Obama To Announce Moon Base and Aliens To The World In November!

DangerMouse27

There was nothing in his speach about it and there will never be anything about it!

Torakx

Undergod wrote: »

I never asked why they are so powerful. I asked "why would they play with us?"

And if your second bit is still in reference to my post, no state official has said that aliens exist, we were referring to the Vatican organizing a conference to discuss the possibility of extraterrestrial life.

What do you mean in the last sentence?

when i said they like to keep us busy and why that is me answering that question earlier regarding why they would play with us.

there have been some state officials who have spoken publically about ET's.
i would guess they did not do so before because it was either forbidden in the job or his life was in too much danger,or he was assigned to speak afterwards to continue the confusion that theres a conspiracy to hide aliens being real by the government.
all of those could be possible and thats why i say there could be many good reasons.

"if a state official says theres aliens then there is a very good reason for him to do so. my thougths are that real aliens or ET's would be the last one i would pick for his reasons to announce them."

i mean i do not trust a single word that comes out of an american presidents mouth.everything he says i would have to take as 50/50 one way could be true and even if so could be for another reason or motive behind it.and again it could be totally false and used to his advantage.
i just know at this stage with politics obama is not going to announce aliens if for example he knew it wouldnt be to his advantage.
if its to his advantage and he has lied about other things then if this aliens existing is a lie and he says they are on the moon, i have to wonder how does this help him politically or someone else?

seems he has done his speech now.so everyone can relax about aliens hehe....................for now!

DangerMouse27

America couldnt find wmd's in Iraq, and yet they have somehow found aliens on the moon?

I truly believe that if there are these things out there flying around,then how come they havent landed in say..Kilbeggan..given location and randomness..Kilbeggan is the same on the outside of this planet as say Nevada!

toiletduck

So that's that then.

RoboClam

King Mob wrote: »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8405033.stm

Nope nothing about aliens.
Shocking.

Just wait. I'd bet if you reverse his speech, slow it down, convert it to chinese, then spanish and back to english it'll sound like he's saying something relating to aliens!

bonkey

Enough with the mockery, guys. Make your point civilly, or not at all

PirateShampoo

Don't think theres any more points to make, the original prediction failed and now the new updated prediction has failed to pass also.

All that is left is for believers of this theory to post new theory's of why it didn't happen.

mysterious

DangerMouse27 wrote: »

America couldnt find wmd's in Iraq, and yet they have somehow found aliens on the moon?

I truly believe that if there are these things out there flying around,then how come they havent landed in say..Kilbeggan..given location and randomness..Kilbeggan is the same on the outside of this planet as say Nevada!

They knew there was no WMDs in Iraq. They just lied. Thats was national news for a decade now. They found Saddam in a matter of weeks and he hid in secret bunkers.

Diogenes

mysterious wrote: »

They knew there was no WMDs in Iraq. They just lied. Thats was national news for a decade now.

Thats impressive considering the invasion happened in 2003. I think it's pretty much impossible for the US/UN to know definitively that Saddam didn't have WMD.

They found Saddam in a matter of weeks and he hid in secret bunkers.

No the invasion happened in March 2003. Saddam was found in Dec 2003.

LostinBlanch

King Mob wrote: »

what's a thing in Norway got to do with it?

Oh I dunno, something about him collecting the nobel peace prize in Oslo today. See? Him in Norway today and that picture taken in Norway last night.

Maybe I should have made it more explicit. I thought that CTers spent most of their time listening to the news and reading between the lines.

Oh well.

LostinBlanch

LostinBlanch wrote: »

Oh I dunno, something about him collecting the nobel peace prize in Oslo today. See? Him in Norway today and that picture taken in Norway last night.

And?
Are you implying that the light is something to do with aliens?
If you are I'd love to know how you know it's aliens.

bonkey

LostinBlanch wrote: »

Oh I dunno, something about him collecting the nobel peace prize in Oslo today. See? Him in Norway today and that picture taken in Norway last night.

If only the prediction had been "alien-related sighting to occur in Oslo when Obama accepts Nobel peace Prize", and not "Obama to announce Moon base and aliens..."

Flamed Diving

Let's not forget the once-again accurate reporting of Richard Hoagland in this. If there was any justice in this world, they would hand this man the Nobel.

cable842

well the Announcement was not announced at all. but I still have ope that it will happen thou I want to believe

maybe it will happen. but to be honest he won a peace prize for doin noting they at least could have let him announce there was aliens and they people would be like yea obama won something for discovering something cool.

obama and the aliens t shirts for everyone.

Undergod

Diogenes wrote: »

I think it's pretty much impossible for the US/UN to know definitively that Saddam didn't have WMD.

Yeah, but they never really thought they did have WMDs, that was undoubtedly a front to allow them to invade. It was never actually the agenda.

indough

how can you possibly know what they thought though?

Undergod

Well that's how it seems from the way they behaved. They fabricated evidence and stuff.

Diogenes

Undergod wrote: »

Yeah, but they never really thought they did have WMDs, that was undoubtedly a front to allow them to invade.

Saddam had chemical and biological weapons he used them against kurdish rebels and in the Iran/Iraq war.

mysterious

indough wrote: »

how can you possibly know what they thought though?

By actions overtime and history is a good indicator too. And you should know that governments (especially US) fake incidents to get nations into wars. Now it's Iran, its not to hard to figure it out since they never stop lieing! They were planning to invade Iraq long before 9/11. They just needed 9/11 to start all these wars. They can't persuade people anymore, because people are waking up.

mysterious

With the sudden announcement on Friday Dec. 4, 2009 of the closing after 50 years by the U.K. Ministry of Defence of its UFO Affairs desk on the implausible grounds that its annual $73,000 budget is now being devoted to President Barack Obama’s surge in the Afghan war, speculation of imminent disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence by the Obama administration has faltered.
The U.K. decision, taken in apparent reaction to secret disclosure maneuvering, authoritative citizen-driven ET disclosures and an impeding citizen ET ballot initiative in Denver, Colorado, has had the function of making transparent the underlying reactionary nature of “official” disclosure strategies that are camouflaged components of expansionist military strategies.
There is evidence that the U.K. and the U.S. governments are co-participants not only in a global expansionist military policy as in Afghanistan, but also in interplanetary military expansionist policies involving secret solar system and galactic anti-gravity fleets. Evidence of these fleets was uncovered by UFO researcher Gary McKinnon, whom the U.S. government is prosecuting and whose extradition the U.K. government is facilitating in contravention of international humanitarian law.
Disclosure of an extraterrestrial presence, and of secret human-ET liaison programs will most plausibly, as they have been in the past, be done by citizen groups or whistleblowers. With the approval of a Denver Ballot Initiative, disclosure may now also be a matter for the voting public to decide. The extraterrestrials themselves, of course may continue their driving role in ET disclosure, at least for the immediate future.
Obama does not intend ET disclosure now
In hindsight of the U.K. decision, there are multiple reasons why the Obama administration would not now disclose ongoing secret human-ET liaison programs of the U.S. government, some of which have been ongoing since at least the early 1970s.
For one, the U.S. government is actively prosecuting UFO researcher Gary McKinnon in order to maintain the secrecy of a black-budget funded anti-gravity space ship fleet.
Secondly, ET disclosure by the Obama administration would risk disclosure of top-secret forward U.S. military bases on Mars, serviced by teleportation corridors. The reality of these has now been revealed by independent whistleblowers. The Obama administration’s function is to rationalize a covert U.S. government strategy to colonize the solar system militarily.
Thirdly, a leading agency of the Obama administration – NASA – is actively seeking to suppress knowledge of the extraterrestrial presence on Mars and other celestial bodies.
Fourth, unlike President Jimmy Carter, Obama never promised to disclosure during his campaign and has undertaken no good faith effort to disclose the ET presence. Efforts by this reporter to reach the office of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for confirmation of some good faith disclosure agenda have been rebuffed.
Finally, independent sources now confirm that Barack Obama is a life-long U.S. intelligence asset, who began his training in the early 1980s at Columbia University as part of an elite unit training him as a future U.S. president, under Zbigniew Brzezinski, founder of the Trilaterist Group under David Rockefeller.
Trilateralist-controlled groups and defense and resource industries have benefited from the decades of the privatization of extraterrestrial liaison programs. There is no reason to believe that a Rockefeller-dominated complex would engage in public interest disclosure not connected with military dominance and a permanent war economy.
Nuclear disarmament, the Nobel Prize and extraterrestrials
On December 10, 2009 in his Nobel acceptance speech at Oslo Barack Obama is expected to continue a multi-lateral initiative for the elimination of nuclear weapons, a policy that advanced ethical extraterrestrial civilizations have reportedly been urging on the United States since the mid-1950s.
Some exopolitics commentators have speculated that a Nov. 9, 2009 spiral night light in the skies of Norway may be a multi-dimensional omen related to extraterrestrial disclosure. If the night-light is not the result of a failed rocket attempt nor a celestial phenomenon and is ET-related, it can be interpreted by the context communication theory of extraterrestrial communication. More likely, if the Norway light is ET-related, it may relate to support of Obama’s nuclear disarmament policies. Of course, the night-light could be Project Blue Beam-related psyops, designed to cast an ET aura over Obama policies.
This theory holds that ET-related events, such as UFO encounters, may be symbolic communications by the intelligence behind the encounter, to a human public. The Chicago-O’Hare UFO sighting of Nov. 7, 2006, in which a 20-60 ft. UFO came down over United Airlines Gate C-17, is held, by one analysis, to be such a context communication related to then Senator Barack Obama’s future U.S. Presidency.
Disclosure by ballot: The Denver initiative



