Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Broker moves policy mid term to different insurer

Options
  • 13-10-2009 7:41pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭


    Hi,

    Quick question for those of you in the insurance industry.

    I have just found out on renewal that my broker moved my house insurance policy mid term last year to a different insurer without notifying me. Now, I phoned the new insurer and not only was the excess agreed (with the previous insurer) higher but they have also not noted my mortgage providers interest on the property.

    To make matters worse I had a claim on the policy on 31st July. I went through the whole process of logging the claim with the company I thought I was insured with (who didn't tell me any different) and now need to go through it all again with the new insurer.

    Surely there are laws against this type of messing by a broker.

    The crap excuse I was given was:

    The insurer I was with decided to pull out of insuring houses in certain areas (as in whole suburbs) due to previous flooding claims.... Can they do this mid term after already agreeing to insure you?

    The whole thing seems a total scam if you ask me.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,844 ✭✭✭Ogham


    If you signed nothing - then this cannot be valid . WHo signed the insurance agreement - because you should have? Did the broker forge your signature? Sounds like a matter for the financial regulator or the ombudsman .


  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭pureirish


    Ogham wrote: »
    If you signed nothing - then this cannot be valid . WHo signed the insurance agreement - because you should have? Did the broker forge your signature? Sounds like a matter for the financial regulator or the ombudsman .

    I agree - thank you. This is exactly how I feel. To be honest I was willing to let it go until I found out today that the excess was wrong and my mortgage companies interest wasn't noted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭pureirish


    Ogham wrote: »
    If you signed nothing - then this cannot be valid . WHo signed the insurance agreement - because you should have? Did the broker forge your signature? Sounds like a matter for the financial regulator or the ombudsman .

    I didn't sign anything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,754 ✭✭✭oldyouth


    The job of a broker is to search the best policy and premium options on your behalf and present them to you to decide. They should not make any decisions regarding your cover without your agreement, even if it is to your advantage. Seek a written explanation from them about this and decide upon your action depending on what they say. You have rights in this regard.

    Also, very strange that you had to log your claim with an insurer, that's what you pay your broker for


  • Registered Users Posts: 750 ✭✭✭broker2008


    Talk to the broker about it I bet they were acting on your behalf and in your interest and would be surprised if somewhere along the line there wasnt an agreement or consent of some sort. Why else would they do it? Not having the mortgage company's interest noted is not a big deal and in fact it would mean that they would not have first call on the insurance cover if house burnt down. My mortgage company doesnt have their interest noted either. Let us know how you get on. Always exhaust all avenues before wasting regulator's time etc. You have to obtain the facts first.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,215 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    broker2008 wrote: »

    Why else would they do it?

    Money?


  • Registered Users Posts: 750 ✭✭✭broker2008


    kearnsr wrote: »
    Money?

    By money do you mean commission ? There should be no difference. I would be surprised if there wasn't a very good reason for what happened.


  • Registered Users Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Cork Boy


    broker2008 wrote: »
    By money do you mean commission ? There should be no difference. I would be surprised if there wasn't a very good reason for what happened.

    Must say i agree, sounds to me though that someone in the broker made a huge boo boo initially and tried to cover their tracks... worse case scenario.

    Anyways, don't worry about it, you're insured one way or the other. This is why broker's have Professional Indemnity Insurance!


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭amdublin


    pureirish wrote: »
    The insurer I was with decided to pull out of insuring houses in certain areas (as in whole suburbs) due to previous flooding claims.... Can they do this mid term after already agreeing to insure you?

    This seems reasonable to me. If you don't believe the broker why not ring the insurer and query it with them?

    Would be interested to hear how you get on!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,754 ✭✭✭oldyouth


    If I was a gambling man, I'd say your broker suddenly realised that your flood cover was deleted at the previous renewal and moved you mid-term to cover their oversight. Insurers do not alter the terms of a contract mid year


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭Radharc na Sleibhte


    B . I . N . G . O


Advertisement