Results

ergonomics

smcgiff wrote: »

How did you get your transcript.

Is there any chance a 2.91 would be made up to a 2.1?

When you log in don't click on Student Records on the top left. Scroll down until you see 'Click here for your Current Results'. It'll have a message about how MIC students can get their results above it in red. From there you'll see your transcript. Scroll down until the bit that looks like it was written on a typewriter starts and across from your course it should have 'Class' and your degree result written beside it.

If you're doing Humanities a 2.91 QCA will get you a 2.1.

smcgiff

ergonomics wrote: »

When you log in don't click on Student Records on the top left. Scroll down until you see 'Click here for your Current Results'. It'll have a message about how MIC students can get their results above it in red. From there you'll see your transcript. Scroll down until the bit that looks like it was written on a typewriter starts and across from your course it should have 'Class' and your degree result written beside it.

If you're doing Humanities a 2.91 QCA will get you a 2.1.

Thanks -

It's a B.Ed - Looked at the transcript and across from Award & Class it's blank ?!?

ergonomics

What year are you in? I'd imagine that would only show up for 4th years, i.e., students graduating this summer.

2 fecken d1s. QCA shot to sh1t. If i chose to repeat them will i not b able to graduate at the end of the summer?

Peteee

Congrats too all and sundry! Looks like everyone did great!

And yes, For all those who graduated, welcome to the suck!

Does jig as he himself is escaping the suck and heading back to UL!

Mossin

Peteee wrote: »

Congrats too all and sundry! Looks like everyone did great!

And yes, For all those who graduated, welcome to the suck!

Does jig as he himself is escaping the suck and heading back to UL!

Haha!! I'm not entering the suck just yet!
Myself like many others on here are remaining to do a Masters!
Huzzah for UL !

Btw congrats to all on your results!

The Don

Congrats to everybody and to those that have to do repeats, its not the end of the world.

smcgiff

ergonomics wrote: »

What year are you in? I'd imagine that would only show up for 4th years, i.e., students graduating this summer.

It's the missus - it was her final year. The transcript still has her as a current student.

From what I've read on the QCA's a 3 would have guaranteed a 2.1, but a 2.91 could, at UL's discretion, achieve a 2.1.

1huge1

Busi_Girl08 wrote: »

Yay I passed!!!:D

A2 in Macro - Which I am visibly shocked at!! :eek:<- See?!
A2 in Business Maths - Pretty happy!!
B1 in Organisational Behaviour
B3 in Marketing - A little disappointed, it was really the only module I cared about
C1 in Business Information Management
C3 in Managerial Accounting -HOW???!!!!! I was sure I failed!!!!!!


Still, I didn't fail anything, yay!!!
Sure either way I was going to get completely sloshed tonight :cool::D

Congrats to everyone!!!!!!!:D

Well done Busi Girl, I got similiar results.
A1 in Macro, over the moon with that, love macro
B3 in German,
B2 in Org Behaviour
B3 in Bus Maths
B3 in Marketing
C1 in Accounting

Glad that is over with.

Congrats all!

kaji

smcgiff wrote: »

Thanks -

It's a B.Ed - Looked at the transcript and across from Award & Class it's blank ?!?

Don't go into student records. It's on the first page you see. Scroll down and click on My Results. It works for Mary I's cos it worked for me!

smcgiff

kaji wrote: »

Don't go into student records. It's on the first page you see. Scroll down and click on My Results. It works for Mary I's cos it worked for me!

Whoopeee - It's been updated and she got a 2.1. :D:D:D

badaulname

Hey lads...

Quick question got my results there a few mins ago after alot of trouble from Student Academic Admin and got a QCA of 2.90. Now I am in BBS and the grading band for a 2.1 is 2.95...does this mean I won't be giving a 2.1 at the discretion of UL or is my QCA too low to be considered?! It says next to class second class honours degree so I presume a 2.2 is my destiny but just said I would ask since ye know lots!:D

Happy with my results otherwise got an A in my FYP which I am beaming with since I wrote it all in 21days!!

Congrats to everyone on here as well;)

smcgiff

Howdy, it should also say grade i.e. I or II ?!?

badaulname

smcgiff wrote: »

Howdy, it should also say grade i.e. I or II ?!?

It says II....2.2 my destiny then?!:pac:

smcgiff

badaulname wrote: »

It says II....2.2 my destiny then?!:pac:

Unless you get a recheck for your D grades? Any point?

badaulname

Nah no point because I didn't even get a D...

I came out with 2 A2's, 2 B2's and 2B2's!

I am telling you I failed stats in 2nd year and my QCA hasn't recovered since!:(

smcgiff

badaulname wrote: »

Nah no point because I didn't even get a D...

I came out with 2 A2's, 2 B2's and 2B2's!

I am telling you I failed stats in 2nd year and my QCA hasn't recovered since!:(

That's though alright!

badaulname

smcgiff wrote: »

That's though alright!

Oh well....roll on the masters!!

Thanks for your input...much appreciated

ninty9er

I'm blaming 2 ****ing election campaigns and a none too ceremonious FYP result C1 (which I'm not at all happy about) considering it took a month and 4 days got one of the lads a B2.

2.56 means I've also lost my tax exemption, so had I not been elected, I'd have no job...oh joy!

Off to apply to Aldi so:pac:

clearya

ninty9er wrote: »

I'm blaming 2 ****ing election campaigns and a none too ceremonious FYP result C1 (which I'm not at all happy about) considering it took a month and 4 days got one of the lads a B2.

2.56 means I've also lost my tax exemption, so had I not been elected, I'd have no job...oh joy!

Off to apply to Aldi so:pac:

I'm with you on the 'feck it' boat :PI was on track in the first semester of 4th year but 2 C1's this term have dragged me to a 2:2. Now have an accumulated QCA of 2.92 but it's way less for this session...got in touch with my employer that requires a 2.1 to see what they have to say, the final step is a recheck of grades but that's really just so I've done everything I can. O hope this fun never ends.

Shyster

Id say have a look at your scripts if you can, cos with rechecks, grades can go down as well as up

Thats the up-side to my big fat F....:P

Does any one know the process for viewing scripts? just contact SAA?

clearya

Shyster wrote: »

Id say have a look at your scripts if you can, cos with rechecks, grades can go down as well as up

Thats the up-side to my big fat F....:P

Does any one know the process for viewing scripts? just contact SAA?

Yah all the exam stuff is done throught the SAA. If you go onto the website you should find the link for rechecks etc there

ninty9er

clearya wrote: »

I'm with you on the 'feck it' boat :PI was on track in the first semester of 4th year but 2 C1's this term have dragged me to a 2:2. Now have an accumulated QCA of 2.92 but it's way less for this session...got in touch with my employer that requires a 2.1 to see what they have to say, the final step is a recheck of grades but that's really just so I've done everything I can. O hope this fun never ends.

2.92 will get you a 2.1 more than likely, if your transcript doesn't already have 2.1 on it.

Mossin

Just realised that I got an overall A2 with my FYP
A1, A2 and B1 over 3 semesters! That stupid FYP methodology module did increase my QCA, and gave weighting to my degree!

I somehow managed to drop .03 with my QCA as well this semester which is now annoying me a little, but I have no reason to complain.

Second semester of second year is what ruined my chances of a 1:1. Fecking Stats, Personnel Managent and Managerial Accounting all were a disaster!
But a solid Second Class Honours, Grade I is in the bag now

Also realised that I'm doing a Masters in Entrepreneurship, and yet I've failed to get an A in any of the modules I've taken in it over the past 2 years..hmmm...makes me rethink that choice, and wonder should I have gone for the marketing masters instead considering my marketing results are a lot better overall than my entrepreneurship..
Then again, I suppose I need to get better at the enterprise, so it'd be more valuable to do that masters...

/end

clearya

ninty9er wrote: »

2.92 will get you a 2.1 more than likely, if your transcript doesn't already have 2.1 on it.

Unfortunately I can understand by the EB didn't give my 2:1. I had a QCA of 2.95 after the first semester this year and for the 2nd semester I dragged myself down to the 2.92 (rounded up as well!) I checked my transcript and it deffo has 2nd class honours on it. I'm waiting to hear back from my employer, if they say i DEFFO need a 2:1 I'll apply for rechecks and do some grovelling...though only myself to blame, I'm just a crammer and I would rather have worked for the 4 years than be in an academic environment, just hate it!

smcgiff

clearya wrote: »

I checked my transcript and it deffo has 2nd class honours on it.

Both a 2.1 and a 2.2 will be called a Second Class Honours. The difference between and 2.1 and a 2.2 is the Grade on the transcript. If it says II then you got a 2.2 degree, but if it says I then you got upgraded to a 2nd Class Honours first Grade or, simply, a 2.1.

Good luck!

clearya

smcgiff wrote: »

Both a 2.1 and a 2.2 will be called a Second Class Honours. The difference between and 2.1 and a 2.2 is the Grade on the transcript. If it says II then you got a 2.2 degree, but if it says I then you got upgraded to a 2nd Class Honours first Grade or, simply, a 2.1.

Good luck!

Oops, meant to say that I got a second class honours. Wish I could magically make the ii change to an i but Harry Potter I ain't

Harpy

got my 2.2 by the skin of my teeth..but i got it so don't really care how i got it..happy days. now what to do with my life?

clearya

Harpy wrote: »

got my 2.2 by the skin of my teeth..but i got it so don't really care how i got it..happy days. now what to do with my life?

If you've decided on an area of interest I'd get onto gradireland and those kinda sites and see what kind of jobs are available. In accounting I've found that there is indeed a huge light at the end of the tunnel if things don't go my way!

limericklady87

Just wondering can anyone help me with this, in final year and took a module this semester with a 40% assignment and a 60% assignment. I received my feedback sheets from the lecturer which state that i got a b2 in the 40% assignment and a b1 in the 60% assignment yet my overall grade was a b2. I was certain it should be a b1 overall when averaged between the two. anyone care to shed light on this or am i just a mathematical dunce, before i go sending a rage filled email at the lecturer!

clearya

limericklady87 wrote: »

Just wondering can anyone help me with this, in final year and took a module this semester with a 40% assignment and a 60% assignment. I received my feedback sheets from the lecturer which state that i got a b2 in the 40% assignment and a b1 in the 60% assignment yet my overall grade was a b2. I was certain it should be a b1 overall when averaged between the two. anyone care to shed light on this or am i just a mathematical dunce, before i go sending a rage filled email at the lecturer!

The only thing that would make sense to me would be if you got a low B2 and a low B1, and thus the average of the 2 was a mid-range to high B2. Other than that I'm stumped!

munsterdevil

clearya wrote: »

The only thing that would make sense to me would be if you got a low B2 and a low B1, and thus the average of the 2 was a mid-range to high B2. Other than that I'm stumped!

Either way, the lecturer sounds like a lousy fcuker!

Mossin

munsterdevil wrote: »

Either way, the lecturer sounds like a lousy fcuker!

Why, for giving the appropriate grade to a student? It happens all the time!

Just wondering can anyone help me with this, in final year and took a module this semester with a 40% assignment and a 60% assignment. I received my feedback sheets from the lecturer which state that i got a b2 in the 40% assignment and a b1 in the 60% assignment yet my overall grade was a b2

The only thing that would make sense to me would be if you got a low B2 and a low B1, and thus the average of the 2 was a mid-range to high B2

This is correct. For example, the grading scheme shows a B1 @ 65%, and a B2 @ 60% - Therefore results for each section at lowest could have been [60% of 40% = 24%] + [65% of 60% = 39%] = 63% Overall = B2 overall

munsterdevil

Mossin Said:

Why, for giving the appropriate grade to a student? It happens all the time!

No, a lecturer often gives the student the benefit of the doubt, which happens most of the time

The Don

munsterdevil wrote: »

Mossin Said:



No, a lecturer often gives the student the benefit of the doubt, which happens most of the time

That may be. But those are the rules and the lecturer was within his/her rights to award the student a B2.

Also, some lecturers get their Teaching Assistants to correct some exam papers for them.

Mossin

munsterdevil wrote: »

No, a lecturer often gives the student the benefit of the doubt, which happens most of the time

Perhaps the lecturer had given the "benefit of the doubt" already by awarding the previous grades, and therefore the final grade is still correct!

Regardless of who corrects the papers, the student gets what they deserve imo.

Going from the email I got it looks like 60% of Comp.Sys is gone already! And that's even before the repeats...It really is a cursed course.

Feyy

I think it will be the same in Comp Games.

What did your e-mail say if u dont mind me asking ?

It was about co-op but she said she was sorry to see we lost so many from Comp.Sys this year and the email was sent to only 8 people so it's not looking good

How many are left in Comp.Games now? There was about 30 last year I think...

Feyy

Deleted User wrote: »

It was about co-op but she said she was sorry to see we lost so many from Comp.Sys this year and the email was sent to only 8 people so it's not looking good

How many are left in Comp.Games now? There was about 30 last year I think...

Ouch, unsure because we didnt get an e-mail like you guys did but i do expect a similar drop but hopefully not that low