Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

TONIGHT With Vincent Browne

Options
1…154155157159160…358

Comments

  • Options
    #4682
    Koloman
    Registered Users Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Koloman


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    Anyone hear that slip of the toungue?!

    Rhymes with punts?


  • Options
    #4683
    AnnyHallsal
    Registered Users Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭AnnyHallsal


    RayM wrote: »
    Did she just say that Jackie Healy Rae was "holding the c**ts to ransom"?

    Someone did a Naughtie?? Fuppin' missed that.


  • Options
    #4684
    Skid
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,873 ✭✭✭Skid


    I'm predicting the next Dáil will be wound up sometime in 2012, and Constantin will be appointed as Supreme Leader for life.

    You heard it here first :).


  • Options
    #4685
    ArtSmart
    Registered Users Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭ArtSmart


    wow! missed that. nice one


  • Options
    #4686
    Sardonicat
    Registered Users Posts: 12,387 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    RayM wrote: »
    Did she just say that Jackie Healy Rae was "holding the c**ts to ransom"?
    Yes, she did!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4687
    AnnyHallsal
    Registered Users Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭AnnyHallsal


    SkidMark wrote: »
    I'm predicting the next Dáil will be wound up sometime in 2012, and Constantin will be appointed as Supreme Leader for life.

    You heard it here first :).

    Knowing this country it's more likely to be Jedward :rolleyes: Or Tubridy.


  • Options
    #4688
    Koloman
    Registered Users Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Koloman


    RayM wrote: »
    Did she just say that Jackie Healy Rae was "holding the c**ts to ransom"?

    Just a statement of fact.


  • Options
    #4689
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Was that a bit of of a Sex Pistols moment, you know "just... a... nother.... c(o)unt.... ryyyyyy"
    She just forgot the last syllable.:D


  • Options
    #4690
    AnnyHallsal
    Registered Users Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭AnnyHallsal


    Koloman wrote: »
    Just a statement of fact.

    Ah come on. Everyone likes c%^&*s :D


  • Options
    #4691
    ArtSmart
    Registered Users Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭ArtSmart


    my god, what's with the ugly fest?


    (oh, it was just an ad for Guinness. phew)


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4692
    th3 s1aught3r
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,925 ✭✭✭th3 s1aught3r


    No way I can vote for Labour now Jack O'Conor and the Unions have backed them. Spend the next five years paying for overpaid public servents and their pensions ?
    no thanks


  • Options
    #4693
    ArtSmart
    Registered Users Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭ArtSmart


    th3 s1aught3r wrote: »
    No way I can vote for Labour now Jack O'Conor and the Unions have backed them. Spend the next five years paying for overpaid public servents and their pensions ?
    no thanks
    well if we're not overpaid, how we gonna live the high life?

    riddle me that!


  • Options
    #4694
    Sardonicat
    Registered Users Posts: 12,387 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    Loads of "man" ads. no pissy pants pads or pooh yoghurts in sight


  • Options
    #4695
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    th3 s1aught3r wrote: »
    No way I can vote for Labour now Jack O'Conor and the Unions have backed them. Spend the next five years paying for overpaid public servents and their pensions ?
    no thanks
    Yeah, that was a real surprise, the unions backing the L-A-B-O-U-R party, wasn't it?:rolleyes:
    You'll spend the next five years paying far more for private bank debts, if that's any consolation.


  • Options
    #4696
    Havermeyer
    Registered Users Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭Havermeyer


    th3 s1aught3r wrote: »
    No way I can vote for Labour now Jack O'Conor and the Unions have backed them. Spend the next five years paying for overpaid public servents and their pensions ?
    no thanks

    He didn't say he'd back them, but a FG majority government would be bad for the country - or something to that effect.


  • Options
    #4697
    AnnyHallsal
    Registered Users Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭AnnyHallsal


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    Loads of "man" ads. no pissy pants pads or pooh yoghurts insight

    Mm .. this is worrying.


  • Options
    #4698
    ArtSmart
    Registered Users Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭ArtSmart


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    Loads of "man" ads. no pissy pants pads or pooh yoghurts in sight
    UM ads.

    (ugly men ads)


  • Options
    #4699
    Sardonicat
    Registered Users Posts: 12,387 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    AnnyHallsal wrote: »
    Mm .. this is worrying.
    Why?


  • Options
    #4700
    youcrazyjesus!
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭youcrazyjesus!


    th3 s1aught3r wrote: »
    No way I can vote for Labour now Jack O'Conor and the Unions have backed them. Spend the next five years paying for overpaid public servents and their pensions ?
    no thanks

    Nobody should have a problem with civil service pay rates and public service pay rates in general for those on low and middle levels. I have a big problem with upper level pay rates and the monolithic Soviet style bureaucracy at the top and the level of efficiency everywhere. Any party that can promise me and is serious about changing things has my vote. I don't want to see those on 30k being kicked around though.


  • Options
    #4701
    AnnyHallsal
    Registered Users Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭AnnyHallsal


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    Why?

    Because it suggests that, not only are about three women running for election, the equivalent amount are watching late night current affairs programming. I don't have much to worry me ...


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4702
    take everything
    Registered Users Posts: 9,806 ✭✭✭take everything


    Another night of hairstyle/clothing discussion hard hitting debate down :p


  • Options
    #4703
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    youcrazyjesus! wrote: »
    Nobody should have a problem with civil service pay rates and public service pay rates in general for those on low and middle levels. I have a big problem with upper level pay rates and the monolithic Soviet style bureaucracy at the top and the level of efficiency everywhere. Any party that can promise me and is serious about changing things has my vote. I don't mind to see those on 30k being kicked around though.
    Just another guy who has no idea what people in the PS get paid I suppose.
    Probably thinks they're all medical consultants or city managers. No toilet cleaners or night shift nurses here on 25k, are there?


  • Options
    #4704
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    AnnyHallsal wrote: »
    Because it suggests that, not only are about three women running for election
    Anyone can register to run you know...


  • Options
    #4705
    youcrazyjesus!
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭youcrazyjesus!


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Just another guy who has no idea what people in the PS get paid I suppose.
    Probably thinks they're all medical consultants or city managers. No toilet cleaners or night shift nurses here on 25k, are there?

    I don't mind to see those on 30k being kicked around though. = I don't want to see....d'oh. It should have been obvious from the overall tone of my post and the first sentence but was a bad typo.

    I agree with you.


  • Options
    #4706
    AnnyHallsal
    Registered Users Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭AnnyHallsal


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Anyone can register to run you know...

    Eh ... yes I do.


  • Options
    #4707
    Sardonicat
    Registered Users Posts: 12,387 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    AnnyHallsal wrote: »
    Because it suggests that, not only are about three women running for election, the equivalent amount are watching late night current affairs programming. I don't have much to worry me ...
    no, advertisers continue to believe the myth sbout gender based interests and advertise according to that myth.


  • Options
    #4708
    ArtSmart
    Registered Users Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭ArtSmart


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Anyone can register to run you know...
    hmm. i see a fight a-brewin . :D
    off the AH for me.


  • Options
    #4709
    youcrazyjesus!
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭youcrazyjesus!


    They never covered the topics laid out at the start of the show.


  • Options
    #4710
    AnnyHallsal
    Registered Users Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭AnnyHallsal


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    no, advertisers continue to believe the myth sbout gender based interests and advertise according to that myth.

    Hmm. Granted a poll of this thread would be far from scientific but I don't see many female posters round these parts.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4711
    ArtSmart
    Registered Users Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭ArtSmart


    youcrazyjesus! wrote: »
    I don't mind to see those on 30k being kicked around though. = I don't want to see....d'oh. It should have been obvious from the overall tone of my post and the first sentence but was a bad typo.

    I agree with you.
    for sure wages at the top went bananas. no argument here.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement