Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

South africa vs. New Zealand 1/Aug/09

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    mikeruurds wrote: »
    I'm actually a little dismayed at the amount of anti-bok sentiment on boards at the moment. No-one is giving the Boks any credit for playing to a gameplan and doing what few other teams have managed against the All Blacks.

    It's all about the result in the end.

    A lot of lingering ill-will after the nastiness of the Lions Tour. Schalk Burger, etc.

    Good team, but I've seen better Boks teams. 07 for one. :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭mikeruurds


    A lot of lingering ill-will after the nastiness of the Lions Tour. Schalk Burger, etc.

    Good team, but I've seen better Boks teams. 07 for one. :p

    The thing is that this Bok team are winning ugly at the moment and are not playing to their full potential yet. It also seems as if the coach has finally given up on messing with good combinations. A lot of PdV's first choice players during the Lions tour were picked on reputation and not form.

    Finally the form players are being picked. This Bok team is only going to get better.

    I still don't understand why you guys are so patriotic towards the Lions. It was a close series that could have gone either way, but the Boks hardly deserve to be demonised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,608 ✭✭✭themont85


    mikeruurds wrote: »
    So who's going to give the Boks a hiding? They've been the most consistent side in recent times and deserve their success.

    Too much begrudgery.

    NZ or Australia away, all their games have been at home thus far this year.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,740 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    mikeruurds wrote: »
    I'm actually a little dismayed at the amount of anti-bok sentiment on boards at the moment. No-one is giving the Boks any credit for playing to a gameplan and doing what few other teams have managed against the All Blacks.

    It's all about the result in the end.

    Agree. Dismayed but not surprised. It's similar to Liverpool winning in football. They only win because the other side plays poorly. And I think most of it because of the Lions.

    But before they can claim great-ness, they need to claim a few away Tri-Nations wins.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    mikeruurds wrote: »
    So who's going to give the Boks a hiding? They've been the most consistent side in recent times and deserve their success.

    Too much begrudgery.

    If the Boks didn't come across as so bloody smug and arrogant perhaps there would be less begrudgery. Anyway hopefully Ireland will give them a run for their money at Croke Park on the 28th November - that's if they can be bothered to send a full strength squad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    mikeruurds wrote: »
    The thing is that this Bok team are winning ugly at the moment and are not playing to their full potential yet. It also seems as if the coach has finally given up on messing with good combinations. A lot of PdV's first choice players during the Lions tour were picked on reputation and not form.

    Finally the form players are being picked. This Bok team is only going to get better.

    I still don't understand why you guys are so patriotic towards the Lions. It was a close series that could have gone either way, but the Boks hardly deserve to be demonised.

    I don't think they have this so called potential.

    Take Habana - absolutely world-class, best winger in the world, but he can't kick, his defence is good, not great, and he's short. He doesn't fit the mould of a modern rugby winger, because with so much kicking, you tend to have three full backs, not one and two wingers.

    As for the patriotism towards the Lions, it's nothing of the sort, it's merely the fact that the Lions went and out-played the Boks, outscored them and genreally played much better rugby. And lost. It's the reverse of 97 I'll point out for the sake of honesty. In essence, the better team lost, and before someone says 'winning's an art form' that's bullshít, South Africa didn't make Stephen Jones miss a few penalties in the first test, South Africa didn't make Monye fcuk up (well De Villiers did for one try :pac:) etc. They were lucky, and we hear so much shíte about how bad the NH is at rugby, then you watch the premier SH team get thrown about by a Lions team that wasn't even meant to be that great. It's frustrating. :P

    I think the problem with the Boks in my mind comes down to the pack, which is made up of 8 great individuals by and large, rather than a cohesive unit. Most teams aren't capable of dealing with the likes of Schalk Burger, Victor Matfield, Heinrich Brussow et al. However, the limp performances from the likes of Pierre Spies in three tests, Mtwawira in two of three tests and more is indicative of a team that's not as strong as it should be. I'd rather have van der Linde and Botha in my front row than Mtwawira and Smit starting at prop.

    As for the backs, the centres are overrated, Morne Steyn's great, but his distrubtion could be a bit better, and they need to find a proper role for Franny Steyn. Just because you win doesn't mean you can't win better. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Depp


    fran steyn is a knob, good player tho, his dg attempt from inside his own half was absolutely pointless


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Depp


    nothing beats a new zealand maori haka


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    If the Boks didn't come across as so bloody smug and arrogant perhaps there would be less begrudgery. Anyway hopefully Ireland will give them a run for their money at Croke Park on the 28th November - that's if they can be bothered to send a full strength squad.

    Absolute rubbish and complete assumption about this bok team because they are so good. Where do you read or receive your information that they are arrogant or smug, if you can quote me one line from any website in recent weeks i'd agree with you. It's just sour grapes because other teams will NEVER be able to achieve the same.

    It's laughable and actually entertaining the more we win the more the opposition hates us.

