Arsenal v Chelsea 4pm

Wreck · 10-05-2009 5:13pm

Can we just not play the rest of the second half and the next two games?

wandatowell · 10-05-2009 5:14pm

I blame Pat Rice, the buck stops with him

Royale with Cheese · 10-05-2009 5:15pm

It must be a legitimate tactic to play poorly to begin with against Arsenal and then take the lead against the run of play. I've never seen them recover from it.

And why is Diaby still on the pitch?

Royale with Cheese · 10-05-2009 5:17pm

Walcott is never gonna make it as a centre forward.

Pepe LeFrits · 10-05-2009 5:17pm

Royale with Cheese wrote: »

Walcott is never gonna make it as a centre forward.

Based on what?

Royale with Cheese · 10-05-2009 5:19pm

Pepe LeFrits wrote: »

Based on what?

Him missing nearly every chance he gets.

Raskolnikov · 10-05-2009 5:19pm

Arsenal really need a coach to help players on their finishing skills.

Pepe LeFrits · 10-05-2009 5:21pm

Oh, see there was I thinking you were making that based on the one game, when he hasn't even been playing in the position.

His movement has been exceptional today, but his finishing has been poor. Then again I've seen games where his finishing has been exceptional too.

Royale with Cheese · 10-05-2009 5:24pm

His pace and movement are good. His decision making and finishing is very poor, I've never seen any games were either has been exceptional.

Dave! · 10-05-2009 5:29pm

Wreck wrote: »

Can we just not play the rest of the second half and the next two games?

That'd be great actually

mike65 · 10-05-2009 5:29pm

The fightback is on.

Royale with Cheese · 10-05-2009 5:30pm

Well done Bendtner.

10-05-2009 5:31pm

Why were there boos for Adebayor?

mike65 · 10-05-2009 5:31pm

Cos he is crap and talking about Milan (I think it was)

Pepe LeFrits · 10-05-2009 5:35pm

Royale with Cheese wrote: »

His pace and movement are good. His decision making and finishing is very poor, I've never seen any games were either has been exceptional.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJSKkFGdPDg

Would have thought that was a rather obvious one.

He's wasted on the wing. He should be playing in attack and we should have an extra creative player in midfield.

10-05-2009 5:37pm

mike65 wrote: »

Cos he is crap and talking about Milan (I think it was)

:pac:

pistolpetes11 · 10-05-2009 5:42pm

Malouda has really surprised me lately , another half decent game from the lad today !

mike65 · 10-05-2009 5:46pm

Chelsea 4

Raskolnikov · 10-05-2009 5:46pm

4-1

10-05-2009 5:46pm

Oh. Dear.

OPENROAD · 10-05-2009 5:47pm

Off side

Mitch Connor · 10-05-2009 5:48pm

Andy Gray saying he was 'well off side'. cause he was beyond the defenders - does being in line with the ball player not count as well? He may not have been in line, looked just ahead, but I thought if you were in line you were onside, regardless of where the defenders are.

pistolpetes11 · 10-05-2009 5:49pm

by a yard at least , looked a decent shout for the peno , great call by the ref

OPENROAD · 10-05-2009 5:50pm

Mitch Connor wrote: »

Andy Gray saying he was 'well off side'. cause he was beyond the defenders - does being in line with the ball player not count as well? He may not have been in line, looked just ahead, but I thought if you were in line you were onside, regardless of where the defenders are.

He looked ahead to me.

wandatowell · 10-05-2009 5:50pm

I believe in my players

Raskolnikov · 10-05-2009 5:50pm

The expression men against boys comes to mind.

Fabregas does not look fit.

pistolpetes11 · 10-05-2009 5:50pm

Mitch Connor wrote: »

Andy Gray saying he was 'well off side'. cause he was beyond the defenders - does being in line with the ball player not count as well? He may not have been in line, looked just ahead, but I thought if you were in line you were onside, regardless of where the defenders are.

He was off when the shot was taken , on when it hit the post , but its the initial shot that counts and it should have been an offside

selpher · 10-05-2009 5:51pm

pistolpetes11 wrote: »

Malouda has really surprised me lately , another half decent game from the lad today !

He seems to be looking like the player we thought we signed. He'd be worth keeping for next season, if not, hes defo raised his price a bit.

pistolpetes11 · 10-05-2009 5:53pm

selpher wrote: »

He seems to be looking like the player we thought we signed. He'd be worth keeping for next season, if not, hes defo raised his price a bit.

Yeah I remember when he first came he looked really good in pre season then faded off completely ,

I was reading something a few weeks back that he got his wisdom teeth taken out in Jan and he had been suffering from them for a good few months and he himself attributes a lot of his recent good play to having them removed !

Mitch Connor · 10-05-2009 5:53pm

seriously, if he was beyond Anelka, it was by inches imo.

Holsten · 10-05-2009 5:59pm

Crazy stuff, does Arshavin really make such a big difference that Liverpool couldn't murder these 4-0... mental.

tony1kenobi · 10-05-2009 6:03pm

pistolpetes11 wrote: »

I was reading something a few weeks back that he got his wisdom teeth taken out in Jan and he had been suffering from them for a good few months and he himself attributes a lot of his recent good play to having them removed !

Surgical reduction of wisdom would help any athlete if they want to perform on the same wavelength as Chelsea.

Indie18 · 10-05-2009 6:04pm

Personally I feel that Arsenal and Arsene Wenger need to be tought these kind of lessons, the team are not good enough and there are major problems there but of course wenger will be the usual "I belive in my players". I can tell you now the fans don't and if he keeps up with that crap the fans will lose faith in him as well, not that i have lost faith in him........... yet.

OPENROAD · 10-05-2009 6:04pm

Holsten wrote: »

Crazy stuff, does Arshavin really make such a big difference that Liverpool couldn't murder these 4-0... mental.

How much of Arsenal have you actually watched this season?

pistolpetes11 · 10-05-2009 6:04pm

tony1kenobi wrote: »

Surgical reduction of wisdom would help any athlete if they want to perform on the same wavelength as Chelsea.

There is always one

Unearthly · 10-05-2009 6:04pm

That's the first goal Arsenal have conceded at the Emirates in the league since Robbie Keane bagged for Liverpool (imagine?) on 21 December. That was 13 hours and 16 minutes ago, would you believe?

Wow didn't know that.

pistolpetes11 · 10-05-2009 6:06pm

Mitch Connor wrote: »

seriously, if he was beyond Anelka, it was by inches imo.

Looking at it again it was only inches , great play leading up to the goal

Indie18 · 10-05-2009 6:12pm

On the offside goal, what difference does it make the game was over anyway.

tony1kenobi · 10-05-2009 6:14pm

pistolpetes11 wrote: »

There is always one

Ah I thought it was funny.....not necessarily true.....but funny.;)

CHD · 11-05-2009 12:01am

Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeestroyed at a canter. Love it.

Arsenal v Chelsea 4pm

Comments