site to play .50/1 NL ??

prunch · 25-07-2009 2:17am #1

just wondering where do you guys think is the best place to play at these limits, as in where are the most fish? cheers

FlushPoker.ie · 25-07-2009 2:22am

any iPoker site....PaddyPower WilliamHill etc....

Also try and learn PLO when i was grinding up the roll the low limit PLO tables were and remain very profitable and full of fish making very basic mistakes

sickpuppy · 25-07-2009 2:30am

Im on pokerstars at the moment 160000players online if you cant find fish there ya may give up.

FlushPoker.ie · 25-07-2009 2:50am

sickpuppy wrote: »

Im on pokerstars at the moment 160000players online if you cant find fish there ya may give up.

LOL very true...can be some very good regs too tho...just look out for french ppl other than elky

cardshark202 · 25-07-2009 3:04am

elky is canadian

phantom_lord · 25-07-2009 3:17am

elky is a freak and a weird dude imo

http://tv.de.pokernews.com/Bertrand+'Elky'+Grosspellier/29174749001

plus i'm pretty sure he's french.

Grafter · 25-07-2009 3:17am

cardshark202 wrote: »

elky is canadian

Oh no he's not

corkie123 · 25-07-2009 3:21am

hes french

FlushPoker.ie · 25-07-2009 3:31am

Getting Off Topic Now:

Main Points
- Elky Good and Either French or Canadian...but sick sick player
- PLO low to mid stakes good option for grinding and full of weak bad players
- Pokeer is good :-)

Tight Ted · 25-07-2009 11:01am

phantom_lord wrote: »

elky is a freak and a weird dude imo

http://tv.de.pokernews.com/Bertrand+'Elky'+Grosspellier/29174749001

plus i'm pretty sure he's french.

That he is, but he comes across pretty normal in that particular vid.

ianmc38 · 25-07-2009 7:27pm

Speaking from a neutral perspective, id say ipoker is amongst the worst places to play .50/1 right now.

Blacktie. · 25-07-2009 7:42pm

Don't play get out while you can!!!

prunch · 25-07-2009 8:45pm

Blacktie. wrote: »

Don't play get out while you can!!!

seriously??

Tony_Montana · 25-07-2009 11:15pm

defo ipoker

Jesus Wept · 03-09-2009 3:26am

Tony_Montana wrote: »

defo ipoker

About 10 active tables, some 6 handed, some 10, biggest average pot is $18, average i about $12.

Is it really tight?

Mr.Plough · 03-09-2009 3:41am

Ipoker is full of nits living off rb and bonuses, last time I checked anyway.

Stars is soft, even the regs usually play 20/15 ish and are pretty exploitable. No rb though.

Havn't played 100nl on FT but I would guess it's better than ipoker mainly due to traffic and rb is a plus.

RoadSweeper · 03-09-2009 8:39am

Stars and FT has loads of fish still, plus ridiculous good software.

The Improver · 03-09-2009 9:49am

No more fish on ipoker. FACT

Wreck · 03-09-2009 11:21am

The Improver wrote: »

No more fish on ipoker. FACT

I'm still there, and I'm a total fish.

ianmc38 · 03-09-2009 11:31am

Boss/Ongame have good traffic and alot softer than Ipoker, also good rb. Stars/FTP are the best software wise.

OilBeefHooked2 · 03-09-2009 11:33am

The Improver wrote: »

No more fish on ipoker. FACT

Your still playing there Keith aren't ya?!

Small Change · 03-09-2009 11:45am

This ipoker thing confuses me TBH...

There appears to be a general consensus that ipoker is mostly populated with multitabling rakeback nits.

Given that, relatively speaking, ipoker has one of the poorest "rakeback"/VIP structures available and relatively tough games, what is the attraction for these types of players??

Are they all on legacy deals from previous networks or am I missing someting in terms of the attraction?

premierstone · 03-09-2009 12:30pm

Fish = badbeats

The Improver · 03-09-2009 1:41pm

david-k wrote: »

Your still playing there Keith aren't ya?!

ya, mr kerins, but for other reasons or else i'd be gone fishing!!!!

Tony_Montana · 03-09-2009 2:35pm

Wreck wrote: »

I'm still there, and I'm a total fish.

Same here

Small Change wrote: »

This ipoker thing confuses me TBH...

There appears to be a general consensus that ipoker is mostly populated with multitabling rakeback nits.

Given that, relatively speaking, ipoker has one of the poorest "rakeback"/VIP structures available and relatively tough games, what is the attraction for these types of players??

Are they all on legacy deals from previous networks or am I missing someting in terms of the attraction?

100% of your rake. I cant see how anyone cannot be on it.

cooker3 · 04-09-2009 12:54am

Small Change wrote: »

This ipoker thing confuses me TBH...

There appears to be a general consensus that ipoker is mostly populated with multitabling rakeback nits.

Given that, relatively speaking, ipoker has one of the poorest "rakeback"/VIP structures available and relatively tough games, what is the attraction for these types of players??

Are they all on legacy deals from previous networks or am I missing someting in terms of the attraction?

Ipoker certainly doesn't have the worst rb deal. Pretty much the opposite.

Jesus Wept · 04-09-2009 1:58am

Tony_Montana wrote: »

100% of your rake. I cant see how anyone cannot be on it.

?

jimbling · 16-09-2009 12:05pm

Right, I'm currently on iPoker and came across this thread. I haven't played a few months but put in 9k+ hands in the last two days 9 tabling .25/.50. The games definitely aren't ridiculously soft or anything, but they're easily beatable and the good rb deal makes me feel all warm and fussy inside.

I do want to "move up levels" though, and if they're going to get much much tougher then I would consider the move.
So, where to?

Stars is a no go for me. Firstly because of a lack of rb and secondly because that's where I play my tourneys and I don't want to mix the two.

FT, I have always heard that cash games where tough there. Is that no longer the case?

Ongame/Boss. Ian, you mention these, is there really enough traffic to satisfy 9 tabling at stakes .25/.50 to 1/2? Even during the day? If so, will you pm me rb info etc.

Any other options for a multi tabling nit wannabe?

ianmc38 · 16-09-2009 12:18pm

Boss has 35-40 tables at .25/.50 right now. Ongame Im not sure but i suspect it has the same. Definitely more than enough to 9 table on one site, let alone both!

jimbling · 16-09-2009 12:31pm

ianmc38 wrote: »

Boss has 35-40 tables at .25/.50 right now. Ongame Im not sure but i suspect it has the same. Definitely more than enough to 9 table on one site, let alone both!

Cheers Ian. I'll download both in a while and take a look, see how they look/feel. Whats the story with the software? Many crashes / network problems etc? Surely they're better than iPoker :rolleyes:

jimbling · 16-09-2009 1:07pm

jimbling wrote: »

Cheers Ian. I'll download both in a while and take a look, see how they look/feel. Whats the story with the software? Many crashes / network problems etc? Surely they're better than iPoker :rolleyes:

Just read some bad things about multi-tabling on Boss. I'll have a look at ongame later.

site to play .50/1 NL ??

Comments