Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What would you bid? 4 bed, Dundrum

Options
2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭El Stuntman


    gurramok wrote: »
    Or as some naieve bulls here say, extend the mortgage to 35years to make it 'affordable' and make them a cashcow for the bank!!

    35 year mortgages should be illegal, they're on a par with the Tony Soprano school of banking (speaking as a banker myself ;))

    if you need a 35 year mortgage, you can't afford it


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,879 ✭✭✭D3PO


    35 year mortgages should be illegal, they're on a par with the Tony Soprano school of banking (speaking as a banker myself ;))

    if you need a 35 year mortgage, you can't afford it

    back to this topic again hey :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭El Stuntman


    The rest of the post I snipped was excellent.

    However I disagree with point 2. From my own research I think 1 of 2 things will happen

    1. Houses will drop a little more before bottoming out
    2. The coutry will go broke and houses will drop around 900% i.e a 500k house will now cost 50k

    This is largely linked to how our economy comes out of the recession

    Ricky this is a load of crap!

    to take scenario 1 to task; houses are still grossly overpriced by any metric you wish to use. They are still firmly in bubble territory except there are now no longer any factors to keep them there. All the price pressures are on the downward side. They will continue to fall and do so for years until they reach a level that is consistent with their actual economic value

    scenario 2; they can't drop by 900%, I thought you were a poker player and hence had a grasp of mathematics :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭El Stuntman


    D3PO wrote: »
    back to this topic again hey :p

    you're right, let's pretend I never mentioned it


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭amacca


    The rest of the post I snipped was excellent.

    However I disagree with point 2. From my own research I think 1 of 2 things will happen

    1. Houses will drop a little more before bottoming out
    2. The coutry will go broke and houses will drop around 900% i.e a 500k house will now cost 50k

    This is largely linked to how our economy comes out of the recession

    Not disagreeing by any means but what parts of your research suggested the possibility of both 1 and 2 in your post?

    For 1 do you see possibility of govt getting finances and unemployment under control + wages remaining static therefore less repossessions, taxes not increasing much further etc

    For 2 do you see us defaulting on our national debt and the eu or imf rescuing us etc

    From your research which do you think is the greater possibility?

    Again, curious to hear your viewpoint, not disagreeing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,879 ✭✭✭D3PO


    scenario 2; they can't drop by 900%, I thought you were a poker player and hence had a grasp of mathematics :pac:

    id be worried if he is. His example is a 1000% drop and not 900% anyway :D :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,299 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    if you need a 35 year mortgage, you can't afford it
    I find it amusing that the house is now 35 years old... and it is now being sold :D

    Check what the insulation (if any) is? It's 35 years old, so may have very little, or none.

    Going by the sheds in the back garden, I'm guessing that it's the 3rd one from the right. As not all the houses have the conversions done, I'm unsure when they were put in. If they were done recently (last 15 years) there's a chance they have decent insulation, but I doubt it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 882 ✭✭✭ZYX


    So that makes 37 replies and only 2 people have answered the OPs question.
    Actually this makes 38:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭The_Chopper


    Ricky this is a load of crap!

    to take scenario 1 to task; houses are still grossly overpriced by any metric you wish to use. They are still firmly in bubble territory except there are now no longer any factors to keep them there. All the price pressures are on the downward side. They will continue to fall and do so for years until they reach a level that is consistent with their actual economic value

    You know I always like the most radical of ideas :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭The_Chopper


    Glowing wrote: »
    Hi there,

    We're first time buyers, not rushing to buy but seriously looking and have had mortgage approval.

    We've recently found this property which ticks all the boxes for us - given its only a 5 min walk from Dundrum village and the Luas and is situated on a lovely secluded st ...

    http://www.myhome.ie/residential/search/brochure/5-laurel-drive-dundrum-dublin-co&-city/OLKUA400070

    What would you bid? Currently on the market for 524,000 ...

    Thanks!

    p.s perhaps you wouldn't bid at all?
    ZYX wrote: »
    So that makes 37 replies and only 2 people have answered the OPs question.
    Actually this makes 38:)

    OP if you want to bid on the house, I would bid somewhere between 10% - 100k less than the asking price and see how you get on


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭bobbiw


    Glowing wrote: »
    Hi there,

    We're first time buyers, not rushing to buy but seriously looking and have had mortgage approval.

    We've recently found this property which ticks all the boxes for us - given its only a 5 min walk from Dundrum village and the Luas and is situated on a lovely secluded st ...

    http://www.myhome.ie/residential/search/brochure/5-laurel-drive-dundrum-dublin-co&-city/OLKUA400070

    What would you bid? Currently on the market for 524,000 ...

    Thanks!

    p.s perhaps you wouldn't bid at all?


    Find out what they owe on their mortgage and offer 10% over that.

    I would think 250-275 would be very fair.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 _aggie_


    just found this thread.. unbelievable that the same house, 4,5 months later is still on sale but this time for 399,950. that's a major drop within 5 months!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    _aggie_ wrote: »
    just found this thread.. unbelievable that the same house, 4,5 months later is still on sale but this time for 399,950. that's a major drop within 5 months!

    And yet not enough for anyone to be stupid enough to buy it. Although it frightens me the number of people I come across that are talking about houses being good value now, we really haven't learned anything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,123 ✭✭✭stepbar


    ....and that's the very reason why if it doesn't add up as an investment (how ever you add it up), you should walk away and fast. There has to be some correlation between house prices and rental income.

    Lets say you rented each room at an average of 500eur p.m - 2k p.m or 24k p.a. Knock 10% off for expenses / 6 (the % yield) * 100 and you get 360k exactly. I'm being very generous here TBH (in terms of rent). I could be even more negative and rent it out as a whole house.

    What would I offer? I'd probably start in the region of 220k and work upwards. Not sure where I would stop, of course it depended how much I wanted the house. There looks like a good bit of work to be done. I think you would have to test a lot of scanarios and be prepared for worse case scenario. In the case of a couple, if you can't afford it on either one of the salary's, I would not bid. In terms of a sole buyer, you'd have to be sure you could rent out rooms if worst came to worst. Of course, you have more comfort as a couple (assuming you have no kids) to rent out a room or two, but I doubt many couples would want to do this; especially if they have a family.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    stepbar wrote: »
    Lets say you rented each room at an average of 500eur p.m - 2k p.m or 24k p.a. Knock 10% off for expenses / 6 (the % yield) * 100 and you get 360k exactly. I'm being very generous here TBH (in terms of rent). I could be even more negative and rent it out as a whole house.

    And given the house I'd say it'd be nearer to 1500 per month rent not 2k.


Advertisement