Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Czech court clears Lisbon Treaty

Options
  • 03-11-2009 2:07pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭


    news_logo.gif
    Czech court clears Lisbon Treaty

    The Czech constitutional court has ruled that the Lisbon Treaty is in line with the constitution, clearing the way for President Vaclav Klaus to sign it.

    The Czech Republic is the only EU member yet to ratify the treaty, and the decision removes the penultimate hurdle to its passage.
    The Eurosceptic Mr Klaus, who was awaiting the court's decision, has said he will not further oppose the treaty.
    The treaty was drawn up to streamline decision-making in the 27-member body.

    Its supporters say it will allow the bloc to operate more efficiently and give it greater influence in world affairs. Critics say it will cede too many national powers to Brussels.

    'No obstacle'
    If Mr Klaus signs, that will pave the way for the treaty to come into effect throughout the EU as early as 1 December.
    "The Treaty of Lisbon should now enter into force by the end of the year," said European Parliament President Jerzy Buzek. The Czech president has been seen as the last major obstacle to the passage of the treaty, but he has recently appeared satisfied with a promised opt-out from the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights.


    LISBON TREATY
    <LI class=bull>Creates new post of EU president (President of European Council)
    <LI class=bull>New post of high representative for foreign affairs <LI class=bull>More decisions by majority vote rather than unanimity <LI class=bull>Ratified by all member states except Czech Republic <LI class=bull>Only Irish Republic held referendum on it - twice ('Yes' vote second time) <LI class=bull>Took a decade of negotiations <LI class=bull>Was intended to take effect in January 2009

    Mr Klaus has said the opt-out was essential to avoid property claims from ethnic Germans, 2.5 million of whom were expelled from Czechoslovakia after World War II.

    The BBC's Rob Cameron in Prague says no-one knows when Mr Klaus might sign the document, though it looks like he will have no reason not to.
    The Czech constitutional court had been considering a case brought by 17 Eurosceptic senators who said the treaty would create a super-state, and as such would infringe Czech sovereignty.

    Following the court's ruling on Tuesday, Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer said he was satisfied with the verdict, adding that there was now "no obstacle to the ratification".

    The Lisbon Treaty replaced an earlier draft constitution, which was rejected in referendums in France and the Netherlands in 2005.
    It would create the post of a new European Council president who would serve a term of two-and-a-half years.

    It also provides for a new foreign policy chief, combining the posts of the existing foreign affairs representative and the external affairs commissioner.

    European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said he hoped the EU could move "as quickly as possible" to make appointments to the new posts following the Czech court's ruling.


    Story from BBC NEWS:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/8339464.stm

    Published: 2009/11/03 11:34:30 GMT

    © BBC MMIX

    Print Sponsor
    Advertisement


    I had a look and saw no thread for this. Unless it has an elusive title.

    Anyway, thoughts?


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    How does this resolve with Klaus's claim that he would "never" sign the treaty into law?

    Is Klaus just a flip-flopping attention seeker like Sarkozy?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    seamus wrote: »
    How does this resolve with Klaus's claim that he would "never" sign the treaty into law?

    Is Klaus just a flip-flopping attention seeker like Sarkozy?

    Are politicians just a flip-flopping attention seekers?

    To generalise, I think so. But let us see how Klaus handles this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,872 ✭✭✭View


    It would appear that Klaus will opt for the security of his position rather than risk a clash with the Czech government.

    However, never let it be forgotten that he was prepared to fight to the last drop of the Irish No campaigners' blood...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    View wrote: »
    However, never let it be forgotten that he was prepared to fight to the last drop of the Irish No campaigners' blood...
    Or he says he was :rolleyes:


Advertisement