Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon [** SPOILERS FROM POST 823 ONWARD **]

constitutionus

gotta say i dont think much of the bag of hangers.

wasnt mad about fox either but at least she looked attractive in a slutty kind of way.

whitely just looks kinda alien.

Overheal

Well this is madness, ludicrous expense, and dedication:

http://gizmodo.com/#!5771262/this-5+ton-megatron-tank-was-hand-built-by-a-man/gallery/1

The Megatron Tank Mode was hand-made by an adoring fan in China.

These people live off of 5c a day and kill themselves for making iPods*, where do they find the resources and the time damnit?





(*May be factualy misleading)

Richard Dower

^ that's badass MF! right there!!

Galvasean

Initial critics' rsponses say brilliant SFX and 3D, but bad acting. As you were so.
http://www.tfw2005.com/transformers-news/transformers-movie-just-movie-31/russian-international-film-market-has-revealed-a-trailer-from-transformers-dark-of-the-moon-171616/

The CGI looks even better than the two first films [put] together. There are some really innovative visual decisions and the 3D has an amazing quality. There was one kinda big spot with Sam and his new blond girlfriend that helps him get a job. Since everyone cares about her being in this film, from this spot I can tell that she [demands] much of the attention. It feels so [forced] when the camera catches her to show everyone her sexiness when it’s not really needed. Well, yes, she looks sexy, and from that spot she didn’t [show] any emotion on her face, [either].

Richard Dower

Even Michael Bay admits Transformers 2 was crap!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2011/03/07/michael-bay-says-transformers-2-crap-worst-sequel-time/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fentertainment+%28Internal+-+Entertainment+-+Mixed%29

Richard Dower

Galvasean wrote: »

Initial critics' rsponses say brilliant SFX and 3D, but bad acting. As you were so.
http://www.tfw2005.com/transformers-news/transformers-movie-just-movie-31/russian-international-film-market-has-revealed-a-trailer-from-transformers-dark-of-the-moon-171616/

LOL!...looks like Duggy was right!

Cantona's Collars

The Chinese transformers guys are at it again,some cool stuff they've built.




More available here-
http://2leep.com/bar.php?url=http://2leep.com/news/155553/0/more/

Galvasean

Quality stuff there. Loved their Jetfire.

Duggy747

Is that you, Hasbro?

dr gonzo

You sir are clearly a mockingster because the trasformers films are, and always have been a pile of ****

godtabh

dr gonzo wrote: »

You sir are clearly a mokcingster because the trasformers films are, and always have been a pile of ****

says you

Rick Deckard

dr gonzo wrote: »

You sir are clearly a mockingster because the second trasformers film was a pile of ****

With Senor Spielbergo back in, hopefully this will be as good as the first one

Wheaven

First transformers movie was good, second not as memorable, hope three hits the spot, some good trailers and behind the scenes over on YouTube, should make for more action being in 3D, but will have to wait and see

krudler

I dont think I'll go to it in 3D, a Michael Bay edited movie in 3D? my friggin head will explode.

Sad Professor

Threads merged.

pixelburp

Jeez, that mockingster either a blatant shill, or it's some kind of SEO boosting tactic.

Against the far more interesting popcorn movies coming out this year, the new Baygasm movie pulls no interest for me.

dr gonzo

godtabh wrote: »

says you

mockingster wrote: »

Well dr Gonzo that is a matter of opinion. I would say that the first two movies or atleast Transformers 2 was not great and they were not **** (then again it is a matter of opinion) but I somehow expect the 3rd and final to be good. C'mon man

Yep i know its my opinion, i didnt think it was necessary to state that my feelings on films dont qualify as fact. Honestly though no insult intended to anyone but Michael "gratuitous explosions" Bay... nearly, but not quite, as bad as John "Slo-Mo Doves" Woo.

Galvasean

dr gonzo wrote: »

Michael "gratuitous explosions" Bay... nearly, but not quite, as bad as John "Slo-Mo Doves" Woo.

What the hell are you shyting about?!?!?!?!?!
Watch The Killer, Bullet In The Head and Hard Boiled and then TRY and say WOO isn't a brilliant director!

krudler

Galvasean wrote: »

What the hell are you shyting about?!?!?!?!?!
Watch The Killer, Bullet In The Head and Hard Boiled and then TRY and say WOO isn't a brilliant director!

and Face/Off, one of, if not the best action movie of the 90's. granted Mission:Impossible 2 was **** but Woo has made some action classics, the opening tea house shootout of Hard Boiled is more exciting than most full action movies these days.

dr gonzo

Galvasean wrote: »

What the hell are you shyting about?!?!?!?!?!
Watch The Killer, Bullet In The Head and Hard Boiled and then TRY and say WOO isn't a brilliant director!

What im "shyting" about is Hard Target, Broken Arrow, Mission Impossible 2, Windtalkers, Paycheck and, to politely disagree with Krudler, Face/Off.

Hard Boiled doesnt change the fact that John Woo's filmography is essentially a list of films that ranges from mediocre to downright terrible so i think im happy enough to stick with my original feelings on the matter.

indough

well the fact he made brilliant movies before he came to america does mean that he has brilliance in him, hes just been utterly ****e since then. a better tomorrow and hard boiled are definitely classics anyway

face/off is crap and i dont get the love in for it but i guess it was better than broken arrow and mi:2 (although these are not exactly yardsticks against which to measure the quality of movies)

personally i find the slow motion pigeons thing hilarious

edit: also, red cliff >>>

krudler

indough wrote: »

well the fact he made brilliant movies before he came to america does mean that he has brilliance in him, hes just been utterly ****e since then. a better tomorrow and hard boiled are definitely classics anyway

face/off is crap and i dont get the love in for it but i guess it was better than broken arrow and mi:2 (although these are not exactly yardsticks against which to measure the quality of movies)

personally i find the slow motion pigeons thing hilarious

edit: also, red cliff >>>

GTFO, best action movie of the 90's along with Speed, The Rock and Die Hard With A Vengeance.

Christ the 90's rocked when it came to action movies, what did the 00's have? Fast and the Furious, Underworld, Ultraviolet, Stealth, SWAT etc etc pants decade for action films. I did like The Transporter though.

Magill

krudler wrote: »

GTFO, best action movie of the 90's along with Speed, The Rock and Die Hard With A Vengeance.

Christ the 90's rocked when it came to action movies, what did the 00's have? Fast and the Furious, Underworld, Ultraviolet, Stealth, SWAT etc etc pants decade for action films. I did like The Transporter though.

Seriously tho, the 00's had tons of good/great action films.

Bourne series, taken, collateral, the matrix 2/3, pitch black, kill bill, swordfish, xXx etc

Then all the comicbook films (Would the be classed as action ?)

Face off is great tho, one of my favorites.

krudler

Magill wrote: »

Seriously tho, the 00's had tons of good/great action films.

Bourne series, taken, collateral, the matrix 2/3, pitch black, kill bill, swordfish, xXx etc

Then all the comicbook films (Would the be classed as action ?)

Face off is great tho, one of my favorites.

Ehh, they're more thrillers/sci fi action, I mean just straight up balls to the wall, Die Hard type stuff. Bourne series is great though, I must rewatch them soon. xXx is awful though lol . thinking about it there was some good action movies in the 00's but the late 80s/90's still reigns supreme for them.

indough

krudler wrote: »

GTFO, best action movie of the 90's along with Speed, The Rock and Die Hard With A Vengeance.

sorry and all that but face/off is muck. everyone is allowed a couple of guilty pleasures though so you get a pass this time. just dont let it happen again

krudler

indough wrote: »

sorry and all that but face/off is muck. everyone is allowed a couple of guilty pleasures though so you get a pass this time. just dont let it happen again

guilty pleasures are actual crap movies that you enjoy, like Rocky IV Face/Off is just action awesomeness. was Woo's last good American movie.

Doctor DooM

Aaand there's the shill.

pixelburp

mockingster wrote: »

Excuse me. I was just expressing my opinion about a movie that is supposed to be one of the best movies for 2011 see OMGthebestURLevah

LOL

Shill

Sad Professor

A quick google search for "mockingster" and "transformers" reveals the same user saying very similar things on other forums. So, yeah, looks like a shill alright. Either that or a troll. It's enough for me. I've perma banned them from Films.

pixelburp

You'd think a movie like this wouldn't need such blatant marketing, that it was pretty much self-promoting, but ho-hum ...

What's the release date and scheduling like on a movie like this? Seems like it's going to come out against a sheer glut of comic movies & I'd wonder if after #2 a lot of people might just not bother this time around. I know I will; bar a trailer of sheer stupendousness, I won't be attending.