why close tread

siochain

why is Hunger Strike for your job? in AH closed?

I just had a look at the last post of it... Nothing of value was lost.

Boston

Link to thread?

Kiera

[AH answer]Because you touch yourself [/AH answer]

Did you pm any of the mods, OP?

Tom Dunne

super-rush wrote:

Thread is closed for now. We have some things to discuss. Stay tuned for more.

Um, I think this might explain why the thread was closed.

Boston

Not really an explanation. That post seems rather abrupt and while it may be possible that the moderator wasn't able to go into more detail, in truth he/she probably wasn't bothered.

Instead of just saying "things" how about

• Legal issues.
• The number of reported post.
• The taste and decency of the thread.
• Request by the general public to close down thread.
• Bullying.

I dunno, the (or lack there of) response seems to indicate attitude more akin to thread ownership, nei?

Tom Dunne

Boston wrote: »

Not really an explanation.

It's the explanation you are being given, deal with it.

This is a privately owned website, if you do not like the way things are done, I am sure you know what options are available to you.

dr.bollocko

Boston wrote: »

Not really an explanation. That post seems rather abrupt and while it may be possible that the moderator wasn't able to go into more detail, in truth he/she probably wasn't bothered.

Instead of just saying "things" how about

• things
• things
• things
• things
• things

I dunno, the (or lack there of) response seems to indicate attitude more akin to thread ownership, nei?

IMO The mod's just telling people that the moderators aren't ignoring the thread. They're sorting it out. That seems reasonable to me given the subject matter.

Boston

Tom Dunne wrote: »

It's the explanation you are being given, deal with it.

This is a privately owned website, if you do not like the way things are done, I am sure you know what options are available to you.

Yea, maybe I'll drop by that new Irish poker site. It wasn't an explaination, it was more akin to what dr.bollocko describes.

Sparks

Boston wrote: »

Yea, maybe I'll drop by that new Irish poker site.

No Boston, don't go! What would we ever do without you to keep us on the straight and narrow, to steer us away from the oblivion we're now becalmed in and into the success story we can only become with your benevolent and wise guidance? We're doomed! Doomed I tell you...

Boston

Sparks wrote: »

No Boston, don't go! What would we ever do without you to keep us on the straight and narrow, to steer us away from the oblivion we're now becalmed in and into the success story we can only become with your benevolent and wise guidance? We're doomed! Doomed I tell you...

Erm, you're not my type.

Sparks

Don't sell yourself so short Boston, you're everyone's type...

Boston

Sparks wrote: »

Don't sell yourself so short Boston, you're everyone's type...

I know. I said you're not mine. Try reading the post before replying.

Tar.Aldarion

Don't be afraid to use your nails girls.

El Weirdo

Tar.Aldarion wrote: »

Don't be afraid to use your nails girls.

Oooooooooh!

dr.bollocko

Fightar sub forum imminent.

I could provide the soundtrack.

siochain

Tom Dunne wrote: »

Um, I think this might explain why the thread was closed.

they posted that at least 4 hours after locking...............:rolleyes:

siochain

Tom Dunne wrote: »

It's the explanation you are being given, deal with it.

This is a privately owned website, if you do not like the way things are done, I am sure you know what options are available to you.

man what a bit of power does.......

siochain

dr.bollocko wrote: »

IMO The mod's just telling people that the moderators aren't ignoring the thread. They're sorting it out. That seems reasonable to me given the subject matter.

and the mods of that forum were good enough reply to a PM explaining as you have,

Super-Rush

Boston wrote: »

Not really an explanation. That post seems rather abrupt and while it may be possible that the moderator wasn't able to go into more detail, in truth he/she probably wasn't bothered.

Instead of just saying "things" how about

• Legal issues.
• The number of reported post.
• The taste and decency of the thread.
• Request by the general public to close down thread.
• Bullying.

I dunno, the (or lack there of) response seems to indicate attitude more akin to thread ownership, nei?

You're dead right it wasn't an explanation. It was me telling you/everyone that the thread was locked because we were discussing things contained in the thread.

If the thread remains closed or is re opened there will be an explanation given.

Dohnny Jepp

If he has the right to demand reasons then I have the right to demand a samwich. . . to be made by a mod!

The samwich must comtain ;

- Cheese (gouda or edam)
- Salami
- Chicken tikka
- Coleslaw
- Red onion
- Things.

If you do not make me my samwich I will leave this site to get it elsewhere! And you will be so sad that I have left!

ZzubZzub

Feedback is waaaaaaaaay more entertaining than AH.

To keep on topic...

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.

jd007

Dohnny Jepp wrote: »

If he has the right to demand reasons then I have the right to demand a samwich. . . to be made by a mod!

The samwich must comtain ;

- Cheese (gouda or edam)
- Salami
- Chicken tikka
- Coleslaw
- Red onion
- Things.

If you do not make me my samwich I will leave this site to get it elsewhere! And you will be so sad that I have left!

Someone's taking the word "Feedback" a bit too literally!

Tom Dunne

siochain wrote: »

and the mods of that forum were good enough reply to a PM explaining as you have,

Ok, I'll close this thread so.