    BTW, after Ireland won 6N and before WC07 you should've read some of the arrogant very biased comments from the Irish camp and supporters (and I can back it up with links).

    Ireland did nothing combined with the best players from Eng, Scot and Wales to beat the boks what makes you think the springboks are going to get a run for their money. Why should they send a first choice team if the Irish can't respect them.

    Agree with Mike, just begrudgery and jealousy.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    A lot of lingering ill-will after the nastiness of the Lions Tour. Schalk Burger, etc.

    Good team, but I've seen better Boks teams. 07 for one. :p

    Really, the Schalk incident isn't any worse than Quinland or Best's gauging. What other nastiness where there. Too much complaing from soft NH rugby people and too little rugby me thinks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    Take Habana - absolutely world-class, best winger in the world, but he can't kick, his defence is good, not great, and he's short. He doesn't fit the mould of a modern rugby winger, because with so much kicking, you tend to have three full backs, not one and two wingers.

    You complete contradicting yourself here, saying Habana is world-class and then doesn't fit the mould of a moderne winger. What does this modern winger thing mean?? :D Each team have their own strenghts and gameplans and the wingers and fullbacks will play too that. Theres no such thing as a too short winger. Both Williams and Habana were World players of the year and both are short. Rocokoko and Sivi in their lenghts were not even nominated, neither was Bowe or Horgan. As for him can't kick, scroll through youtube and you'll see plenty of chip and chases that led to tries by this man.
    As for the patriotism towards the Lions, it's nothing of the sort, it's merely the fact that the Lions went and out-played the Boks, outscored them and genreally played much better rugby. And lost. It's the reverse of 97 I'll point out for the sake of honesty. In essence, the better team lost, and before someone says 'winning's an art form' that's bullshít, South Africa didn't make Stephen Jones miss a few penalties in the first test, South Africa didn't make Monye fcuk up (well De Villiers did for one try :pac:) etc. They were lucky, and we hear so much shíte about how bad the NH is at rugby, then you watch the premier SH team get thrown about by a Lions team that wasn't even meant to be that great. It's frustrating. :P
    Out-played is rubbish. The boks muscled the Lions up and with the intensity forced the Lions into erros just like they did with the ABs on SA. Not many teams can play like this.

    Premier SH team get thrown around by a Lions squad?? made up from the best players in the 4 home nations and STILL you can't win it. :D:D NH rugby standard is so far behind SH and where world rugby should be we can't even see them on the horizon.
    I think the problem with the Boks in my mind comes down to the pack, which is made up of 8 great individuals by and large, rather than a cohesive unit. Most teams aren't capable of dealing with the likes of Schalk Burger, Victor Matfield, Heinrich Brussow et al. However, the limp performances from the likes of Pierre Spies in three tests, Mtwawira in two of three tests and more is indicative of a team that's not as strong as it should be. I'd rather have van der Linde and Botha in my front row than Mtwawira and Smit starting at prop.
    You just don't know what you are talking about. This is the best cohesive unit the boks had in a long time. It doesn't matter what you want Spies to be or think about him, his main plan is to get the ball over the advantage line, which he does. Beast and Smith both earns their spots and he is a captain that any team would be lucky to have. What's the point of having a strong scrum if you not going to use it to score points or win??
    As for the backs, the centres are overrated, Morne Steyn's great, but his distrubtion could be a bit better, and they need to find a proper role for Franny Steyn. Just because you win doesn't mean you can't win better. ;)
    The same centre that stopped the Monye try, or the other centre that scored the winning try in second test. Morne is not a running outhalf like Pienaar and does not need to be. You do know he scored all 31 points and scored a try on Sat. Steyn is doing well as we have no other specialist fullback at the moment.

    The amount of "experienced" and "better know how to win" posters on this forum is laughable. If Ireland can win a world cup, win 6N, beat 2 of 3 SH teams in SH terrotiry, win AIs then I'd respect you more and will be inclined to agree other than that I'll keep enjoying the boks win against all other teams.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭thecornerboy


    I've a foot in both camps, they are arrogant, unlikeable swines but you have to hand it to them. They pissed from a great height all over this NZ team and will do the same against Australia next week. There are so many bads things in sport these days we should recognise the honesty, commitment and passion SA bring to the table. They are awesome and fully deserve their 2 wins.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    Amabokke wrote: »
    You complete contradicting yourself here, saying Habana is world-class and then doesn't fit the mould of a moderne winger. What does this modern winger thing mean?? :D Each team have their own strenghts and gameplans and the wingers and fullbacks will play too that. Theres no such thing as a too short winger. Both Williams and Habana were World players of the year and both are short. Rocokoko and Sivi in their lenghts were not even nominated, neither was Bowe or Horgan. As for him can't kick, scroll through youtube and you'll see plenty of chip and chases that led to tries by this man.
    I'd have expected more intelligence here from ya.

