Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

liquid screed vs. concrete for underfloor

Options
  • 19-03-2010 8:44am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 81 ✭✭


    I'm putting in underfloor and am getting conflicting stories on screeds. My engineer tells me that liquid screeds are too expensive for what they will give us, but some UFH suppliers are really pushing them - any views?

    We have space and a guy who'll do the concrete version cheaply.

    Thanks,

    Fergus.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭Western_sean


    We have about 75mm concrete with UFH and it's proved fine (I think this winter was a good test of a heating system!).

    Liquid screeds tend to be poured thinner which I think has drawbacks in terms of available thermal mass - I'm sure someone else will be more qualified to comment on that.

    Good luck with the build
    Sean


  • Registered Users Posts: 81 ✭✭FergusD


    Yeah, I gather it's a double edged sword - it's less thermal mass, but that equates to a faster response time. Any one any thoughts on it? Which are most people using? Does it make any practical difference if the controls are good on the system?

    Thanks,

    Fergus.


  • Registered Users Posts: 552 ✭✭✭soldsold


    75mm concrete floor should be more than enough thermal mass


  • Registered Users Posts: 81 ✭✭FergusD


    The non-concrete screed has less thermal mass, thus presumably faster heat up and cool down times. Is this of benefit in reality or is it just extra expense?

    Thanks,

    Fergus.


  • Registered Users Posts: 552 ✭✭✭soldsold


    If your house is very well insulated, airtight and has dense insulation such as pumped cellulose to even out the daily temperature swings (ie thermal inertia/ decrement delay) then it stands to reason that the fast heating and cooling of your underfloor system is less important.

    If insulated to building regs or "a bit better" than the regs, the lower thermal mass of a liquid screed will work in your favour to react quicker to temperature fluctuations.

    Dont forget the cost of mesh, labour, rent of powerfloat, tilers levelling compound when comparing prices.

    In my case I just got a good screed/ powerfloat guy and kept the money for other stuff, but Im using radiators so might have looked at it differently if using UFH


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    Our builder put in a concrete floor. In fairness to him he doesn't cut corners and i'm sure if he felt there was a better product on the market at that price he'd use it. It is a very good job and we are happy with the result.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1 coffeyd


    Building new home June 2020, sealed house, underfloor heating ground & 1st floor, any thoughts on standard concrete 75mm or expensive screed circa 40mm or DIY webber screed. ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 964 ✭✭✭Count Mondego


    There's advantages and disadvantages to both. I priced both a 50mm Sudanit 280 Alpha Hemihydrate screed (quick to react) and a 75mm liquid cement screed.

    My problem with the 50mm was that my subfloor was a bit off in places and he'd have to put 60-70mm on to make sure all UFH was covered enough. This priced it out of it. The liquid cement was close to half the price as a result and I'm very happy with it.


Advertisement