girls who are easy

cork1

I recently had this arguement with a few buddies and said id see what ye think. so if a girls sleeps around would ye honestly think less of her? alot of people do. as far as im concerned they can do as many guys as they like it doesnt change a thing. i mean to call her easy or a slut is just a form of discrimination. so if ye were to meet a girl and go out and after a while find out that her bed post is covered in notchs would ye let it influence your opinion of that person?

tony1kenobi

cork1 wrote: »

girls who are easy

The best kind.

4zn76tysfajdxp

cork1 wrote: »

so if ye were to meet a girl and go out and after a while find out that her bed post is covered in notchs would ye let it influence your opinion of that person?

Well from that indication they're either sluts or infested with rats, the latter being a major turn-off for me.

brummytom

Dirty whores

Nevyn

Whats a slut?

orestes

Thaedydal wrote: »

Whats a slut?

It's the female version of a guy who sleeps around and everyone thinks is a legend apparently

AlmightyCushion

Thaedydal wrote: »

Whats a slut?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=slut

The first one sums it up quite well.

gwhiz

Thaedydal wrote: »

Whats a slut?

Otherwise known as "Flora"
Spreads easy

gwhiz

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=slut

The first one sums it up quite well.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=promiscuous

and this one sums it up quite well too.

Nevyn

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/slut

tbh as long as she's clean and not a pro and respects her self whats the issue?

Oh yeah women aren't meant to have more sexual experience then the man they are with :rolleyes:

Max Power1

brummytom wrote: »

Dirty whores

awww yeah!! Giggidy

4zn76tysfajdxp

Thaedydal wrote: »

tbh as long as she's clean and not a pro and respects her self whats the issue

Huh! When I want it, I want it done right. None of your amatuer sex for me!

Brimmy

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=slut

The first one sums it up quite well.

High-larious. Well played good sir.

gwhiz

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_do_you_call_a_man_who_sleeps_with_a_lot_women


The male version of "slut" is "a simultaneous dater".... ???
WTF

orestes

Thaedydal wrote: »

Oh yeah women aren't meant to have more sexual experience then the man they are with :rolleyes:

Experience is good, you can learn all sorts of new things. Reading the books can be useful, but I'm a firm believer in the merits of practical education

gwhiz

Man says: Your nothing but a dirty fcuking slut and whore

Woman: and your just nothing but a simultaneous dater thats what you are.

brummytom

Honestly, sleeping around seems stupid, and only shows a lack of commitment.. but sure what do I know?

Women who sleep around are sluts, men who do are manslags as far as I'm concerned, I dislike both equally


*Runs off to bed before getting attacked*

orestes

brummytom wrote: »

Honestly, sleeping around seems stupid, and only shows a lack of commitment.. but sure what do I know?

Women who sleep around are sluts, men who do are manslags as far as I'm concerned, I dislike both equally

Why? Provided people are happy with themselves and respect themselves and there is no deceit involved (like cheating on a partner in a monogomous relationship) they should be free to sleep with whoever they want imo

randylonghorn

cork1 wrote: »

so if ye were to meet a girl and go out and after a while find out that her bed post is covered in notchs would ye let it influence your opinion of that person?

My bedpost has a fair few notches, not half as many as I'd like, but still a fair few. Does that influence your opinion of me? For the better or for the worse? Why should it be different for women?

(And yes, I get that you're not actually agreeing with your friends, just turning your questions on their head.)


Lol @ Slut: a woman with the morals of a man.

Perfect, tbh.


You know the old joke about why women can't park?

Coz men keep telling them this (hold hands close together) is 6 inches.

Well, there's another version seems apposite here.

Why do some men dislike experienced women?

Coz they can't fool them that 30 seconds and 4 inches twice a week constitutes a sex life.

CianRyan

There's really just no point though, is there?

TheZohanS

cork1 wrote: »

I recently had this arguement with a few buddies and said id see what ye think. so if a girls sleeps around would ye honestly think less of her? alot of people do. as far as im concerned they can do as many guys as they like it doesnt change a thing. i mean to call her easy or a slut is just a form of discrimination. so if ye were to meet a girl and go out and after a while find out that her bed post is covered in notchs would ye let it influence your opinion of that person?

OP you have the right attitude.

Plus;

How the hell would you find out unless you asked?

