Are you in danger?

6th

Ok a bit extreme probably but does anyone here believe that they are in danger or could be in danger due to information they have?

For the record, for me its a "no".

Veni Vedi Vici

That's a negative from me too.

Veni Vedi Vici

Hmm. Would anyone whose likley to answer the question with a 'yes' be highlighting themselves as a 'culprit' (or whatever word correctly applies)?

In other words, wouldn't it be in the better interests of those could answer 'yes' to actually answer 'no'?

6th

A good point but some of these people belive they are putting out information that will expose people who are responsible for thousands of deaths etc. Surely attempting to expose these people is dangerous?

Veni Vedi Vici

I think the average CT'er will base his / her level of fear on the collective rather than themselves as an individual.

e.g. "If hundreds of other's of CT'ers are discussing this Conspiracy Theory A without reprimand then surely I can."

humanji

Well Mysterious was forever claiming he had information that would save the world, but he wouldn't share it. So there's one, at least.

Undergod

humanji wrote: »

Well Mysterious was forever claiming he had information that would save the world, but he wouldn't share it. So there's one, at least.

Haven't seen him in a while actually.

Must be a conspiracy.

jackiebrown

Undergod wrote: »

Haven't seen him in a while actually.

Must be a conspiracy.

As usual he's banned, keep the faith Mysterious.

I'm with VVV, its more a collective danger. I'd say a more pertanent question would be "Do you believe there are forces behind the scenes trying to keep us divided and living in fear?". For the record, Yes.

6th

Lads dicussing another user who doesnt currently have access to the forum isnt exactly fair. No more of it please.

meglome

jackiebrown wrote: »

As usual he's banned, keep the faith Mysterious.

I'm with VVV, its more a collective danger. I'd say a more pertanent question would be "Do you believe there are forces behind the scenes trying to keep us divided and living in fear?". For the record, Yes.

You'd have to keep an eye on whomever banned him, that person is obviously trying to hide the truth.

And I know naughtin... and not the slightest bit threatened either way.

meglome

jackiebrown wrote: »

I'd say a more pertanent question would be "Do you believe there are forces behind the scenes trying to keep us divided and living in fear?". For the record, Yes.

Funnily I kinda agree with you here. With so many people on the internet scaremongering about just about anything you can think of the world seems to be a far more scary place. No government would need to scaremonger much at all, there's plenty of others to do it for them.

jackiebrown

meglome wrote: »

Funnily I kinda agree with you here. With so many people on the internet scaremongering about just about anything you can think of the world seems to be a far more scary place. No government would need to scaremonger much at all, there's plenty of others to do it for them.

Clever:rolleyes:

Veni Vedi Vici

I think there exists a type of 'conspiracy theorist' who revels in the notion of being in danger akin to a fleeting and romantacized day-dream.

This is what fundamentally separates the theorist from the sensationalist.

jackiebrown

Veni Vedi Vici wrote: »

I think there exists a type of 'conspiracy theorist' who revels in the notion of being in danger akin to a fleeting and romantacized day-dream.

This is what fundamentally separates the theorist from the sensationalist.

Can we get a conspiracy sensation forum please:D.

meglome

jackiebrown wrote: »

Clever:rolleyes:

Worse than that... true

meglome

Veni Vedi Vici wrote: »

I think there exists a type of 'conspiracy theorist' who revels in the notion of being in danger akin to a fleeting and romantacized day-dream.

This is what fundamentally separates the theorist from the sensationalist.

Actually that is a good point, I've suggested a few people were fantasists but sensationalist works for me too.

jackiebrown

meglome wrote: »

Worse than that... true

True for you. Obvious to me that as long as your ok the blinkers are on. Forget about all the crap thats happening.

Me: But megs there's people starving to death everyday but in Europe we have food mountains going to waste.

Megs: La la la cant hear you. The world was worse before la la la.

Me: But the USA said there were WMDs in Iraq and none were found. It was just to get oil.

Megs: La la la cant hear you proof proof proof la la la.

Me: Bertie Ahern flat out lied when he said he didn't recieve monies?

Megs: La la la cant hear you evrythings fine, no problems, the world is great everyones happy no genocide no famine no unjust wars no greed no inequality la la la.

Me: Night night sweet innocent megs.

Veni Vedi Vici

meglome wrote: »

fantasists but sensationalist .

Same vein no less. An exemplary question to ask oneself would be whether one becomes excited or repulsed at the concept of an elite squad charging through ones abode and detaining one and ones family?

@jackiebrown: 'Conspiracy Sensation' just sounds like a sex product. A fitting slogan: 'You never know what'll be inside the box!'. :rolleyes::D

6th

Off topic posting can lead to infractions/bans.

jackiebrown

Veni Vedi Vici wrote: »

@jackiebrown: 'Conspiracy Sensation' just sounds like a sex product. A fitting slogan: 'You never know what'll be inside the box!'. :rolleyes::D

Or "Illuminati your sex life":D:D:p:(

I'll get me coat.

6th

You may hve to if you post off topic after an in thread warning

meglome

jackiebrown wrote: »

True for you. Obvious to me that as long as your ok the blinkers are on. Forget about all the crap thats happening.

Me: But megs there's people starving to death everyday but in Europe we have food mountains going to waste.

Megs: La la la cant hear you. The world was worse before la la la.

Me: But the USA said there were WMDs in Iraq and none were found. It was just to get oil.

Megs: La la la cant hear you proof proof proof la la la.

Me: Bertie Ahern flat out lied when he said he didn't recieve monies?

Megs: La la la cant hear you evrythings fine, no problems, the world is great everyones happy no genocide no famine no unjust wars no greed no inequality la la la.

Me: Night night sweet innocent megs.

So yet more assumptions to prove a point eh?

• We have extra food, but it costs a lot of money to move that food. And that's exactly what we should be doing making people dependent on their benign European overlords, right?
• Nope no WMD's, did anyone believe that was their reason for going to war with Iraq? I didn't.
• Sure I believe a guy that has brown bags full of money lying around and has no even remotely good explanation as to here they came from. His head should have rolled as soon as this came out but instead people were patting him on the back. Really pissed me off.

So it would appear you were completely wrong with your assumptions.

jackiebrown

Not nice when people make assumptions is it? I'll furnish you with the evidence on monday. Enjoy your weekend.

BertrandMeyer

Ah the old adage, "innocent till proven guilty". In fairness, the world might end tomorrow, but the government's not some faceless monster - it's just ordinary people. So in theory more people are able to access the records now but all access is logged now which wasn't the case before. My friends put up a point of everything online being possibly viewed by anybody... isn't the same true for national databases?

6th

Ok so does anyone believe they are in danger because of what they know or believe?

blinding

Just because I am paranoid does not mean that someone is not trying to get me !

Veni Vedi Vici

6th wrote: »

Ok so does anyone believe they are in danger because of what they know or believe?

What percentage of people from this forum did you anticpate would answer yes?

Undergod

6th wrote: »

Lads dicussing another user who doesnt currently have access to the forum isnt exactly fair. No more of it please.

Apologies, didn't know he was banned.

Eh, I reckon any information that I would be able to access wouldn't be sensitive enough to be a danger to me.

meglome

Veni Vedi Vici wrote: »

What percentage of people from this forum did you anticpate would answer yes?

And yet we have lot's of people making all sorts of claims. You'd think if we'd so much to fear from the NWO etc we wouldn't be able to say pretty much what we like.

jonbravo

6th wrote: »

Ok a bit extreme probably but does anyone here believe that they are in danger or could be in danger due to information they have?

For the record, for me its a "no".

[their] in danger!? what if i was to say yes but i don't wish to discuss because it's not a conspiracy!? it's 2 wild a question....to answer. what kind of info are you after!?

Veni Vedi Vici

meglome wrote: »

Veni Vedi Vici wrote: »

What percentage of people from this forum did you anticpate would answer yes?

And yet we have lot's of people making all sorts of claims. You'd think if we'd so much to fear from the NWO etc we wouldn't be able to say pretty much what we like.

Not sure if you were answering my question there. I'd literally like to know what percentage of folk around 6th anticipated to believe they could be in danger. I would have thought 20%.

If the question was 'do you think you eventually could be in danger discussing various articles pertaining to 'sensitive' theories then maybe that percentage could be a little higher.

I think I have already addressed your most recent post though:

Veni Vedi Vici wrote: »

Hmm. Would anyone whose likley to answer the question with a 'yes' be highlighting themselves as a 'culprit' (or whatever word correctly applies)?

In other words, wouldn't it be in the better interests of those could answer 'yes' to actually answer 'no'?

Veni Vedi Vici wrote: »

I think the average CT'er will base his / her level of fear on the collective rather than themselves as an individual.

e.g. "If hundreds of other's of CT'ers are discussing this Conspiracy Theory A without reprimand then surely I can."

meglome

Veni Vedi Vici wrote: »

Not sure if you were answering my question there. I'd literally like to know what percentage of folk around 6th anticipated to believe they could be in danger. I would have thought 20%.

If the question was 'do you think you eventually could be in danger discussing various articles pertaining to 'sensitive' theories then maybe that percentage could be a little higher.

How much danger do individuals feel they are in? Well that's a very subjective question and each individual will feel how much that is to them. But in reality there may be no actual danger at all, they just feel there is. We'd need to look at how many people have been threatened in some way or warned off a story and as far as I know there isn't anyone.

Mysterious told us he 'knew the truth' so maybe we could ask him. You never know it mightn't just be a messiah complex.

bonkey

Of course...someone who thought they might be in danger would also have reasons not to come out and say as much...

jackiebrown

I think we're in danger but I'm not afraid.