    Habana's a world-class player - he's definitely the best try-scorer in the game - but he's not used properly by South Africa, because he doesn;t suit the game plan. All he ever does is get to come in off his wing for line-outs and punch through the line (a la the Lions game.) Habana's the kind of player you should build your game plan around, not just hope you'll get to use him for one or two set-pieces a game.

    Chip and chases aren't indicative of a varied and effective kicking game.
    Out-played is rubbish. The boks muscled the Lions up and with the intensity forced the Lions into erros just like they did with the ABs on SA. Not many teams can play like this.
    The Lions scored more points over three games, had more possession and scored more tries. The Boks won the first test only because of the penalties that came from Phil Vickery vs Mtwawira.
    Premier SH team get thrown around by a Lions squad?? made up from the best players in the 4 home nations and STILL you can't win it. :D:D NH rugby standard is so far behind SH and where world rugby should be we can't even see them on the horizon.
    South Africa has the most rugby players in the world, more than England, England has double the player numbers of Ireland, Scotland and Wales. The playing pool of South Africa and that of the four nations that make up the Lions would be about even.

    Again, if NH rugby is so far behind, why couldn't South Africa score more points than the Lions?
    You just don't know what you are talking about. This is the best cohesive unit the boks had in a long time. It doesn't matter what you want Spies to be or think about him, his main plan is to get the ball over the advantage line, which he does. Beast and Smith both earns their spots and he is a captain that any team would be lucky to have. What's the point of having a strong scrum if you not going to use it to score points or win??
    Spies is shíte. He's one of the weakest number 8's at the highest level. He can't tackle, he made no ground against the Lions and he doesn't do a fcuking thing at the breakdown. What's he there to do? Keep Kankowksi out so everyone else has a fair chance?

    Mtwawira earned his spot because the two best props in South Africa are playing in Ireland. (One of whom's injured at the moment.) Neither Smit nor the Zimbabwean are as good props (Smit at hooker's a different issue) as the two they've replaced.

    As for cohesion, the Boks backrow's useless without Brussow, whose probably the best 7 in the world after McCaw. (6 for you lot. :p)
    The same centre that stopped the Monye try, or the other centre that scored the winning try in second test. Morne is not a running outhalf like Pienaar and does not need to be. You do know he scored all 31 points and scored a try on Sat. Steyn is doing well as we have no other specialist fullback at the moment.
    Steyn was fantastic on the weekend, but he's still not a world-class distributor. He's a world-class out-half, that's merely not one of his strengths. In the same Ruan Pienaar can get a back line running but can't tackle or be tackled.

    De Villiers is a very good centre, Fourie's good too, but they're not as good as the likes of Stirling Mortlock, Ma'a Nonu/Conrad Smith, Roberts/O'Driscoll, and so on.
    The amount of "experienced" and "better know how to win" posters on this forum is laughable. If Ireland can win a world cup, win 6N, beat 2 of 3 SH teams in SH terrotiry, win AIs then I'd respect you more and will be inclined to agree other than that I'll keep enjoying the boks win against all other teams.

    Ireland's a tiny country with a small pool of players. South Africa has more professional rugby players in France than Ireland has at all. South Africa's got the most rugby players in the world, if they're not winning games, they're not doing something right.

    No-one in Ireland expects to beat South Africa, we're probably never going to be more than the world's third or fourth best team (right now I'd say we're sitting in fourth behind the tri-nations, which is fairly impressive considering how much smaller we are in rugby terms than that triumvirate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 943 ✭✭✭OldJay


    South Africa has the most rugby players in the world, more than England
    There are more players in England than in South Africa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    Justind wrote: »
    There are more players in England than in South Africa.

    Really? Last time I saw figures it said South Africa.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭mikeruurds


    If the Boks didn't come across as so bloody smug and arrogant perhaps there would be less begrudgery. Anyway hopefully Ireland will give them a run for their money at Croke Park on the 28th November - that's if they can be bothered to send a full strength squad.

    Who are you calling arrogant? Bok fans or the Boks themselves. The team play full on rugby and are difficult to beat. How does that make them arrogant.

    I think John Smit is one of the most humble and likeable guys around.

    You guys just seem to hate to see a team wearing the wrong shade of green doing well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭mikeruurds


    Depp wrote: »
    fran steyn is a knob, good player tho, his dg attempt from inside his own half was absolutely pointless

    Frans has the ability to slot drop kicks from all over the park and to gain immense territory with his boot whenever he gets his hands on the ball.

    There's no harm reminding the opposition every now and then of that threat to stop them from trying to launch a territorial kicking game of their own.

    I will admit though that he's tried it too many times in games in the past.

    He seems to be acting on instructions now and is only giving it a go once or twice in each game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭mikeruurds


    The Lions scored more points over three games, had more possession and scored more tries.

    You're not seriously counting the 3rd game into your stats are you? Whoever selected the Bok team for that game cheated fans from both sides from seeing the best available SA players on the field.

    It would most likely have been a different result if the best available Bok side was fielded.

