Superbowl XLIV

Black Swan

3 would be conservative...will they be? Whoa.. they went for it on 4th and choaked.

walt colman

Crap - again.

cooker3

Huuuge stop by the Colts.

davyjose

evil_seed wrote: »

hear that? thats the momentum shifting

Listen again!!!!!

D3PO

that could be the defining moment just there

redout

anyone watching in HD ?

the difference is stunning.

copacetic

wow, quality speed to the line there by the colts. big call to go for it, big play to keep them out.

bobby wade

me-skywalker wrote: »

WTF is up with Cecil's mic? or is he chewing on some gum!!



Turn-coat! they dont give a **** about NFL, its just a ratings boost for them and nothing else. Stick to Sky and maybe they will try get the powers-that-be to increase coverage to pre-years coverage.

Turncoat?? Given another option I've never watched the Superbowl on Sky.

I'm not having the highlight of my sporting year ruined by poor presenting & awful guests

Great stand by Colts

walt colman

Having check out both I would say stick with sky if you are a regular NFL viewer, go to the BBC it you only watch once a year for the superbowl.

Chucky the tree

InkSlinger67 wrote: »

Valid point but they could do better is all I'm saying

My last comment on Sky coverage.....Is Cecil Martin a real life Tracy Jordan?

Kev's knowledge of the game has really improved over the last few years though and he can bring up some good point that some other presenters who don't know the game couldn't. Cecil Martin is awful though, can't believe he has last this long.

jasonb

redout wrote: »

anyone watching in HD ?

the difference is stunning.

Yep, HD really makes a difference with Sports...

J.

cooker3

jeff Reinholt (sp?) >> than anyone

cooker3

jasonb wrote: »

Yep, HD really makes a difference with Sports...

J.

I'd love to get that, but no way am I wasting 15 a month on it. I await when they abolish that and I'll buy the box instantly.

John mac

walt colman wrote: »

Having check out both I would say stick with sky if you are a regular NFL viewer, go to the BBC it you only watch once a year for the superbowl.

what about CH5 ?

Black Swan

redout wrote: »

anyone watching in HD ?

the difference is stunning.

Indeed! Awesome!

DBIreland

they are going to have to do something with Bush's cleats, he has slipped at least 3 times so far

jasonb

cooker3 wrote: »

I'd love to get that, but no way am I wasting 15 a month on it. I await when they abolish that and I'll buy the box instantly.

It's good for movies as well, but Sports is the big difference. Well, it is for me as I watch a fair bits of sports!

J.

D3PO

after starting with a press coverage the colts have gone very soft in coverage in the second quarter. i dont know why as they were having plenty of success

walt colman

John mac wrote: »

what about CH5 ?

I don't get CH5 :-(

Black Swan

DBIreland wrote: »

they are going to have to do something with Bush's cleats, he has slipped at least 3 times so far

Methinks it's more than cleats.... I wonder if his knee injury is still troubling him?

walt colman

they get the 3 back!!

bobby wade

10-6 halftime

Black Swan

FG Saints... 10-6 colts. It looks like we have a Super Bowl game!

cooker3

Pretty dull first half tbh which is a shame with all the n00bs watching.

fintonie

i would say colts choked in the last 2 mins, saints defence looking like there starting to fire on all cylinders,

if they continue to close out colts it could be lights out,


its interesting to see it did not faze the saints going behind, the second half should be a cracker

me-skywalker

good rhythm being generated now by Brees.

bobby wade wrote: »

I'm not having the highlight of my sporting year ruined by poor presenting & awful guests

So your watching Sky now instead to avoid this


an additional point being if its the highlight of your sporting year then you wouldnt care about the little things instead be more interested in worrying about the game itself. Just saying is all......

WolfForager

cooker3 wrote: »

Pretty dull first half tbh which is a shame with all the n00bs watching.

+1, first time watching an american football game. Hopefully the second half will get me hooked to it

John mac

walt colman wrote: »

I don't get CH5 :-(

If you have sky ,you can add it .

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Dramatic Hamster just made an appearance one of the better Superbowl Ads.

cooker3

WolfForager wrote: »

+1, first time watching an american football game. Hopefully the second half will get me hooked to it

Words of hope. The last 2 superbowls started very slowly and turned out to be epic!