Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

whats the best web browser for windows?

  • 10-12-2009 6:09pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭


    thanks for the replies in advance :)


Comments

  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭yoyo


    * Google Chrome is nice & fast, lacks large addons library like firefox has though
    * Firefox has tons of addons & customisation abilities, although it does hog a good ammount of memory I find (I use it anyway but admit Chrome is faster)
    * Internet Explorer 8 isnt a bad browser, much better than its previous versions, still a bit buggy though
    * Opera is another option, never been keen on it myself though..

    Nick


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭CRAIG07


    well i have firefox at the moment and i too think its taking up alot of memory and my cpu is must higher when using it....

    think i will try crome.....

    thanks ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Opera is the quickest and "lightest" on the old CPU, but it does take an age to unload after a busy day.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,087 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    yoyo wrote: »
    * Google Chrome is nice & fast, lacks large addons library like firefox has though
    * Firefox has tons of addons & customisation abilities, although it does hog a good ammount of memory I find (I use it anyway but admit Chrome is faster)
    * Internet Explorer 8 isnt a bad browser, much better than its previous versions, still a bit buggy though
    * Opera is another option, never been keen on it myself though..

    Nick


    You have 4GB of RAM according to your sig, what are you sparing it for ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭Bob_Harris


    CRAIG07 wrote: »
    thanks for the replies in advance :)

    Unpossible to quantify.

    Whatever does the job for you really.

    Do you want just a "plain and simple" browser? Try Chrome.

    Do you want a good browser with a vast amount of add-ons (block ads to speed up loading time, automatic mail checker, add-ons which mimic every feature found in every other browser, etc)? Try Firefox.

    The latest versions of the below are all good really.

    Firefox
    Opera
    Chrome
    Safari
    IE8 (maybe)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 150 ✭✭time42play


    I swap between Safari, Firefox, and IE8. Tried Chrome, but at the time it didn't let me block third party cookies so I dropped it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,224 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Im comfortable with Firefox myself. It gets bloated between major releases is the only thing, but each new version (2, 3) seems to always be lighter and faster than the competition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 355 ✭✭Princess Zelda


    I use Opera, simply for the fact I have a desktop and laptop, and you can do Opera Link so that all the bookmarks are shared handy. Haven't played around with that Opera Unite yet, but apparently you can Unite with mates and all watch the one video or something?


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭yoyo


    marco_polo wrote: »
    You have 4GB of RAM according to your sig, what are you sparing it for ;)

    I do indeed, even still performance of it is fairly poor tbh! Uses allot of CPU resources aswell, of course, instead of leaving all those wonderful extensions behind, I'm sticking with firefox, as the extensions provide usefull functionality

    Nick


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,835 ✭✭✭CamperMan


    firefox


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,087 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    yoyo wrote: »
    I do indeed, even still performance of it is fairly poor tbh! Uses allot of CPU resources aswell, of course, instead of leaving all those wonderful extensions behind, I'm sticking with firefox, as the extensions provide usefull functionality

    Nick

    In all seriousness I agree that it could do with a fair bit of optimization, it is quite a bit slower than it used to be a few years ago.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,696 ✭✭✭mark renton


    Netscape...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Dorsanty


    One performance tip for Firefox that doesn't see much light is,

    enter 'about:config' and type 'sessionstore.interval' and set to a much higher value like 30000 or 60000.

    Info on the setting : http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.sessionstore.interval

    Essentially Firefox is dumping the browser state to disk every 10 seconds by default. This requires a write to disk which depending on the free space and amount of other apps looking for disk access could be slow. It is known to improve performance when using the flash plugin on some systems. I actually was able to remove stutter from a HD youtube video on a system with limited RAM by changing it to 60000


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Chrome would be the best if it had a better lineup of addons, badly needs adblock


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭Adyx


    marco_polo wrote: »
    You have 4GB of RAM according to your sig, what are you sparing it for ;)

    Exactly! I can never understand this. It's the same with processor usage. If you're not doing anything else then all that RAM and processor power is just going to waste. I can't stand Chrome so Firefox gets my vote.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,329 ✭✭✭Ardent


    I use Opera, simply for the fact I have a desktop and laptop, and you can do Opera Link so that all the bookmarks are shared handy.
    You can do the same thing firefox with the xmarks addon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,224 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    Chrome would be the best if it had a better lineup of addons, badly needs adblock
    I cant see Google supporting an adblocker, do you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    I can not believe people are even mentioning ie8

    i thought bill gate or steve balmer even uses that useless piece of .....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Overheal wrote: »
    I cant see Google supporting an adblocker, do you?

    They've no choice when their browser is open source, the community is free to make whatever


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,227 ✭✭✭gamer


    Theres the iron browser its a version of chrome,more private, it doesnt send any browsing info back to google ,see here
    http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron.php .


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭yoyo


    Adyx wrote: »
    Exactly! I can never understand this. It's the same with processor usage. If you're not doing anything else then all that RAM and processor power is just going to waste. I can't stand Chrome so Firefox gets my vote.

    The reason I'm pinicky about firefox is that the flashplayer keeps stuttering (google it, common problem in 3.5), so it would freeze for like a second every few seconds in firefox, I tryed so called fixes but they still dont work, I use Chrome if I'm using anything flash related

    Nick


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,224 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    yoyo wrote: »
    The reason I'm pinicky about firefox is that the flashplayer keeps stuttering (google it, common problem in 3.5), so it would freeze for like a second every few seconds in firefox, I tryed so called fixes but they still dont work, I use Chrome if I'm using anything flash related

    Nick
    considering how much hulu I watch, thats the first really good reason ive heard to try chrome.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    john47832 wrote: »
    Netscape...
    Yeah and then the oldskool versions, before NS6 came :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭Adyx


    yoyo wrote: »
    The reason I'm pinicky about firefox is that the flashplayer keeps stuttering (google it, common problem in 3.5), so it would freeze for like a second every few seconds in firefox, I tryed so called fixes but they still dont work, I use Chrome if I'm using anything flash related

    Nick

    Yeah I've heard about that. Lifehacker had something about it a while ago. I can't say I've noticed it myself though so I'm happy enough. I do have an issue with some embedded videos (wmv I think) which only play if I change the rendering engine to IE.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    yoyo wrote: »
    The reason I'm pinicky about firefox is that the flashplayer keeps stuttering (google it, common problem in 3.5), so it would freeze for like a second every few seconds in firefox, I tryed so called fixes but they still dont work, I use Chrome if I'm using anything flash related

    Nick

    http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/08/22/how-to-fix-flash-video-performance-in-firefox/

    This fixed that for me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    Chrome would be the best if it had a better lineup of addons, badly needs adblock

    Google Chrome now supports add ons, no adblock but there is alternatives:
    http://www.mychromeaddons.com/
    Overheal wrote: »
    I cant see Google supporting an adblocker, do you?

    Well, they allow other adblock add ons.

    Chrome is going after Firefox, more so than IE.

    Still prefer FF but in a year or so Chrome will be a serious challenger.

    The new Opera is fast for midband users, quicker than Chrome, but the widgets seem old.

    Anyway, still FF for me!

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,356 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    I split my screen between Firefox and Chrome. PMing, IMing, emailing, and checking boards on FF, with Chrome open for simultaneous googling. It's a snap with Windows 7, and you can also manage a split screen with XP and Vista with a few adjustments.


  • Registered Users Posts: 247 ✭✭Cluster


    CRAIG07 wrote: »
    thanks for the replies in advance :)

    Firefox, hands down. Its the one I use. Fast and reliable.

    Dont take my word for it though.

    http://www.technologygear.net/which-is-the-best-browser-ie8-chrome-safari-or-firefox-31.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭slowlydownwards




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 247 ✭✭Cluster




Advertisement