Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sunderland v Manchester City, 4pm

13»

Comments

  • #102
    Mr Alan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    it may well have been a cross, or even just one of those where you throw it up there knowing it might go in or someone might get on the end of it


  • #103
    Warper
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,377 ✭✭✭Warper


    The defender on the line who let the ball go over his head made a mistake. If ever a case for jumping up and catching the ball on the goal-line is justified that was it. Into injury time, your team 1 up and you have the chance to stop a goal well hell ya grab that ball, get sent off and concede the penalty. The form that Gordon was in today, who knows but at least take that chance. I'm not blaming the defender too much as it would have happened so fast but something to think about.


  • #104
    Aidric
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,591 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    leninbenjamin wrote: »
    Am I the only one who thinks that was an attempted cross to Lescott at the back post?
    Thought the same myself on the replay.


  • #105
    SlickRic
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,468 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    beforehand you'd have considered that 2 points dropped by City.

    after that abomination of a first half, City may well consider that a point gained.

    Adam Johnson looks some player.

    Mancini better not start putting him on from the start ;)


  • #106
    flahavaj
    Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    Mancini is going to cost City the CL.


  • #107
    Helix
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17,661 ✭✭✭✭Helix


    flahavaj wrote: »
    Mancini is going to cost City the CL.

    thats really the only way to look at it imo. with the players hes got at his disposal theres absolutely no reason at all that they shouldnt have it wrapped up

    this is what happens when you put an uber defensive italian in charge of one of the most impressive groups of attacking players ever built in england

    that said, its still funny


  • #108
    kryogen
    Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    flahavaj wrote: »
    Mancini is going to cost City the CL.

    yeah and thank **** for that!


Advertisement