Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DVD or HD?

  • 14-10-2009 3:33pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,475 ✭✭✭


    I'm interested in people's opinions on this. I've been getting things from the cousins for many many years and before I would just burn them in batches to a bunch of cheapish DVDs I have. I don't take out the DVDs very often so I don't know if there's a high failure rate, but certainly the ones I've got back to recently seem ok. But I'm wondering if I should invest in a couple of hard drives instead. If I back everything up to 1 500gig hard drive and then just store that away somewhere, is it any more or less corruptible than a burned DVD? I know it's difficult to say, but I've lost several hard drives over the years, and wonder if DVD is a more stable way to go (it's a pain they only hold whatsit 4.7gigs)


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,464 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    As anyone will tell you...use both :D

    My boss is a professional photographer with hundred's of GBs of photos.
    He had a backup on his pc, which in turn is backed to a NAS box plus also DVD backup...
    Never have one source of backup...golden rule...well after the one about always back shít up :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,475 ✭✭✭corblimey


    Berkut wrote: »
    As anyone will tell you...use both :D

    My boss is a professional photographer with hundred's of GBs of photos.
    He had a backup on his pc, which in turn is backed to a NAS box plus also DVD backup...
    Never have one source of backup...golden rule...well after the one about always back shít up :D

    Yeah, I'm starting to think that might be the best option. backing up DVD is such a complete pain in the ass though, whereas backing up to HD is pretty easy. Backup to PC is not an option currently, none of my machines have that much disk space.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,339 ✭✭✭✭tman


    Ideally have important stuff backed up to 2 hard drives... It's a sad fact of life that hard drives fail all the time, I've lost some irreplaceable pictures thanks to that:(

    Depends on how important the stuff is to you really... Surely your "cousins" could just "send" your the files again in the offchance that it did get corrupted.
    I personally favour backing up to hard drives over DVDs - far less hassle, and cheap DVDs degrade/peel after a few years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    I used to back up my music files to DVD.

    The I realised when I got things sorted on the hard drive that I would need a few hundred DVDs to complete the job within a year or two.

    Hard drive backups IMHO unless it's really convenient for you to do DVDs (in other words, if you haven't got a great deal of stuff to be backed up). Then again, I'm looking at a few terabytes of need, and while I'm sure there are plenty of people out there with higher requirements, I'm towards the high usage area as home users go.

    DVDs definitely good for photos though for most of us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭monkeypants


    Backup to at least two hard disks. Burned DVDs deteriorate over time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,936 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    And store them in seperate locations. Theft, fire and even a virus could wipe out the lot if they are all stored (and connected) together.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 371 ✭✭chrism2007


    ironic that paper can last 1000s of years and hard drives cant last a few :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,215 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Thats where SSDs are coming in. Hard Disk's greatest weakness has been its moving parts. Flash has also inherently been its maximum entropy for read-write operations: they 'die' from overuse similarly to HDDs, though probably with more predictability. As a backup solution they would work great and the data could be preserved for centuries (but who cares) while enduring all sorts of bumps and bangs. In day to day operation however they will wear out within ~7-15 years based on use amount.
    corblimey wrote: »
    Yeah, I'm starting to think that might be the best option. backing up DVD is such a complete pain in the ass though, whereas backing up to HD is pretty easy. Backup to PC is not an option currently, none of my machines have that much disk space.
    Blu Ray burners are cheap enough now to the point where its almost worth considering. you can store 25gb per single layer. Prototypes from early phase were burning as high as 200gb and future projections are looking at 1tb-5tb per disc by the end of the format's lifespan. For backing up music and photos it seems ideal. Leave the videos to hard drives for the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,306 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Be sure not to buy cheap DVD's. Use Datawrite yellow label myself, which seem to have a long life, and can be read in different systems. Have used cheap DVD's in the past, only for them to fail after a few months.


Advertisement