Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Lisbon: If it's yes then it's one each...

Options
  • 05-07-2009 8:44am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 39


    ...and then final decider required.

    Well it would be only fair wouldnt it???


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭FutureTaoiseach


    I agree. However the decider may be played out in the UK rather than Ireland. ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Mario007


    I agree. However the decider may be played out in the UK rather than Ireland. ;)

    if uk puts it to a referendum they violate the ratification process within uk, and cameron knows this. all he's trying to do is to get the UKIP votes for the general elections, but a referendum as such would not be possible as UK already ratified the treaty


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,403 ✭✭✭passive


    there are about 50 threads with the exact same purpose and idiocy as this one, why not post in one of them? Or does reading all the counterarguments and explanations as to why your post, and others of its ilk, are childish and meaningless give you a headache? Is it just easier for you to post this and **** off without engaging in any kind of discussion? If so, get a blog, this isn't the right place for you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭FutureTaoiseach


    Mario007 wrote: »
    if uk puts it to a referendum they violate the ratification process within uk, and cameron knows this. all he's trying to do is to get the UKIP votes for the general elections, but a referendum as such would not be possible as UK already ratified the treaty
    Nonsense. The ratification can be reversed before the treaty comes into force. That is perfectly legal. The Tories are a Eurosceptic party and have become more so since 1997. They would not have negotiated Lisbon if in power. Time will tell, but his position is that if Lisbon has not come into force i.e. ratified in all member states, by the time of a Tory govt, the treaty will be put to a referendum in the UK and he will call for a no vote, which would be virtually certain as you well know. If be breaks his word there will be hell to pay with his backbenchers. He has reportedly told them to ignore Kenneth Clarke's suggestions of no referendum if there is an Irish yes. There is also a question mark over whether the Czech president can continue to refuse to sign the treaty in time for the Tories to sink it. Fingers-crossed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    passive is correct - we have plenty of these, thanks.

    moderately,
    Scofflaw


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    Not that a little more passivity wouldn't be nice...:)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement