Hybrid Bird Flu about to be released?

King Mob

nodolan wrote: »

If you can't see the irrationality and lack of logical thinking displayed there I really don't have any more to say to you.

You mean asking for someone to back up their claims with verifiable evidence from a neutral, reliable source is lacking in logic and irrational?

Right....

nodolan

King Mob wrote: »

You mean asking for someone to back up their claims with verifiable evidence from a neutral, reliable source is lacking in logic and irrational?

Right....

You really believe that there's such a source?

You believe government agencies? Big pharma backed studies?

Wow!! You're dumber than I had originally thought.

King Mob

nodolan wrote: »

You really believe that there's such a source?

You believe government agencies? Big pharma backed studies?

Wow!! You're dumber than I had originally thought.

No I believe peer reviewed papers.

How do you know that big pharma back and control every single study?

Do you believe the people selling alternative medicine without question?

Sofa_King Good

Bush Minor suggested that an outbreak would justify the implementation of martial law.


By the way, Spanish flu as mentioned by Bush has nothing to do with Spain, it was caused by the forced vaccinations of US military men, some of whom dropped dead immediatedely after recieving the vaccination.

BUSH: And who best to be able to effect a quarantine?
One option is the use of a military that's able to plan and move. So that's why I put it on the table. I think it's an important debate for Congress to have.
I noticed the other day, evidently, some governors didn't like it. I understand that. I was the commander in chief of the National Guard and proudly so. And, frankly, I didn't want the president telling me how to be the commander in chief of the Texas Guard.
But Congress needs to take a look at circumstances that may need to vest the capacity of the president to move beyond that debate. And one such catastrophe or one such challenge could be an avian flu outbreak.

meglome

nodolan wrote: »

Interesting argument and looks solid at first glance but falls down when you take a closer look. Ever since the discovery/invention of antibiotics and more advanced medical procedures fewer and fewer people have died from flu and what not. Hardly anyone ever dies from the plague any more yet that killed millions way back when. TB was eradicated here in Ireland and Smallpox was eradicated worldwide. The arrival of a variant strain of flu is not a big issue but what is a big issue is the arrival of a strain of flu that seems to be made of three completely different strains.

Ah so simple antibiotics would have stopped all these diseases that killed millions. We wouldn't need any specific medication at all. Pity that isn't true.

nodolan wrote: »

There is a lot of evidence to show that big pharma have on numerous occasions deliberately released new and/or mutated virii into the wild for their own profit-making ends - polio vaccines being the biggest and most public example (they even made movies about some of the bigger incidents).

Lot's of evidence eh. What you'll supply no doubt. Not saying it couldn't happen. But I'd rather put my faith in tested science that hearsay.

nodolan wrote: »

But in all fairness tallaght01 you're 100% biased. You've been through a system of education that has indoctrinated you to believe certain things and the fact that you went to med school in the first place could be taken as an indicator of your socio-economic status which in turn would say a lot as to your disposition towards such threads as these.

Coming from a guy promoting an alternative health website. What is it about people in here and their lack of understanding irony.

King Mob

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

By the way, Spanish flu as mentioned by Bush has nothing to do with Spain, it was caused by the forced vaccinations of US military men, some of whom dropped dead immediatedely after recieving the vaccination.

What actually happened was Bush give them super serum turning them all into supersoldiers. And to cover up this they spread the rumour these soldiers were dead.

Bet I have more evidence than you.

nodolan

King Mob wrote: »

No I believe peer reviewed papers.

How do you know that big pharma back and control every single study?

Do you believe the people selling alternative medicine without question?

Ya see this is where your dishonesty shines through - I never said 'every single study' - you're inflating the issue and trying to make dramatic sweeping statements regarding what I've said in an attempt to detract from it (and to detract from your own inability to present a solid rebuff) - just like meglome who obviously hasn't bothered reading the whole thread and just throws in what he thinks will be suitably sarcastic and caustic statements in the hope that he'll look tough and get away with being ignorant.

I've already posted in another thread that I have done years of research (almost 20 years) into alternative medicines and supplements. Recently I did some research into dental implants. When I approached one medical company a highly qualified dental surgeon lied point blank to me about certain types of implants. I was able to quote peer reviewed papers to contradict him and obviously won't be availing of his services.

I have a 3rd level diploma in Satellite, GPS and GSM Comms, an honours degree in Computer Science, a 1st Class H.Dip. in Sociology and I'm doing an MA in Sociology. Next I'll be studying for the bar. I happen to be a big supporter of science and technology but I don't believe every word they say - I don't believe anyone without doing my own research.

As for peer reviewed papers - even they have been found to be flawed. I'm not going to give you examples - do your own research and educate yourself (like I've done).

King Mob

nodolan wrote: »

Ya see this is where your dishonesty shines through - I never said 'every single study' - you're inflating the issue and trying to make dramatic sweeping statements regarding what I've said in an attempt to detract from it (and to detract from your own inability to present a solid rebuff).

I've already posted in another thread that I have done years of research (almost 20 years) into alternative medicines and supplements. Recently I did some research into dental implants. When I approached one medical company a highly qualified dental surgeon lied point blank to me about certain types of implants. I was able to quote peer reviewed papers to contradict him and obviously won't be availing of his services.

I have a 3rd level diploma in Satellite, GPS and GSM Comms, an honours degree in Computer Science, a 1st Class H.Dip. in Sociology and I'm doing an MA in Sociology. Next I'll be studying for the bar. I happen to be a big supporter of science and technology but I don't believe every word they say - I don't believe anyone without doing my own research.

As for peer reviewed papers - even they have been found to be flawed. I'm not going to give you examples - do your own research and educate yourself (like I've done).

Wow anecdotes and evidence you can't show!
Convincing.

So how do you know that all this anti vaccination stuff is true?
Do you just believe everything people tell you as long as it's a conspiracy?

nodolan

King Mob wrote: »

Wow anecdotes and evidence you can't show!
Convincing.

So how do you know that all this anti vaccination stuff is true?
DO you just believe everything people tell you as long as it's a conspiracy?

Now you're just repeating yourself ad nauseum and adding a sprinkling of sarcasm (or attempting to anyway) so I really will cease replying to you and anyone else who has nothing concrete to say otherwise it's just an exercise in reductio ad absurdum.

King Mob

nodolan wrote: »

Now you're just repeating yourself ad nauseum and adding a sprinkling of sarcasm (or attempting to anyway) so I really will cease replying to you and anyone else who has nothing concrete to say otherwise it's just an exercise in reductio ad absurdum.

Oh hey you know what'd be an actual rebuff to my arguments?
Backing you your claim with verifiable evidence.

But why answer anyone who questions you, right?

Sofa_King Good

King Mob wrote: »

What actually happened was Bush give them super serum turning them all into supersoldiers. And to cover up this they spread the rumour these soldiers were dead.

Bet I have more evidence than you.

Must have gone back in time then, the outbreak was in 1918.

King Mob

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

Must have gone back in time then, the outbreak was in 1918.

So not backing up your claim then?

Sofa_King Good

nodolan wrote: »

it's just an exercise in reductio ad absurdum.

what he said

King Mob wrote: »

So not backing up your claim then?

which one?

King Mob

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

which one?

That Spanish flu was caused by force vaccinations. And that some of those soldiers dropped dead immediately.

Sofa_King Good

King Mob wrote: »

Do you just believe everything people tell you as long as it's a conspiracy?

On this topic at least that a bit rich as history has shown that in relation to influenza pandemics that you should not believe anything the government tells you.

you appear to though, why?

There is nothing concrete to suggest that this outbreak is abnormal yet, except of course that Mexican chap who died the day after meeting Obama, what would you put this down to?

King Mob

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

On this topic at least that a bit rich as history has shown that in relation to influenza pandemics that you should not believe anything the government tells you.

Care to elaborate that or back it up?

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

you appear to though, why?

Usually the government doesn't rely on bad logic to make up for lack of evidence.

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

There is nothing concrete to suggest that this outbreak is abnormal yet, except of course that Mexican chap who died the day after meeting Obama, what would you put this down to?

The flu maybe?
Is the only explanation that it's a conspiracy of some kind?

nodolan

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

On this topic at least that a bit rich as history has shown that in relation to influenza pandemics that you should not believe anything the government tells you.

you appear to though, why?

There is nothing concrete to suggest that this outbreak is abnormal yet, except of course that Mexican chap who died the day after meeting Obama, what would you put this down to?

