Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Thesis advice regarding anatomy in the work of Michelangelo

Options
  • 06-02-2010 8:01pm
    #1
    Power Chords
    Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭


    Hey folks,
    I'm working with a few people on a thesis at the moment but I thought some of you here might be interested in this as it is something approached by members of the medical profession from time to time, although on a very minimal basis.

    In brief, my thesis is based on the work of Michelangelo who practiced dissection as part of his studies to better understand the human form. It is my proposal that while he may have understood elements of anatomy, his understanding was mainly based in the aesthetic and he lacked a full understanding of the functions of muscle groups, showing no regard for i.e. flexion or extension, opposing muscle groups, articulation of joints or the practical nature of anatomy as a functional entity. It is my opinion that he applies a 'copy and paste' method to his constructions, taking features from one form (somatotype) and combining them with another to create what he considered the 'ideal form'. I believe his creations if real would have suffered painful problems and injuries stemming from the muscle imbalance.
    The opinion in the art historical field for the most part is that Michelangelo could do no wrong, 'if he painted it, then it is correct.'

    If anybody finds this in any way of interest, feel free to drop me a pm and I'll forward you some more details and images.
    Cheers,
    Karl


Advertisement