More here....
http://www.examiner.com/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2009m12d9-Obama-ET-disclosure-uncertain-as-voter-ballot-and-citizen-groups-move-to-disclose-ET-presence

indough

no mysterious, the answer is you cant possibly know what they were thinking

unless you have mind reading powers

mysterious

indough wrote: »

no mysterious, the answer is you cant possibly know what they were thinking

unless you have mind reading powers

Been aware is a great tool. If your not aware, a conman will con you everytime and a politician will lie to you everyime too. The truth is in front of you, by judging the actions of someone over time. You dont have to be in someones mind to know their motives or agendas.

mysterious

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=4297.0

Heres a great feed to the project blue beam. I beleive this is more likely to happen rather than Obama been told to spill the coffee on E.T contact.

indough

mysterious wrote: »

Been aware is a great tool. If your not aware, a conman will con you everytime and a politician will lie to you everyime too. The truth is in front of you, by judging the actions of someone over time. You dont have to be in someones mind to know their motives or agendas.

you cant know what someones thinking without having mind reading powers, its impossible

guessing based on past events is not even nearly the same as knowing

mysterious

indough wrote: »

you cant know what someones thinking without having mind reading powers, its impossible

guessing based on past events is not even nearly the same as knowing

Nobody mentioned mind reading powers only you. I've made my point on the question already.

indough

the point wasthat noone knows what 'they' were thinking

bonkey

Enough bickering, thanks.

PirateShampoo

And what are your veiws on this copy and paste?

baza1976

mysterious wrote: »

By actions overtime and history is a good indicator too. And you should know that governments (especially US) fake incidents to get nations into wars. Now it's Iran, its not to hard to figure it out since they never stop lieing! They were planning to invade Iraq long before 9/11. They just needed 9/11 to start all these wars. They can't persuade people anymore, because people are waking up.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11!!??!!??!!??!??!??!?!?!?!?!?!!???!!!

Diogenes

baza1976 wrote: »

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11!!??!!??!!??!??!??!?!?!?!?!?!!???!!!

Um thats something we can all agree on... Right.

cable842

iraq was and always be about oil.

steamjetjoe

cable842 wrote: »

iraq was and always be about oil.

And a Stargate;)

cable842

a stargate what are yea talking about.

are there really stargates,

well that thing in norway last week was no missile or a weather balloon ha ha

its look incredible i've never seen a missile like that, it was prob Iron Man Testing his new suit

PirateShampoo

cable842 wrote: »

its look incredible i've never seen a missile like that, it was prob Iron Man Testing his new suit

How many missles have u seen.

Anyway u will probably never c that missile again due to it being a faild proto type

PirateShampoo

PirateShampoo wrote: »

How many missles have u seen.

Anyway u will probably never c that missile again due to it being a faild proto type

I wouldn't be so sure.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/12/another-russian-rocket-spiral-lights-up-the-sky/

steamjetjoe

cable842 wrote: »

a stargate what are yea talking about.

are there really stargates,

well that thing in norway last week was no missile or a weather balloon ha ha

its look incredible i've never seen a missile like that, it was prob Iron Man Testing his new suit

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/42stargate/04images/Star_Gates/90158300dc65f669.jpg

cable842

that pic looks kinda fake

PirateShampoo

cable842 wrote: »

that pic looks kinda fake

Yes the stargate picture is clearly fake.

Ive seen websites talking about Stargates and how they are real only to post pictures of the ones from the show of the same name.

mysterious

cable842 wrote: »

that pic looks kinda fake

So does something like this look fake? What should a stargate look like? What should we deem a stargate?

Have you actually study the geography of Eden in Iraq. It may shock you. But the motto is, we sit back and just judge all the things we are unfamilar with simply because none of us actually face the unknown and that's why are all so quick to judge and be a la critique


Garden of Eden wasn't just some name mentioned throughout history for the fun of it.

The only way you can find this "un faked" is if you did your research on the subject and find out for yourself. USA has tones of oil, it doesn't need to purposly invade Iraq for oil. Considering there is more oil in most of the other Arab/Persian countries

PirateShampoo

mysterious wrote: »

So does something like this look fake? What should a stargate look like? What should we deem a stargate?

So are you agreeing its a fake picture or not?

No idea why your mentioning garden of Eden or America Oil supply to prove your point?

RoboClam

The picture you linked is from here

http://www.thelivingmoon.com/42stargate/menu.html (This site seems to regularly cite "Sam Carter" from the Stargate TV show as a source...)

It says that the picture was "Presented by Starwarp2000"

Here...

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread197741/pg209

He claims that he got it from an "NSA web portal". When asked for a source he said

It was a .mil site Julie.
Best to be safe than sorry and not go there.

Seems like he's making excuses to me. In the thread he even admits that he thinks it's probably a photoshop.

So some guy on the internet posted it in a forum. Not exactly rock solid proof that it's real now is it?

humanji

Yeah, I'm not sure what you're talking about there, Mysterious, but that picture is from the Stargate tv series. It may of been used in the film too, but I can't remember. That's why it looks fake.

mysterious

humanji wrote: »

Yeah, I'm not sure what you're talking about there, Mysterious, but that picture is from the Stargate tv series. It may of been used in the film too, but I can't remember. That's why it looks fake.

Why was stargate made?

The world is been fooled over and over.

One should just google garden of eden and where it's located. This will make everything fitting the puzzle as to why they invaded Iraq. This has been discussed years ago. You just dont hear it mainstream. So people just sit back and just think it's nonsense (or its to hard to understand)

Things go on outside our mainstream view of reality. My point about oil, is that America has one of the biggest oil reserves in the world and can invade plenty more oil rich nations at far easier reaches than Iraq. So my point clearly states the invasion of Iraq was not about oil. But no harm in taking some while they are there though.

indough

you are hardly suggesting they invaded to capture a fictional artefact?

mysterious

indough wrote: »

you are hardly suggesting they invaded to capture a fictional artefact?

No I'm not as I haven't mentioned anything of fiction or anything that is fiction.

But now that you say it we do live in a world fiction more like. While the wars, Alien conflicts, Blue spiral, stargates, Government - Alien annunaki developments happen. How do you brainwash others to think this is fictionand not really happening .


Put it on a movie!. Classic way to train the subconcious. So if any of this real info is leaked, our subconcious remembers seeing it in a movie, we automatically think its not real or fiction.

indough

well it is fiction until you can prove otherwise

if not then i could, for example, suggest something ridiculous such as, professor x works for the cia controlling the minds of world leaders, and it would have exactly the same credibility as your story as they are both based on the same level of proof, ie none

mysterious

indough wrote: »

well it is fiction until you can prove otherwise

if not then i could, for example, suggest something ridiculous such as, professor x works for the cia controlling the minds of world leaders, and it would have exactly the same credibility as your story as they are both based on the same level of proof, ie none

no one is going to find the proof for you, thats your responsibilty

it's like Atlantis, it doesn't matter People won't beleive it even when the proof is there. It's the conditioning we have all been brought up with. pre ice age civilzations are under water 80% of the evidence is under water. Just like 80% of todays population live near coastlines. The proof is all over the place, but you may expect it to be handed out on a platter and told to you. Thats not going to happen however. Nor will any leader or someone in power would be that honest to tell you either.

Google garden of eden, might shock where its actually located. Logic will tell you there was a more serious ulterior motive to why they invaded Iraq... What exactly do you mean by proof, or more willing to believe the leaders that lied to about Iraq then? 99% of the population of this planet are never going to know, because we are asleep. When we are awake, we work and we go home and sleep. Much of the reallity we know is through the T.V. It's just that easy for a leader to fool the world.

Alll one has to do is have awareness, logic, common sense, intuition, passion of interest, natural curosity and some nack for researching. Your on your way to uncover the hidden truths to the world.

indough

no it isnt, its your responsibility, you are making the claim

mysterious

indough wrote: »

no it isnt, its your responsibility, you are making the claim

Others on this thread have made the claim. Thousands of more in the outside world have made the claim too. It's not a secret nor is it anything special. It's just to special to hit fox news and CNN though. Why would they want to inform people of the real motives of the elites. Common sense and logic prevails here again.

I don't need to prove to you whats already there. If you don't want to do research or look like you are familar with it, no one should be trying to show you.

You have your own mind to use. Remembe are on a C.T. If you want to debunk hand over everything in a scientific (in your face manner) There is the other forum for that. C.Ts come here to share and connect \(that is known outside the mainstream) the info that is not deemed open to the scientific/skeptic arena. I've given you a guideline of where to look and where to find evidence.

indough

no mysterious you are just wrong

i dont want to get into an off topic argument with you but this is not a place for rabbitting on about any old crap, you are supposed to support your theories otherwise its just the science fiction which it actually is

now lets leave it at that eh?