It does occur to me that this is a great way to combat the crime and drugs issues 'plaguing' Mexico.

p.s. You really are wasting your time with that other guy (and a few others) as they'll just keep saying the same stuff over and over again and never fully address anything you say. Death by a thousand paper cuts. But it's your life so...

King Mob

nodolan wrote: »

p.s. You really are wasting your time with that other guy (and a few others) as they'll just keep saying the same stuff over and over again and never fully address anything you say. Death by a thousand paper cuts. But it's your life so...

That's right backing up your claims is completely unimportant as long as there's a conspiracy.

Never question the conspiracy.

bonkey

nodolan wrote: »

Wow!! You're dumber than I had originally thought.

Infracted

Sofa_King Good

King Mob wrote: »

Care to elaborate that or back it up?

http://www.rense.com/general45/USvaccinescaused.htm

King Mob wrote: »

Usually the government doesn't rely on bad logic to make up for lack of evidence.

Usually? care to omit the "usually" or retract that statement because as is it means fect all

King Mob wrote: »

Is the only explanation that it's a conspiracy of some kind?

Nope. As I said there is nothing abnormal as of yet.

But start looking at the big picture, think about all the micro-biologists that have died in strange circumanstances in the last 10 years.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/deadbiologists.html

Think of "I am a Zionist" Biden's projections of Obama's big test. When is his 100th day in office again?

nodolan

bonkey wrote: »

Infracted

Totally worth it.

And while I'm at it - here's a free DVD called 'In Lies We Trust':

[RS]
http://rapidshare.com/files/124353845/In_Lies_We_Trust_-_Len_Horowitz_2007_-_official_release_xvid.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/124359155/In_Lies_We_Trust_-_Len_Horowitz_2007_-_official_release_xvid.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/124363923/In_Lies_We_Trust_-_Len_Horowitz_2007_-_official_release_xvid.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/124368348/In_Lies_We_Trust_-_Len_Horowitz_2007_-_official_release_xvid.part4.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/124372275/In_Lies_We_Trust_-_Len_Horowitz_2007_-_official_release_xvid.part5.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/124376556/In_Lies_We_Trust_-_Len_Horowitz_2007_-_official_release_xvid.part6.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/124379027/In_Lies_We_Trust_-_Len_Horowitz_2007_-_official_release_xvid.part7.rar


[MU]
http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=1HXQ1X3I
http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=URZDOLS2
http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=LI05V0KD
http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=TXZQX3W6
http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=6LT1TGHP
http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=840HNLH8
http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=TPBEQXGY

The CIA, Hollywood & Bioterrorism to learn why your life is entrusted to Manchurian candidates who don't even know how and why they aim to kill you. Horowitz brilliantly critiques the government's new 24-hour television network and feature documentary, History of Bioterrorism, which is now broadcasting daily over the Dish Network. September is "National Preparedness Month." Officials say you must prepare for the worst bioterrorist attacks, yet they use fear and gross inaccuracies (propaganda) examined by Horowitz for your edutainment and informed choice. Dr. Horowitz generously donated this life-saving DVD for widespread free public distribution without copyright restrictions. Make copies and share these DVDs and website liberally. Every American should watch this film to prepare for forced injections, mass quarantines, and official predictions of disasters.



Who's teaching the doctors? Drug firms sponsor required courses - and see their sales rise
by Dan Vergano, USA Today (March 9, 2000)

http://www.pharmadisclose.org/cme/ut000309.html

King Mob

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

http://www.rense.com/general45/USvaccinescaused.htm

First major problem for this, linking an increase in typhoid during a war to vaccines.
Typhoid is a completely disease to the flu, and is transmitted by unsanitary conditions. It has nothing to do with the vaccines.
This article is confusing correlation and causation.
Also the link leads to a site promoting homeopathy, so obviously the site is too big on science.

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

Usually? care to omit the "usually" or retract that statement because as is it means fect all

No because there are tons of times the government uses bad logic.
Most of the time they don't and they usually have the evidence to back them up.

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

Nope. As I said there is nothing abnormal as of yet.

And what lead you to believe there be something abnormal.

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

But start looking at the big picture, think about all the micro-biologists that have died in strange circumanstances in the last 10 years.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/deadbiologists.html

I think this came up before.

But looking at the list to verify the cause of death we get only get two that weren't from conspiracy sites:
Don C. Wiley: Accident http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_C._Wiley
Vladimir Pasechnik: Stroke http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Pasechnik

And this is even before looking into the actual work they where doing.

I'm sure if you look hard enough you'll find a list of dentists with similar "suspicious deaths."

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

Think of "I am a Zionist" Biden's projections of Obama's big test. When is his 100th day in office again?

The crazy Biden giving away the NWO secret plans. But luckily he was very vague so his "prediction" could have been applied to anything.

King Mob

nodolan wrote: »

Totally worth it.

And while I'm at it - here's a free DVD called 'In Lies We Trust':





Who's teaching the doctors? Drug firms sponsor required courses - and see their sales rise
by Dan Vergano, USA Today (March 9, 2000)

http://www.pharmadisclose.org/cme/ut000309.html

That's right making profit makes you evil and the only explanation is that it's a conspiracy.
But remember 5 dollars off new customers at iherb!

Sofa_King Good

okay, KM neither of us can conlusively prove our sides.

I am open minden either way, as is Indonesia's Health Minister who accused the US of having intentions to use bird flu samples to create a biological weapon.

But hypothetically speaking, if there has to be large scale quarantines of sufferers. How do you think this would be enforced?

King Mob

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

okay, KM neither of us can conlusively prove our sides.

I am open minden either way, as is Indonesia's Health Minister who accused the US of having intentions to use bird flu samples to create a biological weapon.

I am open minded, I just need some decent proof first.

Sofa_King Good wrote: »

But hypothetically speaking, if there has to be large scale quarantines of sufferers. How do you think this would be enforced?

But large scale quarantines are unlikely especially given the relatively small number of cases and
the effectiveness of vaccination programes.

Kernel

King Mob wrote: »

I am open minded, I just need some decent proof first.

No you're not.

mysterious

Kernel wrote: »

No you're not.

lmao.. I've said it before, KM why do you just sit there all the time waitng for other people to prove things all the time, You never actually show your own research. And In all the time I'm here, Ive never even seen you have any energy to actually give evidence against someone in order to prove something.

This is something I haven't seen in other conspiracy forums, I know alot of people would get rightly pissed off after a while constantly having to back up every single word, even the obvious. Even STILL, you'd say oh thats not enough. lol/ Pricesless I tell ya.

Not everything in life can be proven, not everthing in science can prove what is. Science cannot prove why we exist. Evidence can be given to a theory, But since it's a theory it has still to be proven for either argument.

If there were proof about bird flu and all the jazz that came with it, the governmetns and secret coporations would be found out. They create this in secret.

Thats the whole idea of a secret.

I'm still luahging at him saying open minded though.

J_Kerr

mysterious wrote: »

lmao.. I've said it before, KM why do you just sit there all the time waitng for other people to prove things all the time, You never actually show your own research. And In all the time I'm here, Ive never even seen you have any energy to actually give evidence against someone in order to prove something.

This is something I haven't seen in other conspiracy forums, I know alot of people would get rightly pissed off after a while constantly having to back up every single word, even the obvious. Even STILL, you'd say oh thats not enough. lol/ Pricesless I tell ya.

Not everything in life can be proven, not everthing in science can prove what is. Science cannot prove why we exist. Evidence can be given to a theory, But since it's a theory it has still to be proven for either argument.

If there were proof about bird flu and all the jazz that came with it, the governmetns and secret coporations would be found out. They create this in secret.

Thats the whole idea of a secret.

I'm still luahging at him saying open minded though.

You can be open minded to the point your brain falls out.

6th

Any more personal comments will result in infractions/bans. Thats to everyone.

King Mob

Still waiting for any evidence or reasoning to show that this flu was made by the NWO.

All I see is a lot of hand waving and jumping to the conclusion.

Iang87

completely new to this forum and i'm wondering is the current swine flu a hybrid of the bird flu. Just read on wiki there it sort of is but like no1 can trust wiki you know.

I'm asking cos it goes hand in hand with the thread title

Kernel

Iang87 wrote: »

completely new to this forum and i'm wondering is the current swine flu a hybrid of the bird flu. Just read on wiki there it sort of is but like no1 can trust wiki you know.

I'm asking cos it goes hand in hand with the thread title

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H1N1

Ask yourself the question what is the HIV virus and you'll have some good fun. Start reading here:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread59990/pg1

and

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread59987/pg1

Donald Rumsfeld made a killing on buying shares in...Tamiflu.:D

bonkey

Iang87 wrote: »

completely new to this forum and i'm wondering is the current swine flu a hybrid of the bird flu.

I guess that depends on what you mean by "a hybrid".

As far as I'm aware, all of the publically-available information at the moment says that the current H1N1 swine flu has genetic material from both avian and human influenza virii.

Note that "avian flu" is a classification of influenza, and is not necessarily the H5N1 strain that has been making headlines these past few years (although I don't rule out that it is this). From what I've been reading, the outbreak in Mexico is what's called a "reassortment" of various A-strain H1N1 virii...predominantly swine, but also human and avian. If that's accurate, then there is no connection to the H5N1 avian flu.

nodolan

Jake1 wrote: »

Donald Rumsfeld made a killing on buying shares in...Tamiflu.:D

Yes he did:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-rumsfeld-makes-5m-killing-on-bird-flu-drug-469599.html

Of course there's no grounds for conspiracy there - it's sheer coincidence. Just like the best way to test new weapons is to have a war in which to test them - no government would ever actually cause a war to do such a thing...would they?

bonkey

nodolan wrote: »

Yes he did:

Gilead was formed in 1987, and Rumsfeld was on the board by 1988.
Tamiflu wasn't invented until several years later.

It would be more accurate to say that Rumsfeld made a killing by having a significant investment in the company that went on to develop and license Tamiflu.

nodolan

Okay...

And it's a sheer coincidence that he and his cronies made a killing from the Iraq War through Halliburton.

And it's a sheer coincidence that the Project For A New American Century was founded in 1997 years before 9/11 and the Iraq War so it had no hand or part in anything despite its publicly declared goals for total world domination by the USA (signed by them and still available on the web).

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

So many coincidences

edit: Oh, 'coincidentally' Rumsfeld became the Chair of the board of Gilead in...guess the year...that's right...1997 - same year as the PNAC statement.

mysterious

nodolan wrote: »

Okay...

And it's a sheer coincidence that he and his cronies made a killing from the Iraq War through Halliburton.

And it's a sheer coincidence that the Project For A New American Century was founded in 1997 years before 9/11 and the Iraq War so it had no hand or part in anything despite it's publicly declared goals for total world domination by the USA (signed by them and still available on the web).

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

So many coincidences

Usually one coincidence leads to another.


Do we take note of them or do we keep dismissing, oh it's just another coincidence.

Is there something grey we never learn. Is there something in black and white we never dicern. Is there nothing else to turn?

If there is nothing else, we will just burn.

nodolan

Here's another coincidence:

http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2009/04/20/flu-pandemic-stockpile.html

Tamiflu resistance prompts Canada to change drugs in pandemic stockpile
Last Updated: Monday, April 20, 2009

Canada will adjust the mix of antiviral drugs in an emergency pandemic stockpile this year, a response to concerns over the vulnerability of the main drug in the arsenal, Tamiflu, to the development of viral resistance.

So Tamiflu may actually make things worse.

Not to mention the possible side-effects of Tamiflu (from the FDA website):

# Roche and FDA informed healthcare professionals of neuropsychiatric events associated with the use of Tamiflu, in patients with influenza. (Posted 3/4/2008)
# Postmarketing reports (mostly from Japan) of self-injury and delirium with the use of Tamiflu in patients with influenza. (Posted 11/13/2006)

So if the flu doesn't kill you, you might kill yourself anyway. It's interesting that the FDA website gives extremely detailed info to medical practitioners regarding the side-effects of Tamflu but on their Patient page they only give half a dozen or so:

* nausea
* vomiting
* diarrhea
* bronchitis
* stomach pain
* dizziness
* headache

and tell you to discuss it with your doctor. Plus it's liable to be totally ineffective or even kill people with already compromised immune systems.

Not a single mention of that in any news report that I've read the last two days (and I've read a lot of them).

bonkey

nodolan wrote: »

Okay...

And it's a sheer coincidence that he and his cronies made a killing from the Iraq War through Halliburton.

