ability, can bring to the ring is absent.

    The most intriguing bout of the undercard is the matchup between undefeated, fast-moving prospect Daniel Jacobs and Michael Walker, though the interest has more to do with circumstances outside the ring than what will happen between the ropes.

    Walker was scheduled to face fearsome junior middleweight contender James Kirkland prior to Kirkland’s arrest on weapons charges. With Kirkland unable to fight, Jacobs took his place, despite fighting a mere eight days before May 2. Jacobs scored a second-round TKO of Jose Varela on ESPN2’s Friday Night Fights on April 24.

    Although the Kirkland court drama and the quick turnaround by Jacobs will likely receive most of the attention, Jacobs-Walker is actually a superior matchup to Kirkland-Walker. Where Walker would have simply been cannon fodder to expose Kirkland to a wider audience, Walker represents the best opponent of Jacobs’ young career other than Varela.

    That said, the interest in Jacobs-Walker for the casual fight fan is minimal. And Jacobs’ last fight was the co-feature on an ESPN2 card, while his fight with Walker is the third slot on the biggest pay-per-view of the year. While Jacobs-Walker would have been a solid Friday Night Fights main event, it loses a lot of luster on a $60 pay-per-view card. Also, “best opponent of Jacobs’ young career” isn’t saying all that much when you examine the resume of Jacobs. Again, this fight fails to measure up on paper, given the event.

    The remaining two fights feature middleweight prospect and 2008 Olympian Matt Korobov and junior middleweight prospect Erislandy Lara. Each fighter is 4-0. Their opponents have a combined record of 16-11. Unless new fans are coming to the sport to witness one-sided beatings or to file away in memory the names of young prospects who may be champions in several years, these two four-round non-contests mean little to anyone other than hardcore fans.

    In a year where HBO responded admirably to past criticism of its matchmaking to put together a special run of fights over the first six months, the lackluster nature of the Hatton-Pacquiao undercard is a distressing return to past bad form. Hopefully, potential fans who tuned in to see a war between Pacman and the Hitman will not be turned off by the whimpers that precede it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭joepenguin


    When you compare it to a ufc event the undercard is terrible. Good fighters on it mind but as it mentioned in a eastside article its more a showcase of talent as opposed to competitive matches. We should expect more of a ppv and especially one of this calibre.

    Sky sports have basically included Friday fight night as part of the card. While I am looking forward to this a bit (even though many of the fightd are mismatches) I think they should have something a little better, something that we dont get a chance to see often and leave Williams and co to Friday night along with some 24-7 to hype the ppv.

    Im starting to lean towards Hatton a little bit more now. Id still back Manny and hope he does win but taking the following into consideration:

    Mannys last 5 opponents:

    April 2007: Jorge Solis... Dont know much about the guy but he is a featherweight and Manny fought him at super feather.

    October 2007: Marco Antonio Barerra: Well past it at the time they fought. Manny even took it easy this time round.

    March 2008: Juan Manuel Marquez: A very very close fight which I believe Marquez won by a round. Very easily could have been the other way around.

    June 2008: David Diaz... A step up in weight but a step down in class. Manny was the favourite going in here and did a number on Diaz but the question remains how would he deal with a higher calibre fighter at the weight.

    December 2008: Oscar De La Hoya: he moved up another 2 weight classes to Welter..The lights were on but no-one was at home in the De La Hoya household. He simply was a shell of fighter, may as well have been a punchbag. I thought dlh would win due to Mannys style of fighting and dlh's left hook. I figured he would catch Manny when he comes in with that lead left hand of his and that would be the turning point.

    It is for this reason I think Hatton has a chance, if he can position himself right then Manny is wide open for counter left hooks, of course Hatton needs to be fast enough to do it. He also has the body, I dont think Manny could take a Hatton left hook to the body. That would be the end of the fight. Not just any left hook, footwork plays an important part in this, but if he gets it right then its an early night imo.

