Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ping times for gamers

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 94 ✭✭Bios


    Perlico
    1.5mb
    12.10am

    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=90.1 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=89.0 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=90.3 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=88.0 ms

    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=87.1 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=88.9 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=85.8 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=90.2 ms

    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=122 time=70.9 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=122 time=71.8 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=122 time=71.7 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=4 ttl=122 time=73.9 ms


  • Registered Users Posts: 258 ✭✭alanucc


    Eircom 3mb 12.21 am

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=55

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 44ms


    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=59
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=59
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=59
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=59

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 59ms


    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=121

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 43ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 43ms


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 339 ✭✭docmol


    NTL 10mb Cabra, Dublin 7 00:30 am

    C:\Users\dave>ping 85.8.132.222
    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=51
    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 90ms, Maximum = 99ms, Average = 92ms
    C:\Users\dave>ping 85.114.152.67
    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=55
    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 40ms
    C:\Users\dave>ping 85.236.96.22
    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=118
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=118
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=118
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=118
    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 37ms, Average = 34ms
    C:\Users\dave>


    Playing CSS on English servers with ping around 25ms, downloads like the clappers:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭Kinetic^


    Smart 4mb

    85.8.132.222

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=52

    85.114.152.67

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=58

    85.236.96.22

    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=124
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=124
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=124
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=124


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭d22ontour


    Smart 6mb


    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=52

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 29ms




    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=58

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 47ms



    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=124
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=124
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=124
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=124

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 29ms


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 8,160 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jonathan


    BT 3mb (fastpath line)



    > ping 85.8.132.222
    PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222): 32 data bytes
    32 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=35.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=30.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=30.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=30.0 ms
    
    --- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 30.0/31.2/35.0 ms
    
    
    
    
    
    > ping 85.114.152.67
    PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67): 32 data bytes
    32 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=40.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=40.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=40.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=40.0 ms
    
    --- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 40.0/40.0/40.0 ms
    
    
    
    
    
    > ping 85.236.96.22
    PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22): 32 data bytes
    32 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=122 time=25.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=122 time=25.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=122 time=25.0 ms
    32 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=4 ttl=122 time=25.0 ms
    
    --- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 25.0/25.0/25.0 ms
    


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 16,836 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gonzo


    Eircom 7.6meg, 1.22am

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 19ms

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 30ms


    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=120

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 16ms


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭wcarey1975


    BT 3Mb package

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=50
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=50
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=50
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=50

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 50ms

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 60ms

    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=120

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 43ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 46ms


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    Note: So far its been all Windows pings, if anyone uses linux for pingtimes won't be comparable as it uses 64 byte pings instead of 32
    except for mine. i did mine straight from my router and the default on that is 56 bytes for some random reason.


  • Registered Users Posts: 413 ✭✭Skittle


    UPC 20Mb Time 23:10

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=51

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=55

    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=120


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 426 ✭✭Baneblade


    BT 24mb

    time 18:30pm


    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 38ms


    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 48ms


    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 32ms


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,871 ✭✭✭Simi


    Ok i'll indulge in your study.

    UPC 10mb - Galway City
    ~19:00 (aka peak time)

    First a control.


    C:\>ping boards.ie

    Pinging boards.ie [89.234.66.107] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=59
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=59
    Reply from 89.234.66.107: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59

    Ping statistics for 89.234.66.107:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 13ms

    Now 1st IP.

    C:\>ping 85.8.132.222

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=50
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=50
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=50
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=50

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 92ms, Maximum = 104ms, Average = 97ms

    2nd IP


    C:\>ping 85.114.152.67

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 43ms


    And 3rd


    C:\>ping 85.236.96.22

    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=54
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 42ms


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,501 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    19:15
    UPC 20MB
    Galway city


    ping 85.8.132.222

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=301ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=51

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 113ms, Maximum = 301ms, Average = 165ms

    ping 85.114.152.67

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=55

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 79ms, Maximum = 176ms, Average = 143ms

    ping 85.236.96.22

    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=120
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=120

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 65ms, Maximum = 264ms, Average = 132ms


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    Fastcom, 2mb Sligo 19:20

    C:\Users\Paul>ping 85.8.132.222

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=53
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=53
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=53

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 27ms

    C:\Users\Paul>ping 85.114.152.67

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

    Request timed out.
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=46
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=46
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=46

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 44ms, Average = 39ms

    C:\Users\Paul>ping 85.236.96.22

    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=121

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 28ms


  • Registered Users Posts: 114 ✭✭smiddyboy


    On Eircom 7.6Mb @ 19:45

    ping 85.8.132.222

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=55

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 46ms

    ping 85.114.152.67

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 67ms

    ping 85.236.96.22

    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=121

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 45ms


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭Redisle


    IBB Breeze 4mb.
    20.25

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=56
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=56
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 29ms

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=49
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=49
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=49

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 46ms

    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=122
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=122
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=122
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=122

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 33ms


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32 TheMeatMan


    Time: 21:01
    Eircom
    3mb

    Pinging 85.8.132.222
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
    round-trip min/avg/max = 20/25/30 msec

    Pinging 85.114.152.67
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
    round-trip min/avg/max = 30/32/40 msec

    Pinging 85.236.96.22
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Received reply
    Success rate is 100 percent (4/4)
    round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 msec


  • Registered Users Posts: 740 ✭✭✭z0oT


    Eircom 7mb
    22:54
    mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping [B]85.8.132.222[/B] -c 4
    PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=53.1 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=52.5 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=53.2 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=53.6 ms
    
    --- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3001ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 52.587/53.157/53.623/0.406 ms
    
    mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping [B]85.114.152.67[/B] -c 4
    PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=71.3 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=69.3 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=72.6 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=68.5 ms
    
    --- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3000ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 68.560/70.463/72.623/1.602 ms
    
    mark@mark-laptop:~$ ping [B]85.236.96.22[/B] -c 4
    PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=121 time=49.8 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=121 time=50.3 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=121 time=50.1 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=4 ttl=121 time=50.1 ms
    
    --- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 2999ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 49.821/50.105/50.365/0.249 ms
    


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 491 ✭✭Some_Person


    Disregard my comment about Alphawave fixing the speed/latency, it's gone down the toilet again.


  • Company Representative Posts: 2,107 ✭✭✭Magnet: Rory


    Thank you all for participating in our survey!
    The winner (out of a hat) of the €20 voucher is Fluffy.Death !!!
    Fluffy.Death - I’ll PM you now and get details of an address to post out the voucher.

    I would say keep the survey going, gamers should know what companies or ISP's have good pings as low ping times are a must have for most if not all online games.


    We'll post the results soon.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭Dardania


    Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

    if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

    deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
    zeus.dl.playstation.net

    although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...


  • Company Representative Posts: 2,107 ✭✭✭Magnet: Rory


    Dardania wrote: »
    Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

    if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

    deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
    zeus.dl.playstation.net

    although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

    By all means, we would love to see it continue.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,242 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    Dardania wrote: »
    Just thinking, would it be an idea to expand the scope of the survey to include PlaySyation Network & Xbox Live? Quite a few people game on their consoles rather than on their desktops...

    if anyones interested in following up on this I'll do a bit of an exercise into finding out what IP addresses to ping. So far for the PS3 I've found:

    deu01.ps3.download.playstation.net
    zeus.dl.playstation.net

    although I think they're only the firmware update check server & the login to the PSN page rather thanstraight up gaming servers...

    DNS names like those are potentially a bad idea, since they're often geo-balanced.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭Dardania


    Spear wrote: »
    DNS names like those are potentially a bad idea, since they're often geo-balanced.

    you're probably rihgt - the zeus one is returning an akami address...

    I mustfigure out some way of sniffing the ip address my ps3 connects to through the router - any ideas of software to do that? I have an old hub (not switch)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13 chris254


    By all means, we would love to see it continue.

    fastcom sligo
    8.23pm

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=152ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=51
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=51

    Ping statistics for 85.8.132.222:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 91ms, Maximum = 152ms, Average = 110ms


    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=44
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=44
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=44
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=44

    Ping statistics for 85.114.152.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 78ms, Maximum = 134ms, Average = 100ms


    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=114
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=114
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=114
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=114

    Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 73ms, Maximum = 207ms, Average = 140ms


  • Registered Users Posts: 931 ✭✭✭Xennon


    Eircon;
    8:50pm
    Caherconlish Limerick



    ping -c 10 85.8.132.222
    PING 85.8.132.222 (85.8.132.222): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=57.934 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=59.608 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=58.965 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=67.209 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.681 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=76.707 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=91.441 ms
    64 bytes from 85.8.132.222: icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=62.914 ms

    --- 85.8.132.222 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 20% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 47.681/65.307/91.441/12.550 ms

    ping -c 10 85.114.152.67
    PING 85.114.152.67 (85.114.152.67): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=59.219 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=64.293 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=69.041 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=72.203 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=68.042 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=71.666 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=68.469 ms
    64 bytes from 85.114.152.67: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=58.347 ms

    --- 85.114.152.67 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 20% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 58.347/66.410/72.203/4.952 ms

    ping -c 10 85.236.96.22
    PING 85.236.96.22 (85.236.96.22): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=0 ttl=121 time=51.902 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=1 ttl=121 time=51.163 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=2 ttl=121 time=53.348 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=3 ttl=121 time=53.155 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=5 ttl=121 time=40.982 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=6 ttl=121 time=53.646 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=7 ttl=121 time=59.488 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=8 ttl=121 time=58.118 ms
    64 bytes from 85.236.96.22: icmp_seq=9 ttl=121 time=62.805 ms

    --- 85.236.96.22 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 10% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 40.982/53.845/62.805/5.846 ms

    :mad:

    Next door to the exchange too!!

    Thanks Rory.


  • Registered Users Posts: 363 ✭✭Calebmcd


    UTV 8Mb
    23:30

    Pinging 85.8.132.222 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52
    Reply from 85.8.132.222: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52

    Pinging 85.114.152.67 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=55
    Reply from 85.114.152.67: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=55

    Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=121
    Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=121


Advertisement