And it's a sheer coincidence that the Project For A New American Century was founded in 1997 years before 9/11 and the Iraq War so it had no hand or part in anything despite its publicly declared goals for total world domination by the USA (signed by them and still available on the web).

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

So many coincidences

edit: Oh, 'coincidentally' Rumsfeld became the Chair of the board of Gilead in...guess the year...that's right...1997 - same year as the PNAC statement.

I don't see the relevance to this thread. I was adding detail to the somewhat inaccurate claim that Rumsfeld bought shares in "Tamiflu" (which is a product, not a company).

I don't see what the problem is. None of this seems to contradict what I said...and only serves to bring us further away from the fact that the point I was addressing was inaccurate.

If Rumsfeld is so obviously guilty, then there's no need to misconstrue facts. He didn't "buy shares in Tamiflu". He invested in a tech company long before they had Tamiflu.

mysterious

bonkey wrote: »

I don't see the relevance to this thread. I was adding detail to the somewhat inaccurate claim that Rumsfeld bought shares in "Tamiflu" (which is a product, not a company).

I don't see what the problem is. None of this seems to contradict what I said...and only serves to bring us further away from the fact that the point I was addressing was inaccurate.

If Rumsfeld is so obviously guilty, then there's no need to misconstrue facts. He didn't "buy shares in Tamiflu". He invested in a tech company long before they had Tamiflu.

Yes, but Bonkey it's Donalds Rumsfield, he seems to be in every conspiracy these days.

I just got the f**** chills when I seen him on t.v Sept 10th 2001, when I seen planes and rise in millitary spending I knew something bad was going to happen. No i didn't predict 9/11.

But Donalds Rumsfield is a wretching parasite. He is just a creep, I'm not surprised hes tied to this or mentioned as a result.

nodolan

So what exactly is the difference in owning shares in a company and owning shares in a company that produces Tamiflu (well it actually licenses the production to Roche).

The point isn't that he invested in a company long before they had Tamiflu (we don't actually know when they 'knew' they had Tamiflu BTW, they may have had it in a crude form back in the 80s) - the point is that he profited immensely not long after he became director of the company and the federal government that he was a part of was one of the biggest purchasers of Tamiflu (and the biggest fear monger regarding Avian Flu) and he still holds a Gilead stake valued at between $5 million and $25 million, according to federal financial disclosures filed by Rumsfeld.

nodolan

And again I repeat this point - the WHO, mostly controlled by US interests (placed there by GWB and his cronies) - is promoting Tamiflu as the most effective drug against this 'new' flu yet the Canadian government has said that it may actually make things worse as it is vulnerable (by its construction) to making the virus immune to it.

nyarlothothep

Someone on this forum mentioned the Biden prediction. I said it would come to pass in 6 months because that's what he said. Well its 6 months now, I believe this is the "test" he mentioned.

King Mob

nyarlothothep wrote: »

Someone on this forum mentioned the Biden prediction. I said it would come to pass in 6 months because that's what he said. Well its 6 months now, I believe this is the "test" he mentioned.

Yea it was nice of him to leave his "prediction" nice and vague so it could apply to anything.

nyarlothothep

King Mob wrote: »

Yea it was nice of him to leave his "prediction" nice and vague so it could apply to anything.

The timing has worked out.

mysterious

nyarlothothep wrote: »

Someone on this forum mentioned the Biden prediction. I said it would come to pass in 6 months because that's what he said. Well its 6 months now, I believe this is the "test" he mentioned.

Seems like the elite are a bunch of self interest mobs with the only interest of creatinf fear.

Debunks the whle notion of what a leader is these days, leaders spread fear now. So oblivian, they tell you something bad is going to happen, and then do nothing about it in all the time they knew.

Its madness.:mad:

mysterious

King Mob wrote: »

Yea it was nice of him to leave his "prediction" nice and vague so it could apply to anything.

and ding dong , its fits saddle on the donkey, what else do you expect. Tell everyone what it was, god KM seriousy think about what you just wrote.

nyarlothothep

2012, its going to be first contact or something similarly big. We're nearing it now. Expect more craziness.

6th

Ok so if he knew why then would he predict it rather than just annouce it and give people a chance to protect themselves?

If he really knew them he seems to just want to get people to think he's great rather than actually make a difference?