Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

I am paying more for somebodys public sector pension than my own Private pension

Options
2456725

Comments

  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,993 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    gazzer wrote: »
    Use this example of a person with a spouse and this is assuming this person retired this year and so didnt even pay the pension levy but has paid the 6.5% of their salary towards their pension. Say an average wage of 30,000. Thats 1950 a year over 40 years = 78000. Say your wage on retirement is 700 a week. Thats approx 36000 a year. One and half times that salary is 54000. That means that you lost 24000. Remember with this calculation I havnt even added the new pension levy.
    Are you averaging the wage over 40 years there? Seems excessively high if your retirement wage is only 35k. It also still excludes the fact the wage would rise after retirement. Now admittedly so too could the SW pension.

    It's also true in this example only if you have a spouse.

    I must try and knock up some figures on this as most of the examples so far have excluded interest and wage rises over the years in them. They're a bit simplistic (from both sides) so it's hard to get a clear picture on how well it's be for say an average executive officer. We keep hearing from numerous sources how good it is, but I'd like to see for myself (using a rather crude data set but I'm not actuary).


  • Registered Users Posts: 212 ✭✭steof1984


    Also if your a single person with a public sector pension and you die at 66 your pension is gone.

    If you have a private pension it goes to your estate.

    For people at the top earning €150k plus Yes Public sector pensions are amazing they will get their lump sum and 50% of their final wage

    for the majoirty of Public Servents its not all that great

    If you leave the CS at the top scale of a CO €38000 you will get
    Lump Sum: €57,000 (1.5 X €38,000)
    Pension: € 19,000 (.5 X € 38,000) this also includes your state pension €12.5k

    So you get €6.5k a year for your 40 years of pension contributions.

    A CO will pay approx €125 000 over 40 years in Pension, PRSI

    so at the most they will be lucky if they break even

    BTW Jimmy that primetime show was totally leveraged against the Public Sector workers . I did an interview for that show and i broke the pay down just like above and it didnt even make it to Air . So please read the facts and dont expect the media to do it for you . They might smudge the facts for their own agenda.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭gazzer


    ixoy wrote: »
    Are you averaging the wage over 40 years there? Seems excessively high if your retirement wage is only 35k. It also still excludes the fact the wage would rise after retirement. Now admittedly so too could the SW pension.

    It's also true in this example only if you have a spouse.

    I must try and knock up some figures on this as most of the examples so far have excluded interest and wage rises over the years in them. They're a bit simplistic (from both sides) so it's hard to get a clear picture on how well it's be for say an average executive officer. We keep hearing from numerous sources how good it is, but I'd like to see for myself (using a rather crude data set but I'm not actuary).


    I used the figure of 30,000 as it is the current mid points (approx) of the starting salary and top pay scale of a CO.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭gazzer


    Lets look at this pension issue another way.

    If a private sector worker who has a spouse and who never had a private pension (and who paid PRSI while working) retired today he would get 406.30 per week. This equates to 21127.60 a year.

    A Clerical Officer (CO) in the Civil Service retires today. His salary after 40 years service is 37,584 which equates to 720.27 a week.

    The CO is entitled to half his salary as a weekly pension so he is entitled to 18792 a year. Now look at the private sector worker again. His yearly pension is worth 21127.60 a year. Almost 2,500 grand a year in the difference. Now as far as I know the CO would be entitled to the full state pension so his pension should be the same as the Private Sector guy, however my point is that for all the pension contributions the CO has made he doesnt get any weekly benefit for it.

    He of course gets a lump sum of 56,376 (37,584 x 1.5) but he/she has made weekly contributions for this for 40 years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 761 ✭✭✭grahamo


    I see the public sector bashers are now conspicuous by their absence. They can't dispute the figures in this thread so I think the public sector bashers have lost this debate.:)
    Could it be time for them to go and pick on someone else now;)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,422 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    grahamo wrote: »
    I see the public sector bashers are now conspicuous by their absence. They can't dispute the figures in this thread so I think the public sector bashers have lost this debate.:)
    Could it be time for them to go and pick on someone else now;)

    dont worry, they'll be back. there currently over bashing the Dublin Bus drivers at the moment, tomorrow its the taxi's and i think the PS is scheduled in for a friday bashing :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭jimmmy


    dresden8 wrote: »
    Just to make it clear, yet again, not all public servants earn 300 grand a year.