    I'll admit that the gameplan that we've followed in the last few years hasn't been the prettiest to watch, but when you're playing tough opposition you have to play to your strengths to get the win. SA's strength is our physical forward pack, great kicking game and tight defence. We get most of our points from putting the opposition under pressure and feeding off of their mistakes. Modern defensive patterns and the ELVs have cut down tries created from standard set pieces and running rugby. This is especially the case when two quality defensive units meet.

    The Boks have beaten the top sides in world rugby in recent times and are rightfully near the top of the world rankings on a consistent basis. I'm not sure what will happen in the away games this Tri Nations, but I have a feeling that we might nick 1 out of the 3 and take bonus points in at least 2 of them. The ABs are not on song at the moment and Australia don't really have the depth in available player talent. Robbie Deans is an awesome coach though.

    This SA team is finally playing with confidence and I believe better performances are coming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭mikeruurds


    Amabokke wrote: »
    Really, the Schalk incident isn't any worse than Quinland or Best's gauging. What other nastiness where there. Too much complaing from soft NH rugby people and too little rugby me thinks.

    There are no excuses for Schalk's actions. My wife and I couldn't believe it when we saw it happen.

    SA don't need to resort to thuggery. We're better than that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 456 ✭✭sm.org


    Amabokke wrote: »
    Really, the Schalk incident isn't any worse than Quinland or Best's gauging. What other nastiness where there. Too much complaing from soft NH rugby people and too little rugby me thinks.

    I think the problem was that he got off so lightly. His offence was as bad as Best's but he got half the penalty which is a joke imo.

    On the plus side Broussow has been a revalation at 6 and I dont think DeVilliers would have picked him if Burger was suspended.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,958 ✭✭✭✭RuggieBear


    threads merged


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    I'd have expected more intelligence here from ya.

    Habana's a world-class player - he's definitely the best try-scorer in the game - but he's not used properly by South Africa, because he doesn;t suit the game plan. All he ever does is get to come in off his wing for line-outs and punch through the line (a la the Lions game.) Habana's the kind of player you should build your game plan around, not just hope you'll get to use him for one or two set-pieces a game.

    Chip and chases aren't indicative of a varied and effective kicking game.
    Intelligence is not needed if you use your common sense.

    And what is the boks gameplan. The boks have played several different game plans between the Lions and 3N tests so far and also the AI last Nov. Habana is marked by most opposition after WC07 so to built the gameplan around him would be suicidle, look what happened to Williams and all of a sudden according to posters he is the worst winger in the world.

    He doesn't need to be a good kicker, we have Du Preez, Steyn and Steyn to do that, which they did very effectively and well against the ABs.
    The Lions scored more points over three games, had more possession and scored more tries. The Boks won the first test only because of the penalties that came from Phil Vickery vs Mtwawira.
    You only scored more tries in third test against a second string bok team. In the first two tests SA scored more tries and the statistics were very similar with some for boks and some for Lions. The Lions didn't loose the first test because of Vickery, 3 missed penalties and 3 failed tries by brilliant SA defence is what cost you.
    South Africa has the most rugby players in the world, more than England, England has double the player numbers of Ireland, Scotland and Wales. The playing pool of South Africa and that of the four nations that make up the Lions would be about even.

    Where are these statistics? SA have over 360 000 registered players compared to England's over 630 000.
    Again, if NH rugby is so far behind, why couldn't South Africa score more points than the Lions?
    Because in international test matches between tough teams one team will rarely run away with the game. It always comes down to a few points. I said far behind and also mentioned when was the last time a NH have consistently beat a SH team or won in the South?
    Spies is shíte. He's one of the weakest number 8's at the highest level. He can't tackle, he made no ground against the Lions and he doesn't do a fcuking thing at the breakdown. What's he there to do? Keep Kankowksi out so everyone else has a fair chance?
    That's your oppinion. He came off a very long S14 season and was immense so we'll cut him some slag for the Lions series. He is 1.94Mtr why on earth would we want a tall No.8 to compete at the breakdown?? He is used for his power and pace to get over advantage line. He can most certainly tackle, focusing just on a few Lions test matches does not sum him up.
    Mtwawira earned his spot because the two best props in South Africa are playing in Ireland. (One of whom's injured at the moment.) Neither Smit nor the Zimbabwean are as good props (Smit at hooker's a different issue) as the two they've replaced.
    Whether that was the reason I don't know but he mostly certainly do deserve his spot now. The front row didn't struggle against the Lions or the ABs.
    As for cohesion, the Boks backrow's useless without Brussow, whose probably the best 7 in the world after McCaw. (6 for you lot. :p)
    Oh really, now I have to question your intelligence. It's just more tit for tat, where is the proof?? Brussouw outshined McCaw in both tests so I wouldn't consider Richie to be the best anymore.
    De Villiers is a very good centre, Fourie's good too, but they're not as good as the likes of Stirling Mortlock, Ma'a Nonu/Conrad Smith, Roberts/O'Driscoll, and so on.
    First you say our centres are overrated now they're good??
    Ireland's a tiny country with a small pool of players. South Africa has more professional rugby players in France than Ireland has at all. South Africa's got the most rugby players in the world, if they're not winning games, they're not doing something right.
    Where's the stats for all this so called most rugby players? As for not doing something right, we are winning most games, tournaments and trophies so we are doing something right
    mikeruurds wrote: »
    There are no excuses for Schalk's actions. My wife and I couldn't believe it when we saw it happen.

    SA don't need to resort to thuggery. We're better than that.
    Not sure why you pointing this out. I agree but was merely pointing to Joe that to call the Lions tour nasty because of Schalk is absurd if their own players do the same thing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    mikeruurds wrote: »
    You guys just seem to hate to see a team wearing the wrong shade of green doing well.

    +1

    I remember after Ireland beat South Africa in 2006 how the papers started to say Ireland could take the WC and other teams need to be prepared to deal with the Irish. I haven't seen South Africa saying they are going to win the WC until they've actually won it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    sm.org wrote: »
    I think the problem was that he got off so lightly. His offence was as bad as Best's but he got half the penalty which is a joke imo.

    I don't really want to start a debate over Schalk's incident. It was disgracfull and frankly I think he should be excluded from a period of time from the boks team to think about it. Brussouw also makes it harder for him to return.

    My point was that Joe called the Lions series nasty because of the Schalk's incident. If the Lions had won you guys wouldn't even have thought about all this begrudgery. It was a very good, tough and competitive series and could've easily been won by the Lions.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭wixfjord


    Interesting points about Spies being made. Ive been very unimpressed with him in the last few games. Doesnt add very much imo. No point being able to run 100 metres in 3 seconds or something if you cant get a chance to use it. Have seen that video of him where hes training and yes hes a monster, but that doesnt make him a good rugby player. We are very lucky to have what I believe to be one of the best 8's in the world atm with Heaslip.

    Have been very very impressed with brussow though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    wixfjord wrote: »
    We are very lucky to have what I believe to be one of the best 8's in the world atm with Heaslip.

    No point being able to run 100 metres in 3 seconds or something if you cant get a chance to use it.

    Oh please, Heaslip had a good season in 09 and now he is all of a sudden one of the best?? He was average and very poor in 07/08. He was very quiet and nowhere near the action in the 1st and 2nd Lions test matches. He played well in third but that hardly makes him the best.

    He used his pace and space plenty of times in the past. Have you actually watched the S14 this year? or the internationals in SA against England, Wales?? He was immense and 1 or 2 quiet games doesn't make him an average player.



  • Site Banned Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭wixfjord


    Oh please ;)

    Yes I am an avid super 14 watcher and spies had a great season. You say that 1 or 2 poor games doesnt make him a bad player, do 5 in a row? Heaslip has been one of Leinsters best for the last few years, had a fantastic Lions tour I dont know what you were watching. Throw up as many videos as you like, doesnt change the fact that what I have seen of spies in the last few games, from a player who I rated highly has been very poor and kankowski couldnt have been as bad. Spies has a big reputation and hasnt been backing it up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 873 ✭✭✭Four-Percent


    wixfjord wrote: »

    Yes I am an avid super 14 watcher and spies had a great season. You say that 1 or 2 poor games doesnt make him a bad player, do 5 in a row?


    No.Spies has been fantastic for a long time now.Form is temporary, class is permanent.
    wixfjord wrote: »
    Heaslip has been one of Leinsters best for the last few years, had a fantastic Lions tour I dont know what you were watching.

    He wasn't as bad as Amabokke said, but was definitely not as good as you are saying.He was at most a 6/10 for the first and second tests.Solid but not spectacular.He made a few good runs but that's what any decent number 8 would do anyway.
    wixfjord wrote: »
    Spies has a big reputation and hasnt been backing it up.

    Ever wonder why he has that reputation?He is the complete number 8, basically Sergio Parisse but in a good team.So what if he's out of form?BOD, POC,ROG have all been in and out of form over time, but you didn't call them average players.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    wixfjord wrote: »
    Oh please ;)

    Yes I am an avid super 14 watcher and spies had a great season. You say that 1 or 2 poor games doesnt make him a bad player, do 5 in a row? Heaslip has been one of Leinsters best for the last few years, had a fantastic Lions tour I dont know what you were watching. Throw up as many videos as you like, doesnt change the fact that what I have seen of spies in the last few games, from a player who I rated highly has been very poor and kankowski couldnt have been as bad. Spies has a big reputation and hasnt been backing it up.

    5 in a row? Name the teams they played against and we can debate it then.

    Being good for Leinster doesnt make you one of the best 8 in the world. He was very average for Ireland last year regardless of Leinster status. I was watching all 3 Lions tests and he was anonymous in first 2, if you browse through here you'll find other posters (non-boks) have said the same thing. Just watch Heaslip from the scrum before Smit's try, not once did he tackle or go into the breakdown or did anything and he could've positioned himself to do cover tackle on Smit. You prob confuse him with Jamie Roberts.

