Birmingham v Man Utd (Mod warning #112)

Frisbee

nullzero wrote: »

We're you watching the Arsenal game earlier?

Yup, there should have been more probably.

6 substitutions @ 30 secs a sub = 3 minutes

Denilson was on the deck for at least 4 or 5 minutes between when Neville clattered him and he collapsed.

Almunia, Traore and Vaughan were on the deck for another two minutes which never got added on.

So yeah, 5 minutes seems right

MagicMarker

keane2097 wrote: »

United have created NO CHANCE.

Rooney first half.

redout

United are doing nothing with the 6mins!

Guy:Incognito

nullzero wrote: »

Had it been Stevie G or John Terry it would have been a different story.
Unfortunately there is a difference in football.

We're not going there.

keane2097

MagicMarker wrote: »

Rooney first half.

I was talking about the second half, but ok one chance.

mayordenis

terribly cynical tackle

nullzero

Frisbee wrote: »

Yup, there should have been more probably.

6 substitutions @ 30 secs a sub = 3 minutes

Denilson was on the deck for at least 4 or 5 minutes between when Neville clattered him and he collapsed.

Almunia, Traore and Vaughan were on the deck for another two minutes which never got added on.

So yeah, 5 minutes seems right

If you add up all the stoppages in this game 6 minutes would be fair.
I don't understand this "Fergie Time" BS.
It's hardly benifiting United today is it?

Trizo

love how people assume exrta time ONLY benifits one team :rolleyes:

L'prof

Frisbee wrote: »

Yup, there should have been more probably.

6 substitutions @ 30 secs a sub = 3 minutes

Denilson was on the deck for at least 4 or 5 minutes between when Neville clattered him and he collapsed.

Almunia, Traore and Vaughan were on the deck for another two minutes which never got added on.

So yeah, 5 minutes seems right

Why don't they just stop the clock to fúck and as soon as it goes out after 45 or 90, blow it up? Prolly makes too much sense!!! :rolleyes:

Guy:Incognito

redout wrote: »

United are doing nothing with the 6mins!

They're waiting for the 2 mins extra extra time.:)

Redzer7

Frisbee wrote: »

Yup, there should have been more probably.

6 substitutions @ 30 secs a sub = 3 minutes

Denilson was on the deck for at least 4 or 5 minutes between when Neville clattered him and he collapsed.

Almunia, Traore and Vaughan were on the deck for another two minutes which never got added on.

So yeah, 5 minutes seems right

Got in ahead of me there :P.

nullzero

Stekelly wrote: »

We're not going there.

Proves my point.

Bandit12

Rule number 2345

All future Premier League games involving Manchester United will be 96 minutes long....

mike65

That's it 12 matches unbeaten.

Best to salute Brum I think.

keane2097

Shockingly poor.

Birmingham had the ball for the entire 6 minutes injury time which is a bit lol.

Guy:Incognito

Trizo wrote: »

love how people assume exrta time ONLY benifits one team :rolleyes:

It usually only does when it's a Utd game

Nalz

game over. 1-1. Take it.

ok bye

Count the Fergies

Kev_ps3

Pathetic:mad:
Fergie needs to take responsibility for that shambles of a team.

copacetic

A point was a good result for Utd today. Birmingham could easily have had the win if they were willing to push forward late on.

PHB

Very poor performance. That's how poor we are without Berbatov btw, incase anyone doesnt realise his importance to the United team now.

If it's possible, possible, that Fergie is telling the truth that there is money to spend (which there probably is a little), if he cant see he needs to dip into the transfer market for a creative spark he seems to have utterly lost it.

Johner

Get in there! Still top.

miralize

dissapointing. Fergie raid the players in Valencia!

Guy:Incognito

nullzero wrote: »

Proves my point.

It proves nothing. I'm not being drawn into a Utd , Liverpool or anyone else against another club debate.

Headshot

I need a ****ing stiff drink after watching that abysmal display from utd

so much wrong with that bloody team

allybhoy

Trizo wrote: »

love how people assume exrta time ONLY benifits one team :rolleyes:

Well why is it only ONE manager who moans about extra time again, and again and again and seems to be able to bully refs into giving more extra time than is needed.

anyways, 1-1, fair result i think Birmingham played well but utd had them on the ropes in the 1st half up until the goal.

Mad_Max

6 minutes is riduclous alright. Can only assume between the red card and rowing after the goal that's where some of it came from

But seriously the commentator emphatically suggesting Fergie "got his way" to change the time?? Sure if that's the case why not ask for, and get, 10 or whatever you want.

No problem hearing it on a forum or in the pub, it is funny banter material alright but the commentator banging on about it.

Trizo

Stekelly wrote: »

It usually only does when it's a Utd game

its not Utd's fault if other teams cant take advantage of extra time.... last time i checked a game of football is between two teams ???

Mr. Presentable

PHB wrote: »

Very poor performance. That's how poor we are without Berbatov btw, incase anyone doesnt realise his importance to the United team now.

.

I dunno. Lost to a div 3 side with him last week...............

IvySlayer

Brown couldn't properly tackle a nun at this stage. And Fergie saying hats off to McLeish :pac:

nullzero

Stekelly wrote: »

It proves nothing. I'm not being drawn into a Utd , Liverpool or anyone else against another club debate.

That isn't what I was getting at.
The top England players never get punished properly, be they playing for United, Liverpool or anyone else. It's been that way forever.

ROCKMAN

WHY THE HELL WOULD FERGIE WANT 6 MINUTES EXTRA TIME ,

Down to Ten men
Drawing 1-1 against the top form team in the league.
Away from home.




Maybe just maybe fergie was given out about the amount of time


well maybe.....


..

nullzero

Mad_Max wrote: »

6 minutes is riduclous alright. Can only assume between the red card and rowing after the goal that's where some of it came from

But seriously the commentator emphatically suggesting Fergie "got his way" to change the time?? Sure if that's the case why not ask for, and get, 10 or whatever you want.

No problem hearing it on a forum or in the pub, it is funny banter material alright but the commentator banging on about it.

What's the point you're making.
In the 6 minutes United played with 10 men, Birmingham were all over United and probably could have won the game.
It's all a big pro United conspiracy I suppose.

eagle eye

United were very poor in that second half with the exception of Evra who had a great game imo.

I've a nickname for that new United striker already. The Ghost, he appeared on the sideline but wasn't seen afterwards.:pac:

The Liverpool fans will be smirking quietly and hoping for a win with their game in hand to close that gap even further. Villa fans won't know what to think, they love to see Birmingham get spanked but it leaves them closer to Arsenal and United. Spurs fans will be delighted.

antod

Boggles wrote: »

Best home defense in the league. Only 5 against.

Still though, going for 0-3.

whats your address we will send you a nice bowl of humble pie ,how on earth did you think this game would be 0-3 to utd i never know.

Mad_Max

nullzero wrote: »

What's the point you're making.
In the 6 minutes United played with 10 men, Birmingham were all over United and probably could have won the game.
It's all a big pro United conspiracy I suppose.

My point is that did the commentator seriously think Fergie can actually got the time he wanted?

Its ridiculous, if he could he'd ask for more. I'd be more inclined to agree with Rockman, he was probably giving out about the 6!

eagle eye

antod wrote: »

whats your address we will send you a nice bowl of humble pie ,how on earth did you think this game would be 0-3 to utd i never know.

If United had scored first, that could easily have been the score.

fkt

Six minutes added time, an offside goal and they still didn't win. Haha

nullzero

Mad_Max wrote: »

My point is that do you seriously think Fergie can actually get the time he wants?

Its ridiculous, if he could he'd ask for more. I'd be more inclined to agree with Rockman, he was probably giving out about the 6!

Do you actually worry about that sort of thing.
The only time it's worked in our favour was against City.
Officials dont go around adding time on to please certain managers of teams you don't like.
United were sh1t today and didn't deserve a win, they got 6 minutes added time and didn't even have the ball for 1 minute of that time.

Mad_Max

Jerome didn't seem upset with the 6 minutes. Seemed to be happy about it.

Mad_Max

nullzero wrote: »

Officials dont go around adding time on to please certain managers of teams

that is EXACTLY my point. I think you've misunderstood my post.

nullzero

Mad_Max wrote: »

Jerome didn't seem upset with the 6 minutes. Seemed to be happy about it.

Quite rightly.
They should have scored a second in that 6 minutes, it would have been Mc Leish time from then on.:rolleyes:

antod

antod wrote: »

no way its going to be 0-3 if you fancy that cant you go to your bookie and have a bet on it,its going to be 1-1 draw for me anyway.

here is my earlier post i got result spot on.

LuckyLloyd

IvySlayer wrote: »

Dominating a match at the home ground of one of the most inform teams with the best defence in the league without a good few key players and getting a point out of it is garbage?

lol wat

Utd won 1 - 1, I'd imagine Ferguson is delighted with that result. As for the performance though...different story.

d22ontour

fkt wrote: »

an offside goal

Wrong.

But don't let that stop you.

:rolleyes:

JP Liz

lucky draw for United

everdead.ie

What is browne's disiplinary record like?

Have to say I thought the ref did a good job let the goal stand correctly and thought if Fletcher didn't have a card already any other ref would have given him a yello so fair play for being consistent.

Good job birmingham great job done

MagicMarker

fkt wrote: »

Six minutes added time, an offside goal and they still didn't win. Haha

You might want to re-watch the replay.

Johner

antod wrote: »

here is my earlier post i got result spot on.

And did you go to the bookies?

fkt

d22ontour wrote: »

Wrong.

But don't let that stop you.

:rolleyes:

Wrong? I'm wrong? Do you know the offside rule?

LuckyLloyd

The goal was a goal, correct decision from the referee in the end.