Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Worst crash test ever

  • 09-02-2010 11:05am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭


    Dont know what year this is...



Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,269 ✭✭✭cabrwab


    At least it has crumble zones, one big crumble zone!

    That is unreal.
    Looks like an old car anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,494 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Well, hopefully the three kids in the boot survived.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    jeez....some one want to say "it'll polish out?"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    This must have been going faster than the usual 50 or 60 km/h ...plus it's not an NCAP style offset test either


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭Borderfox


    Stick the kids in a trailer on the back


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    And before anyone brings up this old chestnut again:


    This is not a chinese van and it is not a crash test either.

    In fact it was a test of the test facility itself where they took an old VW Transporter, loaded it to the gills with sandbags and smashed it into the wall at 120 km/h to see if the wall would stand it.


  • Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 11,147 Mod ✭✭✭✭MarkR


    From another youtube link
    The test was conducted in 1992 and was part of a series of tests to commission our crash test facility. The test was of the drive system, not the car.

    The car was a standard 'second hand' car except that the tail shaft was removed. 300kg of sand ballast was placed in the footwells and boot and a ballast dummy (75kg) was placed on the rear seat.

    The test speed was 100km/h into a solid concrete reaction block.

    Colin Jackson
    Crash Barrier Manager
    RTA Crashlab


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭Howitzer


    Some details on it from youtube...
    **UPDATE**
    The test was conducted in 1992 and was part of a series of tests to commission our crash test facility. The test was of the drive system, not the car.

    The car was a standard 'second hand' car except that the tail shaft was removed. 300kg of sand ballast was placed in the footwells and boot and a ballast dummy (75kg) was placed on the rear seat.

    The test speed was 100km/h into a solid concrete reaction block.

    Colin Jackson
    Crash Barrier Manager
    RTA Crashlab
    (02) 9830 1721

    So I have condensed it down to the following that you can attach to video:
    "Special testing of new facility in 1992. Car was loaded with 375 Kg /827 lb of sand and was 100Kmh into a solid wall not alloy honeycomb. Not a real test of the car." a test crash of the holden commadore this is an old model so you will not find annything on google about it (i checked)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,741 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    @OP, we've done that one many times before. It's a '78 car driven at 140km/h into a solid concrete wall. The safest modern car wouldn't fare any better...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I think a Golf V would have fared better. Passenger compartment shows amazing strength in the 100 km/h offset test below. I know it is into a deformable barrier but the car has barely slowed before impacting the solid barrier behind it. Occupants still well and truly dead.


    A 100+ km/h full head on test would be easier on the cars structure but probably even harder on the occupants. This sort of deceleration is rare even in racing crashes which tend to be glancing blows rather than sudden stops.

    And obviously 300kg of ballast makes a difference...


  • Advertisement
Advertisement