And if you can't handle the truth you shouldn't ask these questions.

Seaneh

TBH, anyone who sleeps around, male or female, is just putting themselves at way too much risk for me to take them seriously.

A lad who shags every bird that moves inst a legend, he's usually a tool with intamcy issues and personal insecurities.
The exact same things applies to girls who sleep around.

Usually the "sluttiest" girls are the onws who have problems with depression aswell.

Bottle_of_Smoke

Thought about this a bit. In general I'd say I wouldn't consider her girlfriend material.

On the other hand I wouldn't ask, so if I found out it would be a mix of feeling uncomfortable with it as well as her lack of tact.

There's one girl I used to sleep with semi casually, liked her a lot but she lived far away, told me she's been with a sizable number, maybe she wouldn't have told me if a relationship was possible.

If the geographical circumstances were right for us now I'd probably make an exception for her and I'm 95% sure it wouldn't bother me.

Abi

When all you could get was this, guys whinged. So.. you lot don't want a prude, but don't want a slut.. so you'd like half a slut by my calculations :rolleyes:



Fussy fcukers aren't you Tbh...

!!!!! 2009 !!!!!


:eek::eek::eek::eek:

5318008!

This thread the biggest let down since i read that book that was supposed to teach me how to kill mockingbirds.

Where are all these easy women?

I want names and numbers.

hussey

5318008! wrote: »

This thread the biggest let down since i read that book that was supposed to teach me how to kill mockingbirds.

Where are all these easy women?

I want names and numbers.

You need to get yourself a wolf moon t-shirt.
All women are easy with the Wolf Moon

Jet Black

Std's are cool.
Anyone wanna trade herpes for crab's?

FlutterinBantam

I asked a young lady whom I was about to bone if I could inspect her gowler for cleanliness and crabs and stuff.

Pulled up her knickers and went off in a huff.

So that doesn't work:mad:

Joey the lips

cork1 wrote: »

I recently had this arguement with a few buddies and said id see what ye think. so if a girls sleeps around would ye honestly think less of her? alot of people do. as far as im concerned they can do as many guys as they like it doesnt change a thing. i mean to call her easy or a slut is just a form of discrimination. so if ye were to meet a girl and go out and after a while find out that her bed post is covered in notchs would ye let it influence your opinion of that person?

For every easy girl you need an easy man, stupid arguement really isnt it. But if I was free and single why the hell not, If you die of aids wouldnt it be better to say you got it riding 400 women intead of dying of prostate cancer or something

Jet Black

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

I asked a young lady whom I was about to bone if I could inspect her gowler for cleanliness and crabs and stuff.

Pulled up her knickers and went off in a huff.

So that doesn't work:mad:

do you carry a nit comb around with you or where you going to use your teeth?

Zadkiel

Joey the lips wrote: »

For every easy girl you need an easy man, stupid arguement really isnt it. But if I was free and single why the hell not, If you die of aids wouldnt it be better to say you got it riding 400 women intead of dying of prostate cancer or something

Why would you be dying of Aids!?
They have non latex condoms now ...just incase you were allergic to the old ones

Jet Black

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

I asked a young lady whom I was about to bone if I could inspect her gowler for cleanliness and crabs and stuff.

Pulled up her knickers and went off in a huff.

So that doesn't work:mad:

do you carry a nit comb around with you or where you going to use your teeth?

veryangryman

cork1 wrote: »

I recently had this arguement with a few buddies and said id see what ye think. so if a girls sleeps around would ye honestly think less of her? alot of people do. as far as im concerned they can do as many guys as they like it doesnt change a thing. i mean to call her easy or a slut is just a form of discrimination. so if ye were to meet a girl and go out and after a while find out that her bed post is covered in notchs would ye let it influence your opinion of that person?

Yes

Joey the lips

Zadkiel wrote: »

Why would you be dying of Aids!?
They have non latex condoms now ...just incase you were allergic to the old ones

I agree but the condom never stays on my finger, imagine if I had to get it over my [EMAIL="P@nis"]P@nis[/EMAIL]!

Dragan

Thaedydal wrote: »

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/slut

tbh as long as she's clean and not a pro and respects her self whats the issue?

Oh yeah women aren't meant to have more sexual experience then the man they are with :rolleyes:

Actually, i have a pretty interesting theory about the whole "slut" thing. It's mostly based on fear from what i can see. A bloke may be very interested in a girl but upon finding out she has had a decent number of sexual partners, she then becomes a "slut". As far as i can tell this change about comes from the fact that the bloke is suddenly uncomfortable with the number as it implies a good chance that someone else made her come a whole lot more than he is able to.

Same applies to women who find out the man in there life may have had a wandering penis before they got together.

People are weird.

gardaitester06

There is a difference between men and woman on this topic....

Its the endless slut v stud argument.

For a man to shag around consistantly, I think he must be attractive to the majority of females, I'd imagine he'd have to be good looking or funny or caring or all of the above. In others words guys usually have to work hard in order to achieve the "Stud" status.

If we look at girls doing this...... well they just have to be there. Men are pigs and most would nail anything. Hence the "Slut" status.

IMO:cool:

BraziliaNZ

women just get more action than men these days it seems, of all the girls I know they are never without dick for more than a couple of weeks at a time, whereas i have to go months and months sometimes without getting laid.

Abi

BraziliaNZ wrote: »

women just get more action than men these days it seems, of all the girls I know they are never without dick for more than a couple of weeks at a time, whereas i have to go months and months sometimes without getting laid.

Well thats because women dont actually have to try. Theres always men around looking for their hole :pac:

BraziliaNZ

Abigayle wrote: »

Well thats because women dont actually have to try. Theres always men around looking for their hole :pac:

I know! it's not fair!

Dragan

BraziliaNZ wrote: »

women just get more action than men these days it seems, of all the girls I know they are never without dick for more than a couple of weeks at a time, whereas i have to go months and months sometimes without getting laid.

Maybe you are just ugly?

In fairness, you seem to know a good few "easy" women as you say, and are unable to seal the deal with any of them.

But of course, the issue is women....and other men.....not you.:pac:

Zadkiel

Abigayle wrote: »

Well thats because women dont actually have to try. Theres always men around looking for their hole :pac:

Very true, I'm so glad I'm not single.
If I get dumped I wouldn't know where to start on the pull again.

Abi

Zadkiel wrote: »

Very true, I'm so glad I'm not single.
If I get dumped I wouldn't know where to start on the pull again.

Aye. Tis a jungle out there. But if you just came out of a relationship, I doubt you'd want to nose dive into another anyway. You'd more than likely want to have some fun first

BraziliaNZ

Dragan wrote: »

Maybe you are just ugly?

In fairness, you seem to know a good few "easy" women as you say, and are unable to seal the deal with any of them.

But of course, the issue is women....and other men.....not you.:pac:

Maybe I am ugly and unattractive yes, that explains me not getting laid, but i've lived with some pretty wrote off girls in the past that would still be getting pretty regular action from different blokes. As a previous poster said, men will bang anything.

FlutterinBantam

Mask wrote: »

do you carry a nit comb around with you or where you going to use your teeth?

Just a poke around the flaps with a lollipop stick would establish all i wanted to know.

Wibbs

gardaitester06 wrote: »

There is a difference between men and woman on this topic....

Its the endless slut v stud argument.

For a man to shag around consistantly, I think he must be attractive to the majority of females, I'd imagine he'd have to be good looking or funny or caring or all of the above. In others words guys usually have to work hard in order to achieve the "Stud" status.

If we look at girls doing this...... well they just have to be there. Men are pigs and most would nail anything. Hence the "Slut" status.

IMO:cool:

I'd agree for the most part. It's a sellers market, so anyone overselling or selling too "cheaply" is considered a slut by men(and a lot of women). It's simply easier for women to get NSA sex. Some of the plainest women I've known would have had a higher number of sexual partners compared to even the better looking men I've known.

Dragan wrote:

Maybe you are just ugly?

In fairness, you seem to know a good few "easy" women as you say, and are unable to seal the deal with any of them.

But of course, the issue is women....and other men.....not you.:pac:

That's a tad harsh tbh. He never said he wanted to "seal the deal" with any of them for a start. They could be rough in his eyes, or he's just not interested in them in particular.

As for "sluts". Yep I've known a few(Men included). I would loosely define a slut as someone who seeks sex for unhealthy reasons, that reflect badly on them and their standing among their peers. It's not so much the number as how they go about it. I will say of the women I've known with very high numbers, not all, but most have been compensating for something. I'd say the same of the male version. I know I was when I was at that lark.

