Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

JC in a pan

  • 12-03-2010 10:25am
    #1
    TravelJunkie
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭


    Page 13 in the Metro Herald made me giggle this morning.

    Who says Christians don't have a sense of humour?


Comments

  • #2
    Zombrex
    Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    pictures or it didn't happen


  • #3
    Glenster
    Registered Users Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭Glenster


    Page 411 of William of Tyre's 'history of events beyond the sea' made me laugh. Who says that medieval academics dont have a sense of humour?


  • #4
    kelly1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,026 ✭✭✭kelly1


    TravelJunkie wrote: »
    Page 13 in the Metro Herald made me giggle this morning.

    Who says Christians don't have a sense of humour?

    What was the picture? Jesus in a toilet? Or a frying pan?


  • #5
    keano_afc
    Registered Users Posts: 8,711 ✭✭✭keano_afc


    Saw it myself, some lad fell asleep cooking bacon, woke up to smoke everywhere and saw he had Jesus staring back at him from the fat of the pan. I noticed he even drew in a crown of thorns on the pan.


  • #6
    pts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭pts


    kelly1 wrote: »
    What was the picture? Jesus in a toilet? Or a frying pan?

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/03/12/man-says-jesus-frying-pan-saved-his-life-115875-22105158/

    jesus-pan-pic-caters-817105235.jpg
    :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    PDN
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,686 ✭✭✭✭PDN


    There you have it! If Jesus appears in a pan of bacon then that must be definitive proof that the Jewish food laws don't apply to Christians.


  • #8
    The Mad Hatter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    Either the Metro Herald's site is down or my internet connection is being a [very annoying thing].


  • #9
    pts
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭pts


    PDN wrote: »
    There you have it! If Jesus appears in a pan of bacon then that must be definitive proof that the Jewish food laws don't apply to Christians.

    In fairness he did burn the Bacon and nearly kill the young lad. Maybe the message is that bacon is a big no no? :p


  • #10
    Glenster
    Registered Users Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭Glenster


    I dont want to burst anyone's bubbles but the fat in that pan has clearly been interfered with, look at the eyes!

    Also why is the lad wearing a suit? Poshboy.


  • #11
    Stephentlig
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,114 ✭✭✭Stephentlig


    for those who believe no explanation is neccesary, and for those who do not believe no explanation will Suffice. :D


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    The Mad Hatter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    Stephentlig wrote: »
    for those who believe no explanation is neccesary, and for those who do not believe no explanation will Suffice. :D

    Au contraire - a one-word explanation suffices quite well: Coincidence.


  • #13
    krudler
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Stephentlig wrote: »
    for those who believe no explanation is neccesary, and for those who do not believe no explanation will Suffice. :D

    hoax is probably a better explanation


Advertisement