    Going back to Manny opponents he has never faced a fighter so fierce and skillfull... yes skillful at this weight before, he has fought much better fighters, and KOd a bigger guy in dlh but Hatton is in his prime and is no David Diaz.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Two guys about an inch apart in height, both strong, but one guy much stronger and having a much stronger frame. This is what I see when I look at both men. I just watched Hatton and Paulie again and Hatton did look ever so sharp and up for it and he looked so much bigger than Pac looked, even when Pac was at 143 approx vs. Oscar

    If the ref allows this fight to develop, I see Hatton's strength and natural size breaking Manny! He is a physically bigger specimen!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    if Pacman can hit and run all night then he wins this fight. However, if Hatton is able to fight in his normal way then Pacman will fade badly in a war of attrition, in the later rounds, due to Hattons naturally bigger frame and strength. I think the latter scenario is what will materialise, so Hatton may well be losing on at least one scorecard before he eventually stops Pacman with a crippling body shot due to Pacman being worn down and therefore easier to hit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 151 ✭✭mikethemouth




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11067_5262280,00.html

    would make for a big fight after with the winners facing the winners of the hatton-pacman fight and the losers also meeting!!

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,309 ✭✭✭T-K-O


    PBF is a joke.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,115 ✭✭✭Pal


    4am start time ?

    are they showing re-runs on TV on sunday ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    cowzerp wrote: »
    http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11067_5262280,00.html

    would make for a big fight after with the winners facing the winners of the hatton-pacman fight and the losers also meeting!!

    Paul, this is exactly why boxing IS NOT like it used to be.
    It's highly motivated by money, easy fights for easy
    money. I won't be botherd at all with a 140-147 lb
    PBF meeting a very small LW fighter!

    And then talk of winners and losers meeting? This is farcical!
    Two hyped up wannabe mega fights. They don't come close to
    real mega fights!

    So, Hatton and PBF may get to box again in another
    piece of sh!t and maybe we can watch JMM and Pac go
    at it again?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    T-K-O wrote: »
    How can Manny be like Mr Muscle and not suffer like a Bruno. Anyway that is off topic.

    O'k this is as dumbed down as i can answer this without getting all scientific!

    Bruno carried a massive amount of muscle which all needs to be supported by cardio system that can deal with it, Manny also carrys a massive amount of muscle for his size and even if there type fibres are similar, his cardio system (Heart) is most likely as strong if not even possibly stronger than Franks was so supporting his muscles through blood flow and oxygen is way easier than Franks which needs way more blood pumping and oxygen to get to the muscles, this is why the 2 are not comparible,

    Manny is well fit enough to sustain the muscle he has and for a man of Bruno's size to be able to match this would take a true super human, you could say that frazier and ali in the thrilla in manilla where super human-i certainly would.
    Pal wrote: »
    4am start time ?


    are they showing re-runs on TV on sunday ?

    AM alright, sunday morning..

    they will show repeats aswell if you've ordered it in..

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    Mayweather may fight at welter but he's not just a welter, he's rose up the weights too, people forget that, thats why it makes no sense him fighting the real big sized men, yes its money driven but will be a great fight, and marquez v hatton or manny would be cool also..


    And bren, this is nothing new, its always been like that, you have a warped view of how pure boxing was!
    if anything it was full of fixes and mismatches more so in the past..

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 128 ✭✭Andyfbt


    I think it's great. Another mega fight. I wonder what weight they aim to fight it at. Juan Manuel Marquez has risen from Featherweight already. Will probably be fought at 140 Ib


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Paul, the difference is now that they are hyping these bouts as legitimate super fights. Years ago and even in the 80's, there was corruption and there was mismatches, I know this, but never the level of hype and mass hysteria for such mismatches.

    That is what irritates the crap out of me. Sure, there are fine fighters today and some great scraps, as there was back in the day, but today, there is so much emphasis on money and red tape and avoidance and hype, that it leads to fights being labeled mega when it's so far wrong.

    Look at Oscar-Floyd, Oscar-Pac etc.

    Floyd is simply back for the limelight and another easy pay day. It
    cannot be for respect or adoration or him trying to
    prove he still has it, or that he wants to meet the best.

    His next two bouts if lined up will be a win over Marquez
    followed by another match With Fatton OR a match with a blown
    up feather. Sorry, if that gets you excited, so be it. To me it
    deserves no real praise at all!

    He had many chances to fight many legit welters I am
    sure, like Cotto, Marg, Williams etc; but why bother
    when the public will pay to see non events.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Andyfbt wrote: »
    I think it's great. Another mega fight.

    Andy, this is what bugs me, not you by the way, the claim itself.
    How the hell is this a mega fight with any substance?

    It has a big name in Floyd, so what.
    That is about it!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭Rob113


    the closer the fight gets the harder it is to see past a Hatton win. Im reckoning around rd 9 / 10. I just cant see Pac knocking him out early on. Hattons just too busy and Pac doesnt have devastating power. If Hatton tires late on and Pac bombards him with combinations then maybe but I reckon Hatton will have hurt Pac a few times by then and will just wear him down and take him with one of his old school bodypunches. I think it has the makings of a great fight. Should be quick tempo'd and could erupt into an all out war by about 5/6.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 36 murpheile


    http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=19631

    according to reports here the other day they've almost agreed on a catchweight of 145. The weight was the big issue over agreeing the contract obviously and for a while it looked like it wouldn't go ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    walshb wrote: »
    Andy, this is what bugs me, not you by the way, the claim itself.
    How the hell is this a mega fight with any substance?

    It has a big name in Floyd, so what.
    That is about it!

    Bren, marquez is a savage, the only thing in question is the weight-marrquez is 1 of the LB 4 LB best fighters..

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre



    expect the recrimations to fly if Hatton looses, if not Floyd Sr will be hailed as as a somewhat eccentric but brilliant trainer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,309 ✭✭✭T-K-O


    Floyd is such a punk for taking this fight. If it does go ahead tt must happen at 140.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Pointless. Mayweather just wants an easy payday and then with the hype it sets up an even bigger payday. Marquez maybe tough but there is no way he will win this one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭Rob113


    walshb wrote: »
    Andy, this is what bugs me, not you by the way, the claim itself.
    How the hell is this a mega fight with any substance?

    It has a big name in Floyd, so what.
    That is about it!

    I agree with you on PBF v Marquez, but i personally would like to see a Hatton v PBF rematch. I bow to your far superior knowledge on boxing and admittedly mine only extends to what is shown on Sky / Setanta.
    I dont see many mega fights out there, not involving household names in anyway. Its unfortunate that any decent boxing is only available PPV or in the states and that the rest of us have only Friday Fight Night to feed off.
    Maybe if there was better coverage available to the average Joe's like myself and Andy (no offence intended) then we might share your views but until then i dont think we are wrong to get excited about the possibility of a Hatton v PBF rematch or a Pacquaio v PBF fight (provided Pac beats Hatton).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 585 ✭✭✭Rob113



    I would be surprised if there wasnt tension in both camps. Id say Roach got pretty p1ssed with all Manny's flunkies from the phillipines hanging around all the time. There always seemed to be 7/8 of them just lounging around doing nothing but get in the way. Floyd turning up late for training was bad form though. Thought that was very arrogant and disrespectful of him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Paul, JMM is not a savage IMO, a lovely boxer with skills and ability, but is he a threat to a man about a weight or two really above him? JMM is a small lightweight even.
    Floyd hasn't seen LW in years.

    Hell, Juan Diaz gave JMM all he could habdle for 8 or 9 rds.
    Juan has been known to fold and is far from a deadly
    hitter

    JMM has also seen better days. This fight is a con on the part of PBF and JMM wants his pay day. I say fair play to JMM, but PBF is not fooling
    me with this crap. What's worse is Fatton-PBF part two. That is just ridisculous!

    BTW, no way Floyd at this stage gets to 140 lbs. If JMM wants his pay, he
    does as he's told. PBF fights a smaller man who is incapable
    of hurting him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    walshb wrote: »
    Paul, JMM is not a savage IMO, a lovely boxer with skills and ability, but is he a threat to a man about a weight or two really above him? JMM is a small lightweight even.
    Floyd hasn't seen LW in years.

    Hell, Juan Diaz gave JMM all he could habdle for 8 or 9 rds.
    Juan has been known to fold and is far from a deadly
    hitter

    JMM has also seen better days. This fight is a con on the part of PBF and JMM wants his pay day. I say fair play to JMM, but PBF is not fooling
    me with this crap. What's worse is Fatton-PBF part two. That is just ridisculous!

    BTW, no way Floyd at this stage gets to 140 lbs. If JMM wants his pay, he
    does as he's told. PBF fights a smaller man who is incapable
    of hurting him.

    exactly. it's a meaningless fight.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,017 ✭✭✭colly10


    Anyone know when the weigh in is?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭joepenguin


    JMM is the only fight that makes sense to Floyd, thats why it is going to happen (although nothing confirmed... id say they are just letting pac-hitman happen first)

    The only guys Floyds size that are big enough names to fight are too much after such a lay off. Cotto and Mosely in particular. There isnt anyone near his ppv level at the mo. Berto has his old belt, thats about the only selling point of that fight. Clottey who is fighting Cotto anyway wouldnt really cut it. Williams :D no chance.

    Theres no stars at this weight really in terms of ppv. Cambell is there and fightless but isnt as big of a name as JMM who is the linear lightweight champ, a golden boy fighter, has fought competitive fights with Pacman and from what I understand has been in 2 good fights at 135. In terms of ppv he ticks all the boxes, plus he is much smaller than pbf so makes for an ideal comeback opponent. This doesnt close any doors for JMM either, in fact it almost ensures another big pay day for him, most likely against Hatton or Pacquiao.

    Pbf will look for the Hatton-Pac winner for sure. This isnt about his legacy, this is about his pocket. If it was abuot his legacy he would look to Mosely, Williams and Cotto but too with any of these guys there is more bruises with less dollars. They truely would give Money Mayweather a recession special.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I'm working Sunday morning.. This whole 4am thing isn't going to sit well with my body and mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    joepenguin wrote: »
    JMM is the only fight that makes sense to Floyd, thats why it is going to happen (although nothing confirmed... id say they are just letting pac-hitman happen first)

    Indeed, little risk for great reward. That's boxing and business, but not to be applauded!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,956 ✭✭✭consultech


    colly10 wrote: »
    Anyone know when the weigh in is?

    If my maths is right I THINK it's 10:30pm tonight our time... ESPN have it live at "5:30pm ET", so I'm right in sayin we're 5 hours ahead, yeah? Their timezones always confuse the fook out of me. Here's a link also: http://assets.espn.go.com/livenow/livenow43.html

    It'll be on sky sports news, most likely uncensored if there's any Hatton banter, much to the relief of sky after Hatton/Mayweather (lol @ cringeworthy way the presenter dealt with it: "The pressure...")


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,460 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The only good thing to come from this is that he has now unretired himself and the big boys can call him out.

    Sugar Shane, Cotto and maybe some of the light middle guys have every right to call him out now.

    Just on the overall picture Timothy Bradley is being left out in the cold here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I checked and the weigh in is on sky news at 2230hrs.

    Nice little article this

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=19653&more=1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Pac 138 lbs, Hatton is 140 lbs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,378 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Feck all difference in height; the real difference should be seen tomorrow night in the ring


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,972 ✭✭✭joepenguin


    Manny wont weigh in at too much more tommorow. Hatton will.

    How many 24/7 episodes were there and how do you know which one is on at what time. Might just catch them on youtube.

    Thoughts on the mayweather-beard situation and the training methods? Lee seems to be giving input where it is due?


Advertisement