Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

VAT Decrease

  • 01-01-2010 1:51pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,497 ✭✭✭


    How about a name and shame on companies not passing on the VAT decrease.

    For instance, Komplett.ie shows a mark down of 0.41-0.42% in the shopping lists I had since last year.
    It's only 0.09ish% but it's a 0.09ish% profit for them at our expense.

    Might be more Rip-off Ireland, but it's still a consumer issue.

    Share what you've found in your calculations since yesterday.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,522 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    The 0.41% figure is correct.

    Previous VAT was 21.5%. New rate is 21% so an item that was e1215 is now e1210 (1000 * 1.215 and 1000 * 1.21)

    Verbose maths for clarity:
    1210 / 1215 * 100 = 99.59%
    100% - 99.59% = 0.41%
    Using that figure:
    1215 * 99.59% = 1210.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    A 0.5% decrease in the VAT rate corresponds to a 0.41% decrease in price.

    I saw posters up in M&S where they explained this in detail with a worked example.

    TBH, this is better suited to Rip Off Ireland

    dudara


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,497 ✭✭✭Nollog


    Ah, I see.
    Consider me enumacated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,716 ✭✭✭brightkane


    should in a perfect world all prices be redused by 0.41% then? by all retailers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,483 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    dudara wrote: »
    TBH, this is better suited to Rip Off Ireland
    Or the Maths forum :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,697 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    brightkane wrote: »
    should in a perfect world all prices be redused by 0.41% then? by all retailers?

    Maybe, maybe not.

    I know some absorbed the VAT increase last year, so since they did not pass on the increase, it is unreasonable to expect them to give the decrease..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,382 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    brightkane wrote: »
    should in a perfect world all prices be redused by 0.41% then? by all retailers?
    In some places the process & administration required to reduce by 0.41% might end up costing more than that to implement -and therefore you could expect prices to increase to cover this soon after. I know where I work it would cost a fortune to redo all the brochures, price lists, spare parts list, the entire accounts system has to go down and be rebooted when stuff like this happens, so there is downtime for anybody using the computer systems.

    You will get some companies who will still do it to appear to be passing it on, but will probably increase prices soon after. I do not like the thought of this, just as I hate the thought of companies squandering money on removing sterling price tags on dual priced items -simply to keep the ignorant moaning gobsh!tes pleased. The cost of the staff needed to hide prices from these fools is no doubt passed onto the consumer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,070 ✭✭✭ScouseMouse


    Maybe, maybe not.

    I know some absorbed the VAT increase last year, so since they did not pass on the increase, it is unreasonable to expect them to give the decrease..

    I absorbed it as it would have taken to long and be to expensive to change about four thousand prices.

    Accordingly, I will not be changing my prices this time either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,070 ✭✭✭ScouseMouse


    brightkane wrote: »
    should in a perfect world all prices be redused by 0.41% then? by all retailers?
    YES

    In a PERFECT world they should be. However its not a perfect world. We have economic realities to consider.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 44 ED 209


    The costs of reducing the prices by such a tiny amount would cancel out any savings from a consumer's standpoint.

    We should have a VAT rate of 15% the EU minimum. If it wasn't for the EU tax regulations we should have a VAT rate of 0%.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭Colonel Sanders


    I always assumed most retailers absorbed the .05% increase last year so won't adjust now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,625 ✭✭✭wmpdd3


    I have spent the last week changing 5000 health and beauty prices in Tesco. Most items are about €2.00 so they decreased by 0.02cent. torture!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,096 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    ED 209 wrote: »
    The costs of reducing the prices by such a tiny amount would cancel out any savings from a consumer's standpoint.

    We should have a VAT rate of 15% the EU minimum. If it wasn't for the EU tax regulations we should have a VAT rate of 0%.

    What's the point of inventing a "tax" that's nil %?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭mcaul


    How many companies added the 0.5% when it rose to 21.5% - very very few.

    It was in effect a tax on business as except for higher price items and specific items such as cigs & petrol, it would have been too difficult to price into goods.

    Did any shop rise the price of an item from €39.99 to €40.03? or €49.99 to €50.04?

    So you will find very few retailers dropping 0.41% off their prices because it wasn't added in the first place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,937 ✭✭✭ballsymchugh


    the m4 toll rose 10c to pass the vat increase onto the motorist. it's early on a saturday (for me anyway) but when the toll was 2.80, the increase due to vat as was claimed is a tad more than 0.5%.
    i'm not holding my breath that they'll pass on the reduction!


Advertisement