Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DAVID ICKE IN DUBLIN 5th SEPTEMBER 2009

  • 15-07-2009 4:35am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 199 ✭✭


    DAVID ICKE IN DUBLIN 5th SEPTEMBER 2009

    David will be speaking against Globalisation, The European Union and the Lisbon Treaty. He will be supported by Brian Gerrish speaking on ‘ Common Purpose’ and other speakers to be advised.

    More details coming soon!!

    http://info-wars.org/?page_id=2173


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Ironically, he's over during the Bulmers Comedy Festival.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 90 ✭✭ihatewallies


    David Icke is coming to speak against Lisbon?

    The pro Lisbon camp will be dancing in the street.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 199 ✭✭sub-x


    DAVID ICKE IN DUBLIN 5th SEPTEMBER 2009

    Confirmed The Helix(DCU) in Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭DubTony


    Gerrish really has a bee in his bonnet about Common Purpose. Makes some interesting points in anything I've seen, but his presentation style sucks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    Would someone not just dress as a lizard and show him a good time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭thecommander


    prinz wrote: »
    Would someone not just dress as a lizard and show him a good time.

    Has he ever U-turned on that, or does he still believe it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Has he ever U-turned on that, or does he still believe it?


    he has moved away from that although im sure if pressed he would still say its his belief


  • Registered Users Posts: 276 ✭✭A_Fitz


    A lot of people laugh at the guy, but if they actually took the time to read his books they'd see that he's talking a lot of sense regarding a numerous things, and while the idea of shape-shifting lizards running the world is certainly a bit left-of-centre, it's about as likely as 'God', 'Buddha', 'Allah', 'Heaven', 'Hell', The Bible containing some truth, etc., etc., except that most people are too ****ing ignorant and brainwashed to consider the fact that us humans only know a tiny, miniscule amount about this universe and everything in it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭thecommander


    A_Fitz wrote: »
    ...except that most people are too ****ing ignorant and brainwashed to consider the fact that us humans only know a tiny, miniscule amount about this universe and everything in it

    I think most people will agree that we know very little. I'm not sure where you're getting that from.


  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭Nuravictus


    Icke while he does say some weird stuff is great in other ways, What I like most about Icke is his talks about 'Self' and overcoming the reptilian brain not to be mistaken with Shape changing Reptiles from the planet poptard has Alex Jones nicely put it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    I think most people will agree that we know very little. I'm not sure where you're getting that from.

    I agree too.

    However there's a big difference between that and believing what comes out of David Ickes mouth.


  • Registered Users Posts: 49 irlande_euroluv


    I Emailed the Helix on tuesday and they replied to say that David Icke would NOT be appearing at the helix in September. Does anyone know where he's on?
    I really want to go see him and hear his views, as the 'No' campaign has been silenced here, this time round.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    I Emailed the Helix on tuesday and they replied to say that David Icke would NOT be appearing at the helix in September. Does anyone know where he's on?

    Sorry don't know
    I really want to go see him and hear his views, as the 'No' campaign has been silenced here, this time round.

    What? There are huge threads about it on a number of forums in here. The only thing about the Lisbon threads on boards.ie is they are not full of made up stuff, at least stuff that isn't challenged and shown to be made up. Maybe if the No side stopped lying for a moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 49 irlande_euroluv


    Who cares whats said on the boards, the main stream madia isnt airing the 'No' side. The text of the treaty hasn't changed at all !!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,453 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Who cares whats said on the boards, the main stream madia isnt airing the 'No' side. The text of the treaty hasn't changed at all !!

    Of course it hasn't changed and if we give a No vote again the treaty will be re named and re branded and will simply be passed on a parlimentary basis. The NWO bandwagon rolls on and never stops for long.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    Who cares whats said on the boards, the main stream madia isnt airing the 'No' side. The text of the treaty hasn't changed at all !!

