Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Suu Kyi found guilty by Burmese court

  • 11-08-2009 10:55am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭


    A court in Burma has found opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi guilty of violating an internal security law.

    The court sentenced the pro-democracy leader to three years in prison but that was immediately reduced to 18 months on the orders of the military government, which said she could serve the time in her Yangon home.

    A guilty verdict had been widely expected in a case critics say was fabricated by the military regime to keep Ms Suu Kyi out of circulation ahead of a general election scheduled for next year.
    Advertisement


    The charges stemmed from a mysterious incident in which US man John Yettaw swam uninvited to her lakeside home in May and stayed there for two days, which breached the terms of her house arrest.
    Yettaw, 54, was sentenced to a total of seven years in prison and hard labour by the court.

    He got three years for breaching security laws, three years for immigration violations and one year for a municipal charge of illegal swimming.
    The verdict in Burma, officially known as Myanmar, has provoked international condemnation.

    The EU called on the regime to free her immediately and has promised to take 'targeted measures' against those responsible for the verdict, by reinforcing sanctions against the regime.
    British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said he was 'saddened and angry' at the 'monstrous' sentencing.

    He described the move as politically motivated to prevent her from taking part in planned elections next year.

    In a statement, he said it was 'further proof that the military regime in Burma is determined to act with total disregard for accepted standards of the rule of law in defiance of international opinion'.
    'The facade of her prosecution is made more monstrous because its real objective is to sever her bond with the people for whom she is a beacon of hope and resistance.'

    He called for the UN Security Council to impose a worldwide ban on the sale of arms to the regime.

    Australia, meanwhile, has expressed 'dismay' at the conviction.
    Amnesty International condemned the conviction as 'shameful' political theatre and called for Ms Suu Kyi's immediate and unconditional release.

    More here - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8194596.stm


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭Jo King


    Your point being?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    We got all that on the news.

    What's your point other than to tell us what we already know??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    I do hope that American prat feels better about himself now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭Starfox


    We got all that on the news.

    What's your point other than to tell us what we already know??

    Do you need a hug? My point being i wanted to tell people, it wasnt all over the news either when posted this it had just become news so i wanted to show peeps. But if you need a hug let me know, lifes not all that bad ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 933 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    It's time that the International Criminal Court started taking an interest in the Burmese junta.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Why don't the US invade Burma to liberate the people from a dictator just like what they did in Iraq?!


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    Starfox, please read the charter before starting any more threads in Politics.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement