Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Attitude of the yes campaign

Options
  • 03-09-2009 12:29pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭


    Have they learnt anything from the first referenda?
    Once again the yes campaign is arrogant and downright patronising and spreading fear.
    A few points:
    Yes campaigners have been painting an image that all no voters are crazy, stupid and ignorant.

    They seem to think that coir and the shinners and other minority parties represent every single no voter.

    The use of celebrities to further the cause is not only patroninsing but a real concern, this is not the x factor!

    Once again we are getting vague slogans like the now classic "heart of europe". What does this mean?

    There is a concerted effort to instill the idea that this treaty is a referenda about our actual membership of the E.U.

    discuss..


    oh and before yes posters start to attack me id just like to say i voted yes the last time out.


«13456716

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 593 ✭✭✭Zuiderzee


    At the launch of the Fianna Fail Yes campaign on September 2nd 2009 Mr. Cowen aptly demonstrated this arrogance by stating he did not even contemplate the rejection of the Lisbon treaty on a second attempt.

    FF arrogance and distain for the electorate at this stage is unreal.
    We have Donaghue flying around, costing a bloody fortune at the best hotels in Europe when there are cutbacks for schoolkids.
    In Cork I believe a councillor more or less told a parent to bugger off because her district did not provide enough votes for FF

    One feels that they have become so dynastic that they really have lost touch. They are entitled to rule as they see fit, and we are entitled to do what the **** we are told
    Look at the front bench.
    Cowen, won by-election for fathers seat after father died
    Lenihan, won by-election for fathers seat after father died
    Mary Coughlan, won by-election for fathers seat after father died
    The Andrews cousins, Lenihans brother and Aunt etc - its like a family business.

    And the Senate shuffle in place for people like Dick Roche, Mary O Rourke who are put into storage until a suitable election comes up.
    The Greens also use the Senate Shuffle for people like Dierdre De Burca, who failed to win a seat in the Dail in 2002 and 2007 and failed to get elected as an MEP in 2009. Yet we are still paying her to be a senator - until the next election comes up


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭patrickthomas


    skelliser wrote: »
    Have they learnt anything from the first referenda?
    Once again the yes campaign is arrogant and downright patronising and spreading fear.
    A few points:
    Yes campaigners have been painting an image that all no voters are crazy, stupid and ignorant.

    They seem to think that coir and the shinners and other minority parties represent every single no voter.

    Once again we are getting vague slogans like the now classic "heart of europe". What does this mean?

    There is a concerted effort to instill the idea that this treaty is a referenda about our actual membership of the E.U.

    discuss..

    Yes, it is exactly the same attitude that made me examine the document and vote no last time, this time i decided to re-evaluate and find that the same old attitude prevails as last time. It is exactly the attitude the government have had towards us for years.

    It is a load of bluffers who do not know what they are talking about :(

    Thank God for a bs detector:pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭patrickthomas


    Zuiderzee wrote: »
    At the launch of the Fianna Fail Yes campaign on September 2nd 2009 Mr. Cowen aptly demonstrated this arrogance by stating he did not even contemplate the rejection of the Lisbon treaty on a second attempt.

    FF arrogance and distain for the electorate at this stage is unreal.
    We have Donaghue flying around, costing a bloody fortune at the best hotels in Europe when there are cutbacks for schoolkids.
    In Cork I believe a councillor more or less told a parent to bugger off because her district did not provide enough votes for FF

    You said it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭Euro_Kraut


    skelliser wrote: »
    They seem to think that coir and the shinners and other minority parties represent every single no voter.


    So what parties do represent the No side? Aside from the ones you mentioned I can only think of the Socialists (and variants of Socialist) and the UKIP.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    Have to agree with the OP.
    The Yes side seem so smug with their "smarter than thou" attitude.
    This also eminates from Europe, where so many talking heads spoke down on the little Irish and their upstart No vote.

    I get the feeling from them that the whole democratic process is beneath them and they would rather we plebs left running our lives to our "superiors".

    And btw, I voted Yes to Lisbon 1.
    I believe in the merits of the treaty and made my own mind up on it.

    However because the people of Ireland have spoken I wont disrespect that by voting again. We lost fair and square, the failure to respect it has diminished democracy enough already.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭skelliser


    @EURO KRAT i dont know and i dont care tbh.

    more interestingly 95?% of the political parties supported it, yet it was defeated?!
    i think that says alot about the general publics attitude to the main parties


  • Registered Users Posts: 604 ✭✭✭Kai


    So is the main reason you are voting no to punish FF because you think they are arrogant. They are arrogant and probably all the claims you lay at them are true but is that a good reason to vote No? I would hope you would asses Lisbon on its own merits and decide based on the facts rather than on your emotional feeling towards a party that will no longer be in power after the next election.


  • Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,804 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    skelliser wrote: »
    Yes campaigners have been painting an image that all no voters are crazy, stupid and ignorant.
    I think that's patently untrue. What has actually happened is that "no" campaigners have claimed that "yes" campaigners have claimed this.

    Can you actually provide a link to any "yes" campaigner ever claiming that all "no" voters are crazy, stupid and ignorant? Or have you just made a sweeping and unjustifiable claim?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭skelliser


    Kai wrote: »
    So is the main reason you are voting no to punish FF because you think they are arrogant. They are arrogant and probably all the claims you lay at them are true but is that a good reason to vote No? I would hope you would asses Lisbon on its own merits and decide based on the facts rather than on your emotional feeling towards a party that will no longer be in power after the next election.

    i suggest you re-read my post, especially the last line


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16 Galwaybuzz


    Referring to the use of celebrities joining the bandwagon , i think that they are a great way for young people to pay attention to politics.

    No young person is going to pay attention to any TD or MEP because there is a bad feeling between young people and politics.Most politician are just a face they see for a few minutes on a tv screen, however if they see the likes of Bill Cullen or Micheal O Leary pop up, they are suddenly attentive!! They are more familiar with celebrities than anyone!! This is the culture we are in, so the more celebrities pop up, the better, either way it may entice the youth of today to use their vote!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    ? Or have you just made a sweeping and unjustifiable claim?

    whats new?
    oscarBravo wrote: »
    I think that's patently untrue. What has actually happened is that "no" campaigners have claimed that "yes" campaigners have claimed this.

    this thread is a bait for them to get such a material by making some people angry

    there has been a few of such bait threads lately


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    I think that's patently untrue. What has actually happened is that "no" campaigners have claimed that "yes" campaigners have claimed this.

    Can you actually provide a link to any "yes" campaigner ever claiming that all "no" voters are crazy, stupid and ignorant? Or have you just made a sweeping and unjustifiable claim?
    Michael O'Leary's "headbangers" dig probably didn't help.

    I voted yes last time and will again but I really think this one is lost because of the sheer vagueness of the Yes campaign. No one seems to have copped on that when you spend all your time speaking in vague platitudes and putting out the fires that that others lit (it seems workers rights and misrepresentation of QMV are the new abortion and corporate tax), you can't effectively communicate the benefits of the Treaty.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭skelliser


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    I think that's patently untrue. What has actually happened is that "no" campaigners have claimed that "yes" campaigners have claimed this.

    Can you actually provide a link to any "yes" campaigner ever claiming that all "no" voters are crazy, stupid and ignorant? Or have you just made a sweeping and unjustifiable claim?

    no obviously i cant, im talking about attitudes, not specific statements that may have been made.
    case in point michael o learys sweeping statement!
    the "heart of europe" slogan isnt that not a sweeping and unjustifiable claim?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 W1ct0ry


    Voting No because of Fianna Fail is what happened last time. And hopefully people will not do it again. This is an EU referendum what Finna Fail have to say about it means nothing.

    If Ireland get kicked out of Europe it is the end of this country. And since all anyone does is complain about the stupid things the Irish government do, I dont see how giving some power to the EU is a bad thing.

    Voting yes to this will have no noticeable effect on the running of our country. Voting No will have a devastating effect.

    Stop voting for petty reasons. And vote on the treaty.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭Euro_Kraut


    skelliser wrote: »
    @EURO KRAT i dont know and i dont care tbh.

    Thanks. Its great to see you coming along to have a debate. Its odd that you would start a thread about something the don't care about and (as you have admitted) don't know about.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭King of Kings


    Euro_Kraut wrote: »
    So what parties do represent the No side? Aside from the ones you mentioned I can only think of the Socialists (and variants of Socialist) and the UKIP.

    Since you mention the UKIP - do the conservatives in the UK not oppose it. If cameron was PM Lisbon would be defunct.

    Celebrities?
    What does robbie keane know - he lives in london and is paid more than only a handful of the the electorate here. I doubt he understands the needs of the average punter.
    Good for him to vote yes but his bastion of intellect won't sway my no vote.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Since you mention the UKIP - do the conservatives in the UK not oppose it. If cameron was PM Lisbon would be defunct.

    Celebrities?
    What does robbie keane know - he lives in london and is paid more than only a handful of the the electorate here. I doubt he understands the needs of the average punter.
    Good for him to vote yes but his bastion of intellect won't sway my no vote.

    list which parties are openly opposed and campaigning for a NO

    let me begin

    * Sinn Fein
    * Coir
    * Socialists
    * UKIP

    who else?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭skelliser


    Euro_Kraut wrote: »
    Thanks. Its great to see you coming along to have a debate. Its odd that you would start a thread about something the don't care about and (as you have admitted) don't know about.

    sorry i didnt mean to be abrupt ;)
    i just dont think its relevent to this topic which is about the attitude of the yes campaign.

    And again i voted yes, a few other posters voted yes and agree with my sentiments so this is not bait for the no side as someone has suggested


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 593 ✭✭✭Zuiderzee


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    I think that's patently untrue. What has actually happened is that "no" campaigners have claimed that "yes" campaigners have claimed this.

    Can you actually provide a link to any "yes" campaigner ever claiming that all "no" voters are crazy, stupid and ignorant? Or have you just made a sweeping and unjustifiable claim?

    Your taking the piss right??? Headbangers, economic illiterates, COIRs fellow travellers!!!!
    Here, and with a lot of the media the No campaign are portrayed as nutbags or extremists, not least by open attacks by O Leary Given that he dismissed the No voters last as "economically illiterate, unscrupulous dole scroungers" or snide asides on oppositon funding by Dick Roche.

    But this is an old, old tactic, to impugn and ridicule dissent and opposition with the generation of fear of financial ruin will be the main driving factors used by FF to try and push this through.

    Try to stop being such a pedant man, if you want a sweeping statement from the Yes side, just search for O Leary and Lisbon


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Zuiderzee wrote: »
    COIRs fellow travellers!!!!

    i presume you are referring to this
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=61911304&postcount=1

    then you will notice that I dont take lightly to that being said 2 posts later
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=61911471&postcount=3

    and a moderator steps in later on
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=61913975&postcount=15


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 593 ✭✭✭Zuiderzee


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    list which parties are openly opposed and campaigning for a NO

    let me begin

    * Sinn Fein
    * Coir
    * Socialists
    * UKIP

    who else?


    I just love the way COIR, SF and Socialists again get banged in together.

    As for UKIP, when the Yes camp call for EU solidarity, unity, the EU working together the moment a UK party says anything against their view suddenly the tricolour gets run up and nationalism becomes popular again.
    UKIP are a British party, not Irish

    FYI Tony Benn, Labour legend is campaigning against the Lisbon referendum, and will be coming to Dublin on the 9th to give a speech.

    Look at it this way, others have commented on our No vote like the Germans and the French and DEstaing was so furious he wanted us to rerun in April or May.
    Berliosconi and his neo-fascist allies would ratify this treaty.

    Dont lump everyone in the one basket just cause they say No, over 50% of the Irish electorate said no last time


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭Bob_Harris


    W1ct0ry wrote: »
    Voting No will have a devastating effect.

    No it won't. In fact, if we vote No, nothing happens, as we still live under the previous treaties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    Zuiderzee wrote: »
    I just love the way COIR, SF and Socialists again get banged in together.

    As for UKIP, when the Yes camp call for EU solidarity, unity, the EU working together the moment a UK party says anything against their view suddenly the tricolour gets run up and nationalism becomes popular again.
    UKIP are a British party, not Irish

    FYI Tony Benn, Labour legend is campaigning against the Lisbon referendum, and will be coming to Dublin on the 9th to give a speech.

    Look at it this way, others have commented on our No vote like the Germans and the French and DEstaing was so furious he wanted us to rerun in April or May.
    Berliosconi and his neo-fascist allies would ratify this treaty.

    Dont lump everyone in the one basket just cause they say No, over 50% of the Irish electorate said no last time

    Berlusconi's significantly further left than Cóir and UKIP.

    Cut the bullshít and show some honesty for a change. If you're going to accuse a centre-right leader of being a neo-fascist, at least have the fúcking courage to come out and say that of the four parties people can list that support a No, one isn't even Irish, and two are more right-wing than Berlusconi could ever be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭patrickthomas


    Robbo wrote: »
    Michael O'Leary's "headbangers" dig probably didn't help.

    I voted yes last time and will again but I really think this one is lost because of the sheer vagueness of the Yes campaign. No one seems to have copped on that when you spend all your time speaking in vague platitudes and putting out the fires that that others lit (it seems workers rights and misrepresentation of QMV are the new abortion and corporate tax), you can't effectively communicate the benefits of the Treaty.

    Well said and i voted No last time, was seriously thinking of voting yes this time but thanks to Scofflaws "reasons" for voting yes i am changing my mind rapidly. There is a complete lack of conviction on the yes side that they know what they are voting for.