    Nobody - but nobody - suggested they do. Average public sector pay is 966 per week, plus perks. This is way more than the private sector. As the tv programme said, what the public sector does get is a big proportion of the salary plus the gratuity. This " gratuity " ( as well as the pension ) is not often mentioned by the public sector peopleicon6.gif


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,889 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    grahamo wrote: »
    I see the public sector bashers are now conspicuous by their absence. They can't dispute the figures in this thread so I think the public sector bashers have lost this debate.:)
    Could it be time for them to go and pick on someone else now;)

    Get real and smell the coffee.
    This is whats known in private worker circles as pension apartheid.
    The vast majority of the 357,000 people employed in the public sector are members of a defined-benefit pension scheme which provides a guaranteed 50pc of final salary on retirement.
    Oh yes I forgot......the lump sum of 1.5 times final-year salary.
    This is for a contribution of 6.5% of income per annum plus a levy of 4% after tax relief.
    Pretty good deal if you ask me.
    Now both private and public sector workers pay equitable PRSI, so PRSI is not an issue here.
    If I was to arrange a pension like that for myself in the private sector, I would have to put aside 25+% of my salary until I retire, and depending on how the portfolio does on retirement date, maybe I could pick up a comparable income. NOT a guaranteed income.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭gazzer


    Get real and smell the coffee.
    This is whats known in private worker circles as pension apartheid.
    The vast majority of the 357,000 people employed in the public sector are members of a defined-benefit pension scheme which provides a guaranteed 50pc of final salary on retirement.

    The pension deductions that PS pay is NOT (repeat NOT) for 50 pc of final salary. It is for 50pc of final salary MINUS (repeat MINUS) the State Pension that ALL PRSI payers get.

    Just in case you didnt get that I will repeat it.

    The pension deductions that PS pay is NOT (repeat NOT) for 50 pc of final salary. It is for 50pc of final salary MINUS (repeat MINUS) the State Pension that ALL PRSI payers get.


  • Registered Users Posts: 49 Fergus08


    Get real and smell the coffee.
    This is whats known in private worker circles as pension apartheid.

    What's the cause of that apartheid?? Would it be the tens of thousands of private companies who refuse to extent the company pension scheme to workers?? Where only middle and upper management were given the benefit of, in many cases, a DEFINED BENEFIT PRIVATE SECTOR pension.

    Public sector workers didn't cause pensions apartheid. The private sector business classes did as they knew the state would take up the slack for their disgraceful conduct in not allowing workers access to company schemes. This has been a feature of capitalism for decades.

    10000maniacs should try to explain what she/he means by 'pension apartheid' and offer an explanation of how it arose. If she/he did so it would reveal a far greater problem than the decent-ish pensions the majority of public sector workers enjoy.

    Anyone who begrudges any worker, public or private sector, is acting irresponsibly. Attacking public sector workers for their pensions is not going to provide better pension coverage for those in the private sector.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 291 ✭✭Biffo The Bare


    gazzer wrote: »
    MINUS (repeat MINUS) the State Pension that ALL PRSI payers get.
    Including all public sector workers. :rolleyes:
    You get the state pension too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,889 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Including all public sector workers. :rolleyes:
    You get the state pension too.

    Hmmmm.... Now theres an idea. If only I were in power. Rats.:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭gazzer


    Including all public sector workers. :rolleyes:
    You get the state pension too.


    Eh Yeah :rolleyes: That was the point I was making. All PRSI workers get the state pension. THe pension contributions that PS make ARE NOT for the state pension. The pension contributions that PS's pay on top of their PRSI contributions is for the pension amount that makes up the difference (if any) between the state pension and half the PS's salary on retirement.