    As I was saying most of the arguments the No side use against the Lisbon treaty are either not in the treaty or are untrue. So why would the media, at least any media that likes to use facts, report untrue rubbish. I don't want people to agree with me about Lisbon I want them to find out the reality and vote according which is why I'm personally now voting yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    If you want a conspiracy theory look into Declan Ganley's background. Dodgy as. Albania, Eastern Bloc, Iraq, American think-tanks...... he has popped up in some unusual places over the years. Then Ireland re Lisbon I. Reason enough not vote Yes for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,453 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    meglome wrote: »
    As I was saying most of the arguments the No side use against the Lisbon treaty are either not in the treaty or are untrue. So why would the media, at least any media that likes to use facts, report untrue rubbish. I don't want people to agree with me about Lisbon I want them to find out the reality and vote according which is why I'm personally now voting yes.

    Does the fact that we're having a second referedum not ring any alram bells in your head?
    Lisbon doesn't do anyone any favors.
    Ireland was pushed into a Yes vote for the Nice treaty, we were told there would be no jobs in the country and the Celtic Tiger party would come to an abrupt stop. Nice allowed new accession states into the EU, and sure those countries had a right to enter, but it is those countries with their cheaper labour markets and newfound EU membership that have been drawing large footloose international companies out of this country.

    In the end the Nice treaty made a huge impact on how this current downturn affected Ireland. With continued direct foriegn investment we could now be in a much better position, but instead the companies that once made our country prosperous are now operating out of eastern euorpean countries with cheaper labour markets.
    We got ****ed by the Nice treaty, and in a second referendum.

    Lisbon, if ratified will take away our right to ratify any further treaties.
    In anyones language that can only be viewsed in a negative light.
    The No campaign last year was seriously shady and the issues they raised were thinly veiled lies. I have no time for Libertas or for Sinn Fein and as far as I'm concerned there are very legitimate reasons for voting No to Lisbon which have been discredited by the involvment of these parties.
    Regardless of the bull**** that gets bandied about regarding Lisbon, it is something that should not be ratified.
    If you think a Yes vote will make Ireland prosperous again, then you're a very stupid person. If you think that the EU after a Yes vote will be a more democratic place then you're naive to say the least.

    There are very simple issues which make the Lisbon treay something to be voted out, unfortunatly we have been subjected to a No campaign that was built on lies and deciet and now we have a situation where there is no campaign for a No vote in this unconstitutional second referendum and the Yes side are being made to look pious and untouchable and anyone who has anti Lisbon leanings is made to look foolish and willing to risk Irelands economic future in a time of huge economic turmoil, it's a cheap emotional blackmail trick and the suggestion that last years No vote contributed to our current economic situation is laughable at best, we were already in decline for 18 months before the No vote.

    This whole Lisbon debate has been based on lies and subterfuge.
    It's time to look at the basics and realise that it really is a piece of **** and forget all the media jargon we've been bombarded with recently and stop acting like sheep and make up our own minds and not just follow the line of "well someone said it's common sense to vote Yes". **** common sense, use facts instead. Facts show Lisbon up for what it really is regardless of how many people say otherwise.

    Glazers Out!



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,556 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    was the second divorce referendum unconstitutional too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,453 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    was the second divorce referendum unconstitutional too?

    No, and neither was changing the Marathon bar to the Snickers, and that has nothing to do with what we're discussing either.

    Glazers Out!



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 174 ✭✭NilByMouth


    I thought the topic was about david icke and his lizards and whether he would make an apearrance and not the lisbon treaty?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    nullzero wrote: »
    Does the fact that we're having a second referedum not ring any alram bells in your head?
    Lisbon doesn't do anyone any favors.
    Ireland was pushed into a Yes vote for the Nice treaty, we were told there would be no jobs in the country and the Celtic Tiger party would come to an abrupt stop. Nice allowed new accession states into the EU, and sure those countries had a right to enter, but it is those countries with their cheaper labour markets and newfound EU membership that have been drawing large footloose international companies out of this country.
    In the end the Nice treaty made a huge impact on how this current downturn affected Ireland. With continued direct foriegn investment we could now be in a much better position, but instead the companies that once made our country prosperous are now operating out of eastern euorpean countries with cheaper labour markets.
    We got ****ed by the Nice treaty, and in a second referendum.

    We priced ourselves out of the market. other countries were happy to accept jobs offered, because Irish people were expecting / demanding wages far above the average. It had nothing to do with Nice. MNC's would have left anyway. It's the nature of business. Do you think if we rejected Nice they would for some reason have stayed here? :confused:
    nullzero wrote: »
    Lisbon, if ratified will take away our right to ratify any further treaties.
    In anyones language that can only be viewsed in a negative light.
    The No campaign last year was seriously shady and the issues they raised were thinly veiled lies. I have no time for Libertas or for Sinn Fein and as far as I'm concerned there are very legitimate reasons for voting No to Lisbon which have been discredited by the involvment of these parties.
    Regardless of the bull**** that gets bandied about regarding Lisbon, it is something that should not be ratified.
    If you think a Yes vote will make Ireland prosperous again, then you're a very stupid person. If you think that the EU after a Yes vote will be a more democratic place then you're naive to say the least..

    I don't think anyone believes we're suddenly going to be prosperous again, but it will have a massive impact on the reputation and standing of the country in the international community, which in the long run can only help/hinder recovery depending on the outcome. A No vote is shooting ourselves in the foot before the race out of recession even begins. The Lisbon Treaty transfers more powers to the Parliament, i.e. the only democratically elected institution....
    nullzero wrote: »
    Facts show Lisbon up for what it really is regardless of how many people say otherwise.

    What facts and what do they show?

    p.s. on topic David Icke's a gobsh!te.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,453 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    prinz wrote: »
    We priced ourselves out of the market. other countries were happy to accept jobs offered, because Irish people were expecting / demanding wages far above the average. It had nothing to do with Nice. MNC's would have left anyway. It's the nature of business. Do you think if we rejected Nice they would for some reason have stayed here? :confused:



    I don't think anyone believes we're suddenly going to be prosperous again, but it will have a massive impact on the reputation and standing of the country in the international community, which in the long run can only help/hinder recovery depending on the outcome. A No vote is shooting ourselves in the foot before the race out of recession even begins. The Lisbon Treaty transfers more powers to the Parliament, i.e. the only democratically elected institution....



    What facts and what do they show?

    p.s. on topic David Icke's a gobsh!te.

    I understand that we priced ourselves out of the market. But the accession states offered a quick get out for the foriegn companies that previously wasn't present. Footloose companies never stick around forever, but we could have held those jobs for a few more years and given ourselves a chance to steady our ship properly. I'm not naive enough to believe that these companies were going to stay here forever but the accession of new states with cheaper labour markets via the Nice treaty accelerated the process much to our detriment.
    The situation we find oursleves in now is almost impossible to solve. Having a good standing in an undemocratic EU system will not change that. In essence there's very little we can do to make our situation worse than it already is or is going to become.
    We're a country with no valuable natural resources, we got rich off the back of large multinational companies who took advatage of our cheap labour markets(and who will do the same in every country in which they operate eventually) and we have deluded oursleves into thinking that we can once again become a major economic force. We have nothing that anybody wants, just like we did in the 80's, being realistic we never had anything other than a cheap labour market and a lower rate of corporate tax. We no longer have a cheap labour market and now the EU will have the power via Lisbon to raise our corporate tax rates so we won't have an "unfair" advantage over other EU countries in attracting business. In yet YOU have the great idea that Lisbon will enhance our economic prospects. We only had two tricks up our sleeves to attarct direct foreign investment and we're about to be without either of them. Now that clever isn't it?

    As for your point about democracy, do you not think that the people should have a voice? Do you trust politicians to always have the best interests of the people at heart?
    When you take the people out of the political equation you hand free reign over to those in power and after all, if we've learned anyting from our species history it is that we are incredibly fair and just when given absolute power, or maybe not, perhaps you could enlighten me on that issue.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    nullzero wrote: »
    As for your point about democracy, do you not think that the people should have a voice?

    Yes, and the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty allow more powers and competencies to the Parliament... which is more democratic, since that is elected by the people. :confused:. I agree the EU is not perfect, Lisbon is not perfect, but it is a step in the right direction. It's a lot better than the present set up. You argue that the EU is undemocratic, but yet you won't vote for change? :confused:. All the no campaigners have had the same angle on this, the EU is x, y and z boo boo boo. Yet they will vote no, and nothing will change, which means the EU stays exactly the way it was before and they can complain about it more. Circular argument.
    nullzero wrote: »
    Do you trust politicians to always have the best interests of the people at heart?

