Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Boards.ie is obsessed with the Public Sector

Options
  • 24-11-2009 3:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭


    Just when you thought there wasn't enough time or space or words left, well here it is, ANOTHER public sector thread on Boards.ie.
    Boards is a talking shop, right? So, it's fairly representative of society at large. Or is it? I'm pretty new to boards.ie, so wasn't on boards.ie for the Tiger years. Were people on boards.ie as obsessed with house prices/mortgages/child care fees/school fees.
    I do understand the need to reform government (in all it's aspects incl PS reform).
    Anyway the last few months people on Boards.ie seem to be obsessed with the Public Sector, is this a topic du jour or is it from a genuine societal/economic standpoint.


«1345678

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,333 ✭✭✭bad2dabone


    a bit of both.

    i think most people are just frightened that the country is ****ed big time.

    i know i am :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    imme wrote: »
    Just when you thought there wasn't enough time or space or words left, well here it is, ANOTHER public sector thread on Boards.ie.
    Boards is a talking shop, right? So, it's fairly representative of society at large. Or is it? I'm pretty new to boards.ie, so wasn't on boards.ie for the Tiger years. Were people on boards.ie as obsessed with house prices/mortgages/child care fees/school fees.
    I do understand the need to reform government (in all it's aspects incl PS reform).
    Anyway the last few months people on Boards.ie seem to be obsessed with the Public Sector, is this a topic du jour or is it from a genuine societal/economic standpoint.

    Maybe people are obsessed because they are paying for it for a start. This isn't their (public sector workers) fault to be honest... This government let this partnership process become a private forum for unionised public sector and a small number of private sector workers, while excluding many other people such as the unemployed (nearly at 500,000 people now), and the vast majority of non-unionised private sector workers. Of course people are right to be angry now that this madness is continuing, more partnership talks behind closed doors while the majority of the people in the country have no real input into the process, there is no balance to any of this, that is what is making people angry I think, it's more of the same, more talking behind closed doors with everyone who is at the table paid well in excess of 100K...


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭imme


    I see a few more threads have been added to the bloated lot of Boards. Shopping Action, further strike action, any chance of any more?

    There was me thinking Obsession was a perfume by Calvin Cline.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,430 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    imme wrote: »
    I see a few more threads have been added to the bloated lot of Boards. Shopping Action, further strike action, any chance of any more?

    There was me thinking Obsession was a perfume by Calvin Cline.

    well you were totally wrong....its by Calvin Klein :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 69 ✭✭bridgitt


    There is a huge amount of justifiable anger at those who have secure, well paid , well pensioned work and who are striking.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭imme


    bridgitt wrote: »
    There is a huge amount of justifiable anger at those who have secure, well paid , well pensioned work and who are striking.
    by people starting up 75,000 threads on the subject on a discussion forum, what will this accomplish?
    In the Tiger years were people as obsessed with current affairs/economics. Were people on here advocating pay restraint, value for money auditing in government expenditure, reform of the Dáil, abolition of the Seanad, reform of a bloated public sector. Is it the topic du jour.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭BroomBurner


    The masses need someone to hate, someone that's easy to target. Who is easier to target than a faceless, giant body of staff such as the PS? With the added benefit of having loads of easy one-line insults to throw aswell, it pretty much writes itself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,920 ✭✭✭cee_jay


    bridgitt wrote: »
    There is a huge amount of justifiable anger at those who have secure, well paid , well pensioned work and who are striking.

    And why exactly do you think it is justifiable?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭brayblue24


    Of all the related threads on Boards there has been more sense spoken on this one page alone than the rest of them combined. We need to remember that no matter which "side" one is on (I work in the public sector for what it's worth) the long term repercusssions of this manufactured divide is what concerns me. A divided society, no matter what one's occupation, is not a good thing-short (obviously) or long term. This is the 3rd recession I have witnessed-it is due to the last one that I am a public servant-but I have never witnessed this sort of spite and hatred before, and all for having a job to go to?