    If it ain't broke don't fix it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Zuiderzee wrote: »
    I just love the way COIR, SF and Socialists again get banged in together.

    do you have a different list of parties on the NO side of the campaign?

    yes it is amusing having only far right and far left parties come together, just shows that when you go out far enough on the fringe you come around full circle


    Zuiderzee wrote: »
    I just love the way COIR, SF and Socialists again get banged in together.

    As for UKIP, when the Yes camp call for EU solidarity, unity, the EU working together the moment a UK party says anything against their view suddenly the tricolour gets run up and nationalism becomes popular again.
    UKIP are a British party, not Irish

    Then what are they doing sending leaflets to Irish households?

    dont you find it a tiny bit ironic a party that insists it doesnt like interference in internal affairs from EU turns around and interferes in affairs of another country?

    and lets not forget that the main policy of UKIP is to leave the EU
    so much for the NO campaigners calling themselves "Pro EU"
    Zuiderzee wrote: »
    over 50% of the Irish electorate said no last time

    ~25% actually the turnout was about ~50% of electorate, please get the figures straight


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,995 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Well said and i voted No last time, was seriously thinking of voting yes this time but thanks to Scofflaws "reasons" for voting yes i am changing my mind rapidly. There is a complete lack of conviction on the yes side that they know what they are voting for.

    If it ain't broke don't fix it.

    To be honest, I don't think you ever had intention of voting Yes, you just wanted to play games with people (how's the broken refresh button today?) but at least we got an actual discussion on the content of the treaty out of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭patrickthomas


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    ~25% actually the turnout was about ~50% of electorate, please get the figures straight

    This really gets me hot under the collar, Who do you think you are talking to when you make a statement like this? Do you think we do not understand percentage points. I am shocked when i see this attitude from the yes side, how dare you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭patrickthomas


    Stark wrote: »
    To be honest, I don't think you ever had intention of voting Yes, you just wanted to play games with people (how's the broken refresh button today?) but at least we got an actual discussion on the content of the treaty out of it.


    You knew that Scofflaw would lose credibility and I would change my mind, fair dues, does not show much confidence. The refresh button is not the problem i was having last night, I am on wireless modem and it stops when it rains, thank you wonderful government.

    All we got was a load of platitudes and downtalking, zero conviction and what is obviously a group following instructions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 593 ✭✭✭Zuiderzee


    W1ct0ry wrote: »
    Voting No because of Fianna Fail is what happened last time. And hopefully people will not do it again. This is an EU referendum what Finna Fail have to say about it means nothing.

    FF are part the Government of this state.

    FF are the people who are putting this referendum to the people for a second time

    FF have launched a campaign (as have others) to get us to do as we are told.
    So whatever you say on the matter, they obviously feel what they have to say is important, so it is open to debate as to whether they have the ability to make a decision.
    And we have the right to dismiss their opinion, and dissent and disagree with a failing government. I would not take their advice to buy a rock, let alone vote on a treaty.
    W1ct0ry wrote: »
    If Ireland get kicked out of Europe it is the end of this country. And since all anyone does is complain about the stupid things the Irish government do, I dont see how giving some power to the EU is a bad thing.
    Voting yes to this will have no noticeable effect on the running of our country. Voting No will have a devastating effect.

    Stop voting for petty reasons. And vote on the treaty.

    I am voting on the treaty, and I am most concerned about workers rights.
    Voting Yes will make a large difference, we are told it is great for Europe etc.

    Essentially its an attitude 'look, your so unimportant this will never affect you, and you dont need to understand it, so be a good little sheep, and vote the way we tell you, trust us, we have f~~ked everything else so badly we have to get at least one right'

    Giving power to an external body for whom I cannot vote makes me very uncomfortable.

    Things do change, laws like the UK's 2005 Law and order act have changed a lot of things, even though 'normal' people were assured it would not changed their lives, it has. Check out 'Taking Liberties' on Youtube.

    We will not get kicked out of the EU if we vote No, that is a lie.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    This really gets me hot under the collar, Who do you think you are talking to when you make a statement like this? Do you think we do not understand percentage points. I am shocked when i see this attitude from the yes side, how dare you?

    lets quote what he said word for word
    Zuiderzee wrote: »
    over 50% of the Irish electorate said no last time

    lets lookup the definition of electorate
    electorate
    Noun
    1. all the people in an area or country who have the right to vote in an election

    how many people in Ireland who have the right to vote voted in the last referendum?

    53.13%

    how many of these people voted NO?

    53.20%


    now please so the maths and please do tell us what % of the electorate voted NO

    :rolleyes:


    im sick of the NO side telling lies, not backing it up with references and ignoring basic facts


Advertisement