    In Europe, yes.
    nullzero wrote: »
    When you take the people out of the political equation you hand free reign over to those in power and after all, if we've learned anyting from our species history it is that we are incredibly fair and just when given absolute power, or maybe not, perhaps you could enlighten me on that issue.

    The Lisbon Treaty gives the average person more of a hand in running the EU not less :confused:. It also allows for more democratic decision making at state level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    NilByMouth wrote: »
    david icke and his lizards


    Good name for a band that :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,453 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    prinz wrote: »
    Yes, and the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty allow more powers and competencies to the Parliament... which is more democratic, since that is elected by the people. :confused:. I agree the EU is not perfect, Lisbon is not perfect, but it is a step in the right direction. It's a lot better than the present set up. You argue that the EU is undemocratic, but yet you won't vote for change? :confused:. All the no campaigners have had the same angle on this, the EU is x, y and z boo boo boo. Yet they will vote no, and nothing will change, which means the EU stays exactly the way it was before and they can complain about it more. Circular argument.



    In Europe, yes.



    The Lisbon Treaty gives the average person more of a hand in running the EU not less :confused:. It also allows for more democratic decision making at state level.

    There is no point in debating with you. You're mind is made up.
    You're entitled to your opinions but believing that all MEP's have the wishes of the people at heart all the time and that by signing away our right influence the power stucture we gain MORE control then you must have a screw loose.
    I notice that you didn't respond to the points I made about Nice and the accession states and their affect on our current economic dilema.
    Perhaps it's because I used facts and not half baking opinions. But then you can prove anything with facts cant you?

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    nullzero wrote: »
    There is no point in debating with you. You're mind is made up.
    You're entitled to your opinions but believing that all MEP's have the wishes of the people at heart all the time and that by signing away our right influence the power stucture we gain MORE control then you must have a screw loose.

    No. Having problems with the current set up. And rejecting improvements on the same grounds as the problems you already have, that is having a screw lose. If you want to blame the ills of the world on the NWO and elites etc go ahead.
    nullzero wrote: »
    I notice that you didn't respond to the points I made about Nice and the accession states and their affect on our current economic dilema.
    Perhaps it's because I used facts and not half baking opinions. But then you can prove anything with facts cant you?

    What facts exactly? The accession states were already there. MNC's didn't relocate because we passed Nice. They would have gone anyway :confused: Your argument doesn't stand up whatsoever. Most MNC's are relocating beyond the accession states now, India, China etc. What EU Treaty are you going to blame for that? The accession states would have helped our economy if the minimum wage had not of been brought in incidentally. As basic wages would have been brought down by labour arriving into Ireland willing to work the same jobs for less. Which would have brought costs down etc. You think all the companies went east because of Nice? Half baked opinions is right. By the way I didn't see any facts in your posts care to point them out? Saying that all politicians don't have the best interests of the people at heart is not a fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,453 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    prinz wrote: »
    No. Having problems with the current set up. And rejecting improvements on the same grounds as the problems you already have, that is having a screw lose. If you want to blame the ills of the world on the NWO and elites etc go ahead.



    What facts exactly? The accession states were already there. MNC's didn't relocate because we passed Nice. They would have gone anyway :confused: Your argument doesn't stand up whatsoever. Most MNC's are relocating beyond the accession states now, India, China etc. What EU Treaty are you going to blame for that? The accession states would have helped our economy if the minimum wage had not of been brought in incidentally. As basic wages would have been brought down by labour arriving into Ireland willing to work the same jobs for less. Which would have brought costs down etc. You think all the companies went east because of Nice? Half baked opinions is right. By the way I didn't see any facts in your posts care to point them out? Saying that all politicians don't have the best interests of the people at heart is not a fact.


    I was talking about the EU, not the far east in regards to direct foreign investment leaving our country as it was in the context of the debate.
    I do not see how Lisbon improves the EU, it does change it in as much as it centralizes power and reduces the amount of people who have influence over it, which is the opposite of what you seem to believe.
    If you don't see any facts in what I'm saying then it's because you wish not to. I don't see many in your posts but I'm not arrogant enough to believe that everything I say is 100% correct.
    If you want to believe that the EU is a nice cuddly institution be my guest. As I said before your mind is closed and you believe that everything you say cannot be challenged. It is impossible to have a discussion with somebody with such narcissism inherint in their personality.
    There is huge amounts of evidence to support the NWO conspiracy, more than I could be bothered to quote here, or what you would be bothered to read.
    I understand that you believe yourself to be my intellectual superior, you're a very egotistocal person and those things go hand in hand.
    I used to have beliefs very much like yours, but I had to question the world around me, and my opinions shift with each new piece of information I come across that challenges my beliefs.
    If you go through life believing in the same set of ideals you're closing yourself off from ever really learning anything because you will warp the facts in front of you to fit your own beliefs. I used to be like that myself, but I had to reailse that I didn't have the answers, and I never would have claimed to have known everything, much like I'm sure you don't, in yet I found it was my right to bad mouth other alternative opinions when I had no right to do so.
    I'm sure you will come back at me and refute whay I have said and paint me in a negative light and that is your right if you feel the need to do so.
    However I must congratualte you on taking the thread completely off topic and castigate myself for allowing you to bait me in such a manner.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    nullzero wrote: »
    I was talking about the EU, not the far east in regards to direct foreign investment leaving our country as it was in the context of the debate.

    And I responded to your point about the accession states, and asked you a question about MNC's relocating further afield...:confused:
    nullzero wrote: »
    I do not see how Lisbon improves the EU, it does change it in as much as it centralizes power and reduces the amount of people who have influence over it, which is the opposite of what you seem to believe.

    It gives the democratically elected Parliament more power.....fact.
    nullzero wrote: »
    If you don't see any facts in what I'm saying then it's because you wish not to. I don't see many in your posts but I'm not arrogant enough to believe that everything I say is 100% correct.

    Simply because you haven't given any facts. :confused:.
    nullzero wrote: »
    If you want to believe that the EU is a nice cuddly institution be my guest. As I said before your mind is closed and you believe that everything you say cannot be challenged. It is impossible to have a discussion with somebody with such narcissism inherint in their personality.

    I already made clear that the EU, IMO, is not perfect and has a long way to go before being "nice and cuddly". Once again :confused:
    nullzero wrote: »
    There is huge amounts of evidence to support the NWO conspiracy, more than I could be bothered to quote here, or what you would be bothered to read.

    I could be bothered to read anything of worth.
    nullzero wrote: »
    I understand that you believe yourself to be my intellectual superior, you're a very egotistocal person and those things go hand in hand.

    How do you come to that understanding?
    nullzero wrote: »
    I used to have beliefs very much like yours, but I had to question the world around me, and my opinions shift with each new piece of information I come across that challenges my beliefs.

    So basically you're easily led and influenced, believing what people tell you to believe. Hmm.
    nullzero wrote: »
    If you go through life believing in the same set of ideals you're closing yourself off from ever really learning anything because you will warp the facts in front of you to fit your own beliefs. I used to be like that myself, but I had to reailse that I didn't have the answers, and I never would have claimed to have known everything, much like I'm sure you don't, in yet I found it was my right to bad mouth other alternative opinions when I had no right to do so..

    You're voting no on an EU Treaty you obviously are having difficulty (a) understanding and (b) accepting is not part of some NWO elitist lizard-man conspiracy. I don't know everything, I never claim to. I am always open to challenging my own beliefs.
    nullzero wrote: »
    I'm sure you will come back at me and refute whay I have said and paint me in a negative light and that is your right if you feel the need to do so.
    However I must congratualte you on taking the thread completely off topic and castigate myself for allowing you to bait me in such a manner.

