Nikon Wildlife Lens

Sasquatch76

Hi folks,

Have asked this question in a few places, and I'm looking for as much advice as possible. Basically, I'm looking for a lens that would suit wildlife photography*, but alas I'm on somewhat of a budget. I have been looking at the Nikkor 70-300mm AF-S VR f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED, which, when using a money back voucher from Nikon themselves, I could have for under £400 sterling, or about €450. Reviews for this lens have been favourable, and the cash back thingy has almost persuaded me to go for it.

However, being a relative beginner, it's only right that I ask those in the know (ie you guys) if there are any alternatives in or around the same price? I did have someone tell me to get a second hand "Bigma" but I don't know too much about the Sigma lenses as regards quality etc? Are there any other lenses I should be considering?

All feedback, user experiences etc etc most welcome



*I know I'll probably need something longer than 300mm for birding, but that can wait.

Cosmo K

The Nikon 70-300VR is considered to be the best lens its class. I have one, and its one of my favorite lenses, really sharp, and the VR works great. But I don't think, its the ideal lens for wildlife photography, its simply a bit too short.

I have heard good things about the Sigma 150-500:

http://www.calumetphoto.co.uk/item/399-155A/

its a good bit more expensive then the Nikon 70-300, but might be the better choice for wildlife photography.

Cosmo K

BTW, you can get the Nikon 70-300VR for 379 euro

http://www.cameranu.nl/artikel/4022/Nikkor_AF-S_VR_70-300_4.5-5.6G_IF-ED_Zoom.html

The dealer is based in Holland.

bernard0368

I have the sigma 150-500 lens and It is a great lens for the money.
Took this with it.

magicbastarder

a friend has the sigma 70-300 f4-5.6 (i think) APO - cost around 200 quid for the model with the motor (as it's being used on a D40). she's very happy with it.

Sasquatch76

Cheers for the feedback guys - I'll look into that Sigma