There is a gender bias and above and beyond the sellers market bit you could easily argue there is also the evolutionary bit too. Men have more to lose from a promiscuous woman as far as suspicion of paternity goes. Yes we have contraception and paternity tests now, but the animal brain has yet to keep pace. The suspicion that she's had a load in the past and is too free and easy with giving it up and the guy figures she'll do it to him in time.

It may also be a small part of the confidence thing with men too. I do agree that has a lot to do with it. A guy thinking she's had better. I'll say this though, even if she has had, doesn't mean she'll leave the current guy. Not by a long shot. Example; I had an ex that left me for another man and I discovered through a mutual mate that he was dire in the sack. This ex told the mutual mate this repeatedly and commented that she missed that part of our relationship(he must have been dire:D). She still stayed with him and left me.

Now I can't speak for men, but I would also say that high number of sex partners does not always mean women are any better at sex. A bit of a crap shoot that one. Among the best in bed I've been with had little enough experience(in one case none) and among the very worst had plenty of experience. Indeed the very worst I recall was the most "experienced" as far as notches on the bedpost go. God luv her she thought she was the bees knees in the leaba.

I would imagine that aspect would be more true with men though. A woman could have 100 sex partners and essentially just lay there and still she'd get more.

Actually there's a bit of a double standard going the other way on that score. You will hear far more how crap a guy is in bed and is often a topic of debate and derision among women, but not as much as how crap a woman is among men. And there are some that are next to useless.

Dragan

Wibbs wrote: »

That's a tad harsh tbh. He never said he wanted to "seal the deal" with any of them for a start.

Why? It's the exact attitude that he is taking towards the women he is talking about just slightly reversed. "They(he) look a certain way but(and) they(he) do(don't) get laid inspite(because) of it."

It's not always a deep psychological chat and a life history assesment that is required, sometimes it's just pointing out that people have preconceived idea's about other people, should expect that other people have them about them, and move the **** on.

Abi

*BAM*

Headshot from teh Wibbs

Wibbs wrote: »

I know I was when I was at that lark.

Lulz. "That lark" :pac:

Wurly

Seaneh wrote: »

Usually the "sluttiest" girls are the onws who have problems with depression aswell.

Woah there - what a sweeping generalisation!!!

BraziliaNZ

Dragan wrote: »

Why? It's the exact attitude that he is taking towards the women he is talking about just slightly reversed. "They(he) look a certain way but(and) they(he) do(don't) get laid inspite(because) of it."

It's not always a deep psychological chat and a life history assesment that is required, sometimes it's just pointing out that people have preconceived idea's about other people, should expect that other people have them about them, and move the **** on.

I never mentioned the way I look, i like the way i look and look after myself. Anyway i wouldn't go near the girls in question with a barge pole.
It's like this - I'm 28, fit, in good shape, I want to say interesting, and go ages without sex sometimes. Whereas previous girls i've lived with etc take no care of themselves, are overweight, are bland and uninteresting, yet they get laid whenever they want. So I wish I had it that easy.

Dragan

BraziliaNZ wrote: »

I never mentioned the way I look, i like the way i look and look after myself. Anyway i wouldn't go near the girls in question with a barge pole.
It's like this - I'm 28, fit, in good shape, I want to say interesting, and go ages without sex sometimes. Whereas previous girls i've lived with etc take no care of themselves, are overweight, are bland and uninteresting, yet they get laid whenever they want. So I wish I had it that easy.

Why? That is exactly the double standard that is being discussed.

You wish you had it that easy? Why, so you could look at yourself with very little respect? Or would the fact that you get laid a lot suddenly make you a stud?

And if not, then why the different attitude towards these girls. If a decent sex life is a goal that you have for yourself and something that you might enjoy, then why would somebody else acheiving that be a bad thing?

Honestly, it's a ****ing mystery to me.

With regard to the girls getting laid, had it occured to you that the blokes they might be with my have less in the looks department that you, they just put themselves out a bit more, or try a bit harder, or simply have completely different tastes to you?

BraziliaNZ

where are my double standards? the fact that they sleep around doesn't lower my view of them, i dont care how many people women sleep with, i just wish i could get laid as easily as them, that's all i'm saying.