    If you're going to call me an egotistical narcissist then yes I feel the need to do so. So much for taking in new information and 'challenging' your beliefs.. you're obviously completely closed off to reality. If David Icke is, as I expect he is, here to give a talk on the EU and the Lisbon Treaty then no I haven't taken it off topic. Given the OP that's exactly what he is doing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    nullzero wrote: »
    I was talking about the EU, not the far east in regards to direct foreign investment leaving our country as it was in the context of the debate.
    I do not see how Lisbon improves the EU, it does change it in as much as it centralizes power and reduces the amount of people who have influence over it, which is the opposite of what you seem to believe.
    If you don't see any facts in what I'm saying then it's because you wish not to. I don't see many in your posts but I'm not arrogant enough to believe that everything I say is 100% correct.
    If you want to believe that the EU is a nice cuddly institution be my guest. As I said before your mind is closed and you believe that everything you say cannot be challenged. It is impossible to have a discussion with somebody with such narcissism inherint in their personality.
    There is huge amounts of evidence to support the NWO conspiracy, more than I could be bothered to quote here, or what you would be bothered to read.
    I understand that you believe yourself to be my intellectual superior, you're a very egotistocal person and those things go hand in hand.
    I used to have beliefs very much like yours, but I had to question the world around me, and my opinions shift with each new piece of information I come across that challenges my beliefs.
    If you go through life believing in the same set of ideals you're closing yourself off from ever really learning anything because you will warp the facts in front of you to fit your own beliefs. I used to be like that myself, but I had to reailse that I didn't have the answers, and I never would have claimed to have known everything, much like I'm sure you don't, in yet I found it was my right to bad mouth other alternative opinions when I had no right to do so.
    I'm sure you will come back at me and refute whay I have said and paint me in a negative light and that is your right if you feel the need to do so.
    However I must congratualte you on taking the thread completely off topic and castigate myself for allowing you to bait me in such a manner.

    Give this a try... Stop attacking and insulting people who haven't said anything about you personally and instead debate the points like you say you're doing.

    Others are happy to prove what you're saying is simply wrong. They are not attacking you, they are attacking your beliefs.

    Edit: Not trying to backseat Mod here just want Nullzero to actually debate like he says he is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,453 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    meglome wrote: »
    Give this a try... Stop attacking and insulting people who haven't said anything about you personally and instead debate the points like you say you're doing.

    Others are happy to prove what you're saying is simply wrong. They are not attacking you, they are attacking your beliefs.

    Edit: Not trying to backseat Mod here just want Nullzero to actually debate like he says he is.

    As I said on the other thread if people such as yourself or Prinz have something to say to me off topic PM me. Stop clogging the thread. I'm not looking for arguments but I won't stand for bullies like you and Prinz who feel they have a right to take the discussion off topic and cause arguments.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    nullzero wrote: »
    As I said on the other thread if people such as yourself or Prinz have something to say to me off topic PM me. Stop clogging the thread. I'm not looking for arguments but I won't stand for bullies like you and Prinz who feel they have a right to take the discussion off topic and cause arguments.

    (a) It was on topic (b) I resent being referred to as a bully purely because I have a different opinion to you and (c) I wasn't looking for an argument, your personal insults lead to petty arguments.... posting on topic, but merely disagreeing with you in an adult manner is not causing an argument :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    nullzero wrote: »
    As I said on the other thread if people such as yourself or Prinz have something to say to me off topic PM me. Stop clogging the thread. I'm not looking for arguments but I won't stand for bullies like you and Prinz who feel they have a right to take the discussion off topic and cause arguments.

    So if we can be clear... if we disagree with your beliefs we are bullies too? As I said I'm happy for you to believe what you want but when your putting it out there for other people, like me, to believe then forgive for for wanting you to back it up. As I said I don't know you, you could be a complete liar for all I know.

    And as Prinz says David Icke was coming here to ask for a Lisbon No vote amongst other things right? So not really off topic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,247 ✭✭✭✭6th


    nullzero wrote: »
    rant

    Ok you're a newish poster but I'll still gonna infract you and tell you to read the charter at the top of this forum. You may feel that you are defending yourself but the idea here is that its ok to address what someone is saying but not attack the poster (attack the post not the poster is how it get phrased usually).

    Anyway, thread has gone way off topic and its now locked!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement