Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Western Rail Corridor (all disused sections)

Options
1283284286288289324

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭voz es


    marno21 wrote: »
    How does it make economic sense to reopen a railway line costing tens of millions to transport irregular, low volumes of "freight"?

    Who is going to pay for this? Would make infinite more sense to dual the N17.

    Its a regular question, the wondering about who is going to pay for a costing fractional to the many billions splattered in the mid East of the country. There is rural decreases in population for good reason and that is simple lack of investment, or as some would say strategic perishing in the hope our western infrastructure from west cork to Donegal becomes too far gone that they can argue its lack of viability.

    I travel regular along the western axis from South Sligo to Limerick, I'm tired after that journey no mater how smooth the road. I'm over taking or getting over taken by piles of cars on the same journey when we could all have a train brining us.
    And then I think of cancer patients in Donegal having to travel via bus or car to get their treatment in galway city and do you know what I think it is madness that we don't have rail.

    An earlier poster spoke of limited freight, well why would the industry come, would you cast a fishing line into a field in the hope of a fish? no the industry needs to be encouraged to come.

    I hope that one day this country will have enough vision to have a passenger and freight train service from cork to Letterkenny and across to Belfast taking in a direct link to Knock airport. I think we need to have faith in ourselves as a society that we can deliver that.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    voz es wrote: »
    Its a regular question, the wondering about who is going to pay for a costing fractional to the many billions splattered in the mid East of the country. There is rural decreases in population for good reason and that is simple lack of investment, or as some would say strategic perishing in the hope our western infrastructure from west cork to Donegal becomes too far gone that they can argue its lack of viability.

    The rural to urban trend is the same the world over and has been going on for over 2 centuries. Sorry, but your 18th century rail line will not make a dent in that
    I travel regular along the western axis from South Sligo to Limerick, I'm tired after that journey no mater how smooth the road. I'm over taking or getting over taken by piles of cars on the same journey when we could all have a train brining us.

    You should have a go on a bus, I think you would love it
    And then I think of cancer patients in Donegal having to travel via bus or car to get their treatment in galway city and do you know what I think it is madness that we don't have rail.

    That's an issue with the health service and a rail service that would take longer than a car would not serve these people well
    An earlier poster spoke of limited freight, well why would the industry come, would you cast a fishing line into a field in the hope of a fish?

    You would have a better chance of catching something than that line reopening
    no the industry needs to be encouraged to come.

    Sure, but again, a crap rail line with a poor service will not encourage any industry, period. Any that would be encouraged to setup here already have options in the form of existing, active lines. You would be better off looking to set up incubator locations, fiber connections, industrial hubs etc etc etc

    I hope that one day this country will have enough vision to have a passenger and freight train service from cork to Letterkenny and across to Belfast taking in a direct link to Knock airport. I think we need to have faith in ourselves as a society that we can deliver that.

    That'll be the year 2255 you'll be looking for. You should just about have the population density then to justify it


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    voz es wrote: »
    Its a regular question, the wondering about who is going to pay for a costing fractional to the many billions splattered in the mid East of the country. There is rural decreases in population for good reason and that is simple lack of investment, or as some would say strategic perishing in the hope our western infrastructure from west cork to Donegal becomes too far gone that they can argue its lack of viability.

    I travel regular along the western axis from South Sligo to Limerick, I'm tired after that journey no mater how smooth the road. I'm over taking or getting over taken by piles of cars on the same journey when we could all have a train brining us.
    And then I think of cancer patients in Donegal having to travel via bus or car to get their treatment in galway city and do you know what I think it is madness that we don't have rail.

    An earlier poster spoke of limited freight, well why would the industry come, would you cast a fishing line into a field in the hope of a fish? no the industry needs to be encouraged to come.

    I hope that one day this country will have enough vision to have a passenger and freight train service from cork to Letterkenny and across to Belfast taking in a direct link to Knock airport. I think we need to have faith in ourselves as a society that we can deliver that.
    there we have it," the "mid-east|" has da Luas , we want the WRC " and "build it and they will come" in the same post. Classic


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Muckyboots


    voz es wrote: »
    marno21 wrote: »
    How does it make economic sense to reopen a railway line costing tens of millions to transport irregular, low volumes of "freight"?

    Who is going to pay for this? Would make infinite more sense to dual the N17.

    Its a regular question, the wondering about who is going to pay for a costing fractional to the many billions splattered in the mid East of the country. There is rural decreases in population for good reason and that is simple lack of investment, or as some would say strategic perishing in the hope our western infrastructure from west cork to Donegal becomes too far gone that they can argue its lack of viability.

    I travel regular along the western axis from South Sligo to Limerick, I'm tired after that journey no mater how smooth the road. I'm over taking or getting over taken by piles of cars on the same journey when we could all have a train brining us.
    And then I think of cancer patients in Donegal having to travel via bus or car to get their treatment in galway city and do you know what I think it is madness that we don't have rail.

    An earlier poster spoke of limited freight, well why would the industry come, would you cast a fishing line into a field in the hope of a fish? no the industry needs to be encouraged to come.

    I hope that one day this country will have enough vision to have a passenger and freight train service from cork to Letterkenny and across to Belfast taking in a direct link to Knock airport. I think we need to have faith in ourselves as a society that we can deliver that.
    ...... on the 30mph Western Rail Corridor, or not at all. Cause ya gotta have Faith.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭voz es


    The rural to urban trend is the same the world over and has been going on for over 2 centuries. Sorry, but your 18th century rail line will not make a dent in that



    You should have a go on a bus, I think you would love it



    That's an issue with the health service and a rail service that would take longer than a car would not serve these people well



    You would have a better chance of catching something than that line reopening



    Sure, but again, a crap rail line with a poor service will not encourage any industry, period. Any that would be encouraged to setup here already have options in the form of existing, active lines. You would be better off looking to set up incubator locations, fiber connections, industrial hubs etc etc etc



    That'll be the year 2255 you'll be looking for. You should just about have the population density then to justify it
    Lovely, ....
    Utter dung but anyhow.

    Opinionated crap for all to see...
    You are the picky eater when it comes to context

    Please please give us some thing other than this unadulterated muck


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭eastwest


    voz es wrote: »
    Lovely, ....
    Utter dung but anyhow.

    Opinionated crap for all to see...
    You are the picky eater when it comes to context

    Please please give us some thing other than this unadulterated muck

    You should read his post properly before condemning it as 'muck', which in your book appears to be anything that disagrees with the narrow view of a closed nineteenth century line as a panacea for all the ills of the west.
    The notion that the building of a twisting, slow railway through a thinly populated rural area would create an industrial economy where neither raw materials nor a suitable workforce exists is the stuff of cowboy novels -- it does not address either the problems of the west or the realities.
    The flight to the cities is a reality that needs to be addressed, but insisting that mass transit solutions designed for cities are a good use of resources in rural areas is daft. Because they have the DART and the LUAS in Dublin, the notion that we should build the same in the west so that a few pensioners can have a day out is nuts. The DART carries more people in a day or two than the wrc carries in a year, once you use comparable figures.
    While a small group of well placed politicians continue to promise city infrastructure in Kiltimagh, the west won't get what it really needs, because the real solutions are not being sought, let alone delivered. It's easier to promise unachievable nonsense and to blame Dublin for the ills of the west, while conveniently forgetting that the east coast pays most of the bills in places whinging for railways.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Muckyboots


    voz es wrote: »
    Lovely, ....
    Utter dung but anyhow.
    Opinionated crap for all to see...
    You are the picky eater when it comes to context
    Please please give us some thing other than this unadulterated muck

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZhzxCP0pts


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    voz es wrote: »
    Lovely, ....
    Utter dung but anyhow.

    Opinionated crap for all to see...
    You are the picky eater when it comes to context

    Please please give us some thing other than this unadulterated muck

    So no logical, reasoned, fact based response then, ok :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1 pong ping


    The Western Rail corridor will eventually get a passenger and freight service running on it, That's despite the name calling, the insults and the stalking being undertaken by certain well known greenway activists. I think the dame has been well and truly up for the greenway idea for a long time and it isn't because of anything that pro rail politicians and activists have done, it's entirely because a few individuals think its acceptable to use this thread as their personal star chamber, making threats and sly remarks.

    The game is up lads, you won't get your greenway. And you were the ones who stopped it yourselves. Voz es, you are not alone and change is coming. Thanks for giving the bullies a taste of their own medicine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭eastwest


    pong ping wrote: »
    The Western Rail corridor will eventually get a passenger and freight service running on it, That's despite the name calling, the insults and the stalking being undertaken by certain well known greenway activists. I think the dame has been well and truly up for the greenway idea for a long time and it isn't because of anything that pro rail politicians and activists have done, it's entirely because a few individuals think its acceptable to use this thread as their personal star chamber, making threats and sly remarks.

    The game is up lads, you won't get your greenway. And you were the ones who stopped it yourselves. Voz es, you are not alone and change is coming. Thanks for giving the bullies a taste of their own medicine.
    The first time I read this I thought 'what an idiot!', but then I read it again and realised you were being ironic. My apologies, good post. Clearly what you are rather cleverly getting across is that people who believe that a train is coming on that route should be patted on the head and told 'of course it is.'


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    Ask yourself, how many new jobs have resulted in the re-opening between Ennis and Athenry, how many tonnes of freight have shifted on to the line from the roads.... if the answer is "none" in both cases for a line connecting two Cities, ask yourself how sucessful a line from Athenry to the Boondocks would be. It's a no-brainer.

    I don't care if there's a Greenway or not, that's a side issue. What I don't want to see is hundreds of millions more wasted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭eastwest


    Isambard wrote: »
    Ask yourself, how many new jobs have resulted in the re-opening between Ennis and Athenry, how many tonnes of freight have shifted on to the line from the roads.... if the answer is "none" in both cases for a line connecting two Cities, ask yourself how sucessful a line from Athenry to the Boondocks would be. It's a no-brainer.

    I don't care if there's a Greenway or not, that's a side issue. What I don't want to see is hundreds of millions more wasted.
    But they have the LUAS and the DART up.in Dublin....


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    eastwest wrote: »
    But they have the LUAS and the DART up.in Dublin....

    yes and what they should be campaigning for is a better service to Dublin. I'd support spending on the various existing lines to Dublin but not on the WRC White Elephant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    voz es wrote: »
    Its a regular question, the wondering about who is going to pay for a costing fractional to the many billions splattered in the mid East of the country. There is rural decreases in population for good reason and that is simple lack of investment, or as some would say strategic perishing in the hope our western infrastructure from west cork to Donegal becomes too far gone that they can argue its lack of viability.

    I travel regular along the western axis from South Sligo to Limerick, I'm tired after that journey no mater how smooth the road. I'm over taking or getting over taken by piles of cars on the same journey when we could all have a train brining us.
    And then I think of cancer patients in Donegal having to travel via bus or car to get their treatment in galway city and do you know what I think it is madness that we don't have rail.

    An earlier poster spoke of limited freight, well why would the industry come, would you cast a fishing line into a field in the hope of a fish? no the industry needs to be encouraged to come.

    I hope that one day this country will have enough vision to have a passenger and freight train service from cork to Letterkenny and across to Belfast taking in a direct link to Knock airport. I think we need to have faith in ourselves as a society that we can deliver that.

    It is called Utopia and is not going to happen, however I do recommend you keep taking the pills.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    pong ping wrote: »
    The Western Rail corridor will eventually get a passenger and freight service running on it, That's despite the name calling, the insults and the stalking being undertaken by certain well known greenway activists. I think the dame has been well and truly up for the greenway idea for a long time and it isn't because of anything that pro rail politicians and activists have done, it's entirely because a few individuals think its acceptable to use this thread as their personal star chamber, making threats and sly remarks.

    The game is up lads, you won't get your greenway. And you were the ones who stopped it yourselves. Voz es, you are not alone and change is coming. Thanks for giving the bullies a taste of their own medicine.

    Fairly emotive stuff old chap, now steady on! However lets get away from the emotion shall we and accusing good citizens of being bullies!!! (hilarious stuff by the way). Let's examine how official thinking is going:

    Sligo county plan: Now accepts a greenway is the way to go.
    Mayo County council: Being challenged on their attitude to a greenway by the good citizens of Kiltimagh.
    Galway county council on the brink of saying ok lets have a greenway study, pending the outcome of a rail review.

    and probably the best of all, The North West Regional Assembly saying this in a recently published document about economic, social an infrastructure issue on page 22 of a document called REGIONAL SPATIAL AND ECONOMIC STRATEGY ISSUES PAPER - as I say published only recently.

    This is what this said about the Western Rail Corridor:
    6.4 Air & Rail Infrastructure
    6.4.1 Rail
    The Western region is relatively well served with
    rail connectivity. The freight line out of Ballina
    (to Waterford) is one of the most successful and
    effective lines in the country. However north of
    Sligo and along our border communities there
    are no services.
    The Western Rail Corridor is a long standing
    preserved corridor, and County Development
    Plans in Mayo, Sligo & Galway recognise the
    need to preserve the line, whether for rail
    (passenger and, or freight), or for an alternative
    use, such as a Greenway project, or indeed
    both. The retention and preservation of publicly
    owned lines should remain a key public priority,
    and indeed the railway line in some parts of our
    Region are already earmarked for trails, whether
    walking routes, or greenways, or a combination.

    You see, I don't think (I might be wrong) they were bullied into putting this into such a key strategic publication, I might be wrong. You can read the document in full here http://www.nwra.ie/wp-content/uploads/NWRA-RSES-Issues-Paper.pdf

    By the way this is what the NWRegional Assembly key issues document sees as the key questions, question 2 looks interesting, again these are on page 22 maybe the bullies made them ask that

    1. Is there scope for increasing rail activity from the region or into the region?
    2. Are there Rail projects within our Region which should be identified as priority, and are there rail-lines which are currently unused which could be utilised for alternative recreational uses?

    Now take your emotive accusations and shove them politely where they belong and have a look at how official thinking is actually going because as a keen advocate of using the closed railway as something useful, I would say things are looking quite positive about the greenway, but who knows, it may continue to pay the politicians to offset both sides of this debate and do nothing.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭voz es


    Even when you include, in addition to the tailpipe, the CO2 emissions from infrastructure, fuel production and the supply chain, on average rail will still have a lower carbon footprint than road travel, when comparing life-cycle to life-cycle

    https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/greener-travel-car-or-rail

    Just for our environmentally minded readers


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭eastwest


    voz es wrote: »
    Even when you include, in addition to the tailpipe, the CO2 emissions from infrastructure, fuel production and the supply chain, on average rail will still have a lower carbon footprint than road travel, when comparing life-cycle to life-cycle

    https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/greener-travel-car-or-rail

    Just for our environmentally minded readers

    That's irrelevant to this debate for a number of reasons.
    1. It only applies to trains pulling full loads; hauling empty rolling stock around the country is not environmentally sound.
    2. You ignore the scattered nature of the population in the west, and the carbon consumed in getting them to and from railheads.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    voz es wrote: »
    Even when you include, in addition to the tailpipe, the CO2 emissions from infrastructure, fuel production and the supply chain, on average rail will still have a lower carbon footprint than road travel, when comparing life-cycle to life-cycle

    https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/greener-travel-car-or-rail

    Just for our environmentally minded readers

    Is that the smell of CO2 emissions I can smell emanating from the internet or is it just plain old BS


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And bikes are lower again, another reason for the Greenway to be built


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,163 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    And bikes are lower again, another reason for the Greenway to be built

    For the purpose of this argument, that makes no sense.

    You try 'cycling' 27 wagons of cargo along the Greenway :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Muckyboots


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    For the purpose of this argument, that makes no sense.

    You try 'cycling' 27 wagons of cargo along the Greenway :)

    With the potential for new cargo, looking for a new route on the WRC, that may not be as difficult as you think. I reckon a Deliveroo man could do the job, no probs - and faster than the proposed train too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    For the purpose of this argument, that makes no sense.

    You try 'cycling' 27 wagons of cargo along the Greenway :)

    Ah the old freight chestnut and that wonderful report which cost what was it? €17K of tax payers money to tell us there was no real demand to re-open the WRC for freight from the west. Let's remind ourselves of how that piece of propaganda failed WOT, and just to remind readers how this freight argument can be well and truly knocked on the head, here are some facts about this report which is now gathering dust at the Western Development Commission:

    The WDC commissioned the report into Rail Freight and the Western Region in March of 2015 at a cost of €17,000. The report was produced by a UK based rail consultant Intermodality which has been involved in several rail freight projects in the UK. The report was released on the WDC.ie website on 17th December 2015 http://www.wdc.ie/publications/reports-and-papers/.

    There was nothing in the report that suggested that rail freight from the West of Ireland will demand more railway lines. The report certainly highlighted the need for longer freight trains to make freight more competitive which would require infrastructural investment. For example, better and longer passing loops on our existing railway lines would help the case for more freight in and out of the West of Ireland.

    The report highlighted the number of freight trains per day going in and out of the West of Ireland at about 4 per day (4.3.17 page 46, 2 inbound trains 2 outbound), which is hardly enough to justify new railway lines.

    Extensive “bottom up” analysis involved trade research with industry in the region showed that there is potential for about another 2 freight trains per day in and out of the region, again not enough to re-open a new railway line. The report also covered what it called “speculative freight increase” to a level of 10-14 freight trains a day by 2050. This kind of speculation has to be taken for what it is, pure speculation, there is no realistic reason to accept that rail freight to and from the West of Ireland is going to increase fourfold anytime in the near to medium future.

    The realisitic forecasts for Rail Freight are still quite low even in a report the WDC tried to load with pro-WOT propaganda and the speculative forecasts really had no foundation apart from pure speculation.

    The increased freight argument is pure bunkum. Thought it was worth pulling out some of the analysis of that ill fated report that was meant to be a propaganda coup for the WDC/WOT.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    And bikes are lower again, another reason for the Greenway to be built

    Not to mention electric cars which we will all be driving by 2030 when European TEN-T policy will be reviewed, oh haven't West on Track folk on this thread mentioned that European policy! Tough pill to swallow for them that one!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭eastwest


    westtip wrote: »
    Ah the old freight chestnut and that wonderful report which cost what was it? €17K of tax payers money to tell us there was no real demand to re-open the WRC for freight from the west. Let's remind ourselves of how that piece of propaganda failed WOT, and just to remind readers how this freight argument can be well and truly knocked on the head, here are some facts about this report which is now gathering dust at the Western Development Commission:

    The WDC commissioned the report into Rail Freight and the Western Region in March of 2015 at a cost of €17,000. The report was produced by a UK based rail consultant Intermodality which has been involved in several rail freight projects in the UK. The report was released on the WDC.ie website on 17th December 2015 http://www.wdc.ie/publications/reports-and-papers/.

    There was nothing in the report that suggested that rail freight from the West of Ireland will demand more railway lines. The report certainly highlighted the need for longer freight trains to make freight more competitive which would require infrastructural investment. For example, better and longer passing loops on our existing railway lines would help the case for more freight in and out of the West of Ireland.

    The report highlighted the number of freight trains per day going in and out of the West of Ireland at about 4 per day (4.3.17 page 46, 2 inbound trains 2 outbound), which is hardly enough to justify new railway lines.

    Extensive “bottom up” analysis involved trade research with industry in the region showed that there is potential for about another 2 freight trains per day in and out of the region, again not enough to re-open a new railway line. The report also covered what it called “speculative freight increase” to a level of 10-14 freight trains a day by 2050. This kind of speculation has to be taken for what it is, pure speculation, there is no realistic reason to accept that rail freight to and from the West of Ireland is going to increase fourfold anytime in the near to medium future.

