Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Stats: Why is Health always dropped when calculating Public service stats?

  • 04-12-2009 01:24PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭


    I was just wondering why is Health always dropped when calculating Public service stats?
    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/budget/analysis-overview/public-sector-not-carrying-its-share-of-our-burden-1963989.html

    Here is what the statistics actually do tell us. The latest data from the Central Statistics Office -- showing earnings in private and public sectors through the second quarter of this year -- show that earnings in the public sector (excluding Health) have increased from just under €943 per week in the second quarter of 2008 to €973 per week in the same period this year -- a rise of more than 3.2pc in one year.

    All in, in the second quarter of this year the average mid-to-top grade private sector worker was earning 2.2pc less than the average public sector employee (excluding those working in health).


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    I was just wondering why is Health always dropped when calculating Public service stats?
    I assume it is because health workers are paid alot more than other members of PS and it would skew the figures? Not sure but that is what I think


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    As far as I know it's because the HSE doesn't provide the stats sufficiently quickly to be included in the most recent analyses.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,903 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Rather than being "dropped" statistics in health have never been included...because the CSO dont have any info to use!!!:pac:
    Health The employment details for this sector are obtained from the quantity census conducted by the Health Service Executive and are recorded on a full-time equivalent basis. Earnings information is not available at present. From March 2007 certain grades, categories and subsumed agencies
    are included. A direct comparison with previous data is not possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    Sure could they not use PPARS to extract the HSE data quickly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    ardmacha wrote: »
    Sure could they not use PPARS to extract the HSE data quickly.

    I thought the whole point of the HSE was that all this stuff was centralised?
    The mind boggles. (again).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,364 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    ardmacha wrote: »
    Sure could they not use PPARS to extract the HSE data quickly.

    did they ever get that to work? and for how much??

    i hear they use PPARS in soft eng classes as an example of what can go wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    did they ever get that to work

    I doubt it. I was being somewhat tongue in cheek in suggesting it.

    PPARS failed because computers require order and logic and the system in the HSE didn't have that. It wasn't a software failure so much as a management failure.


Advertisement