6th

jackiebrown wrote: »

I think we're in danger but I'm not afraid.

In danger of what?

I really dont mean these as loaded questions etc, as I've said before I'm probably more interested in CTers than I am in CTs

jackiebrown

6th wrote: »

In danger of what?

In danger of stalling, of being too cowardly to stand up to tyranny and greed. In danger of ****ting the nest when scare stories come on and letting corporations further erode our civil liberties. In danger of living at 100 mph and leaving a dead rock floating in space for our children to inherit. In danger of watching people starving and babies dying and thinking "Well we're OK, praise god". In danger of getting caught up in some stupid ego battle between a few men and asking the many to pay the price. In danger of losing hope.

I was scared for years. Of my teachers, the cops, the boogeyman, of dying but not anymore. I'm up for it.

meglome

bonkey wrote: »

Of course...someone who thought they might be in danger would also have reasons not to come out and say as much...

Very true. But the fact remains that we pretty much say what we like in here, no matter how outrageous. So either lots of us are very brave or maybe there isn't much danger.

feoil

"All that is required for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing",

Let's assume for a moment that the CTers (of which I am one) are on the right track and that there actually is a secret cabal of luciferians pulling the strings from behind the scenes. Well then yes i am afraid, because the plan seems to be to starve us and there ain't enough bunnies on that there hill to feed everybody.

On the other hand, there's alot of "Tom Clancy" novels being posted out there as fact which has in fairness created a mire of disinfo and scaremongering, therefore I am not afraid.

But forewarned is forarmed as they say, and I think I'm prepared for most things (a tidal wave might catch me out though:D). Some water, food and diesel stashed away along with plenty ammo of course. I did put down a few rows of spuds too. Whether you believe the conspiracies or not, prepare for a depression because that is a real and tangible fear!

blackgold>>

I think your deluded 6th
Why do you feel this little bit of the web is important?It's only an internet forum relax...
If anyone feels their in danger then it's not because they post on here lol.

6th

blackgold>> wrote: »

I think your deluded 6th
Why do you feel this little bit of the web is important?It's only an internet forum relax...
If anyone feels their in danger then it's not because they post on here lol.

I didnt mean because of here, I presume some people put their views across in real life as well as on here. If I took the internet too seriously I would have logged off a decade ago

blackgold>>

I got the feeling from your posts that you placed massive importance on this forum when you asked the question hehe.I doubt you'll get in danger from posting your views on here.:)

espinolman

meglome wrote: »

Very true. But the fact remains that we pretty much say what we like in here, no matter how outrageous. So either lots of us are very brave or maybe there isn't much danger.

I don't say what i would like to say in here .

blackgold>>

espinolman wrote:

It is so obvious to me that people are afraid to discuss certain things in this forum , l know things i would not dream of posting here , stuff about 9/11 .etc. that i found out.
I don't say what i would like to say in here .

Oh come on now. You don't know nothing we don't know... I don't think anyone would believe what you just said above. Quite funny actually

espinolman

blackgold>> wrote: »

Oh come on now. You don't know nothing we don't know... I don't think anyone would believe what you just said above. Quite funny actually

I know things .:cool:

blackgold>>

It's always a good quality in a human being to pass on what one knows so as others can learn.Keeping the one inch punch to yourself, is not nice.....

Volvagia

espinolman wrote: »

I don't say what i would like to say in here .

What is stopping you?

Do you actually think someone or something will happen to you if you share what you know?

thecommander

espinolman wrote: »

Yea , i started a free energy thread here a while ago , and i was researching it on the internet and came across something , after that i just could'nt be bothered discussing it anymore

Cos you believed you were in danger, or cos you couldn't be bothered?

blackgold>>

I'd go with the first assessment .

mysterious

I'M BACK

Someone said, earlier that I have knowledge to save the world, Yes I do, but I cant save you, You have to save you. I know how the world can be saved. But the point is i know how it's supposed to go.;)


Now to the question, Am I in danger, Not if I master my reality. It's about law of attraction. That something I've yet to master. Polarisation is something we do lot in this world:mad: Trying to regain balance.


To be honest, I don't think I'm in danger, because I know my purpose on earth anyway. I've gotten sling shot from all over the cosmos already.:) I know just as much the ones out there are already telling the world pubically. The reptillan power system know they can't anilate every threat to expose reality. Infact they are standing back now. lol Reptiles and humonoid for the first time are beggining to mirror aspects of each other. Yet both the opposite of each other. But both are recognising on a deep soul counciousness collective they have to integrate on this planet.

My hope that more will follow.

The soul never dies.

blackgold>>

Sounds to me like you enjoy astral projection young man....

mysterious

blackgold>> wrote: »

Sounds to me like you enjoy astral projection young man....

Its in all of you,

It's just all coming right back to me. It's not easy, If you open all the windows, you have to remember to close them afterwoulds.

But the feeling is amazing with the knowing.:)