Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"6,000 learner drivers fined for breaking law"

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 108 ✭✭galwaybob


    ztoical wrote: »
    The punishment is a large fine, seems fitting to me......you'd rather jail time?

    Actually given that you can get a large fine and/or jail time for not having a tv license, a fine for driving alone/without L plates might be a little weak.

    Yes...perhaps say 50 lashings would be more appropriate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    Given that motorists can be clamped for overstaying on meter for a few minutes, this seems proportionate enough. Unqualified people driving is a serious thing and should have a large fine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    How is it a serious thing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,036 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I know cars might be new to you but bear in mind that they do weigh >1000kg and are capable of moving at speeds well in excess of 100km/hr. They also tend to make a lot of splat if you make a mistake while in control of one and hit someone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    How would they be new to me??? :confused::confused::confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,036 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Well given that you haven't been for a test yet, I assume you're less than 6 months driving anyway. Either that and you failed and are bitter about it, in which case it's unsafe for you to be out unaccompanied until you sort out whatever it was that caused you to fail.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    Bogger77 wrote: »
    life is simple.
    1) Got a car, pay insurance and road tax
    2) Got a learners permit, then arrange for accompanying driver.

    if you cannot afford 1, and cant be bothered about 2, then dont whinge if/when caught.
    is option two really workable. you might as well just get them to drop you off to your point of destination.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,036 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    You wouldn't exactly learn much then would you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    Stark wrote: »
    You wouldn't exactly learn much then would you?
    What im saying is that most L Drivers going to work are hampered by this arrangement. You learn to drive for the most part by taking driving lessons.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    Stark wrote: »
    Well given that you haven't been for a test yet, I assume you're less than 6 months driving anyway. Either that and you failed and are bitter about it, in which case it's unsafe for you to be out unaccompanied until you sort out whatever it was that caused you to fail.

    Your assuming as usual is making an ass of yourself - gather the facts before you make comment or pass judgement on people


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 108 ✭✭galwaybob


    The idea that the guy who passes his test on the Wednesday is suddenly a better driver than he was on the Tuesday is farcical.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    Very true bob - then you have the scaremongers saying "The streets are not safe with drivers with provisional licences" when actually there is no difference between 95% of provisional licence holders passing the test, they are the same drivers


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,104 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    I don't see how you don't think it would be retarded that I could go in to a theory test centre, pass a very short multiple choice question exam, that you don't even have to study for to pass, and then be allowed behind the wheel without supervision of something that can easily kill.

    And yeah, I have a learners permit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    I don't see how you don't think it would be retarded that I could go in to a theory test centre, pass a very short multiple choice question exam, that you don't even have to study for to pass, and then be allowed behind the wheel without supervision of something that can easily kill.

    And yeah, I have a learners permit.
    think its the case that the majority of L drivers are more careful behind the wheel. their insurance rockets if they are involved in a crash


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,157 ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    Right lads, next person to insult another poster or breech the charter in any way gets a weeks ban.
    galwaybob wrote: »
    The idea that the guy who passes his test on the Wednesday is suddenly a better driver than he was on the Tuesday is farcical.

    No they're not a better driver, and i don't think anyone here has been suggesting that. They have proven to the tester that they can control a car safely under normal circumstances with the inclusion of set manoeuvres. Successfully passing the driving test does not prove you are a good driver, it shows you are a safe driver for the 30 or so minutes driving one does during the test.
    john47832 wrote: »
    Very true bob - then you have the scaremongers saying "The streets are not safe with drivers with provisional licences" when actually there is no difference between 95% of provisional licence holders passing the test, they are the same drivers

    The test is there to prove you are safe. If you can't pass a basic test, then you are not deemed to be safe enough to control a car on your own. Saying there is no difference between 95% of learners is something you've plucked out of thin air and has no grounding in fact.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    Clamping down on learner drivers is one thing; we need to worry about the maniacs who somehow have a licence despite being outrageously wreckless on the roads. I would go as far as saying that half the people I know, regularily do things on the road that would cause them to fail their test.

    What we really need is mandatory resitting of the driving test, every ten years. Bad habits need to be hammered out of people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    I don't see how you don't think it would be retarded that I could go in to a theory test centre, pass a very short multiple choice question exam, that you don't even have to study for to pass, and then be allowed behind the wheel without supervision of something that can easily kill.

    Couldnt agree more, I believe it would be very retarded to allow you to go into a test centre, pass an exam, and allow you behind the wheel of a car


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,104 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    think its the case that the majority of L drivers are more careful behind the wheel. their insurance rockets if they are involved in a crash

    Yes I am certainly more careful and more cautious than a driver of years, because we don't have the experience they have or the ability they have. We can be as careful as we want but we can easily make a mistake being new at this, and it's not the insurance that matters, if you react badly people die. Things are getting stricter here, and with that road deaths are lowering every year! So I think that is good. It is annoying yes that those of us that feel we are safe can't go out on our own, but when you are at that level you don't need to go out much to be ready for the test. And lets face it, a lot of people will think they are good drivers when they don't have enough experience of the things that can happen around them.

    And then there are the reckless drivers with full licences, I don't think they should be allowed on the road either.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,104 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    john47832 wrote: »
    Couldnt agree more, I believe it would be very retarded to allow you to go into a test centre, pass an exam, and allow you behind the wheel of a car

    Stop talking bollocks. It's like of going into an exam where you are asked to name various foods, then you feel you are entitled to be a head chef.

    And I agree with the poster above with retesting or something to prove youa re still safe on the road, as huge amounts are not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    Stop talking bollocks.

    Now I might be a little over sensitive here but that to me seems like an insult :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,022 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭Sunjammer


    I see they're keeping you on your toes tonight Donegalfella :rolleyes:

    Lads look at this another way:

    A student heart surgeon that is not taking his final exams until tomorrow, would you be happy to let him preform open heart surgery unaccompanied on you tonight even though he's up to the standard for to sit his exams tomorrow! Or would you wait until he can prove he has passed his exams and knows exactly what he's doing.... If you think about it it's the same thing as a learner driver let loose on a public road with a lethal weapon (a car) ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    Now their is a difference in technical ability required to perform heart surgery and driving a car - I'm sure if I looked on youtube then I would find footage of a monkey driving


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭ztoical


    john47832 wrote: »
    I'm sure if I looked on youtube then I would find footage of a monkey driving

    But could the monkey past the test?

    Seriously this thread is pointless and going in circles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,022 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement