Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Buying site when planning is in other persons name

  • 12-11-2009 3:56pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2


    Hi,

    Is it wise to buy a site when the planning permission has been granted in the sellers name. The condition states that this person must live in the house for 5 years. The seller got planning permission because he qualified for local needs and now wants to sell site with FPP.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 656 ✭✭✭davidoco


    For all intends and purposes that field does not therefore have planning permission. If you look at the actual grant you will see it may have a condition that a deed/legal document be lodged against the property by the council before occupation.

    Just buy it "subject to planning" in your own name.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,863 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Malary wrote: »
    The seller got planning permission because he qualified for local needs and now wants to sell site with FPP.

    in most cases this is not allowed (the selling of 'the permission')... no solicitor would allow any transaction to take place as immediately the conditions of planning cannot be met. as davidoco says.... offer to buy 'subject to FPP'.


    however i have heard cases where local authorities 'may' accept the sale if the purchaser can prove he/she meets the requirements of the rural housing guidelines. Contact your local authority and ask them...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,321 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    however i have heard cases where local authorities 'may' accept the sale if the purchaser can prove he/she meets the requirements of the rural housing guidelines. Contact your local authority and ask them...
    That would be the situation in Donegal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,466 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    When this occupancy condition is on the planning, it cannot be sold as 'with planning'.
    If you qualify to live in the area, you can apply again and you should receive planning in your own name but that is never certain.
    Nobody can stop you buying the field as a 'field', not a site regardless of the planning so if you really want to go ahead and buy it, all the solicitor can do is advise that it doesnt have planning. You should only buy subject to planning though. Anything else would be reckless seeing as Im sure you are paying more than agricultural value for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 308 ✭✭clint_eastman


    My experience in Limerick has been that once a residency clause has been included as part of the planning grant, a new application must be made by any prospective purchaser to ensure that the same local requirements are met. As far as I know though,if you fulfill the requirements as did the original applicant/owner, it should be a straightforward application, but bear in mind that the owner may have used the fact that he was building on his own land to get a favorable planning decision, which you will not be able to do. I'd agree with the above that purchasing subject to planning is the only way forward, and a pre-planning meeting with the LA will give you a pretty good indication as to where you stand. As above, depending on the LA, they may even let you proceed without a new application if you can prove you fulfill the requirements.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 Malary


    Thanks for advice. Yes the asking price is way above agricultural value and there is no chance that I will qualify for local needs (site is in Meath) even though I live here for 6 years, I'm not originally form here. However, the seller is of the opinion that the build can go ahead and as long as I don't sell it in the 5 years, then the LA are no wiser.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,321 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    Malary wrote: »
    Thanks for advice. Yes the asking price is way above agricultural value and there is no chance that I will qualify for local needs (site is in Meath) even though I live here for 6 years, I'm not originally form here. However, the seller is of the opinion that the build can go ahead and as long as I don't sell it in the 5 years, then the LA are no wiser.
    Have you read the conditions on the planning permission? You will most likely see a condition that the Local Authority are to be notified in writing of the name of the first occupant of the house when its completed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1 meathlady


    Is there any way around this? I am in a similar situation myself. Is it possible for the person with planning permission to perhaps lay the foundations and then sell it on? How does the council actually know if the house is being built by another person?
    I know of people who have done it, I just don't know how!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,321 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    Steady on here meathlady. Please read the forum charter

    Im cutting you a bit of slack as this is your first post.


Advertisement