    Short answer is Yes Boards is obsessed with the PS


  • Registered Users Posts: 438 ✭✭Diom


    imme wrote: »
    by people starting up 75,000 threads on the subject on a discussion forum, what will this accomplish?
    In the Tiger years were people as obsessed with current affairs/economics. Were people on here advocating pay restraint, value for money auditing in government expenditure, reform of the Dáil, abolition of the Seanad, reform of a bloated public sector. Is it the topic du jour.
    As you say... I'm sure people were talking about Ansbacher and Ben Dunne when they were the current affairs.

    What is your point?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 303 ✭✭privateBeavis


    I'm new enough to boards.ie too and yeah its the topic du jour alright and seems to me that whenever heating discussion breaks out about the Public vs Private sector more posters against public sector, so would it be interesting to see what is the representation of public vs private sector posters on boards... a poll anyone?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,957 ✭✭✭The Volt


    imme wrote: »
    Just when you thought there wasn't enough time or space or words left, well here it is, ANOTHER public sector thread on Boards.ie.
    Boards is a talking shop, right? So, it's fairly representative of society at large. Or is it? I'm pretty new to boards.ie, so wasn't on boards.ie for the Tiger years. Were people on boards.ie as obsessed with house prices/mortgages/child care fees/school fees.
    I do understand the need to reform government (in all it's aspects incl PS reform).
    Anyway the last few months people on Boards.ie seem to be obsessed with the Public Sector, is this a topic du jour or is it from a genuine societal/economic standpoint.
    Not just obsessed but they also seem to be buying the line pedalled by the media that somehow the public service and the unions are to blame for our economic plight and not the Government, bankers, land owners and property developers. Unless of course, many of the people on boards.ie have been put there to help the powers that be pedal their lies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,957 ✭✭✭The Volt


    bridgitt wrote: »
    There is a huge amount of justifiable anger at those who have secure, well paid , well pensioned work and who are striking.
    A lot of this 'justifiable' anger comes from Dick Turpin who wore a mask during the boom. Builders and tradesmen who made a fortune during the boom and who charged ordinary householders outrageous prices for the smallest task. It's extremely difficult to have symathy for those people who had no interest in Public sector jobs at the time as they viewed them as 'beneath them'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭BroomBurner


    I'm new enough to boards.ie too and yeah its the topic du jour alright and seems to me that whenever heating discussion breaks out about the Public vs Private sector more posters against public sector, so would it be interesting to see what is the representation of public vs private sector posters on boards... a poll anyone?

    We're all too busy working... drumroll please!!

    Sorry, couldn't resist.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭imme


    Diom wrote: »
    As you say... I'm sure people were talking about Ansbacher and Ben Dunne when they were the current affairs.

    What is your point?
    Point 1: Is it the topic du jour?
    Point 2: Are we obsessed with the status quo? Has any innovation/entrepreneurship been advocated by anyone in the debate (nationally, government, pol parties, unions, stakeholders). There are many way of skinning a cat you know. Do we ever think outside the box. Even if you don't like the expression, you know what I mean. Do we always have to think in a linear fashion?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    imme wrote: »
    Point 1: Is it the topic du jour?

    I think the PS Unions have firmly and intentionally made it so.
    There is a second day of action planned.

    Point 2: Are we obsessed with the status quo? Has any innovation/entrepreneurship been advocated by anyone in the debate (nationally, government, pol parties, unions, stakeholders). There are many way of skinning a cat you know. Do we ever think outside the box. Even if you don't like the expression, you know what I mean. Do we always have to think in a linear fashion?

    I think someone suggested tax increases.
    Tax increases on a recessing economy=putting out a fire with petrol.

    We can all take LSD and think our heads off, but that still won't change the fact that there is only one path to safety and there is no way to out-think it this time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 438 ✭✭Diom


    imme wrote: »
    Point 1: Is it the topic du jour?
    Point 2: Are we obsessed with the status quo? Has any innovation/entrepreneurship been advocated by anyone in the debate (nationally, government, pol parties, unions, stakeholders). There are many way of skinning a cat you know. Do we ever think outside the box. Even if you don't like the expression, you know what I mean. Do we always have to think in a linear fashion?
    1) Yes of course it is! The country is bankrupt and the public sector are striking...what would you be expecting us to talk about on the forum dedicated to the Irish economy? Katie Price's exit from the jungle?

    2) What? The best way of controlling public sector spending is by cutting the wages of over-paid public servants. There are plenty of other things going on, but that is the simplest, most effective, quickest and fairest thing to do. The private sector is not in a position to support the public wages bill as it was in the past, and if we don't cut spending we will condemn the next few generations of Irish people (our prospective children) to a life spent paying off HUGE debts.

    The other way out of this is to pull out of the euro, print more money and de-value our economy!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭imme


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »

    I think someone suggested tax increases.
    Tax increases on a recessing economy=putting out a fire with petrol.

    We can all take LSD and think our heads off, but that still won't change the fact that there is only one path to safety and there is no way to out-think it this time.
    Putting petrol on a fire makes it take off surely? The economy is actually contracting, the government better watch out they contract it further.

    I wasn't advocating the use/misuse of proscribed drugs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 SouthEast


    bridgitt wrote: »
    There is a huge amount of justifiable anger at those who have secure, well paid , well pensioned work and who are striking.

    Your right, in fairness, the recession is all their fault:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 438 ✭✭Diom


    imme wrote: »
    Putting petrol on a fire makes it take off surely? The economy is actually contracting, the government better watch out they contract it further.

    I wasn't advocating the use/misuse of proscribed drugs.

    Less spending in shops by public sector employees is preferable to tens of billions of public debt!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,925 ✭✭✭doc_17


    bridgitt wrote: »
    There is a huge amount of justifiable anger at those who have secure, well paid , well pensioned work and who are striking.
    I agree. Although it does come through as jealousy from some. No public servant should be earning more than 100k


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    Diom wrote: »
    1) Yes of course it is! The country is bankrupt and the public sector are striking...what would you be expecting us to talk about on the forum dedicated to the Irish economy? Katie Price's exit from the jungle?

    2) What? The best way of controlling public sector spending is by cutting the wages of over-paid public servants. There are plenty of other things going on, but that is the simplest, most effective, quickest and fairest thing to do. The private sector is not in a position to support the public wages bill as it was in the past, and if we don't cut spending we will condemn the next few generations of Irish people (our prospective children) to a life spent paying off HUGE debts.

    The other way out of this is to pull out of the euro, print more money and de-value our economy!

    I think it's time now though that we put the public sector under the microscope now and have a day of judgement... We need to identify those that are on moderate enough salaries, those on say under 50K for the sake of argument and put those people aside for the moment and shake out those that are on 50K plus, and agressively cut their wages. For every 10K of additional salary over and above 50K, there should be a 3% paycut, so if you are on 100K, your salary will be cut by 15%, if you are on 150K, your salary will be cut by 30%, 200K = 45%, etc...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 tommyfitz


    doc_17 wrote: »
    I agree. Although it does come through as jealousy from some. No public servant should be earning more than 100k
    Im a public servant for 5 years and my salary is 26k as a clerical officer.
    I worked for 25 years in the private sector. The company I worked for, closed down at the height of the so-called Celtic Tiger. Am I overpaid?
    Im not permanent and can be let go in the morning. I have taken 2 sick days in last 5 years.
    All I read about in the Sunday Independent is what a burden I am on this country. Its Tony O'Reilly and his cronies that are behind all this rubbish that is printed in papers. Divide ordinary working people and make sure the RICH get away with every mistake they make in propertry and investments in banks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 251 ✭✭thatsa spicy


    People who hate the public sector workers so much are often just jealous of the comfortable, worthwhile and well-paid jobs they have. Which begs the question, why didn't the haters get into a public sector career in the last 10 years? Oh right, 'cause there was far better money to be made elsewhere. :rolleyes:
    It suits them to complain now.
    I'll admit that I often get angry myself at how out-of-touch some public sector workers can seem.
    It also pisses me off greatly when they say things like "we didn't cause the recession, why should we pay?". Listen, you had your pay increased greatly during the boom years to keep up with the incomes of your private sector friends; now its time to have them pulled down again.

    People in the public sector should have some common sense and realise that, regardless of the fact that it is as a result of their own actions/ decisions, they are in a very very good position in comparision to most other workers and the involuntarily unemployed. I know the strikes today are just to make a point, but seriously, if those workers don't understand that there needs to be savage cuts, both in the areas of pay and staff numbers, then they are deluded.

    We're going to be stuck in this mess until every working and unemployed person on this island bites the bullet and suffers a massive drop in disposable income and living standards. End of.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    To get back to the OP's original point..yes Boards.ie is obssessed with the Public Sector. The amount of productivity lost by the litany of regurgitated anti-public sector rants, not to mention the amount of time spent by the media doing same, has no doubt cost this economy numerous jobs and much needed tax receipts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    tommyfitz wrote: »
    Im a public servant for 5 years and my salary is 26k as a clerical officer.
    I worked for 25 years in the private sector. The company I worked for, closed down at the height of the so-called Celtic Tiger. Am I overpaid?
    Im not permanent and can be let go in the morning. I have taken 2 sick days in last 5 years.
    All I read about in the Sunday Independent is what a burden I am on this country. Its Tony O'Reilly and his cronies that are behind all this rubbish that is printed in papers. Divide ordinary working people and make sure the RICH get away with every mistake they make in propertry and investments in banks.

    Right, you should not be asked to take another hit for the moment I think. But some of your co-workers are paid stupid salaries and you owe it to yourself to identify those you work with that are paid trophy salaries without having to deliver any results and put them out there for us all to see.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭glaston


    EF wrote: »
    To get back to the OP's original point..yes Boards.ie is obssessed with the Public Sector. The amount of productivity lost by the litany of regurgitated anti-public sector rants, not to mention the amount of time spent by the media doing same, has no doubt cost this economy numerous jobs and much needed tax receipts.


    Not to mention the time spend by public sector employees posting on this forum when they should be working.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    glaston wrote: »
    Not to mention the time spend by public sector employees posting on this forum when they should be working.

    Works both ways, but I think it is safe to say public sector workers are vastly outnumbered on boards, especially during office hours.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭imme


    glaston wrote: »
    Not to mention the time spend by public sector employees posting on this forum when they should be working.
    I don't believe PS workers would have access to Social Networking sites such as Boards, those that access to the internet that is.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,097 ✭✭✭Darragh29


    People who hate the public sector workers so much are often just jealous of the comfortable, worthwhile and well-paid jobs they have. Which begs the question, why didn't the haters get into a public sector career in the last 10 years? Oh right, 'cause there was far better money to be made elsewhere. :rolleyes:
    It suits them to complain now.

    Simply not true... The culture and attitude within the public sector doesn't actually suit most people. Most people want to perform better in their job over time, they seek out challenges within their current job and naturally seek to improve their work environment and also the service experienced by the customer.

    This is the main reason why I would never have looked for a job in the public sector, it is a place that I would end up being completely depressed working in. Nothing whatsoever to do with better earning opportunities elsewhere, I couldn't retain my dignity and my sanity in a workplace that is so inherently opposed to change and improvement, so overrun with petty rules, union directives, promotion on seniority, collective consultations required on even the smallest decisions and change, not for me I'm afraid...


Advertisement