Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Tiger Woods admits affair!
Comments
-
-
-
OutlawPete wrote: »Correct, I mean you .. not him
Rick Stein is my hero. I have been cooking for myself (and others too who'll eat it;)) since I was 14.
Yeah Rick Stein cheated for years on his wife of 30 odd yrs with a younger woman before she found out, the he divorced her and moved in with the younger woman ... :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Just saying :pac::pac:0 -
-
No she shouldn't and i never said she was free of blame. People like her make me sick, she cheated with David Boreanz too.
We agree on that, so.And WTF is the thing with a distinction between a woman and temptation??? The temptation was a woman , who was interested in Tiger as he was with her... who knows who made the first move. It doesn't matter!!!
It doesn't in the sense that they're both to blame, but like I said it's around 50/50 or 60/40.
There's another thread where a girl is objecting to being "ogled"; and my point was that a woman existing doesn't mean that she's "temptation".....something that she did - or maybe didn't do, like saying "no" to a married guy - had to make her transition from just being "a woman" to being a "temptation".If my husband cheated on me are you saying i should be more angry at the piece of skirt he played around with or the person who broke our wedding vows, lied and deceived continuously and who ultimately made a hugely negative impact on my children's family life
Like I said, 60/40; 60 him; 40 her. The vows / relationship make up the 20, but the remainder is 40/40.I honestly don't get the idea that because someone is hot and attractive and expressing an interest in you then that gives you license to be with them despite being married
If we all took that stance, there'd be no point being in a monogomous relationship at all!!!!
Well, I never said anything even remotely along those lines.
All I said was that while, yes, he shouldn't have; neither should she, because she knew he was married.
So - again I'll say it - it was 60% his fault and 40% hers. And if she actively chased him, then it's 50/50; she should have known not to.
But no, it doesn't make it right.0 -
Advertisement
-
-
niceirishfella wrote: »but, you're not a REAL man.
.....based on what definitive definition ? The pathetic losers who barely know how to turn on a microwave ?
If "REAL" means "Reheating Even Addles Losers", then you're right!0 -
-
Tiger is to blame for his marriage going belly up, full stop!! If she was throwing herself at him, he should have had self control and said No! I don't like what she did but he is responsible for his marriage not anyone else. Thats like an addict blaming drugs, its not the drugs fault the addict decided to take it! There are always options and you have to be responsible for your own actions... and its Tiger's fault his marriage is fvcked!
Interesting that you used the drugs analogy, and completely avoided the one that I proposed earlier that people shouldn't even try to take what isn't theirs!
If she was throwing herself at him, he should have had self control and said No!
You see no requirement for self-control on her part, then ? :rolleyes:
It's BOTH of their faults that his marriage is fvcked; more Tiger's than hers, but definitely BOTH.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
Liam Byrne wrote: »Interesting that you used the drugs analogy, and completely avoided the one that I proposed earlier that people shouldn't take what isn't theirs!
You see no requirement for self-control on her part, then ? :rolleyes:
It's BOTH of their faults that his marriage is fvcked; more Tiger's than hers, but definitely BOTH.
She didn't 'take' or 'steal' anything, he offered it to her, just like she offered it to him. Point is, he had the wife and kids not her! Doesn't make what she did appropriate but when you look at her track record she's not exactly a woman with a healthy regard for the sisterhood is she?
Its not just Tiger Wood's im talking about either, ANYONE who cheats on a partner is at fault for ruining the relationship, not whoever they cheated with. There's no point fobbing responsibility off on someone else no matter how much they were flaunting themselves at you. If you can't see that then there's no way we'll come to any agreememnt just go round and round in circles frankly...
Oh wait...maybe they are deeply in love and he'll end up marrying he, what was meant to be and all that:D:D:D:D0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
niceirishfella wrote: »it does'nt get more erronious than this.:rolleyes:
Er, yes it does :niceirishfella wrote: »no, real men don't cook.I said END OF first so i closed the argument and won ... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
What are you, two ??? Sheesh! :rolleyes:
BTW, reaching the "end of" doesn't mean anyone in particular wins.......it just means full time has been called. Mind you, that's a sporting term, and I doubt a mere woman would understand! 0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
Liam Byrne wrote: »Er, yes it does :
What are you, two ??? Sheesh! :rolleyes:
BTW, reaching the "end of" doesn't mean anyone in particular wins.......it just means full time has been called. Mind you, that's a sporting term, and I doubt a mere woman would understand!
Or Thierri Henri (sp):D:D 0 -
-
-
opinion guy wrote: »Bull. Don't agree with this. The fault is with the married person not the single one. The single person is not stealing anything since the married one is not property of their spouse. They chose to cheat - its their business
But I do have to say this
a ) he has not actually admitted to cheating
b ) if she beat him with a golf club, do you honestly belief its first incidence of physical violence from her? I wouldn't assume so. So I'd say if he did cheat, it was a symptom of some bigger problem in their marriage, like her being an abuser.
Thank you for agreeing with me about the married person being responsible. But i have to say that IF Elin did go apesh!t with the golf club it doesn't mean she's a regular abuser ... at all! There are not many things that could anger you as much as finding your husband cheating so maybe she just lost it at that point. Not saying I think she was right to lose it at all but it doesn't mean she's a husband beater all the time..
What do ppl think happened? That they were arguing, she smacked him, he drove off and that she ran after the car with a golf club? I would too! I'd smash it to bits 0 -
-
Thank you for agreeing with me about the married person being responsible. But i have to say that IF Elin did go apesh!t with the golf club it doesn't mean she's a regular abuser ... at all! There are not many things that could anger you as much as finding your husband cheating so maybe she just lost it at that point. Not saying I think she was right to lose it at all but it doesn't mean she's a husband beater all the time..
What do ppl think happened? That they were arguing, she smacked him, he drove off and that she ran after the car with a golf club? I would too! I'd smash it to bits
No I think she hit him in the face with the golf club. He was in and out of consciousness after all. I also don't think someone woudl react so violently if they were not prone to violence anyhow. I've been cheated on and worse and I've never felt an urge to hit anyone over it. Also I think the fact that he was clearly running away from her speaks volumes too. He's a big fit guy, he could easily overpower her. I think that fact that he didn't and tried to run away is interesting.0 -
What do ppl think happened? That they were arguing, she smacked him, he drove off and that she ran after the car with a golf club? I would too! I'd smash it to bits
It don't look so rosey on the flipside.........That they were arguing, he smacked her, she drove off and that he ran after the car with a golf club? I would too! I'd smash it to bits0 -
If a kid drinks alcohol, and asks you to buy them one, who's wrong ? The kid for wanting one (yes) but surely you're wrong to facilitate them, too ?
WTF??? I don't even get how that relates to a someone being responsible for destroying their marriage. You can use all the analogies you want, fact is both were fvcks for gettin involved with eachother but its Tiger's fault his marriage is up sh!t creek. HE could have saved it by being faithful. If she had said no he would have found someone else (apparently he did anyway ... several.. on the go at the same time!! )
I do sort of feel bad that an extra marital affair is now on the news though. Thats the price of being famous and seemingly perfect!! He's the one that encouraged that reputation though so its even more unfathomable that he'd do all in his power to destroy it 0 -
Advertisement
-
Advertisement