    The realisitic forecasts for Rail Freight are still quite low even in a report the WDC tried to load with pro-WOT propaganda and the speculative forecasts really had no foundation apart from pure speculation.

    The increased freight argument is pure bunkum. Thought it was worth pulling out some of the analysis of that ill fated report that was meant to be a propaganda coup for the WDC/WOT.

    The recent trialling of longer goods trains by Irish Rail points to fewer trains coming out of Mayo, even allowing for an incremental increase in tonnage.
    There is simply no argument for a second freight line to serve mayo, and the foynes argument doesn't hold water.
    In truth, the only thing that holds water is the wrc north of ennis.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭Consonata


    I wonder will at some stage, this thread be renamed to the "Western Greenway" since that is effectively what is being discussed here 90% of the time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭eastwest


    Consonata wrote: »
    I wonder will at some stage, this thread be renamed to the "Western Greenway" since that is effectively what is being discussed here 90% of the time.

    It's a valid point, and very timely given the approaching season.
    After all, the greenway is a reality -- only the timeline is at issue. The western rail corridor, like santa clause, is a myth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Muckyboots


    "A SENIOR official with Mayo County Council has told councillors that the goal for the county is to have 200km of Greenways which will ‘separate’ Mayo from the rest of country and make the county the destination of choice for cyclists."
    http://www.mayonews.ie/news/31106-louisburgh-greenway-to-start-in-earnest-in-2018 This quote explains why Mayo execs, TD's & Cllrs are happy to obstruct Greenways everywhere else around them. Time to pull on the south of the line maroon jerseys and north of the line black jerseys from here on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    Muckyboots wrote: »
    "A SENIOR official with Mayo County Council has told councillors that the goal for the county is to have 200km of Greenways which will ‘separate’ Mayo from the rest of country and make the county the destination of choice for cyclists."
    http://www.mayonews.ie/news/31106-louisburgh-greenway-to-start-in-earnest-in-2018 This quote explains why Mayo execs, TD's & Cllrs are happy to obstruct Greenways everywhere else around them. Time to pull on the south of the line maroon jerseys and north of the line black jerseys from here on.

    Not to mention stopping a greenway in East Mayo on the closed railway, because when Mayo coco talk greenways and tourism East Mayo is in a black hole they refuse to acknowledge exists.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭Hugh Jampton


    Muckyboots wrote: »
    This quote explains why Mayo execs, TD's & Cllrs are happy to obstruct Greenways everywhere else around them. Time to pull on the south of the line maroon jerseys and north of the line black jerseys from here on.

    Interesting observation. Weren’t the council promoting a greenway from Claremorris to Ballinrobe?

    As an aside, this letter from one of the prominent greenway campaigners to the Irish Times two years ago hasn’t worn particularly well, given the lack of cure to traffic issues by the motorway.
    Sir, The supportive editorial for a greenway on the route of the western rail corridor north of Tuam was very welcome.
    However, you suggested a commuter route from Athenry to Tuam could make commercial sense. In two years a new motorway will open linking Tuam to Galway by fast dual-carriageway. Bus journey times will not only be reduced significantly but the removal of the Claregalway bottleneck and high-quality bus lanes into Galway city centre will make the bus highly competitive with any proposed commuter rail service.
    If a business case is once again presented to reopen the line from Athenry to Tuam and then onto Claremorris, either based on passenger or freight forecasts, we hope the warning “buyer beware” will be attached to any proposal in large red capital letters.
    The Western Rail Trail from Athenry to Collooney will be a huge boost to our tourism trade, so why not just get on with it? – Yours, etc,
    BRENDAN QUINN,
    Enniscrone,
    Co Sligo


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    the point of that is that the buses became more competitive than a rail link ever could be on opening of that motorway. The cure to traffic problems is not opening a second rate rail link (as is the southern section which cost €103 million). The cure is to get as many drivers out of their cars and on to cheap frequent buses, running to diverse destinations around the City


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement