Just a bit of fun

Hezz700

http://yfrog.com/5m090110010j

Just for the craic and to lift the mood a little. how many of you can identify all nine calibers in the attached link?.:)

There is no reward other than personal satisfaction:D

"Answers on a postcard to PO Box XXX":D:D

CJhaughey

Bah firewall has me blocked.

Rovi

Here's a reduced version:


Fullsize attached below for detailed perusal.

CJhaughey

Heres my guess

Left to right 30.06, Unknown, 6.5x55, .303,.308, .220 Swift,.223, .17HMR, .22LR

macnas

.22LR, .17HMR, .223, .25-06, .308, .303, 6.5x55, .30-06, .300 Win Mag.

How did I do?

dwighet

macnas wrote: »

.22LR, .17HMR, .223, .25-06, .308, .303, 6.5x55, .30-06, .300 Win Mag.

How did I do?

I think your right bar the 300 win mag...The win mag has a belted case and the neck is a bit shorter

Im thinking the big lad is a 300 remington ultra magnum
See here

It wasn't me!

Also, it's a .220 swift rather than a .25-06,and fairly sure second from the left is an 8x57IS

dwighet

It wasn't me! wrote: »

Also, it's a .220 swift rather than a .25-06,and fairly sure second from the left is an 8x57IS

your right on the 220 swift.....
The 25-06 has a slightly fatter case...
Thank god for ammo guide hey!!!!

dwighet

Heres my call....
22lr,17hmr,223,220-swift,308 win,303,6.5x55,8x57,30-06

It wasn't me!

dwighet wrote: »

your right on the 220 swift.....
The 25-06 has a slightly fatter case...
Thank god for ammo guide hey!!!!

Rebated rim is what gives it away.

Last two are 8x57 and .30-06 unless I'm mistaken.

dwighet

It wasn't me! wrote: »

Rebated rim is what gives it away.

Last two are 8x57 and .30-06 unless I'm mistaken.

You know...I think your right with the last 2....

It wasn't me!

dwighet wrote: »

You know...I think your right with the last 2....

Took a root through the brass box and a funny squint or two.

poulo6.5

Rovi wrote: »

Here's a reduced version:


Fullsize attached below for detailed perusal.

my guess

30 06 , 8x57 , 6.5x55 , 303 , 308 , 220 , 223 , 17 , 22.

i could change the 220 for a 204 maybe but i'll stick to my first guess

Hezz700

Well done to all

30 06 , 8x57 , 6.5x55 , 303 , 308 , 220 , 223 , 17 , 22.

I think i'll have to make it tougher next time and throw in something exotic.;)

I thought the 8X57 would'nt go so quickly.

If ya got something you think will have us scratching heads, stick its up.

Dwighet, Ya need to get out more:D

fish slapped

Hezz wrote: »

If ya got something you think will have us scratching heads, stick its up...

:eek::o :D:D

Hezz700

fish slapped wrote: »

:eek::o :D:D

Weirdo.............:D

dwighet

Hezz wrote: »

Well done to all

30 06 , 8x57 , 6.5x55 , 303 , 308 , 220 , 223 , 17 , 22.

I think i'll have to make it tougher next time and throw in something exotic.;)

I thought the 8X57 would'nt go so quickly.

If ya got something you think will have us scratching heads, stick its up.

Dwighet, Ya need to get out more:D

I know!!!!!

Kramer

Hezz700

Nice one Kramer, this should be fun.

It wasn't me!

To the first one:

.22WMR; .223 Rem; .308 Win; .50 Beowulf; .270 Win; 7mm Rem Mag; .30-06 Sprg; .338 Lap Mag; .50 BMG

The .338 LM could be an 8x68S either, but fairly sure.


For the second row:

.22LR; .17HMR; .22 Hornet; 6mmBR Norma; .222 Rem; .223 Rem; 6.5x47 Lapua; .308 Win; 6.5x55 Swedish; 8x57IS; .30-06 Sprg; .300 Win Mag; .375 H&H Mag; .50 BMG

Hezz700

It wasn't me.

I think the fourth one in your first list is a .500 S&W and not a .50 beowulf, cos the beowulf has a rebated head.

Hezz

It wasn't me!

Hezz wrote: »

It wasn't me.

I think the fourth one in your first list is a .500 S&W and not a .50 beowulf, cos the beowulf has a rebated head.

Hezz

I'm wondering about it as well Hezz, but based on COAL, since the Beowulf is designed to feed from a .223 magazine.

Hezz700

It wasn't me! wrote: »

I'm wondering about it as well Hezz, but based on COAL, since the Beowulf is designed to feed from a .223 magazine.

You did all the hard work, i'm being lazy and using your list for reference.:cool:

kowloon

When I saw the thread title, the first thing that came to mind was that someone had put 'just a bit of fun' down on their fca1 as reason required.

Hezz700

kowloon wrote: »

When I saw the thread title, the first thing that came to mind was that someone had put 'just a bit of fun' down on their fca1 as reason required.

Would that work, do you think?:D

dwighet

Hezz wrote: »

Would that work, do you think?:D

if they thought like we do it would:D

Kramer

IWM, great stuff. 100% correct on the 2nd picture.
A couple wrong on the first though. I knew there'd be trouble identifying at least one of those little buggers .
Good attempts though......

dwighet

IWM.....I thought I didnt have a life at all...But you take the cake;);)

Well done..