    In a lot of cases there is no difference so the only benefit that the PS get from paying the pension contribution is the lump sum payment. 40 years of paying this more than makes up for the lump sum payment


  • Registered Users Posts: 212 ✭✭steof1984


    [QUOTE/] Nobody - but nobody - suggested they do. Average public sector pay is 966 per week, plus perks. This is way more than the private sector. As the tv programme said, what the public sector does get is a big proportion of the salary plus the gratuity. This " gratuity " ( as well as the pension ) is not often mentioned by the public sector people [QUOTE/]

    Average PS pay includes the pay of all politicians , Sec Generals etc who All earn over 100k so they do up the average . Plus its hard compare Private average VS Public Average . As private includes minimum wage jobs which lowers the Private Sector Average

    They don’t get a big proportion of their salary plus gratuity. Look at my last post and come up with a argument against the figures don’t just quote poorly investigated speech bubbles.


    I mentioned the Gratuity as well as the pension. I also mentioned how much it would all be worth and i also mentioned how much they individual pays for it.

    Look over my last post and come up with figures to put holes in what i have said.

    Your either ill informed or plain ignorant and don’t want to open your eyes to the facts because you know then your argument holds no water.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭gazzer


    jimmmy wrote: »
    Nobody - but nobody - suggested they do. Average public sector pay is 966 per week, plus perks. This is way more than the private sector. As the tv programme said, what the public sector does get is a big proportion of the salary plus the gratuity. This " gratuity " ( as well as the pension ) is not often mentioned by the public sector peopleicon6.gif

    In the Civil Service Clerical Officers, Staff Officers and Executive Officers make up the vast vast bulk of staff. None of these grades earn 966 per week. They all earn below this amount. I know you said it is an average figure but for instance in the deparment I work in there are 250 staff (210 CS staff and 40 consultants). 136 of the CS staff are EO grade or below.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,418 ✭✭✭loobylou


    grahamo wrote: »
    I see the public sector bashers are now conspicuous by their absence. They can't dispute the figures in this thread so I think the public sector bashers have lost this debate.:)
    Could it be time for them to go and pick on someone else now;)

    No,they're probably all at work at 16.08 on a Wednesday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 391 ✭✭Naz_st


    grahamo wrote: »
    :rolleyes:Yeah right!
    Have you looked into your claims?
    This has been explained lots of times before. Public sector workers (Post 1995 employees) receive a pension mostly made up of the state pension. If they have 40 years service they will receive a pension worth half salary.
    This means that if they earn 40k a year whilst working they will receive a state pension of 12k. (This is paid for by their PRSI contributions). To bring the pension up to 50% of their salary they then receive a public sector pension of 8k.
    12k plus 8k = 20k = 50% of salary. In return for this princely sum the public sector employee pays 6.5% of income plus a pension levy of around 5%
    plus their PRSI contribution which from the 1st of May will be around 9%.
    We'll leave the PRSI contributions out as everyone gets the state pension (If enough contributions paid).
    I think 11.5 % of 40k per annum will accrue quite a bit of interest by the time it comes to retirement so should easily cover 8 grand a year until the average life expectancy which I believe is about 78 for men.
    Lets work it out, retire at 65, receive pension for 13 years if you are lucky.
    Pension = 8k x 13 years = 104k
    Contributions = upwards of 184k (Then add interest to this)
    even with a lump sum you dont even get back what you put in.!!!
    Please explain how YOU are paying for this
    grahamo wrote: »
    What gift??? What are you talking about? Did you read my post. I explained exactly how a public sector employee pays for his pension and shown that it is MORE than paid for!
    Maybe some people with private pensions should be having a go at their brokers for investing their money badly!
    grahamo wrote: »
    I see the public sector bashers are now conspicuous by their absence. They can't dispute the figures in this thread so I think the public sector bashers have lost this debate.:)
    Could it be time for them to go and pick on someone else now;)

    Your calculations are at best misrepresentative of the facts, but being blunt, they're just plain wrong.

    First of all, using the CO salary scale as representative of the majority of the public sector is completely disingenuous and it simply biases your numbers towards proving your own point. It's also an inaccurate representation, especially since the average public sector wage is currently 50k.

    However, because the average salary and the median salary can vary widely due to a skewing from very high earners, let's look at a more concrete example:

    The STARTING SALARY of a teacher with a good degree is almost 40k (€39,075). However, even if you discount all bonuses for qualifications and just use the basic pay scale, every single teacher in the country, who spent their career teaching fulltime, will be on significantly more than 40k when they retire (€63,360 to be exact).

    So to redo your "calculations" taking into account that workers don't start on the same high salary that they finish on, and using the BASIC teachers pay scale, along with reasonably accurate* calculations of pension contributions, let's see what we come up with:

    Years Employed | Salary | 6.5% Contrib | Pension Levy Contrib % | Total Contrib % | Annual Pension Contribution (€)
    1 €32,599 0.065 0.04875 0.11375 €3,708.14
    2 €33,754 0.065 0.04970 0.11470 €3,871.48
    3 €34,907 0.065 0.05059 0.11559 €4,034.84
    4 €36,068 0.065 0.05143 0.11643 €4,199.35
    5 €37,865 0.065 0.05222 0.11722 €4,438.62
    6 €39,028 0.065 0.05297 0.11797 €4,604.25
    7 €40,194 0.065 0.05368 0.11868 €4,770.39
    8 €43,123 0.065 0.05436 0.11936 €5,147.12
    9 €44,586 0.065 0.04056 0.10556 €4,706.61
    10 €46,336 0.065 0.04101 0.10601 €4,912.18
    11 €48,077 0.065 0.04144 0.10644 €5,117.34
    12 €49,830 0.065 0.04185 0.10685 €5,324.28
    13 €51,297 0.065 0.04224 0.10724 €5,501.02
    14 €53,238 0.065 0.04261 0.10761 €5,729.00
    15 €53,238 0.065 0.04297 0.10797 €5,747.97
    16 €53,238 0.065 0.04331 0.10831 €5,766.13
    17 €55,916 0.065 0.04364 0.10864 €6,074.46
    18 €55,916 0.065 0.04395 0.10895 €6,091.99
    19 €54,916 0.065 0.04425 0.10925 €5,999.57
    20 €55,916 0.065 0.04454 0.10954 €6,124.99
    21 €59,454 0.065 0.04482 0.10982 €6,529.08
    22 €59,454 0.065 0.04508 0.11008 €6,544.99
    23 €59,454 0.065 0.04534 0.11034 €6,560.31
    24 €59,454 0.065 0.04559 0.11059 €6,575.07
    25 €63,360 0.065 0.04583 0.11083 €7,022.21
    26 €63,360 0.065 0.04606 0.11106 €7,036.85
    27 €63,360 0.065 0.04628 0.11128 €7,050.98
    28 €63,360 0.065 0.04650 0.11150 €7,064.64
    29 €63,360 0.065 0.04671 0.11171 €7,077.84
    30 €63,360 0.065 0.04691 0.11191 €7,090.61
    31 €63,360 0.065 0.04710 0.11210 €7,102.96
    32 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    33 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    34 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    35 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    36 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    37 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    38 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    39 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    40 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93

    Total Contributions: €237,851.46
    Retirement Lump Sum: €95,040.00
    Contributions - Lump Sum: €142,811.46
    50% Final Salary: €31,680.00
    State Pension: €11,975.60
    Contributory Pension: €19,704.40
    15yrs** of Pension: €295,566.00
    Total Deficit: -€152,754.54

    So to answer the OPs question, the above calculations would suggest that the taxpayer is subsidising on average €152k for the pension of every fulltime teacher in the country upon retirement. (and that's not even counting the fact that all the currently employed teachers haven't been paying the extra pension levy for all the time they've currently been employed thus far!)
    grahamo wrote: »
    I agree some pensions are good but to say 'Hundreds of thousands' is a bit of a joke.

    Hmmm... well just using the above example, there are over 55k fulltime teachers in Ireland that will gain significantly from these pensions. Couple that with the fact that every Garda in the country along with every prison officer, every lecturer, every doctor, every nurse, the majority of semi-state employees, a significant number of the civil service, the judiciary, and of course the politicians will also finish on significantly more than 40k, and you do have "hundreds of thousands".

    Feel free to do the same exercise on the HSE pay scales (remember, the HSE is the largest employer in the state, with 111k employees). If you don't ignore the facts, you will find a very similar result for all medical staff and the vast majority of the admin staff.

    In summary, the defined benefit public sector pension is A GOOD DEAL for the vast majority of those that contribute to it. For some it's not, but stop trying to pretend that it's only the very high earners that are gaining out of it.

    Lastly, I just threw the above together in excel based on a few google searches and as a rebuttal to what I perceived as a misrepresentation of the public service pension benefits based on a spurious calculation. As such, this is not supposed to be a definitive set of calculations, and I'm happy to be corrected on any of the specifics (esp the calc of pension levy - bloody minefield of gross/net, multiple levels of tax relief etc). I think the central point should remain clear however.

    *based on post-95 employees, calculation of pension levy contribution is: 15k @ 3% + 5k @ 6%, balance @ 10% with tax relief at both 20% and 41% levels calculated

    **this number is taken the average life expectancy in 2002 for Males age 65. Women have a life expectancy of higher than this (18.7 years), so in fact the state deficit is quite a bit worse since the majority of teachers are women, but the central point remains.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,993 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Thanks for the above there - and it doesn't even begin to take into account inflation either.

    The other examples are for the civil service which are actually a pretty small representation of government employees. Be interesting to see if there's a rebuttal of those figures.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭kindajaded


    jimmmy wrote: »
    Nobody - but nobody - suggested they do. Average public sector pay is 966 per week, plus perks. This is way more than the private sector. As the tv programme said, what the public sector does get is a big proportion of the salary plus the gratuity. This " gratuity " ( as well as the pension ) is not often mentioned by the public sector peopleicon6.gif

    now i do not understand this: you keep saying that only private sector workers get lump sums but both of my parents retired in the last few years - mother public service and father private and BOTH got lump sums. he always made more than she did and got a lump sum twice as big (despite apparently being in a fairly high risk pension). so can you please explain this or is my dad the only private sector worker who paid into a pension that entitled him to a lump sum? also - he gets the prsi pension added she does not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭kindajaded


    loobylou wrote: »
    No,they're probably all at work at 16.08 on a Wednesday.

    ya, if they are lucky enough to be working 9-5 jobs like most private sector workers..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    ixoy wrote: »
    Thanks for the above there - and it doesn't even begin to take into account inflation either.

    The other examples are for the civil service which are actually a pretty small representation of government employees. Be interesting to see if there's a rebuttal of those figures.


    No rebuttal required. Some public servants do well.

    All public servants have taken the levies. Even those who will get nothing from their "gilt edged" "gold plated" pensions.

    p.s. Maybe rebuttal required. and that's based on a single person, not a couple with a dependant wife. One size does not fit all.

    206.30 by 52 weeks = 10,727.60 by 15 years = €160,916

    Swings the calculation around.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    kindajaded wrote: »
    also - he gets the prsi pension added she does not.


    Highlight this bit every chance you get.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭kindajaded


    Naz_st wrote: »
    Your calculations are at best misrepresentative of the facts, but being blunt, they're just plain wrong.

    First of all, using the CO salary scale as representative of the majority of the public sector is completely disingenuous and it simply biases your numbers towards proving your own point. It's also an inaccurate representation, especially since the average public sector wage is currently 50k.

    However, because the average salary and the median salary can vary widely due to a skewing from very high earners, let's look at a more concrete example:

    The STARTING SALARY of a teacher with a good degree is almost 40k (€39,075). However, even if you discount all bonuses for qualifications and just use the basic pay scale, every single teacher in the country, who spent their career teaching fulltime, will be on significantly more than 40k when they retire (€63,360 to be exact).

    So to redo your "calculations" taking into account that workers don't start on the same high salary that they finish on, and using the BASIC teachers pay scale, along with reasonably accurate* calculations of pension contributions, let's see what we come up with:

    Years Employed | Salary | 6.5% Contrib | Pension Levy Contrib % | Total Contrib % | Annual Pension Contribution (€)
    1 €32,599 0.065 0.04875 0.11375 €3,708.14
    2 €33,754 0.065 0.04970 0.11470 €3,871.48
    3 €34,907 0.065 0.05059 0.11559 €4,034.84
    4 €36,068 0.065 0.05143 0.11643 €4,199.35
    5 €37,865 0.065 0.05222 0.11722 €4,438.62
    6 €39,028 0.065 0.05297 0.11797 €4,604.25
    7 €40,194 0.065 0.05368 0.11868 €4,770.39
    8 €43,123 0.065 0.05436 0.11936 €5,147.12
    9 €44,586 0.065 0.04056 0.10556 €4,706.61
    10 €46,336 0.065 0.04101 0.10601 €4,912.18
    11 €48,077 0.065 0.04144 0.10644 €5,117.34
    12 €49,830 0.065 0.04185 0.10685 €5,324.28
    13 €51,297 0.065 0.04224 0.10724 €5,501.02
    14 €53,238 0.065 0.04261 0.10761 €5,729.00
    15 €53,238 0.065 0.04297 0.10797 €5,747.97
    16 €53,238 0.065 0.04331 0.10831 €5,766.13
    17 €55,916 0.065 0.04364 0.10864 €6,074.46
    18 €55,916 0.065 0.04395 0.10895 €6,091.99
    19 €54,916 0.065 0.04425 0.10925 €5,999.57
    20 €55,916 0.065 0.04454 0.10954 €6,124.99
    21 €59,454 0.065 0.04482 0.10982 €6,529.08
    22 €59,454 0.065 0.04508 0.11008 €6,544.99
    23 €59,454 0.065 0.04534 0.11034 €6,560.31
    24 €59,454 0.065 0.04559 0.11059 €6,575.07
    25 €63,360 0.065 0.04583 0.11083 €7,022.21
    26 €63,360 0.065 0.04606 0.11106 €7,036.85
    27 €63,360 0.065 0.04628 0.11128 €7,050.98
    28 €63,360 0.065 0.04650 0.11150 €7,064.64
    29 €63,360 0.065 0.04671 0.11171 €7,077.84
    30 €63,360 0.065 0.04691 0.11191 €7,090.61
    31 €63,360 0.065 0.04710 0.11210 €7,102.96
    32 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    33 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    34 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    35 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    36 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    37 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    38 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    39 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93
    40 €63,360 0.065 0.04729 0.11229 €7,114.93

    Total Contributions: €237,851.46
    Retirement Lump Sum: €95,040.00
    Contributions - Lump Sum: €142,811.46
    50% Final Salary: €31,680.00
    State Pension: €11,975.60
    Contributory Pension: €19,704.40
    15yrs** of Pension: €295,566.00
    Total Deficit: -€152,754.54

    So to answer the OPs question, the above calculations would suggest that the taxpayer is subsidising on average €152k for the pension of every fulltime teacher in the country upon retirement. (and that's not even counting the fact that all the currently employed teachers haven't been paying the extra pension levy for all the time they've currently been employed thus far!)



    Hmmm... well just using the above example, there are over 55k fulltime teachers in Ireland that will gain significantly from these pensions. Couple that with the fact that every Garda in the country along with every prison officer, every lecturer, every doctor, every nurse, the majority of semi-state employees, a significant number of the civil service, the judiciary, and of course the politicians will also finish on significantly more than 40k, and you do have "hundreds of thousands".

    Feel free to do the same exercise on the HSE pay scales (remember, the HSE is the largest employer in the state, with 111k employees). If you don't ignore the facts, you will find a very similar result for all medical staff and the vast majority of the admin staff.

    In summary, the defined benefit public sector pension is A GOOD DEAL for the vast majority of those that contribute to it. For some it's not, but stop trying to pretend that it's only the very high earners that are gaining out of it.

    Lastly, I just threw the above together in excel based on a few google searches and as a rebuttal to what I perceived as a misrepresentation of the public service pension benefits based on a spurious calculation. As such, this is not supposed to be a definitive set of calculations, and I'm happy to be corrected on any of the specifics (esp the calc of pension levy - bloody minefield of gross/net, multiple levels of tax relief etc). I think the central point should remain clear however.

    *based on post-95 employees, calculation of pension levy contribution is: 15k @ 3% + 5k @ 6%, balance @ 10% with tax relief at both 20% and 41% levels calculated

    **this number is taken the average life expectancy in 2002 for Males age 65. Women have a life expectancy of higher than this (18.7 years), so in fact the state deficit is quite a bit worse since the majority of teachers are women, but the central point remains.

    HERE IS YOUR REBUTTAL:

    A/ you omitted prsi contributions
    B/ MOST IMPORTANTLY: ALL pension funds go up in value to the tune of 10s to 100s of thousands from the contributions made. WHY ELSE WOULD PEOPLE JOIN THEM?? This is just a fact and if you don't realise this then I assume you are just hiding your money under the bed or investing it in property
    C/ Many private funds pay out a lump sum
    D/ FINGLETON


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭kindajaded


    ixoy wrote: »
    Thanks for the above there - and it doesn't even begin to take into account inflation either.

    The other examples are for the civil service which are actually a pretty small representation of government employees. Be interesting to see if there's a rebuttal of those figures.

    I should also point out that until the recession hit private sector pensions were also good value and some of the lower risk ones still are.
    The fact that the markets have messed all this up only means that maybe there should be some discussion around de-privatising the whole industry - but I doubt most private sector people would be in favour of this kind of leftiness.


  • Registered Users Posts: 212 ✭✭steof1984


    No one here is denying Public Sector workers have good pensions and HAD great ones pre 95

    But now the facts are

    Public Sector workers can not claim State Pension aswell as their Pension. Private sector workers can . this is about €12 k a year

    Public Sector workers pay between 12% and 15% towards their pension

    The pension a Public Sector worker gets is similar to a private pension in a decent company

    There are a lot more conditions now with Public Sector pensions

    They can not pass on their pension to their estate if they die.

    They must pay widows and orphans even if they are single

    Like everything the more you earn the more you get. People on high wages get good pensions but not all Public Sector worker Leaves on a high wage

    For the majority of Public Sector workers their pension will just about allow them to enjoy their golden years.

    This was not as much of an issue when the Private Sector pensions were doing well and people were getting their tax relief on the amounts they put in. But now because people are feeling the pinch they want everyone else to feel the pinch.

    Can i ask would you take joy in knowing your Private Sector neighbour looses his pension. What difference would that make to your day to day life


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,993 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    kindajaded wrote: »
    now i do not understand this: you keep saying that only private sector workers get lump sums but both of my parents retired in the last few years - mother public service and father private and BOTH got lump sums. he always made more than she did and got a lump sum twice as big (despite apparently being in a fairly high risk pension). so can you please explain this or is my dad the only private sector worker who paid into a pension that entitled him to a lump sum? also - he gets the prsi pension added she does not.
    Umm didn't he get a high lump sum because he was in a high-risk pension rather than despite that? He took a gamble and it paid off.

    Do you know how well it paid out after that though? Did he take it all in a lump sum or some mixture?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭kindajaded


    ixoy wrote: »
    Umm didn't he get a high lump sum because he was in a high-risk pension rather than despite that? He took a gamble and it paid off.

    Do you know how well it paid out after that though? Did he take it all in a lump sum or some mixture?

    It was twice what she got and a much bigger pension when you add the state bit. And if you spread a big lump sum difference over 10 years or even 15 years it works well.

    I agree though that risk is the issue. He was lucky. If people really want security instead of the big payouts then they have to start looking at different ways of working pensions for everyone.

    I notice you looked for a rebuttal of the figures offered by naz but haven't answered mine:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭kindajaded


    ixoy wrote: »
    Umm didn't he get a high lump sum because he was in a high-risk pension rather than despite that? He took a gamble and it paid off.

    Do you know how well it paid out after that though? Did he take it all in a lump sum or some mixture?

    Just to clarify one thing - I had the impression that Naz thinks people should just get from a pension what they pay in. This makes absolutely no sense.
    And in the same way that private pension companies make money out of funds paid in until they have to pay out so the state can too - using the funds in recent times being an obvious example but even out of recession money makes money.
    I really think alot of people on this thread just don't understand how pensions work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 391 ✭✭Naz_st


    dresden8 wrote: »
    No rebuttal required. Some public servants do well.

    All public servants have taken the levies. Even those who will get nothing from their "gilt edged" "gold plated" pensions.

    p.s. Maybe rebuttal required. and that's based on a single person, not a couple with a dependant wife. One size does not fit all.

    206.30 by 52 weeks = 10,727.60 by 15 years = €160,916

    Swings the calculation around.

    First, I did point out that not all public service workers come out with a fantastic pension, but it seems clear that most PS workers who contribute towards a DB public pension get out significantly more than they put in (even after the pension levy)

    Second, yes it is based on a a single person or couple with 2 pensions. Do you have statistics on how many public service retirees, now and in the future, have or will have dependent partners with no separate source of income?
    kindajaded wrote: »
    HERE IS YOUR REBUTTAL:

    A/ you omitted prsi contributions
    B/ MOST IMPORTANTLY: ALL pension funds go up in value to the tune of 10s to 100s of thousands from the contributions made. WHY ELSE WOULD PEOPLE JOIN THEM?? This is just a fact and if you don't realise this then I assume you are just hiding your money under the bed or investing it in property
    C/ Many private funds pay out a lump sum
    D/ FINGLETON

    A) I omitted PRSI contributions as all workers public and private pay that, and it's not just a pension contribution it also pays unemployment benefits etc. Also, I was rebutting the original calculations by grahamo who also omitted it for the same reason:
    We'll leave the PRSI contributions out as everyone gets the state pension (If enough contributions paid).

    B) Fine, but this depends on where the money is invested. As far as I know unlike private sector pension funds, the public sector defined benefit pension reserve fund is used to pay current pensions (when it's not being used to bail out banks!). So I don't think you can quantify the interest returns easily. But if you have statistics on these annual returns, please provide them and I'll gladly update the spreadsheet.

    C) That has no bearing on what I was trying to demonstrate - this is about the public service pension and the cost to the taxpayer, private sector pensions aren't a part of it.

    D) Again, irrelevant
    steof1984 wrote: »
    No one here is denying Public Sector workers have good pensions and HAD great ones pre 95

    But now the facts are

    Public Sector workers can not claim State Pension aswell as their Pension. Private sector workers can . this is about €12 k a year

    That was part of the above sample calculation

    Public Sector workers pay between 12% and 15% towards their pension

    From the example above you can see that, after tax relief, the maximum contribution (ex PRSI for reasons given) was 11.29% (at a salary of €63,360)

    The pension a Public Sector worker gets is similar to a private pension in a decent company

    Not so, most private sector pensions are defined contribution which have been decimated by the recent carnage in investment funds across all asset classes and geographies

    There are a lot more conditions now with Public Sector pensions

    They can not pass on their pension to their estate if they die.

    They must pay widows and orphans even if they are single

    I'll take your word for it, but these seem minor elements TBH.
    Like everything the more you earn the more you get. People on high wages get good pensions but not all Public Sector worker Leaves on a high wage

    For the majority of Public Sector workers their pension will just about allow them to enjoy their golden years.

    I agree with the point that not all public sector workers do as well as the example I showed, but I think the majority get significantly more out of it than they put in. There are a lot of "high earners" in the public sector - especially as the average wage in the public sector is 50k (a "high earner" in my book).
    This was not as much of an issue when the Private Sector pensions were doing well and people were getting their tax relief on the amounts they put in. But now because people are feeling the pinch they want everyone else to feel the pinch.

    To be honest, I think it was a big issue long before now, but no one was listening. Now there's a recession, the media are perfectly happy to point out all the big issues that would have been seen as "boring", "misguided" or "scare-mongering" before.
    Can i ask would you take joy in knowing your Private Sector neighbour looses his pension. What difference would that make to your day to day life

    No, I wouldn't take joy in anyone currently retired losing their pension, if that's what you're asking. I do take exception to people trying to make out that the government pension is costing most PS workers a lot more than they get out of it in return - it's just not the case. If you're getting a good, guaranteed pension at the end of your career, you should expect to pay for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,993 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    kindajaded wrote: »
    It was twice what she got and a much bigger pension when you add the state bit. And if you spread a big lump sum difference over 10 years or even 15 years it works well.
    Just to clarify - his lump sum + yearly pay out (from pension) + state pension was greater than her lump sum + yearly pay out?
    I agree though that risk is the issue. He was lucky. If people really want security instead of the big payouts then they have to start looking at different ways of working pensions for everyone.
    Agreed. The problem is, at a bare minimum, they should track inflation. Low-risk do (and the last time I had a pension, this was the option I took as I'm risk averse).
    I notice you looked for a rebuttal of the figures offered by naz but haven't answered mine:)
    PRSI was a big omission to be fair. I'd still like to look at some figures for my own satisfaction though (and try and see the different for pre '95 workers).


Advertisement