    How did Spies get his big reputation? He has backed his position and deserves to be there, Kankowski can run but gets isolated and don't have the same power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    mikeruurds wrote: »
    You're not seriously counting the 3rd game into your stats are you? Whoever selected the Bok team for that game cheated fans from both sides from seeing the best available SA players on the field.

    It would most likely have been a different result if the best available Bok side was fielded.

    I'll admit that the gameplan that we've followed in the last few years hasn't been the prettiest to watch, but when you're playing tough opposition you have to play to your strengths to get the win. SA's strength is our physical forward pack, great kicking game and tight defence. We get most of our points from putting the opposition under pressure and feeding off of their mistakes. Modern defensive patterns and the ELVs have cut down tries created from standard set pieces and running rugby. This is especially the case when two quality defensive units meet.

    The Boks have beaten the top sides in world rugby in recent times and are rightfully near the top of the world rankings on a consistent basis. I'm not sure what will happen in the away games this Tri Nations, but I have a feeling that we might nick 1 out of the 3 and take bonus points in at least 2 of them. The ABs are not on song at the moment and Australia don't really have the depth in available player talent. Robbie Deans is an awesome coach though.

    This SA team is finally playing with confidence and I believe better performances are coming.
    Ok, you're assuming I dislike South Africa or something here.

    South Africa have probably got the best collection of players in the world, but they're not perfect, and not quite balanced. In my reckoning, there's a bit of a hole in the middle of the park in terms of quality, in that, while the players there are good, they're not as good as the pack or the outside backs.

    I wasn't impressed at all with South Africa during the Lions tour, I thought they were the second best team, whereas I thought the 07 team which one the world cup was magnificent, and I was delighted to see them win.
    Amabokke wrote: »
    Intelligence is not needed if you use your common sense.
    True, and I often lack common sense. :pac:
    And what is the boks gameplan. The boks have played several different game plans between the Lions and 3N tests so far and also the AI last Nov. Habana is marked by most opposition after WC07 so to built the gameplan around him would be suicidle, look what happened to Williams and all of a sudden according to posters he is the worst winger in the world.
    By building a game plan around him, I don't mean teh equivalent of Ireland in 07 when our plan was to throw the ball to BOD and hope for the best, I mean using the threat of Habana to draw opposition players defensive lines out a little, and when not using Habana, using the threat of his speed to compromise opposition defences creating gaps further inside from him.
    He doesn't need to be a good kicker, we have Du Preez, Steyn and Steyn to do that, which they did very effectively and well against the ABs.
    But he's contantly going to get the ball rammed down his throat and be forced to kick it back because sadly, that's how the game is going.
    You only scored more tries in third test against a second string bok team. In the first two tests SA scored more tries and the statistics were very similar with some for boks and some for Lions. The Lions didn't loose the first test because of Vickery, 3 missed penalties and 3 failed tries by brilliant SA defence is what cost you.
    Without the penalties for Vickery/Mtwawira the Lions wouldn't have needed any of the 3 tries missed or the missed penalties. The Lions crossed the Boks line six times. They might only have scored three tries, but to be honest, if I had my line breached six times and still won I'd accept luck had played a part.
    Where are these statistics? SA have over 360 000 registered players compared to England's over 630 000.
    They were in rugby world magazine a while ago. England's got around the same number as South Africa. Both are in and around 300,000, give or take a 100,000 or so. To put that in context, Ireland and Wales are both 20,000, Scotland's 10,000.
    Because in international test matches between tough teams one team will rarely run away with the game. It always comes down to a few points. I said far behind and also mentioned when was the last time a NH have consistently beat a SH team or won in the South?
    NH teams usually send shíte teams down South, and SH teams generally send shíte teams up North.

    In teh AI South Africa almost lost to Scotland let's not forget, and Wales were unlucky not to beat them either. Meanwhile New Zealand looked unstoppable. Those tests are often not quite indicative of how things really stand.
    That's your oppinion. He came off a very long S14 season and was immense so we'll cut him some slag for the Lions series. He is 1.94Mtr why on earth would we want a tall No.8 to compete at the breakdown?? He is used for his power and pace to get over advantage line. He can most certainly tackle, focusing just on a few Lions test matches does not sum him up.
    I saw a comparison between Kankowski and Spies over the s14 season on a South African website prior to the Lions, Spies has slightly more metres gained, carries etc than Kankowski, but in terms of tackling, Spies' was in and around 50% which is abysmal for an international. Kankowski's was around 90%. He's a much better played than the Blue Bull.

    I don't remember Spies making any gains at all during the Lions, the outstanding Springbok backrow forward of the series was not Juan Smith, it wasn't Pierre Spies nor was it the oft-lauded Schalk Burger. The reason the Springboks won the second test was because O'Driscoll took himself and Dani Russouw out, whom that gobshíte coach of yours put on instead of Brussow. With Brussow on, South Africa took over the breakdown and were able to win. Fantastic coaching decision made totally by accident.
    Whether that was the reason I don't know but he mostly certainly do deserve his spot now. The front row didn't struggle against the Lions or the ABs.
    Actually, other than the first half of the first test, the Lions and Springboks had very even front rows.
    Oh really, now I have to question your intelligence. It's just more tit for tat, where is the proof?? Brussouw outshined McCaw in both tests so I wouldn't consider Richie to be the best anymore.
    Proof of what? :pac:

    Richie McCaw's definitely the best in the world in terms of openside in my opinion. I could see Brussow being the best in a couple of seasons for sure, not sure he is yet.
    First you say our centres are overrated now they're good??
    Overrated means bad since when?

    I said you had some overrated centres, you do, they're still very good players. But I'd say South Africa's centres while very good are not the equal of New Zealand's, Australia's or even Ireland or Wales' centre pairings. That hardly means they're bad though.

    I think Jean de Villiers could easily be the second best centre in Ireland next year, unless Gordon D'Arcy fully recaptures his form, in which case, that'll be one hell of a duel between those two, and one I can't wait to see.
    Where's the stats for all this so called most rugby players? As for not doing something right, we are winning most games, tournaments and trophies so we are doing something right
    They're around the place, but there's always a margin of error.
    Not sure why you pointing this out. I agree but was merely pointing to Joe that to call the Lions tour nasty because of Schalk is absurd if their own players do the same thing.
    Well the two big gouging incidents this season have been against Leinster players, so it's not my lot doing it, merely suffering it. :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭mikeruurds


    Ok, you're assuming I dislike South Africa or something here.

    Nope. I've enjoyed your contributions on this forum for a long time and I know that you appreciate good rugby regardless of which team is playing it at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,599 ✭✭✭ScrubsfanChris


    [/quote]

    Wow, can that video get more homo-erotic :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,608 ✭✭✭themont85


    Amabokke wrote: »
    Being good for Leinster doesnt make you one of the best 8 in the world. He was very average for Ireland last year regardless of Leinster status. I was watching all 3 Lions tests and he was anonymous in first 2, if you browse through here you'll find other posters (non-boks) have said the same thing. Just watch Heaslip from the scrum before Smit's try, not once did he tackle or go into the breakdown or did anything and he could've positioned himself to do cover tackle on Smit. You prob confuse him with Jamie Roberts.

    How did Spies get his big reputation? He has backed his position and deserves to be there, Kankowski can run but gets isolated and don't have the same power.

    And conversley Amabokke being good for the Blue Bulls doesn'tmake you the best 8 in the world.

    Spies was no better than Heaslip in the test series. In fact I would edge Heaslip considering his immense 3rd test performance.

    Heaslip was very good during the 6 nations, what are you talking about?

    I haven't seen a lot of the dominating S14 Spies at international level yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Webbs


    Amabokke wrote: »
    Absolute rubbish and complete assumption about this bok team because they are so good. Where do you read or receive your information that they are arrogant or smug, if you can quote me one line from any website in recent weeks i'd agree with you. It's just sour grapes because other teams will NEVER be able to achieve the same.

    Bloemfontein - Jaque Fourie is in two minds about whether he would like to stay in South Africa or accept a contract to play in France, but he is absolutely certain about one thing: "I think I am still the best outside centre in the world, so that hasn't changed." (Cape Times July 24th)
    Arrogant? Smug?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    themont85 wrote: »
    And conversley Amabokke being good for the Blue Bulls doesn'tmake you the best 8 in the world.

    Spies was no better than Heaslip in the test series. In fact I would edge Heaslip considering his immense 3rd test performance.

    Heaslip was very good during the 6 nations, what are you talking about?

    I haven't seen a lot of the dominating S14 Spies at international level yet.

    I didn't say Spies is good or the best because of his Blue Bull status. I should make the point in saying he had some great performances on international level aand gained a reputation for that over past 2 years.

    I didn't believe Spies was good or better than Heaslip in the Lions series, you're making an assumption. Spies had a quiet Lions series after a long S14 season.

    Heaslip was good during the 09 6N, read my posts again. He was not very good during last year's 6N.

    If you haven't seen Spies on international level then you are not watching ALL of the matches he has played. There is a video above, which clearly got 1 poster into homo-rectic mood that shows his skills during some of the international tests (ignore S14). He was immense against Wales, England, Argentinia, NZ and Aus over past 2 years.

    Take nothing away from Heaslip, I believe Spies is very lucky to be playing in a good team and if it was Heaslip he would be the front runner but for now Spies in my opinion has proved himself and are under the top 3 8s in the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    Webbs wrote: »
    Bloemfontein - Jaque Fourie is in two minds about whether he would like to stay in South Africa or accept a contract to play in France, but he is absolutely certain about one thing: "I think I am still the best outside centre in the world, so that hasn't changed." (Cape Times July 24th)
    Arrogant? Smug?

    I was waiting for Fourie's quote and happy to respond. He was winding the Cape Times writer up, it's not arrogance, if you read some of the Afrikaans newspapers you would see there is great rivalry between him and Jacobs for the 13 shirt.

    What is he going to do, say he is second best so that Jacobs could start. Fourie has always been good, not the best 13 but that comment hardly makes the whole boks team arrogant.

    I can right now quote a few links to Irish papers, players saying that they were the best or their players the best in their positions in the world. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 943 ✭✭✭OldJay


    Webbs wrote: »
    Arrogant? Smug?
    Misquoted


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,416 ✭✭✭chupacabra


    You also have to remember that Spies is only 23, so nowhere near the player that he will be in 5 or so years. With time and experience i cant see anyone coming near him as the best 8 in the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭andrewdcs


    LTLFTC

    Wow, SA are just incredible at the moment, the Lions tour really sorted out some of their selection issues which boks had been complaining about before the tour. NZ played the wrong game tho, looked like a French team, barrel of a gun stuff.

    Spies is superb athlete, he's quicker/faster than 90% of 8s, and to be fair, most centers and even a few wings I could name, but his game is about ball in hand go forward (as the modern 8 game) he has loads of backrow help for all the drudge. Heaslip does a good bit more 'drudge' and has this season to make himself a great. They really don't play in a similar way though, Heaslip is just not as fast, Spies not as wily (yet).
    They are the same age arn't they? [EDIT] Heaslip is 26 this season...and an Israeli to boot. ;)
    At present Spies is better 8, but the back row is the back row, not a collection of fast / jinky runners.

    I'd LOVE to see a northern / southern club competition, say a 3 match series between HEC and S14 winners??


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Amabokke


    andrewdcs wrote: »
    I'd LOVE to see a northern / southern club competition, say a 3 match series between HEC and S14 winners??

    I agree with your post except for the above. Please spare us from any further whinging and excuse making from NH fans if they do loose it. It'll be blamed on too much rugby for NH, poor SH referring, too little preparation, injuries, not full strneght squads - the list is endless.

    Just take a look at the list of excuses from the Lions series.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭andrewdcs


    Amabokke wrote: »
    Just take a look at the list of excuses from the Lions series.

    lol, I hear ya on the excuses front (drives me mad) but think it'd be great for a bi annual.

    An extra few games every other season / in bewteen WRCs and existing major tours.

    On the moaning front, aussie coverage of their defeat to NZ was littered with ref bashing (Joubert in the middle I think) from the commentators!
    Just like bloody Sky . . .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭vorbis


    anyone else find it a bit of a dull game to watch? Same as the other two matches, the breakdown area was a mess. Both sides were flying in from all angles. It made holding onto the ball near impossible. Has any team had 10 phases of possession so far in this trinations. The tactics are certainly effective but its a bit awful to watch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,855 ✭✭✭pappyodaniel


    vorbis wrote: »
    anyone else find it a bit of a dull game to watch? Same as the other two matches, the breakdown area was a mess. Both sides were flying in from all angles. It made holding onto the ball near impossible. Has any team had 10 phases of possession so far in this trinations. The tactics are certainly effective but its a bit awful to watch.

    It ain't great but the intensity of the games is on a high level.
    The half empty stadiums in Sth Africa is getting ridiculous. Rugby mad country my hole, where is everyone? are the SARU still cheating the rugby fans with extortionate ticket prices? is it economic downturn? or have I, in the past, over estimated Sth Africa's 'rugby mad' people.

    New Zealand are so bad at the moment. With so many of their elite players overseas they are really suffering. Their pack is missing so many big game players, Carl Hayman (remember him?), Chris Jack, Byron Kelleher, Dan Carter and to a lesser extent (but due to Carter's absence, Nick Evans). These players would form the back-bone of any team and would inject some much needed steel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Webbs


    Justind wrote: »
    Misquoted

    Nope he said it as it read


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Webbs


    chupacabra wrote: »
    You also have to remember that Spies is only 23, so nowhere near the player that he will be in 5 or so years. With time and experience i cant see anyone coming near him as the best 8 in the world.

    Maybe he will become the best 8 in the world but only if he adds a grafting side to his game. You only have to look at Parisse to see in my opinion by far the best 8 in the world and what he does in the tight and loose he is at a completely different level.

    Spies may suffer and not develop that part of his game, if thats the right way to put it from playing with a pair of backrow forwards (Smit, Brussow or Burger) who allow him to do the showy stuff with relative impunity and it would take a class oppo backrow to make his lack of contribution in the tight noticable (I actually think the Lions did this in all the test played even with Heaslip not firing on all cylinders).

    While we are talking of show ponies (sorry couldnt resist) does anyone else think that Matfield does sweet FA around the pitch (apart from the obvious sublime lineout and restart skills he has). You never see him carry the ball, tackle or make a nuisance of himself at the breakdown. All these things Botha does in spades and lets matfield off the hook for the dirty work a second row should do


  • Advertisement
Advertisement