Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

film and airports

  • 28-07-2009 4:45pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,319 ✭✭✭


    Quick question - I'm flying in the morning and have decided just to bring the film camera. I have some Ilford HP5 and some Fomapan. Will the xray machines effect it? All in hand luggage...


Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    nope dont think so, just ir.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    Generally it'll only affect the higher iso's.

    If you're very worried, but your film on the other side and get it dev'd over there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    sineadw wrote: »
    Quick question - I'm flying in the morning and have decided just to bring the film camera. I have some Ilford HP5 and some Fomapan. Will the xray machines effect it? All in hand luggage...

    nah. I've had rolls of portra 800 that have been through a ton of xray machines and I've never noticed anything awry about them*. Just make sure it goes in your carry on, and not your checked baggage.

    *or at least anything more than the usual weird stuff that happens as a matter of course when I develop them ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml

    And also, it happened to some older 400 speed film coming back from an airport in the middle of nowhere... So I wouldn't say it's completely unlikely to happen. They were using some pretty old x-rays though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭wersal gummage


    nope dont think so, just ir.

    put IR through an x-ray myself a few weeks ago and it turned out fine.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    True IR or extended range/SFX film?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭wersal gummage


    Fajitas! wrote: »
    True IR or extended range/SFX film?

    it was SFX film.... the more i find out about these things the more i realise how little i know.

    care to tell me what true IR film is ? thanks.

    while i'm at it - some IR shots i've seen have colour in them - I think my film must have been b+w - it didn't look very 'IR' to me when i got it developed - more like b+w with a bit of punch to the whites. it was the first time i'd tried IR (i was using a red filter as well).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    Ah, see SFX isn't actually an IR film, it's just got an extended range of sensitivity - If you want to bring out the 'IR' in it, you're going to need to use a dark red filter - But, however, the film is all B&W, so you're not going to see much colour in that. It's mostly digital IR that's going to have colour tonings present in them (There is an IR slide film out there from at least Kodak, but I've never got my hands on it).

    Here's some info on 'true' IR film, a run down of Ilford's SFX and other IR films (and why they're such a royal pain in the arse); http://www.vividlight.com/Articles/2915.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    while i'm at it - some IR shots i've seen have colour in them - I think my film must have been b+w - it didn't look very 'IR' to me when i got it developed - more like b+w with a bit of punch to the whites. it was the first time i'd tried IR (i was using a red filter as well).

    SFX is whats known as an 'extended range' IR film. Its only sensitive a small way into the IR spectrum, but still more sensitive than normal B&W (into 720nm iirc). Using a dark red filter, the SFX cokin filter for example, will result in a recognisable IR effect (dark skies, white foliage) but again nowhere near as strong as the far IR films. Also it has an anti-halation backing. IR films from kodak didn't have this, resulting in that characteristic blooming that people recognise as IR.

    There were colour IR films available aswell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    Incidentally, wouldn't IR film be LESS sensitive to fogging by XRay ? Up the other end of the spectrum if my physics classes stood me in good stead :-)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    It's at the other end of the spectrum as far as light goes alright, it still fogs it up proper though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭wersal gummage


    fajitas & daire - thanks very much to both of you.

    i was using the cokin red filter system you mention daire. i also have a filter for the digital camera but haven't really given this a proper go yet as the weather has been so bad and i've only had it about two weeks.

    with digital, i shoot in raw and then convert to b+w afterwards is it ? i tried the digital once or twice - in 'normal' mode, the photos just look a bit red, when i turn the camera to b+w and then shoot, the photos do look a bit IRish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    Here's about the only one of mine that looked in any way IR-y


    2766436556_da5277dde1.jpg

    Even so its not a great example. The big problem here is the weather :-) I've had a roll of SFX stuck in my FE-2 for the last month waiting for some IR weather and a good place to go to shoot it...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,666 ✭✭✭wersal gummage


    this came off the roll of SFX i was using with the red filter. as i said above, it isn't really what i had in my mind as IR.

    3743220647_308d5e89be.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    fajitas & daire - thanks very much to both of you.

    i was using the cokin red filter system you mention daire. i also have a filter for the digital camera but haven't really given this a proper go yet as the weather has been so bad and i've only had it about two weeks.

    with digital, i shoot in raw and then convert to b+w afterwards is it ? i tried the digital once or twice - in 'normal' mode, the photos just look a bit red, when i turn the camera to b+w and then shoot, the photos do look a bit IRish.

    With digital, when you get the 'wierd' looking colour photographs, make sure you're shooting in RAW, then with whatever RAW converter you use, get a custom white balance from the grass, and use that. You can do it in camera too, take a photo containing just grass/foliage, and use that to set a custom white balance. That'll go a long ways to getting your photos looking 'IR' afterwards :)

    Also, it appears I've been lucky being back in Waterford the last two weeks, plenty of weather perfect for IR at the moment!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,218 ✭✭✭padocon


    On an X ray machine when I was passing trough recently it said no film. I presume that if you ask they will not pass it trough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    It's where I keeps my drugs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭trooney


    padocon wrote: »
    On an X ray machine when I was passing trough recently it said no film. I presume that if you ask they will not pass it trough.

    Years ago you used to be able to request your camera to be searched by hand so it didn't have to go through the x-ray. And that was in pretty much any airport I had been through, from NY to HK and any inbetween. The one exception was Cairo, but after a bit of the aul oirish charm they did it by hand. Good luck getting that anywhere now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,218 ✭✭✭padocon


    trooney wrote: »
    Years ago you used to be able to request your camera to be searched by hand so it didn't have to go through the x-ray. And that was in pretty much any airport I had been through, from NY to HK and any inbetween. The one exception was Cairo, but after a bit of the aul oirish charm they did it by hand. Good luck getting that anywhere now.

    No the camera just the film.


  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭_sparkie_


    i have had electronics searched by hand at my request in JFK. if they will do it, i dont see why dublin wouldnt.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,319 ✭✭✭sineadw


    Thanks all :) Reading up a bit more - it seems you can formally request a hand search in the US, but maybe not anywhere else. I'll give it a go anyway - can't do any harm to ask. I don't want to buy over there as I'm guessing Fomapan isn't freely available in Perth :rolleyes: Perth Scotland that is. I'm planning on pushing it from 200 to 800 as per Thonda's instructions. There's a fairly good old fashioned camera shop over there where I *might* be able to get it processed properly for that. But if they look at me like I have 4 heads then I'll be in the darkroom with it myself. My mate's coming back on the ferry the next day so I can give it to her. I'm hoping one xray won't kill it...

    And speaking of IR - I think the problem with it is that it's shipped in metal cannisters as it's so light sensitive, so they tend to blast the hell out of it at airports as they're a bit dubious of small metal cannisters in your hand luggage. Which will kill it no matter what end of the spectrum its at. Or so I've been told. Although I talked to a guy in DCC a while back who said he never had a problem with bringing it through. Either way, I'm planning on trying to source some in Edinburgh as NOWHERE in dublin has true IR film.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 582 ✭✭✭thefizz


    I have never had any films fogged by x-ray machines and sometimes my films may have got up to 10 x-rays so don't worry. Last year I brought some Rollei IR film with me and asked in Dublin airport for a hand inspection. They just laughed, not a chance of them doing it. It got a good few scans in total on my trip but turned out fine when I got home and developed it. And that film is a lot more IR sensitive than SFX.

    Re Kodak IR films: The colour and B&W film are both discontinued so you won't get them in Edinburgh unless its old stock.

    I have never seen any IR films in metal cannisters :confused:


Advertisement